- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Analytically tractable zoo of similarity-induced exceptional structures

Anton Montag1,2,*, Jordan Isaacs1,3, Marcus Stålhammar4,5,†, and Flore K. Kunst1,2,‡

  • *Contact author: anton.montag@mpl.mpg.de
  • †Contact author: marcus.backlund@physics.uu.se
  • ‡Contact author: flore.kunst@mpl.mpg.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043199 – Published 21 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bzqh-2w3l

Abstract

Exceptional points (EPs) are non-Hermitian spectral degeneracies marking a simultaneous coalescence of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Despite the fact that multiband n-fold EPs (EPns) generically emerge as special points on manifolds of EPms, where m<n, EPns as well as their topological properties have hitherto been studied as isolated objects. In this work, we address this issue and carefully map out the emerging properties of multifold exceptional structures in three and four dimensions under the influence of one or multiple generalized similarities, revealing diverse combinations of EPms in direct connection to EPns. We find that simply counting the number of constraints defining the EPns is not sufficient in the presence of similarities; the constraints can also be satisfied by the EPm manifolds obeying certain spectral symmetries in the complex eigenvalue plane, reducing their dimension beyond what is expected from counting the number of constraints. Furthermore, the in- duced spectral symmetries not always allow for any EPm manifold to emerge in n-band systems, making the plethora of exceptional structures deviate further from naive expectations. We illustrate our findings in simple periodic toy models. By relying on similarity relations instead of the less general symmetries, we simultaneously cover several physically relevant scenarios, ranging from optics and topolectrical circuits to open quantum systems. This makes our predictions highly relevant and broadly applicable in modern research, as well as experimentally viable within various branches of physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  2. Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater. 18, 783 (2019).
  3. L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Topological photonics, Nat. Photonics 8, 821 (2014).
  4. T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019).
  5. S. Khandelwal, N. Brunner, and G. Haack, Signatures of liouvillian exceptional points in a quantum thermal machine, PRX Quantum 2, 040346 (2021).
  6. N. Hatano, Exceptional points of the Lindblad operator of a two-level system, Mol. Phys. 117, 2121 (2019).
  7. G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
  8. M. Kreibich, J. Main, H. Cartarius, and G. Wunner, Realizing PT-symmetric non-hermiticity with ultracold atoms and Hermitian multiwell potentials, Phys. Rev. A 90, 033630 (2014).
  9. A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Observation of non-Hermitian topology and its bulk–edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29561 (2020).
  10. J. Schindler, Z. Lin, J. M. Lee, H. Ramezani, F. M. Ellis, and T. Kottos, PT-symmetric electronics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 444029 (2012).
  11. X. Yang, J. Li, Y. Ding, M. Xu, X.-F. Zhu, and J. Zhu, Observation of transient parity-time symmetry in electronic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 065701 (2022).
  12. F. Yang, Q.-D. Jiang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Liouvillian skin effect in an exactly solvable model, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023160 (2022).
  13. F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018).
  14. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  15. E. Edvardsson, F. K. Kunst, and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-Hermitian extensions of higher-order topological phases and their biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence, Phys. Rev. B 99, 081302 (2019).
  16. J. T. Gohsrich, A. Banerjee, and F. K. Kunst, The non-Hermitian skin effect: A perspective, Europhys. Lett. 150, 60001 (2025).
  17. T. Kato, in Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators, edited by A. Cappelli and G. Mussardo (Springer, Berlin, 1966).
  18. W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 444016 (2012).
  19. I. Rotter, A non-Hermitian Hamilton operator and the physics of open quantum systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 153001 (2009).
  20. M. V. Berry, Physics of nonHermitian degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004).
  21. P. Delplace, T. Yoshida, and Y. Hatsugai, Symmetry-protected multifold exceptional points and their topological characterization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 186602 (2021).
  22. S. Sayyad and F. K. Kunst, Realizing exceptional points of any order in the presence of symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023130 (2022).
  23. J. Carlström and E. J. Bergholtz, Exceptional links and twisted Fermi ribbons in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042114 (2018).
  24. R. A. Molina and J. González, Surface and 3D quantum Hall effects from engineering of exceptional points in nodal-line semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 146601 (2018).
  25. K. Moors, A. A. Zyuzin, A. Y. Zyuzin, R. P. Tiwari, and T. L. Schmidt, Disorder-driven exceptional lines and Fermi ribbons in tilted nodal-line semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 99, 041116 (2019).
  26. J. Carlström, M. Stålhammar, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Knotted non-Hermitian metals, Phys. Rev. B 99, 161115 (2019).
  27. X. Zhang, G. Li, Y. Liu, T. Tai, R. Thomale, and C. H. Lee, Tidal surface states as fingerprints of non-Hermitian nodal knot metals, Commun. Phys. 4, 47 (2021).
  28. M. Stålhammar, L. Rødland, G. Arone, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Hyperbolic nodal band structures and knot invariants, SciPost Phys. 7, 019 (2019).
  29. K. Wang, L. Xiao, J. C. Budich, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Simulating exceptional non-Hermitian metals with single-photon interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 026404 (2021).
  30. J. C. Budich, J. Carlström, F. K. Kunst, and E. J. Bergholtz, Symmetry-protected nodal phases in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 041406(R) (2019).
  31. S. Sayyad, M. Stålhammar, L. Rødland, and F. K. Kunst, Symmetry-protected exceptional and nodal points in non-Hermitian systems, SciPost Phys. 15, 200 (2023).
  32. I. Mandal and E. J. Bergholtz, Symmetry and higher-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 186601 (2021).
  33. M. Stålhammar and E. J. Bergholtz, Classification of exceptional nodal topologies protected by PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 104, L201104 (2021).
  34. A. Montag and F. K. Kunst, Essential implications of similarities in non-Hermitian systems, J. Math. Phys. 65, 122101 (2024).
  35. A. Montag and F. K. Kunst, Symmetry-induced higher-order exceptional points in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023205 (2024).
  36. T. Yoshida, J. L. K. König, L. Rødland, E. J. Bergholtz, and M. Stålhammar, Winding topology of multifold exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012021 (2025).
  37. M. Stålhammar and L. Rødland, Abelian spectral topology of multifold exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033246 (2025).
  38. R. Okugawa and T. Yokoyama, Topological exceptional surfaces in non-Hermitian systems with parity-time and parity-particle-hole symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 99, 041202(R) (2019).
  39. K. Wang, L. Xiao, H. Lin, W. Yi, E. J. Bergholtz, and P. Xue, Experimental simulation of symmetry-protected higher-order exceptional points with single photons, Sci. Adv. 9, eadi0732 (2023).
  40. Y.-J. Liu, K. K. Pak, P. Ren, M. Guo, E. Zhao, C. He, and G.-B. Jo, Third-order exceptional point in non-Hermitian spin-orbit-coupled cold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 112, 023305 (2025).
  41. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/bzqh-2w3l for the proof of equivalence of parametric similarity and spectral symmetry (SM1), the analysis of acompanying Fermi structures (SM2), and the description of multiple similarity-induced EPs in four dimensions (SM3).
  42. K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019).
  43. R. Zhang, H. Qin, and J. Xiao, PT-symmetry entails pseudo-hermiticity regardless of diagonalizability, J. Math. Phys. 61, 012101 (2020).
  44. T. L. Curtright, D. B. Fairlie, and H. Alshal, A galileon primer, arXiv:1212.6972.
  45. L. Brand, The companion matrix and its properties, Am. Math. Mon. 71, 629 (1964).
  46. V. I. Arnold, On matrices depending on parameters, Russ. Math. Surv. 26, 29 (1971).
  47. M. Udagawa and E. J. Bergholtz, Field-selective anomaly and chiral mode reversal in type-II Weyl materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 086401 (2016).
  48. A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142 (1997).
  49. S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Topological insulators and superconductors: Tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys. 12, 065010 (2010).
  50. V. Mathai and G. C. Thiang, Differential topology of semimetals, Commun. Math. Phys. 355, 561 (2017).
  51. N. K. Gupta and A. M. Jayannavar, Non-Hermitian topoelectrical circuits: Expedient tools for topological state engineering with gain-loss modulation, arXiv:2108.11587.
  52. W. Tang, K. Ding, and G. Ma, Realization and topological properties of third-order exceptional lines embedded in exceptional surfaces, Nat. Commun. 14, 6660 (2023).
  53. Y. Wu, Y. Wang, X. Ye, W. Liu, Z. Niu, C.-K. Duan, Y. Wang, X. Rong, and J. Du, Third-order exceptional line in a nitrogen-vacancy spin system, Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 160 (2024).
  54. R. Schäfer, J. C. Budich, and D. J. Luitz, Symmetry protected exceptional points of interacting fermions, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033181 (2022).
  55. M. Jahangiri, G.-M. Parsanasab, and L. Hajshahvaladi, Observation of anti-PT-symmetry and higher-order exceptional point PT-symmetry in ternary systems for single-mode operation, Sci. Rep. 15, 4823 (2025).
  56. B. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Liu, M. Li, W. Wang, J. Ma, P. Yuan, D. Zhang, H. Zhu, H. Zhang, and L. Qian, Non-Hermitian optical parametric systems with anti-parity-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023012 (2025).
  57. A. Bergman, R. Duggan, K. Sharma, M. Tur, A. Zadok, and A. Alù, Observation of anti-parity-time-symmetry, phase transitions and exceptional points in an optical fibre, Nat. Commun. 12, 486 (2021).
  58. R. A. Vicencio, C. Cantillano, L. Morales-Inostroza, B. Real, C. Mejia-Cortés, S. Weimann, A. Szameit, and M. I. Molina, Observation of localized states in Lieb photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 245503 (2015).
  59. S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, D. Choudhury, N. Goldman, P. Öhberg, E. Andersson, and R. R. Thomson, Observation of a localized flat-band state in a photonic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 245504 (2015).
  60. Y.-X. Xiao, K. Ding, R.-Y. Zhang, Z. H. Hang, and C. T. Chan, Exceptional points make an astroid in non-Hermitian Lieb lattice: Evolution and topological protection, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245144 (2020).
  61. L. Hill, J. T. Gohsrich, A. Ghosh, J. Fauman, P. Del’Haye, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional, but separate: Precursors to spontaneous symmetry breaking, arXiv:2505.02691.
  62. A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008).
  63. A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 22 (2009).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043199– Published 21 November, 2025
  • Received 7 August 2025
  • Accepted 7 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Open access publication funded by Max Planck Society.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation