- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Optimal sensing on an asymmetric exceptional surface

Robert L. Cook, Liwen Ko, and K. Birgitta Whaley*

  • *Contact author: whaley@berkeley.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013031 – Published 14 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dzwk-1cv8

Abstract

We study the connection between exceptional points (EPs) and optimal parameter estimation, in a simple system consisting of two counterpropagating traveling wave modes in a microring resonator. The unknown parameter to be estimated is the strength of a perturbing cross-coupling between the two modes. Partially reflecting the output of one mode into the other creates a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian that exhibits a family of EPs, creating an exceptional surface (ES). We use a fully quantum treatment of field inputs and noise sources to obtain a quantitative bound on the estimation error by calculating the quantum Fisher information (QFI) in the output fields, whose inverse gives the Cramér-Rao lower bound on the mean-squared error of any unbiased estimator. We determine the bounds for two input states, namely, a semiclassical coherent state and a highly nonclassical NOON state. We find that the QFI is enhanced in the presence of an EP for both of these input states and that both states can saturate the Cramér-Rao bound. We then identify idealized yet experimentally feasible measurements that achieve the minimum bound for these two input states. We also investigate how the QFI changes for parameter values that do not lie on the ES, finding that these can have a larger QFI, suggesting alternative routes to optimize the parameter estimation for this problem.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203901 (2014).
  2. J. Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033809 (2016).
  3. J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photonics Res. 8, 1457 (2020).
  4. H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing, Nat. Commun. 9, 4320 (2018).
  5. C. Chen, L. Jin, and R.-B. Liu, Sensitivity of parameter estimation near the exceptional point of a non-Hermitian system, New J. Phys. 21, 083002 (2019).
  6. L. Bao, B. Qi, D. Dong, and F. Nori, Fundamental limits for reciprocal and nonreciprocal non-Hermitian quantum sensing, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042418 (2021).
  7. R. Duggan, S. A. Mann, and A. Alù, Limitations of sensing at an exceptional point, ACS Photonics 9, 1554 (2022).
  8. H. Loughlin and V. Sudhir, Exceptional-Point sensors offer no fundamental signal-to-noise ratio enhancement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 243601 (2024).
  9. Q. Zhong, J. Ren, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, Ş. K. Özdemir, and R. El-Ganainy, Sensing with exceptional surfaces in order to combine sensitivity with robustness, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 153902 (2019).
  10. S. Soleymani, Q. Zhong, M. Mokim, S. Rotter, R. El-Ganainy, and Ş K. Özdemir, Chiral and degenerate perfect absorption on exceptional surfaces, Nat. Commun. 13, 599 (2022).
  11. H. Lee, A. Kecebas, F. Wang, L. Chang, Sahin K. Özdemir, and T. Gu, Chiral exceptional point and coherent suppression of backscattering in silicon microring with low loss mie scatterer, eLight 3, 20 (2023).
  12. J. Zhu, S. K. Ozdemir, Y.-F. Xiao, L. Li, L. He, D.-R. Chen, and L. Yang, On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-q microresonator, Nat. Photonics 4, 46 (2010).
  13. S. Arnold, M. Khoshsima, I. Teraoka, S. Holler, and F. Vollmer, Shift of whispering-gallery modes in microspheres by protein adsorption, Opt. Lett. 28, 272 (2003).
  14. F. Vollmer, S. Arnold, and D. Keng, Single virus detection from the reactive shift of a whispering-gallery mode, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20701 (2008).
  15. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
  16. U. Dorner and P. Zoller, Laser-driven atoms in half-cavities, Phys. Rev. A 66, 023816 (2002).
  17. R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).
  18. C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  19. A. Meurer, et al., SymPy: Symbolic computing in python, PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3, e103 (2017).
  20. Y. Ye and X.-M. Lu, Quantum Cramér-Rao bound for quantum statistical models with parameter-dependent rank, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022429 (2022).
  21. D. Šafránek, Discontinuities of the quantum Fisher information and the Bures metric, Phys. Rev. A 95, 052320 (2017).
  22. J. C. Garrison and R. Chiao, Quantum Optics (Oxford University Press, USA, 2008).
  23. L. M. Rachbauer, D. Bouchet, U. Leonhardt, and S. Rotter, How to find optimal quantum states for optical micromanipulation and metrology in complex scattering problems: Tutorial, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 41, 2122 (2024).
  24. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006).
  25. S. Boixo, S. T. Flammia, C. M. Caves, and JM Geremia, Generalized limits for single-parameter quantum estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 090401 (2007).
  26. E. L. Lehmann and G. Casella, Theory of Point Estimation, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 1998).
  27. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
  28. A. Roy, S. Jahani, Q. Guo, A. Dutt, S. Fan, M.-A. Miri, and A. Marandi, Nondissipative non-Hermitian dynamics and exceptional points in coupled optical parametric oscillators, Optica 8, 415 (2021).
  29. J. E. Gough, Principles and applications of quantum control engineering, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 5241 (2012).
  30. R. L. Cook, L. Ko, and K. B. Whaley, Optimal-ES-QFI [Computer software] (2025), https://github.com/whaley-group-berkeley/optimal-ES-fisher-info.
  31. K. Jacobs, Quantum Measurement Theory and its Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).
  32. R. Cook, D. I. Schuster, A. N. Cleland, and K. Jacobs, Input-output theory for superconducting and photonic circuits that contain weak retroreflections and other weak pseudocavities, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013801 (2018).
  33. J. Combes, J. Kerckhoff, and M. Sarovar, The SLH framework for modeling quantum input-output networks, Adv. Phys.: X 2, 784 (2017).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013031– Published 14 January, 2026
  • Received 4 April 2025
  • Accepted 9 November 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation