Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Evidencing quantum gravity with thermodynamical observables

Thomas Strasser1,*, Marios Christodoulou1, Richard Howl2, and Časlav Brukner1,3

  • 1Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) Vienna, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 2Department of Physics, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
  • 3Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ), Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

  • *Contact author: thomas.strasser@mail.com

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043299 – Published 16 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jdgg-hmcq

Abstract

Proposed experiments for obtaining empirical evidence for a quantum description of gravity in a tabletop setting focus on detecting quantum information signatures, such as entanglement or non-Gaussianity production, in gravitationally interacting quantum systems. Here, we explore an alternative approach where the quantization of gravity could be inferred through measurements of macroscopic, thermodynamical quantities, without the need for addressability of individual quantum systems. To demonstrate the idea, we take as a case study a gravitationally self-interacting Bose gas and consider its heat capacity. We find a clear-cut distinction between the predictions of a classical gravitational interaction and a quantum gravitational interaction in the heat capacity of the Bose gas.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (46)

  1. S. Bose, I. Fuentes, A. A. Geraci, S. M. Khan, S. Qvarfort, M. Rademacher, M. Rashid, M. Toroš, H. Ulbricht, and C. C. Wanjura, Massive quantum systems as interfaces of quantum mechanics and gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 015003 (2025).
  2. S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroš, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240401 (2017).
  3. C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017).
  4. R. Howl, V. Vedral, D. Naik, M. Christodoulou, C. Rovelli, and A. Iyer, Non-Gaussianity as a signature of a quantum theory of gravity, PRX Quantum 2, 010325 (2021).
  5. M. Wiesniak, V. Vedral, and C. Brukner, Magnetic susceptibility as a macroscopic entanglement witness, New J. Phys. 7, 258 (2005).
  6. C. Brukner and V. Vedral, Macroscopic thermodynamical witnesses of quantum entanglement, arXiv:quant-ph/0406040.
  7. C. Brukner, V. Vedral, and A. Zeilinger, Crucial role of quantum entanglement in bulk properties of solids, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012110 (2006).
  8. M. Wiesniak, V. Vedral, and C. Brukner, Heat capacity as an indicator of entanglement, Phys. Rev. B 78, 064108 (2008).
  9. H. Singh, T. Chakraborty, D. Das, H. S. Jeevan, Y. Tokiwa, P. Gegenwart, and C. Mitra, Experimental quantification of entanglement through heat capacity, New J. Phys. 15, 113001 (2013).
  10. L. Rosenfeld, On quantization of fields, Nucl. Phys. 40, 353 (1963).
  11. C. Møller, Les théories relativistes de la gravitation, Colloq. Int. C.N.R.S. 91, 15 (1962).
  12. L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2016).
  13. A. L. Gaunt, T. F. Schmidutz, I. Gotlibovych, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Bose-Einstein condensation of atoms in a uniform potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200406 (2013).
  14. R. Lopes, C. Eigen, A. Barker, K. G. H. Viebahn, M. Robert-de Saint-Vincent, N. Navon, Z. Hadzibabic, and R. P. Smith, Quasiparticle energy in a strongly interacting homogeneous Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 210401 (2017).
  15. R. Lopes, C. Eigen, N. Navon, D. Clément, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantum depletion of a homogeneous Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 190404 (2017).
  16. C. Eigen, J. A. P. Glidden, R. Lopes, N. Navon, Z. Hadzibabic, and R. P. Smith, Universal scaling laws in the dynamics of a homogeneous unitary Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 250404 (2017).
  17. For BECs with noncontact electromagnetic interactions, such as electromagnetically charged BECs, see, e.g., Refs. [18, 19].
  18. M. Ghabour and A. Pelster, Bogoliubov theory of dipolar Bose gas in a weak random potential, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063636 (2014).
  19. I. Lukin, A. Sotnikov, and Y. Slyusarenko, Aspects of Bose-Einstein condensation in a charged boson system over the dielectric surface, Phys. Lett. A 417, 127695 (2021).
  20. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/jdgg-hmcq for detailed derivations for the box potential approximations, the application of the Bogolyubov formalism to the self-gravitating Bose-gas, and brief comments regarding Nambu-Goldstone-Bosons.
  21. M. Christodoulou, A. Di Biagio, M. Aspelmeyer, C. Brukner, C. Rovelli, and R. Howl, Locally mediated entanglement in linearized quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 100202 (2023).
  22. There is an interesting connection between this mean-field gravity approximation and a mean-field approximation often used in describing BECs, which we discuss in the Supplemental Material [20].
  23. V. I. Yukalov and H. Kleinert, Gapless Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approximation for Bose gases, Phys. Rev. A 73, 063612 (2006).
  24. Note, as stated above, we assume the BEC to be uniform, and thus we do not consider a Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the condensate (see, e.g., Ref. [12]). This is discussed further in the Supplemental Material [20].
  25. Y. Nambu, Axial vector current conservation in weak interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 380 (1960).
  26. J. Goldstone, Field theories with « Superconductor » solutions, Il Nuovo Cimento 19, 154 (1961).
  27. See the Supplemental Material [20].
  28. D. G. Fried, T. C. Killian, L. Willmann, D. Landhuis, S. C. Moss, D. Kleppner, and T. J. Greytak, Bose-Einstein condensation of atomic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3811 (1998).
  29. K. M. R. van der Stam, E. D. van Ooijen, R. Meppelink, J. M. Vogels, and P. van der Straten, Large atom number Bose-Einstein condensate of sodium, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 013102 (2007).
  30. T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, All-optical formation of quantum degenerate mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 79, 021601 (2009).
  31. Despite the high mass, the nonrelativistic, perturbative treatment used to derive the heat capacity is still valid, as demonstrated in the Supplemental Material [20].
  32. C. Deppner, W. Herr, M. Cornelius, P. Stromberger, T. Sternke, C. Grzeschik, A. Grote, J. Rudolph, S. Herrmann, M. Krutzik, A. Wenzlawski, R. Corgier, E. Charron, D. Guéry-Odelin, N. Gaaloul, C. Lämmerzahl, A. Peters, P. Windpassinger, and E. M. Rasel, Collective-mode enhanced matter-wave optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 100401 (2021).
  33. A. G. Sinclair, E. Riis, and M. J. Snadden, Improved trapping in a vapor-cell magneto-optical trap with multiple laser frequencies, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11, 2333 (1994).
  34. C. Qiang, L. Xin-Yu, G. Kui-Yi, W. Xiao-Rui, C. Dong-Min, and W. Ru-Quan, Improved atom number with a dual color magneto-optical trap, Chin. Phys. B 21, 043203 (2012).
  35. R. Howl, N. Cooper, and L. Hackermüller, Gravitationally-induced entanglement in cold atoms, arXiv:2304.00734.
  36. M. G. Raizen, A. M. Dudarev, Q. Niu, and N. J. Fisch, Compression of atomic phase space using an asymmetric one-way barrier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 053003 (2005).
  37. M. G. Raizen, D. Budker, S. M. Rochester, J. Narevicius, and E. Narevicius, Magneto-optical cooling of atoms, Opt. Lett. 39, 4502 (2014).
  38. L. E. Hillberry, D. Budker, S. M. Rochester, and M. G. Raizen, Efficient cooling of high-angular-momentum atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 56, 155301 (2023).
  39. D. C. Aveline, J. R. Williams, E. R. Elliott, C. Dutenhoffer, J. R. Kellogg, J. M. Kohel, N. E. Lay, K. Oudrhiri, R. F. Shotwell, N. Yu et al., Observation of Bose–Einstein condensates in an Earth-orbiting research lab, Nature (London) 582, 193 (2020).
  40. D. Becker, M. D. Lachmann, S. T. Seidel, H. Ahlers, A. N. Dinkelaker, J. Grosse, O. Hellmig, H. Müntinga, V. Schkolnik, T. Wendrich et al., Space-borne Bose–Einstein condensation for precision interferometry, Nature (London) 562, 391 (2018).
  41. Y. Y. Fein, P. Geyer, P. Zwick, F. Kiałka, S. Pedalino, M. Mayor, S. Gerlich, and M. Arndt, Quantum superposition of molecules beyond 25 kDa, Nat. Phys. 15, 1242 (2019).
  42. Y. Sato and R. E. Packard, Superfluid helium quantum interference devices: physics and applications, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 016401 (2012).
  43. P. Noziéres and D. Pines, Theory of Quantum Liquids: Superfluid Bose Liquids (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1990), Vol. 2.
  44. B. Haskell and A. Sedrakian, Superfluidity and superconductivity in neutron stars, in The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars, edited by L. Rezzolla, P. Pizzochero, D. Jones, N. Rea, and I. Vidaña (Springer, Cham, 2019), Vol. 547, pp. 401–454.
  45. S. Donadiand A. Bassi, Seven nonstandard models coupling quantum matter and gravity, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 025601 (2022).
  46. http://www.qiss.frqiss.fr.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation