Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tunable harmonic frequency combs via dual-beam or structured-target laser-solid interactions

Raoul Trines1,*, Holger Schmitz1, Martin King2,3, Paul McKenna2,3, and Robert Bingham1,2

  • *Contact author: raoul.trines@stfc.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013241 – Published 5 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/j531-q3tk

Abstract

When an intense laser pulse strikes a flat solid target at normal incidence, only odd, equally spaced harmonics are typically generated. Using particle-in-cell simulations, we show that introducing transverse spatial modulation—either via two beams incident at small opposing angles or via a single beam reflecting from a corrugated surface—produces a two-dimensional harmonic spectrum. Selecting the emission through a narrow slit isolates an angle-dependent subset of harmonics, forming a tunable frequency comb controlled by both the viewing angle and the drive-laser frequency. Distinct combs arise for s- and p-polarized emission, while increasing the focal spot size reduces divergence and improves efficiency. Additional control is achieved by varying beam frequencies, target tilt, or beam number. Replacing the dual-beam configuration with a single beam and structured surface provides equivalent functionality with significantly reduced experimental complexity.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. M Ferray, et al., Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21, L31 (1988).
  2. R. Lichters, et al., Short-pulse laser harmonics from oscillating plasma surfaces driven at relativistic intensity, Phys. Plasmas 3, 3425 (1996).
  3. T. Popmintchev, et al., Bright coherent ultrahigh harmonics in the keV x-ray regime from mid-infrared femtosecond lasers, Science 336, 1287 (2012).
  4. T. Popmintchev, et al., Ultraviolet surprise: Efficient soft x-ray high-harmonic generation in multiply ionized plasmas, Science 350, 1225 (2015).
  5. O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, and N. Moiseyev, Selection rules for the high harmonic generation spectra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3743 (1998).
  6. D. Baykusheva, A. Chacon, D. Kim, D. E. Kim, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, Strong-field physics in three-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023101 (2021).
  7. L. Rego, et al., Necklace-structured high-harmonic generation for low-divergence, soft x-ray harmonic combs with tunable line spacing, Sci. Adv. 8, eabj7380 (2022).
  8. R. Trines, et al., Laser harmonic generation with independent control of frequency and orbital angular momentum, Nat. Commun. 15, 6878 (2024).
  9. D. Hickstein, et al., Non-collinear generation of angularly isolated circularly polarized high harmonics, Nat. Photon. 9, 743 (2015).
  10. L. Yi, High-harmonic generation and spin-orbit interaction of light in a relativistic oscillating window, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 134801 (2021).
  11. J. B. Bertrand, H. J. Worner, H. C. Bandulet, E. Bisson, M. Spanner, J. C. Kieffer, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, Ultrahigh-order wave mixing in noncollinear high harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 023001 (2011).
  12. G. Gariepy, J. Leach, K. T. Kim, T. J. Hammond, E. Frumker, R. W. Boyd, and P. B. Corkum, Creating high-harmonic beams with controlled orbital angular momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 153901 (2014).
  13. F. Kong, et al., Controlling the orbital angular momentum of high harmonic vortices, Nat. Commun. 8, 14970 (2017).
  14. C. M. Heyl, P. Rudawski, F. Brizuela, S. N. Bengtsson, J. Mauritsson, and A. Lhuillier, Macroscopic effects in noncollinear high-order harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143902 (2014).
  15. Z. Li, G. Brown, D. H. Ko, F. Kong, L. Arissian, and P. B. Corkum, Perturbative high harmonic wave front control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 033905 (2017).
  16. L. Rego, J. S. Roman, A. Picon, L. Plaja, and C. Hernandez- Garcia, Nonperturbative twist in the generation of extreme-ultraviolet vortex beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 163202 (2016).
  17. A. de las Heras, et al., Attosecond vortex pulse trains, Optica 11, 1085 (2024).
  18. H. Vincenti and F. Quéré, Attosecond lighthouses: How to use spatiotemporally coupled light fields to generate isolated attosecond pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 113904 (2012).
  19. J. A. Wheeler, et al., Attosecond lighthouses from plasma mirrors, Nat. Photon. 6, 829 (2012).
  20. C. M. Heyl, et al., Noncollinear optical gating, New J. Phys. 16, 052001 (2014).
  21. J. P. Kennedy, B. Dromey, and M. Yeung, Isolated ultra-bright attosecond pulses via non-collinear gating, New J. Phys. 24, 113004 (2022).
  22. L. Rego, et al., Generation of extreme-ultraviolet beams with time-varying orbital angular momentum, Science 364, eaaw9486 (2019).
  23. J. Wang, M. Zepf, Y. Leng, R. Li, and S. G. Rykovanov, Self-torqued harmonics and attosecond pulses driven by time-delayed relativistic vortex lasers, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033515 (2022).
  24. X. Zhang, B. Shen, Y. Shi, X. Wang, L. Zhang, W. Wang, J. Xu, L. Yi, and Z. Xu, Generation of intense high-order vortex harmonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 173901 (2015).
  25. S. V. Fomichev, P. Breger, B. Carré, P. Agostini, and D. F. Zaretsky, Non-collinear high-harmonic generation, Laser Phys. 12, 383 (2002).
  26. M. Negro, et al., Non-collinear high-order harmonic generation by three interfering laser beams, Opt. Express 22, 29778 (2014).
  27. J. L. Ellis, et al., Phase matching of noncollinear sum and difference frequency high harmonic generation above and below the critical ionization level, Opt. Express 25, 10126 (2017).
  28. L. Yi, Anomalous effects in single-slit diffraction of light at relativistic intensities, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043163 (2025).
  29. T. D. Arber, et al., Contemporary particle-in-cell approach to laser-plasma, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57, 113001 (2015).
  30. The epoch code is available at https://epochpic.github.io/.
  31. The data that support the figures within this paper and other findings of this study are available at https://doi.org/10.15129/78998a66-bc5c-4d60-b5aa-9d6003a58420.
  32. H. Wikmark, et al., Spatiotemporal coupling of attosecond pulses, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4779 (2019).
  33. L. Quintard, et al., Optics-less focusing of XUV high-order harmonics, Sci. Adv. 5, eaau7175 (2019).
  34. E. F. J. Bacon, et al., High order modes of intense second harmonic light produced from a plasma aperture, Matter Radiat. Extremes 7, 054401 (2022).
  35. I. Pupeza, et al., Extreme-ultraviolet frequency combs for precision metrology and attosecond science, Nat. Photon. 15, 175 (2021).
  36. T. Fortier and E. Baumann, 20 years of developments in optical frequency comb technology and applications, Commun. Phys. 2, 153 (2019).
  37. S. Xun, et al., Attosecond light science and its application for probing quantum materials, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53, 184008 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation