Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonclassical cutoff fluctuations in squeezed-light-driven high-harmonic generation

Tsendsuren Khurelbaatar1,2,*, R. T. Sang1,2,3, and Igor V. Litvinyuk1,2

  • 1Queensland Quantum and Advanced Technologies Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland 4111, Australia
  • 2School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland 4111, Australia
  • 3Office of the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research, Development and Commercialisation), University of Southern Queensland, Springfield 4300, Australia

  • *Contact author: t.khurelbaatar@griffith.edu.au

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 043107 – Published 30 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ffdj-mz2y

Abstract

In the conventional description of strong-field high-harmonic generation (HHG), the atom is treated quantum mechanically while the driving laser is represented by a classical field. Quantum fluctuations of the driver can become relevant in nanoscale interaction geometries, where tight spatial confinement can raise the vacuum-field amplitude to ∼10−2 of the mean driving-field amplitude. In this regime, fluctuations of a squeezed driver can imprint its quadrature statistics on HHG observables. To model this interaction, we sample the positive Wigner function of the driving field and solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for each sampled field realization. Within a single-mode Gaussian framework, we show that amplitude squeezing suppresses the shot-to-shot variance of the HHG cutoff below the coherent-state standard quantum limit (SQL) at the same mean field. To leading order in the vacuum-to-driver field ratio, the normalized variance follows e−2r, where r is the squeezing parameter, independently of the absolute vacuum-field amplitude. At stronger squeezing, quadratic coupling of the antisqueezed quadrature to the field modulus competes with this suppression, yielding a variance minimum near ropt≈1.55 for the parameters studied. A sub-SQL cutoff variance thus indicates subvacuum noise in the quadrature probed by the cutoff, suggesting that shot-resolved HHG cutoff measurements could witness driving-field nonclassicality.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (49)

  1. P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993).
  2. M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994).
  3. M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, Attosecond metrology, Nature (London) 414, 509 (2001).
  4. P.-M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, P. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation, Science 292, 1689 (2001).
  5. B. Walker, B. Sheehy, L. F. DiMauro, P. Agostini, K. J. Schafer, and K. C. Kulander, Precision measurement of strong field double ionization of helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1227 (1994).
  6. D. N. Fittinghoff, P. R. Bolton, B. Chang, and K. C. Kulander, Observation of nonsequential double ionization of helium with optical tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2642 (1992).
  7. T. Sh. Iskhakov, A. M. Pérez, K. Y. Spasibko, M. V. Chekhova, and G. Leuchs, Superbunched bright squeezed vacuum state, Opt. Lett. 37, 1919 (2012).
  8. M.V. Chekhova, G. Leuchs, and M. Żukowski, Bright squeezed vacuum: Entanglement of macroscopic light beams, Opt. Commun. 337, 27 (2015).
  9. A. M. Pérez, P. R. Sharapova, S. S. Straupe, F. M. Miatto, O. V. Tikhonova, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, Projective filtering of the fundamental eigenmode from spatially multimode radiation, Phys. Rev. A 92, 053861 (2015).
  10. A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M. Krüger, D. Seletskiy, M. Chekhova, and F. Tani, High-harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum, Nat. Phys. 20, 1960 (2024).
  11. S. Lemieux, S. A. Jalil, D. N. Purschke, N. Boroumand, T. J. Hammond, D. Villeneuve, A. Naumov, T. Brabec, and G. Vampa, Photon bunching in high-harmonic emission controlled by quantum light, Nat. Photon. 19, 767 (2025).
  12. J. Heimerl, A. Rasputnyi, J. Pölloth, S. Meier, M. Chekhova, and P. Hommelhoff, Quantum light drives electrons strongly at metal needle tips, Nat. Phys. 21, 1899 (2025).
  13. Z. Jiang, S. Pan, J. Chen, M. Zhu, C. Zhao, Y. Wang, R. Zhang, J. Lu, L. Han, S. Xiong, D. Wu, W. Li, S. Jiang, H. Ni, and J. Wu, Nonlinear atomic tunnelling boosted by bright squeezed vacuum, Nature (London) 654, 356 (2026).
  14. M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Krüger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics, Nat. Photon. 17, 501 (2023).
  15. A. Gorlach, M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, M. Krüger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light, Nat. Phys. 19, 1689 (2023).
  16. U. Bhattacharya, T. Lamprou, A. S. Maxwell, A. Ordóñez, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Strong-laser-field physics, non-classical light states and quantum information science, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 094401 (2023).
  17. J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, Structured squeezed light allows for high-harmonic generation in classical forbidden geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 013801 (2025).
  18. F. Wang, C. Yang, X. Cui, L. He, T. Ou, R.-B. Jin, Q. Liao, P. Lan, and P. Lu, Quantum path control in high-order harmonic generation via squeezed lights, Phys. Rev. A 112, 043119 (2025).
  19. S.-J. Wang, X.-Y. Lai, and X.-J. Liu, Attosecond pulse synthesis from high-order harmonic generation in intense squeezed light, Phys. Rev. A 112, L011102 (2025).
  20. L. Petrovic, P. Stammer, M. Lewenstein, and J. Rivera-Dean, Generation of circularly polarized high-order harmonics from single-color quantum light, Phys. Rev. A 114, 013127 (2026).
  21. M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, I. Kaminer, M. Krüger, and O. Cohen, Generation of squeezed high-order harmonics, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033079 (2024).
  22. J. Li, Z. Lyu, H. Liu, and Y. Liu, Quantum-optical signatures of solid-state high-harmonic generation driven by squeezed coherent states, Phys. Rev. A 112, 033507 (2025).
  23. D. Habibović and D. B. Milošević, Intensity-dependent enhancements in strong-field ionization by quantum light, Phys. Rev. A 112, L051103 (2025).
  24. S.-J. Wang and X.-Y. Lai, High-order above-threshold ionization of an atom in intense quantum light, Phys. Rev. A 108, 063101 (2023).
  25. D. Habibović and D. B. Milošević, High-order above-threshold ionization by squeezed coherent light, Phys. Rev. A 113, 043124 (2026).
  26. S. Kim, J. Jin, Y.-J. Kim, I.-Y. Park, Y. Kim, and S.-W. Kim, High-harmonic generation by resonant plasmon field enhancement, Nature (London) 453, 757 (2008).
  27. M. F. Ciappina, J. A. Pérez-Hernández, A. S. Landsman, W. A. Okell, S. Zherebtsov, B. Förg, J. Schötz, L. Seiffert, T. Fennel, T. Shaaran et al., Attosecond physics at the nanoscale, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 054401 (2017).
  28. M. Krüger, M. Schenk, and P. Hommelhoff, Attosecond control of electrons emitted from a nanoscale metal tip, Nature (London) 475, 78 (2011).
  29. M. Sivis, M. Taucer, G. Vampa, K. Johnston, A. Staudte, A. Y. Naumov, D. M. Villeneuve, C. Ropers, and P. B. Corkum, Tailored semiconductors for high-harmonic optoelectronics, Science 357, 303 (2017).
  30. G. Vampa, B. G. Ghamsari, S. S. Mousavi, T. J. Hammond, A. Olivieri, E. Lisicka-Skrek, A. Yu Naumov, D. M. Villeneuve, A. Staudte, P. Berini, and P. B. Corkum, Plasmon-enhanced high-harmonic generation from solid silicon, Nat. Phys. 13, 659 (2017).
  31. K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, Density operators and quasiprobability distributions, Phys. Rev. 177, 1882 (1969).
  32. W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001).
  33. C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  34. See Supplemental Material at https://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/ffdj-mz2y for details of the numerical method and its validation, the vacuum-field estimate, the analytical derivations, the strong-field-approximation cross-check, and the multimode and optical-loss analyses of the classicality criterion, which includes Refs. [35, 36, 37].
  35. M. D. Feit, J. A. Fleck, Jr., and A. Steiger, Solution of the Schrödinger equation by a spectral method, J. Comput. Phys. 47, 412 (1982).
  36. C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012).
  37. A. Huck, S. Smolka, P. Lodahl, A. S. Sørensen, A. Boltasseva, J. Janousek, and U. L. Andersen, Demonstration of quadrature-squeezed surface plasmons in a gold waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 246802 (2009).
  38. Q. Su and J. H. Eberly, Model atom for multiphoton physics, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5997 (1991).
  39. J. Javanainen, J. H. Eberly, and Q. Su, Numerical simulations of multiphoton ionization and above-threshold electron spectra, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3430 (1988).
  40. L. V. Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1965).
  41. K. Burnett, V. C. Reed, J. Cooper, and P. L. Knight, Calculation of the background emitted during high-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3347 (1992).
  42. J. C. Baggesen and L. B. Madsen, On the dipole, velocity and acceleration forms in high-order harmonic generation from a single atom or molecule, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 115601 (2011).
  43. M. V. Ammosov, N. B. Delone, and V. P. Kraĭnov, Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an alternating electromagnetic field, Sov. Phys. JETP 64, 1191 (1986).
  44. R. L. Hudson, When is the Wigner quasi-probability density non-negative? Rep. Math. Phys. 6, 249 (1974).
  45. R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).
  46. E. C. G. Sudarshan, Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963).
  47. M. Sennary, J. Rivera-Dean, M. ElKabbash, V. Pervak, M. Lewenstein, and M. T. Hassan, Attosecond quantum uncertainty dynamics and ultrafast squeezed light for quantum communication, Light Sci. Appl. 14, 350 (2025).
  48. A. Husakou, S.-J. Im, and J. Herrmann, Theory of plasmon-enhanced high-order harmonic generation in the vicinity of metal nanostructures in noble gases, Phys. Rev. A 83, 043839 (2011).
  49. D. K. Oh, Y. Kim, J. Kim, I. Kim, and J. Rho, Guided domino lithography for uniform fabrication of single-digit-nanometer scale plasmonic nanoantenna, Nanophotonics 12, 1435 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation