Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Decidabilities of local unitary equivalence for entanglement witnesses and states

Yi Shen1,* and Lin Chen2,†

  • 1School of Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
  • 2LMIB (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, and School of Mathematical Sciences, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

  • *Contact author: yishen@jiangnan.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: linchen@buaa.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033258 – Published 16 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bzfp-wxbt

Abstract

The problem of determining whether two states are equivalent by local unitary (LU) operations is important for quantum information processing. In this paper, we propose an alternative perspective to study this problem by comparing the decidabilities of LU equivalence (also known as LU decidabilities for short) between entanglement witnesses and states. We introduce a relation between sets of Hermitian operators in terms of the LU decidability. Then, we compare the LU decidability for the set of entanglement witnesses to the LU decidabilities for several sets of states. By comparison, we establish a hierarchy of these sets in terms of LU decidabilities. Moreover, we realize that the simultaneous LU (SLU) equivalence between tuples of mutually orthogonal projectors is crucial to LU equivalent operators. We reveal by examples that for two tuples of projectors, the partial SLU equivalence cannot ensure the overall SLU equivalence. Generally, we present a necessary and sufficient condition such that two tuples of states are SLU equivalent.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. B. Kraus, Local unitary equivalence and entanglement of multipartite pure states, Phys. Rev. A 82, 032121 (2010).
  2. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
  3. L. Chen and M. Hayashi, Multicopy and stochastic transformation of multipartite pure states, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022331 (2011).
  4. F. G. S. L. Brandão and G. Gour, Reversible framework for quantum resource theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 070503 (2015).
  5. I. Marvian, Restrictions on realizable unitary operations imposed by symmetry and locality, Nat. Phys. 18, 283 (2022).
  6. L. Piroli, G. Styliaris, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum circuits assisted by local operations and classical communication: Transformations and phases of matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 220503 (2021).
  7. M. Oszmaniec, R. Augusiak, C. Gogolin, J. Kołodyński, A. Acín, and M. Lewenstein, Random bosonic states for robust quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041044 (2016).
  8. A. Acín, A. Andrianov, L. Costa, E. Jane, J. I. Latorre, and R. Tarrach, Generalized Schmidt decomposition and classification of three-quantum-bit states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560 (2000).
  9. B. Kraus, Local unitary equivalence of multipartite pure states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 020504 (2010).
  10. B. Liu, J.-L. Li, X. Li, and C.-F. Qiao, Local unitary classification of arbitrary dimensional multipartite pure states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 050501 (2012).
  11. Y. Makhlin, Nonlocal properties of two-qubit gates and mixed states, and the optimization of quantum computations, Quantum Inf. Proc. 1, 243 (2002).
  12. T.-G. Zhang, M.-J. Zhao, M. Li, S.-M. Fei, and X. Li-Jost, Criterion of local unitary equivalence for multipartite states, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042304 (2013).
  13. M. Li, T. Zhang, S.-M. Fei, X. Li-Jost, and N. Jing, Local unitary equivalence of multiqubit mixed quantum states, Phys. Rev. A 89, 062325 (2014).
  14. A. M. Martins, Necessary and sufficient conditions for local unitary equivalence of multiqubit states, Phys. Rev. A 91, 042308 (2015).
  15. N. Jing, S.-M. Fei, M. Li, X. Li-Jost, and T. Zhang, Local unitary invariants of generic multiqubit states, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022306 (2015).
  16. B.-Z. Sun, S.-M. Fei, and Z.-X. Wang, On local unitary equivalence of two and three-qubit states, Sci. Rep. 7, 4869 (2017).
  17. Q. Zhou, Y.-Z. Zhen, X.-Y. Xu, S. Zhao, W.-L. Yang, S.-M. Fei, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, and K. Chen, Local unitary equivalence of arbitrary-dimensional multipartite quantum states, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022427 (2024).
  18. L. Zhang, B. Xie, and Y. Tao, Local unitarty equivalence and entanglement by Bargmann invariants, arXiv:2412.17237.
  19. L. Chen and L. Yu, Decomposition of bipartite and multipartite unitary gates into the product of controlled unitary gates, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032308 (2015).
  20. Y. Shen, L. Chen, and L. Yu, Classification of Schmidt-rank-two multipartite unitary gates by singular number, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55, 465302 (2022).
  21. D. Chruściński and G. Sarbicki, Entanglement witnesses: Construction, analysis and classification, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 483001 (2014).
  22. Y. Shen, L. Chen, and Z. Bian, Detection power of real entanglement witnesses under local unitary equivalence, Phys. Rev. A 112, 022415 (2025).
  23. L. Chen and L. Yu, Entangling and assisted entangling power of bipartite unitary operations, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022307 (2016).
  24. X. Qiu, Z. Song, and L. Chen, Multipartite entangling power by von Neumann entropy, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022407 (2025).
  25. Y. Liang, J. Yan, D. Si, and L. Chen, Inertia of partial transpose of positive semidefinite matrices, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57, 125203 (2024).
  26. L. Yu, R. B. Griffiths, and S. M. Cohen, Efficient implementation of bipartite nonlocal unitary gates using prior entanglement and classical communication, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062315 (2010).
  27. D. Amaro and M. Müller, Design and experimental performance of local entanglement witness operators, Phys. Rev. A 101, 012317 (2020).
  28. P. Horodecki, Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997).
  29. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, T. Mor, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and B. M. Terhal, Unextendible product bases and bound entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5385 (1999).
  30. C. Cheng and L. Chen, The construction of multiqubit unextendible product bases, arXiv:2402.11785 [quant-ph].
  31. G. B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed. (Wiley, USA, 1999).
  32. S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 555 (2007).
  33. G. Gour and R. W. Spekkens, The resource theory of quantum reference frames: Manipulations and monotones, New J. Phys. 10, 033023 (2008).
  34. G. Gour, I. Marvian, and R. W. Spekkens, Measuring the quality of a quantum reference frame: The relative entropy of frameness, Phys. Rev. A 80, 012307 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation