- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Driven dynamics of localization phase transition in the Aubry-André model with initial gapless extended states

Xin-Yu Wang1,2,*, Wen-Jing Yu1,2,*, Yue-Mei Sun1,2, and Liang-Jun Zhai1,2,3,†

  • *These authors contribute equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: zhailiangjun@jsut.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013093 – Published 27 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fzyh-8r3r

Abstract

Recently, the driven dynamics of localization phase transition have garnered growing interest. However, studies so far have mainly considered initial localized states, whose driven dynamics follow the Kibble-Zurek mechanism (KZM). In this study, we investigate the driven dynamics of the localization phase transition in the Aubry-André model starting from a gapless extended state, which violates the adiabatic-impulse scenario of KZM. By linearly driving the quasiperiodic potential strength across the critical point, we numerically simulate the driven dynamics and analyze the scaling behavior of both the inverse participation ratio (I) and the dynamic deviation from the instantaneous ground-state energy (D). We demonstrate that the driven dynamics starting from initially extended states satisfies the criterion for the applicability of KZM and its extension, finite-time scaling (FTS). The scaling functions governing the driven dynamics of both I and D have been derived based on FTS and numerically validated. We found that the scaling functions exhibit significant differences at large R and small R, and also differ considerably from the scaling functions when the initial state is localized, highlighting the crucial role of initial-state behavior. The established scaling laws remain robust across a wide range of system sizes and driving rates, providing testable predictions for experimental realizations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (118)

  1. P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
  2. E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Scaling theory of localization: Absence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979).
  3. P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Disordered electronic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985).
  4. B. Kramer and A. MacKinnon, Localization: Theory and experiment, Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 1469 (1993).
  5. T. Schwartz, G. Bartal, S. Fishman, and M. Segev, Transport and Anderson localization in disordered two-dimensional photonic lattices, Nature (London) 446, 52 (2007).
  6. F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
  7. M. Segev, Y. Silberberg, and D. N. Christodoulides, Anderson localization of light, Nat. Photonics 7, 197 (2013).
  8. D. S. Wiersma, Disordered photonics, Nat. Photonics 7, 188 (2013).
  9. A. Yamilov, S. E. Skipetrov, T. W. Hughes, M. Minkov, Z. Yu, and H. Cao, Anderson localization of electromagnetic waves in three dimensions, Nat. Phys. 19, 1308 (2023).
  10. S. Aubry and G. André, Analyticity breaking and Anderson localization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc. 3, 133 (1980).
  11. J. Biddle and S. Das Sarma, Predicted mobility edges in one-dimensional incommensurate optical lattices: An exactly solvable model of Anderson localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070601 (2010).
  12. H. Yao, A. Khoudli, L. Bresque, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Critical behavior and fractality in shallow one-dimensional quasiperiodic potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070405 (2019).
  13. J. Schirmann, S. Franca, F. Flicker, and A. G. Grushin, Physical properties of an aperiodic monotile with graphene-like features, chirality, and zero modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 086402 (2024).
  14. M. Gonçalves, B. Amorim, E. V. Castro, and P. Ribeiro, Critical phase dualities in 1D exactly solvable quasiperiodic models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 186303 (2023).
  15. J. Šuntajs, T. Prosen and L. Vidmar, Localization challenges quantum chaos in the finite two-dimensional Anderson model, Phys. Rev. B 107, 064205 (2023).
  16. U. Agrawal, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Universality and quantum criticality in quasiperiodic spin chains, Nat. Commun. 11, 2225 (2020).
  17. U. Agrawal, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Quantum criticality in the 2D quasiperiodic Potts model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 265702 (2020).
  18. V. Goblot, A. Štrkalj, N. Pernet, J. L. Lado, C. Dorow, A. Lemaître, L. L. Gratiet, A. Harouri, I. Sagnes, S. Ravets, A. Amo, J. Bloch, and O. Zilberberg, Emergence of criticality through a cascade of delocalization transitions in quasiperiodic chains, Nat. Phys. 16, 832 (2020).
  19. S. Roy, S. Chattopadhyay, T. Mishra, and S. Basu, Critical analysis of the reentrant localization transition in a one-dimensional dimerized quasiperiodic lattice, Phys. Rev. B 105, 214203 (2022).
  20. U. Agrawal, R. Vasseur, and S. Gopalakrishnan, Quasiperiodic many-body localization transition in dimension d>1, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094206 (2022).
  21. X.-C. Zhou, Y.-J. Wang, T.-F. J. Poon, Q. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, Exact new mobility edges between critical and localized states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 176401 (2023).
  22. A. Smith, J. Knolle, R. Moessner, and D. L. Kovrizhin, Absence of ergodicity without quenched disorder: From quantum disentangled liquids to many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 176601 (2017).
  23. H. Roche Carrasco, J. Schirmann, A. Mordret, and A. G. Grushin, Family of aperiodic tilings with tunable quantum geometric tensor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 236603 (2025).
  24. J. Biddle, D. J. Priour, B. Wang, and S. Das Sarma, Localization in one-dimensional lattices with non-nearest-neighbor hopping: Generalized Anderson and Aubry-André models, Phys. Rev. B 83, 075105 (2011).
  25. Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zilberberg, Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 106402 (2012).
  26. X. Bu, L.-J. Zhai, and S. Yin, Quantum criticality in the disordered Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 214208 (2022).
  27. T. Lv, Y.-B. Liu, T.-C. Yi, L. Li, M. Liu, and W.-L. You, Exploring unconventional quantum criticality in the p-wave-paired Aubry-André-Harper model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144205 (2022).
  28. A. Sahoo, A. Saha, and D. Rakshit, Stark localization near Aubry-André criticality, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024205 (2025).
  29. C. Y. Guo, Multiple intermediate phases in the interpolating Aubry-André-Fibonacci model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174203 (2024).
  30. T.-C. Yi, Y.-Y. Fang, W. Chen, W.-L. You, and Y. Zhang, Unveiling quantum criticality of disordered Aubry-André-Harper models via typical fidelity susceptibility, Phys. Rev. A 112, 023308 (2025).
  31. S. Saha, S. K. Maiti, and S. Karmakar, Multiple mobility edges in a 1D Aubry chain with Hubbard interaction in presence of electric field: Controlled electron transport, Physica E 83, 358 (2016).
  32. S. Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley, and S. Das Sarma, Nearest neighbor tight binding models with an exact mobility edge in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 146601 (2015).
  33. Y. Wang, X. Xia, L. Zhang, H. Yao, S. Chen, J. You, Q. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, One-dimensional quasiperiodic mosaic lattice with exact mobility edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 196604 (2020).
  34. H.-T. Hu, Y. Chen, X. Lin, A.-M. Guo, Z. Lin, and M. Gong, Exact mobility edges in quasiperiodic network models with slowly varying potentials, Phys. Rev. B 112, 054201 (2025).
  35. T. Liu, X. Xia, S. Longhi, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Anomalous mobility edges in one-dimensional quasiperiodic models, SciPost Phys. 12, 027 (2022).
  36. J. Gao, I. M. Khaymovich, X.-W. Wang, Z.-S. Xu, A. Iovan, G. Krishna, J. Jieensi, A. Cataldo, A. V. Balatsky, V. Zwiller, and A. W. Elshaari, Probing multi-mobility edges in quasiperiodic mosaic lattices, Sci. Bull. 70, 58 (2025).
  37. S. Banerjee, S. R. Padhi, and T. Mishra, Emergence of distinct exact mobility edges in aquasiperiodic chain, Phys. Rev. B 111, L220201 (2025).
  38. S. Iyer, V. Oganesyan, G. Refael, and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization in a quasiperiodic system, Phys. Rev. B 87, 134202 (2013).
  39. M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. Lüschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015).
  40. V. Mastropietro, Localization of interacting fermions in the Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180401 (2015).
  41. V. Khemani, D. N. Sheng, and D. A. Huse, Two universality classes for the many-body localization transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 075702 (2017).
  42. S.-X. Zhang and H. Yao, Universal properties of many-body localization transitions in quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 206601 (2018).
  43. M. Rispoli, A. Lukin, R. Schittko, S. Kim, M. E. Tai, J. Léonard, and M. Greiner, Quantum critical at the many-body localization transition, Nature (London) 573, 385 (2019).
  44. F. Weiner, F. Evers, and S. Bera, Slow dynamics and strong finite-size effects in many-body localization with random and quasiperiodic potentials, Phys. Rev. B 100, 104204 (2019).
  45. S. Xu, X. Li, Y.-T. Hsu, B. Swingle, and S. Das Sarma, Buttery effect in interacting Aubry-André model: Thermalization, slow scrambling, and many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 032039(R) (2019).
  46. L.-J. Zhai, S. Yin, and G.-Y. Huang, Many-body localization in a non-Hermitian quasiperiodic system, Phys. Rev. B 102, 064206 (2020).
  47. T. Cookmeyer, J. Motruk, and J. E. Moore, Critical properties of the ground-state localization-delocalization transition in the many-particle Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174203 (2020).
  48. A. Štrkalj, E. V. H. Doggen, I. V. Gornyi, and O. Zilberberg, Many-body localization in the interpolating Aubry-andré-Fibonacci model, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033257 (2021).
  49. L.-Z. Tang, G.-Q. Zhang, L.-F. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Localization and topological transitions in non-Hermitian quasiperiodic lattices, Phys. Rev. A 103, 033325 (2021).
  50. A. Štrkalj, E. V. H. Doggen, and C. Castelnovo, Coexistence of localization and transport in many-body two-dimensional Aubry-André models, Phys. Rev. B 106, 184209 (2022).
  51. Y. Prasad and A. Garg, Single-particle excitations across the localization and many-body localization transition in quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094204 (2024).
  52. K. Huang, D. D. Vu, S. Das Sarma, and X. Li, Interaction-enhanced many-body localization in a generalized Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022054 (2024).
  53. A. Chakrabarty, S. Banerjee, T. Mishra, and S. Datta, Emergence of non-trivial phases in interacting non-Hermitian quasiperiodic chains with power-law hopping, arXiv:2508.14724.
  54. Q.-B. Zeng, S. Chen, and R. Lü, Anderson localization in the non-Hermitian Aubry-André-Harper model with physical gain and loss, Phys. Rev. A 95, 062118 (2017).
  55. H. Jiang, L.-J. Lang, C. Yang, S.-L. Zhu, and S. Chen, Interplay of non-Hermitian skin effects and Anderson localization in nonreciprocal quasiperiodic lattices, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054301 (2019).
  56. S. Longhi, Metal-insulator phase transition in a non-Hermitian Aubry-André-harper model, Phys. Rev. B 100, 125157 (2019).
  57. S. Longhi, Non-Hermitian Maryland model, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224206 (2021).
  58. Y. Liu, Y. Wang, X.-J. Liu, Q. Zhou, and S. Chen, Exact mobility edges, PT-symmetry breaking, and skin effect in one-dimensional non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014203 (2021).
  59. C.-X. Guo, C.-H. Liu, X.-M. Zhao, Y. Liu, and S. Chen, Exact solution of non-Hermitian systems with generalized boundary conditions: Size-dependent boundary effect and fragility of the skin effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 116801 (2021).
  60. L.-J. Zhai, G.-Y. Huang, and S. Yin, Cascade of the delocalization transition in a non-Hermitian interpolating aubry-andré-Fibonacci chain, Phys. Rev. B 104, 014202 (2021).
  61. Q. Lin, T.-Y Li, L. Xiao, K.-K Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Topological phase transitions and mobility edges in non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 113601 (2022).
  62. A. P. Acharya and S. Datta, Localization transitions in a non-Hermitian quasiperiodic lattice, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024203 (2024).
  63. C.-X. Guo, L. H. Su, Y. L. Wang, L. Li, J. Z. Wang, X. H Ruan, Y. J. Du, D. N. Zheng, S. Chen, and H. P Hu, Scale-tailored localization and its observation in non-Hermitian electrical circuits, Nat. Commun. 15, 9120 (2024).
  64. C.-C. Zeng, Z. Cai, G.-H. Wang, and G. Sun, Fidelity and criticality in the nonreciprocal Aubry-André-Harper model, Europhys. Lett. 149, 38001 (2025).
  65. Y.-M. Sun, X.-Y. Wang, and L.-J. Zhai, Hybrid scaling properties of the localization transition in a non-Hermitian disordered Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054202 (2024).
  66. R.-J. Chen, G.-Q. Zhang, Z. Li, and D.-W. Zhang, Mobility rings in a non-Hermitian non-Abelian quasiperiodic lattice, Phys. Rev. A 112, 013320 (2025).
  67. R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Quantum simulations with trapped ions, Nat. Phys. 8, 277 (2012).
  68. S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, M. Valiente, E. Andersson, P. Öhberg, N. Goldman, and R. R. Thomson, Experimental observation of anomalous topological edge modes in a slowly driven photonic lattice, Nat. Commun. 8, 13918 (2017).
  69. C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017).
  70. S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature (London) 595, 227 (2021).
  71. L. Xiao, D.-K. Qu, K.-K. Wang, H.-W. Li, J.-Y Dai, B. Dóra, M. Heyl, R. Moessner, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian Kibble-Zurek mechanism with tunable complexity in single-photon interferometry, PRX Quantum 2, 020313 (2021).
  72. J. Bedow, E. Mascot, and D. K. Morr, Emergence and manipulation of non-equilibrium Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states, Commun. Phys. 5, 281 (2022).
  73. G. Perfetto, F. Carollo, M. Magoni, and I. Lesanovsky, Designing nonequilibrium states of quantum matter through stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. B 104, L180302 (2021).
  74. R. Mankowsky, M. Först, and A. Cavalleri, Non-equilibrium control of complex solids by nonlinear phononics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 064503 (2016).
  75. V. Popkov and R. Livi, Manipulating energy and spin currents in non-equilibrium systems of interacting qubits, New J. Phys. 15, 023030 (2013).
  76. G. Giudici, M. D. Lukin, and H. Pichler, Dynamical preparation of quantum spin liquids in Rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 090401 (2022).
  77. Y. Cheng, C. Li, and H. Zhai, Variational approach to quantum spin liquid in a Rydberg atom simulator, New J. Phys. 25, 033010 (2023).
  78. A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pichler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator, Nature (London) 568, 207 (2019).
  79. M. Dupont and J. E. Moore, Quantum criticality using a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. B 106, L041109 (2022).
  80. C. J. O. Reichhardt, A. del Campo, and C. Reichhardt, Kibble-Zurek mechanism for nonequilibrium phase transitions in driven systems with quenched disorder, Commun. Phys. 5, 173 (2022).
  81. A. D. King, et al., Quantum critical dynamics in a 5,000-qubit programmable spin glass, Nature (London) 617, 61 (2023).
  82. J. Soto Garcia and N. Chepiga, Resolving chiral transitions in one-dimensional Rydberg arrays with quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism and finite-time scaling, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125113 (2024).
  83. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9, 1387 (1976).
  84. W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium? Nature (London) 317, 505 (1985).
  85. W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701 (2005).
  86. J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: Exact solution of the quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 245701 (2005).
  87. J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Adv. Phys. 59, 1063 (2010).
  88. A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
  89. S. Yin, G.-Y. Huang, C.-Y. Lo, and P. Chen, Kibble-Zurek scaling in the Yang-Lee edge singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 065701 (2017).
  90. L.-J. Zhai, H.-Y. Wang, and S. Yin, Hybridized Kibble-Zurek scaling in the driven critical dynamics across an overlapping critical region, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134108 (2018).
  91. Y.-R. Shu, S.-K. Jian, A. W. Sandvik, and S. Yin, Equilibration of topological defects near the deconfined quantum multicritical point, Nat. Commun. 16, 3402 (2025).
  92. S. Deng, G. Ortiz, and L. Viola, Dynamical non-Ergodic scaling in continuous finite-order quantum phase transitions, Europhys. Lett. 84, 67008 (2008).
  93. A. Polkovnikov and V. Gritsev, Breakdown of the adiabatic limit in low-dimensional gapless systems, Nat. Phys. 4, 477 (2008).
  94. F. Pellegrini, S. Montangero, G. E. Santoro, and R. Fazio, Adiabatic quenches through an extended quantum critical region, Phys. Rev. B 77, 140404 (2008).
  95. S. Gong, F. Zhong, X. Huang, and S. Fan, Finite-time scaling via linear driving, New J. Phys. 12, 043036 (2010).
  96. Y. Huang, S. Yin, B. Feng, and F. Zhong, Kibble-Zurek mechanism and finite-time scaling, Phys. Rev. B 90, 134108 (2014).
  97. B. Feng, S. Yin, and F. Zhong, Theory of driven nonequilibrium critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 94, 144103 (2016).
  98. Z. Zeng, Y.-K. Yu, Z.-X. Li, Z.-X. Li, and S. Yin, Finite-time scaling beyond the Kibble-Zurek prerequisite in Dirac systems, Nat. Commun. 16, 6181 (2025).
  99. L. Morales-Molina, E. Doerner, C. Danieli, and S. Flach, Resonant extended states in driven quasiperiodic lattices: Aubry-Andre localization by design, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043630 (2014).
  100. E. Bairey, G. Refael, and N. H. Lindner, Driving induced many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B 96, 020201(R) (2017).
  101. L. Zhou, Floquet engineering of topological localization transitions and mobility edges in one-dimensional non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033184 (2021).
  102. V. Tiwari, D. S. Bhakuni, and A. Sharma, Dynamical localization and slow dynamics in quasiperiodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, L161104 (2024).
  103. C. Yang, Y. C. Wang, P. Wang, X. L. Gao, and S. Chen, Dynamical signature of localization-delocalization transition in a one-dimensional incommensurate lattice, Phys. Rev. B 95, 184201 (2017).
  104. Z. Xu, H. Huangfu, Y. Zhang, and S. Chen, Dynamical observation of mobility edges in one-dimensional incommensurate optical lattices, New J. Phys. 22, 013036 (2020).
  105. Z. H. Xu and S. Chen, Dynamical evolution in a one-dimensional incommensurate lattice with PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043325 (2021).
  106. J.-Q. Cheng, S. Yin, and D.-X. Yao, Dynamical localization transition in the non-Hermitian lattice gauge theory, Commun. Phys. 7, 58 (2024).
  107. A. Sinha, M. M. Rams, and J. Dziarmaga, Kibble-Zurek mechanism with a single particle: Dynamics of the localization-delocalization transition in the Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. B 99, 094203 (2019).
  108. L.-J. Zhai, G.-Y. Huang, and S. Yin, Nonequilibrium dynamics of the localization-delocalization transition in the non-Hermitian Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014204 (2022).
  109. L.-J. Zhai, L.-L. Hou, Q. Gao, and H.-Y. Wang, Kibble-Zurek scaling of the dynamical localization-skin effect phase transition in a non-Hermitian quasi-periodic system under the open boundary condition, Front. Phys. 10, 1098551 (2022).
  110. X. Bu, L.-J. Zhai, and S. Yin, Kibble-Zurek scaling in one-dimensional localization transitions, Phys. Rev. A 108, 023312 (2023).
  111. E.-W. Liang, L.-Z. Tang, and D.-W. Zhang, Quantum criticality and Kibble-Zurek scaling in the Aubry-André-Stark model, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024207 (2024).
  112. Y.-M. Sun, X.-Y. Wang, and L.-J. Zhai, Non-equilibrium dynamics of localization phase transition in the non-Hermitian disorder-Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. A 112, 022204 (2025).
  113. B.-B. Wei, Fidelity susceptibility in one-dimensional disordered lattice models, Phys. Rev. A 99, 042117 (2019).
  114. J. Bauer, T. M. Chang, and J. L. Skinner, Correlation length and inverse-participation-ratio exponents and multifractal structure for Anderson localization, Phys. Rev. B 42, 8121 (1990).
  115. Y. V. Fyodorov and A. D. Mirlin, Analytical derivation of the scaling law for the inverse participation ratio in quasi-one-dimensional disordered systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1093 (1992).
  116. G. Roati, C. D’ Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose-Einstein condensate, Nature (London) 453, 895 (2008).
  117. J. Billy, V. Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lugan, D. Clément, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of Anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature (London) 453, 891 (2008).
  118. L.-J. Zhai, Driven dynamics of localization phase transition in the Aubry-André model with a initial gapless state, figshare, Dataset (2025), doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30119707.v1.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013093– Published 27 January, 2026
  • Received 13 September 2025
  • Accepted 7 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation