Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Parametric instability landscape of coupled Kerr parametric oscillators

Orjan Ameye1, Alexander Eichler2, and Oded Zilberberg1

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033204 – Published 29 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/c91r-8t3h

Abstract

Networks of coupled Kerr parametric oscillators (KPOs) hold promise for the realization of neuromorphic and quantum computation. Yet, their rich bifurcation structure remains poorly understood. Here, we employ secular perturbation theory to map the stability regions of these networks and identify the regime where the system can be mapped to an Ising model. Starting with two coupled KPOs, we show how the bifurcations arise from the competition between the global parametric drive and linear coupling between the KPOs. We then extend this framework to larger networks with all-to-all equal coupling, deriving analytical expressions for the full cascade of bifurcation transitions. In the thermodynamic limit, we find that these transitions become uniformly spaced, leading to a highly regular structure. Our results reveal the precise bounds under which KPO networks have an Ising-like solution space, and thus provide crucial guidance for their experimental implementation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. M. Dykman, Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
  2. A. Eichler and O. Zilberberg, Classical and Quantum Parametric Phenomena (New York, 2023).
  3. K. Husimi, Miscellanea in elementary quantum mechanics, II, Prog. Theor. Phys. 9, 381 (1953).
  4. S. Kohler, T. Dittrich, and P. Hänggi, Floquet-Markovian description of the parametrically driven, dissipative harmonic quantum oscillator, Phys. Rev. E 55, 300 (1997).
  5. A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature (London) 584, 205 (2020).
  6. T. Kanao, S. Masuda, S. Kawabata, and H. Goto, Quantum gate for a Kerr nonlinear parametric oscillator using effective excited states, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 014019 (2022).
  7. J. Guo, Q. He, and M. Fadel, Quantum metrology with a squeezed Kerr oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 109, 052604 (2024).
  8. R. Di Candia, F. Minganti, K. V. Petrovnin, G. S. Paraoanu, and S. Felicetti, Critical parametric quantum sensing, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 23 (2023).
  9. I. Mahboob and H. Yamaguchi, Bit storage and bit flip operations in an electromechanical oscillator, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 275 (2008).
  10. R. B. Karabalin, R. Lifshitz, M. C. Cross, M. H. Matheny, S. C. Masmanidis, and M. L. Roukes, Signal amplification by sensitive control of bifurcation topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 094102 (2011).
  11. A. Eichler, T. L. Heugel, A. Leuch, C. L. Degen, R. Chitra, and O. Zilberberg, A parametric symmetry breaking transducer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 233105 (2018).
  12. M. I. Dykman, C. Bruder, N. Lörch, and Y. Zhang, Interaction-induced time-symmetry breaking in driven quantum oscillators, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195444 (2018).
  13. H. Goto, K. Tatsumura, and A. R. Dixon, Combinatorial optimization by simulating adiabatic bifurcations in nonlinear Hamiltonian systems, Sci. Adv. 5, eaav2372 (2019).
  14. A. Leuch, L. Papariello, O. Zilberberg, C. L. Degen, R. Chitra, and A. Eichler, Parametric symmetry breaking in a nonlinear resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 214101 (2016).
  15. M. Soriente, T. L. Heugel, K. Omiya, R. Chitra, and O. Zilberberg, Distinctive class of dissipation-induced phase transitions and their universal characteristics, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023100 (2021).
  16. I. Mahboob, H. Okamoto, and H. Yamaguchi, An electromechanical Ising Hamiltonian, Sci. Adv. 2, e1600236 (2016).
  17. T. Inagaki, Y. Haribara, K. Igarashi, T. Sonobe, S. Tamate, T. Honjo, A. Marandi, P. L. McMahon, T. Umeki, K. Enbutsu, O. Tadanaga, H. Takenouchi, K. Aihara, K.-I. Kawarabayashi, K. Inoue, S. Utsunomiya, and H. Takesue, A coherent Ising machine for 2000-node optimization problems, Science 354, 603 (2016).
  18. S. E. Nigg, N. Lörch, and R. P. Tiwari, Robust quantum optimizer with full connectivity, Sci. Adv. 3, e1602273 (2017).
  19. S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quantum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving, npj Quantum Inf. 3, 18 (2017).
  20. L. Bello, M. Calvanese Strinati, E. G. Dalla Torre, and A. Pe’er, Persistent coherent beating in coupled parametric oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 083901 (2019).
  21. Y. Okawachi, M. Yu, J. K. Jang, X. Ji, Y. Zhao, B. Y. Kim, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Demonstration of chip-based coupled degenerate optical parametric oscillators for realizing a nanophotonic spin-glass, Nat. Commun. 11, 4119 (2020).
  22. T. L. Heugel, O. Zilberberg, C. Marty, R. Chitra, and A. Eichler, Ising machines with strong bilinear coupling, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013149 (2022).
  23. G. Margiani, J. del Pino, T. L. Heugel, N. E. Bousse, S. Guerrero, T. W. Kenny, O. Zilberberg, D. Sabonis, and A. Eichler, Deterministic and stochastic sampling of two coupled Kerr parametric oscillators, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012029 (2023).
  24. P. Álvarez, D. Pittilini, F. Miserocchi, S. Raamamurthy, G. Margiani, O. Ameye, J. del Pino, O. Zilberberg, and A. Eichler, Biased Ising model using two coupled Kerr parametric oscillators with external force, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 207401 (2024).
  25. C. Han, M. Wang, B. Zhang, M. I. Dykman, and H. B. Chan, Coupled parametric oscillators: From disorder-induced current to asymmetric Ising model, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023162 (2024).
  26. G. Margiani, O. Ameye, O. Zilberberg, and A. Eichler, Three strongly coupled Kerr parametric oscillators forming a Boltzmann machine, arXiv:2504.04254 [Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published)].
  27. R. Lifshitz and M. C. Cross, Response of parametrically driven nonlinear coupled oscillators with application to micromechanical and nanomechanical resonator arrays, Phys. Rev. B 67, 134302 (2003).
  28. P. Breiding, M. Michałek, L. Monin, and S. Telen, The algebraic degree of coupled oscillators, arXiv:2208.08179.
  29. V. Borovik, P. Breiding, J. del Pino, M. Michałek, and O. Zilberberg, Khovanskii bases for semimixed systems of polynomial equations—approximating stationary nonlinear Newtonian dynamics, J. Math. Pures Appl. 182, 195 (2024).
  30. T. L. Heugel, M. Oscity, A. Eichler, O. Zilberberg, and R. Chitra, Classical many-body time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 124301 (2019).
  31. I. Kovacic, R. Rand, and S. Mohamed Sah, Mathieu’s equation and its generalizations: Overview of stability charts and their features, Appl. Mech. Rev. 70, 020802 (2018).
  32. J. A. Richards, Analysis of Periodically Time-Varying Systems (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
  33. G. Datseris and U. Parlitz, Nonlinear Dynamics: A Concise Introduction Interlaced with Code, Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022).
  34. C. Zerbe and P. Hänggi, Brownian parametric quantum oscillator with dissipation, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1533 (1995).
  35. When γi=γ, we have Γ̃=UTΓU=γUTIU=γI.
  36. A. M. Fedorchenko, How to perform higher order KB method and in the meanwhile make sure that the averaged equation stay canonical, Ukrain. Mat. Zh. 9, 220 (1957).
  37. E. L. Burshtein and L. S. Solov’ev, [The Hamiltonian of an averaged motion], Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 139 (4) (1961) [Sov. Phys. Dokl. 6, 731 (1962)].
  38. I. Mitropolsky, Averaging method in non-linear mechanics, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2, 69 (1967).
  39. C. Holmes and P. Holmes, Second order averaging and bifurcations to subharmonics in Duffing’s equation, J. Sound Vib. 78, 161 (1981).
  40. K. Seibold, O. Ameye, and O. Zilberberg, Floquet expansion by counting pump photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 060401 (2025).
  41. The KB method allows for higher-order EOMs in ε; however, we restrict ourselves to the first-order dynamics.
  42. J. Košata, J. del Pino, T. L. Heugel, and O. Zilberberg, HarmonicBalance.jl: A Julia suite for nonlinear dynamics using harmonic balance, SciPost Phys. Codebases 6 (2022).
  43. The magnitude of αi only changes the amplitude of the phase states, as it can be eliminated by rescaling xi with αi.
  44. H. Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computation with a nonlinear oscillator network, Sci. Rep. 6, 21686 (2016).
  45. Recently, it was shown that the maximum number of physical stationary solutions to the slow-flow equations [cf. Eqs. (4) and (5)] is 5N when dealing with N coupled KPOs [28, 29, 46]. However, not all of these solutions are stable. Recall that the solutions manifest in a tensor space of N two-dimensional phase spaces (corresponding to each normal mode). In each two-dimensional phase space, every pair of stable solution must be separated by an unstable stationary saddle, implying that the maximum number of stable solutions of our KPO network is 3N.
  46. P. Danzl and J. Moehlis, Weakly coupled parametrically forced oscillator networks: Existence, stability, and symmetry of solutions, Nonlinear Dyn. 59, 661 (2010).
  47. T. L. Heugel, R. Chitra, A. Eichler, and O. Zilberberg, Proliferation of unstable states and their impact on stochastic out-of-equilibrium dynamics in two coupled Kerr parametric oscillators, Phys. Rev. E 109, 064308 (2024).
  48. T. L. Heugel, A. Eichler, R. Chitra, and O. Zilberberg, The role of fluctuations in quantum and classical time crystals, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 053 (2023).
  49. Along the detuning axis, the sign of J interchanges the order in which the normal modes appear, and the sign of α reverses the direction at which the coexistence region appears.
  50. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley-VCH, 1986), Vol. 2.
  51. B. Denardo, J. Earwood, and V. Sazonova, Parametric instability of two coupled nonlinear oscillators, Am. J. Phys. 67, 187 (1999).
  52. E. Buks and M. L. Roukes, Electrically tunable collective response in a coupled micromechanical array, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 11, 802 (2002).
  53. L. Catalini, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Soft-clamped phononic dimers for mechanical sensing and transduction, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 014041 (2020).
  54. A. Eichler, J. Chaste, J. Moser, and A. Bachtold, Parametric amplification and self-oscillation in a nanotube mechanical resonator, Nano Lett. 11, 2699 (2011).
  55. A. Sarkar, R. Singh, A. A. Makki, J. A. Mondal, A. K. Rathi, R. J. Nicholl, S. Chakraborty, K. I. Bolotin, S. Ghosh et al., Observation of tunable discrete time crystalline phases, arXiv:2302.13318.
  56. C. Yang, Y. Zhang, H. Lu, C. Zhang, F. Chen, Y. Yan, F. Xue, A. Eichler, and J. Moser, Symmetry breaking of large-amplitude parametric oscillations in few-layer graphene nanomechanical resonators, arXiv:2502.18827.
  57. C. M. Wilson, T. Duty, M. Sandberg, F. Persson, V. Shumeiko, and P. Delsing, Photon generation in an electromagnetic cavity with a time-dependent boundary, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 233907 (2010).
  58. Z. Lin, K. Inomata, K. Koshino, W. D. Oliver, Y. Nakamura, J. S. Tsai, and T. Yamamoto, Josephson parametric phase-locked oscillator and its application to dispersive readout of superconducting qubits, Nat. Commun. 5, 4480 (2014).
  59. Z. Wang, M. Pechal, E. A. Wollack, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, M. Gao, N. R. Lee, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Quantum dynamics of a few-photon parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021049 (2019).
  60. T. Yamaji, S. Masuda, A. Yamaguchi, T. Satoh, A. Morioka, Y. Igarashi, M. Shirane, and T. Yamamoto, Correlated oscillations in Kerr parametric oscillators with tunable effective coupling, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 014057 (2023).
  61. N. E. Frattini, R. G. Cortiñas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, Q. Su, C. U. Lei, B. J. Chapman, V. R. Joshi, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. Puri, and M. H. Devoret, Observation of pairwise level degeneracies and the quantum regime of the Arrhenius law in a double-well parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031040 (2024).
  62. N. Bartolo, F. Minganti, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Exact steady state of a Kerr resonator with one-and two-photon driving and dissipation: Controllable Wigner-function multimodality and dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 94, 033841 (2016).
  63. C. K. Andersen, A. Kamal, N. A. Masluk, I. M. Pop, A. Blais, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum versus classical switching dynamics of driven dissipative Kerr resonators, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 044017 (2020).
  64. J. Košata, A. Leuch, T. Kästli, and O. Zilberberg, Fixing the rotating-wave approximation for strongly detuned quantum oscillators, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033177 (2022).
  65. A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, High-frequency approximation for periodically driven quantum systems from a Floquet-space perspective, New J. Phys. 17, 093039 (2015).
  66. J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, R. G. Cortiñas, A. Eickbusch, and M. H. Devoret, Static effective Hamiltonian of a rapidly driven nonlinear system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 100601 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation