Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Scaling of von Neumann entropy in dissipative Liouvillian dynamics

Wei-Zhu Yi1,2, Hao-Jie Lin1, Ze-Xun Lin3,4,5, Rui Wang2,6,7,*, and Wei-Qiang Chen1,8,†

  • *Contact author: rwang89@nju.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: chenwq@sustech.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L022032 – Published 7 May, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L022032

Abstract

The universal dynamical phenomenon of von Neumann entropy plays an important role in understanding the nature of open many-body systems, as it uncovers general collective properties driven by correlation and quantum dynamics. Here, we reveal a universal time evolution behavior of bipartite von Neumann entropy in open quantum systems with dissipation into the surrounding environments. The coupling with the environment leads to a rapid growth of the entropy, resulting in an exotic short-time evolution law, S(t)∼−tlnt. Such a fast growth behavior is proved to be a general phenomenon for generic many-body systems in dissipative environments, as long as the systems exhibit well-defined fermionic quasiparticles. Interestingly, even for strongly interacting Luttinger liquids, which display vanishing fermionic but emergent bosonic quasiparticles, the same dynamical phenomenon is still found to persist. These results demonstrate a universal Liouvillian dynamical feature that has no counterpart in isolated Hamiltonian systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (61)

  1. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010).
  2. J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  3. M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  4. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008).
  5. J. M. Deutsch, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 082001 (2018).
  6. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, V. Yurovsky, and M. Olshanii, Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1D lattice hard-core bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050405 (2007).
  7. A. Dymarsky and K. Pavlenko, Generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in 2D conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 111602 (2019).
  8. D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  9. M. Serbyn, Z. Papić, and D. A. Abanin, Universal slow growth of entanglement in interacting strongly disordered systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 260601 (2013).
  10. J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Unbounded growth of entanglement in models of many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 017202 (2012).
  11. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002(R) (2016).
  12. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  13. M. Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Phys. Rep. 831, 1 (2019).
  14. P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Engineered dissipation for quantum information science, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 660 (2022).
  15. G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
  16. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976).
  17. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 504005 (2009).
  18. B. Swingle and T. Senthil, Universal crossovers between entanglement entropy and thermal entropy, Phys. Rev. B 87, 045123 (2013).
  19. Y.-W. Dai, Q.-Q. Shi, S. Y. Cho, M. T. Batchelor, and H.-Q. Zhou, Finite-temperature fidelity and von Neumann entropy in the honeycomb spin lattice with quantum Ising interaction, Phys. Rev. B 95, 214409 (2017).
  20. M. Pustilnik, M. Khodas, A. Kamenev, and L. I. Glazman, Dynamic response of one-dimensional interacting fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 196405 (2006).
  21. A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023).
  22. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  23. Y. Sun, T. Shi, Z. Liu, Z. Zhang, L. Xiao, S. Jia, and Y. Hu, Fractional quantum Zeno effect emerging from non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031009 (2023).
  24. S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Chern bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136802 (2018).
  25. Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Non-Hermitian bulk-boundary correspondence and auxiliary generalized Brillouin zone theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 226402 (2020).
  26. C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 201103 (2019).
  27. C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Hybrid higher-order skin-topological modes in nonreciprocal systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016805 (2019).
  28. K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence between winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020).
  29. T. Hyart and J. L. Lado, Non-Hermitian many-body topological excitations in interacting quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L012006 (2022).
  30. W.-Q. Chen, Y.-S. Wu, W. Xi, W.-Z. Yi, and G. Yue, Fate of Quantum Anomalies for 1d lattice chiral fermion with a simple non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 090.
  31. W. Xi, Z.-H. Zhang, Z.-C. Gu, and W.-Q. Chen, Classification of topological phases in one dimensional interacting non-Hermitian systems and emergent unitarity, Sci. Bull. 66, 1731 (2021).
  32. K. Li and Y. Xu, Non-Hermitian absorption spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 093001 (2022).
  33. L.-M. Chen, Y. Zhou, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, Quantum entanglement of non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B 105, L121115 (2022).
  34. T. Prosen, Third quantization: A general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New J. Phys. 10, 043026 (2008).
  35. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L022032 for technical details including (Sec. SI) the minimal solvable model, (Sec. SII) the damping matrix, (Sec. SIII) time-dependent entanglement entropy from correlation matrix, (Sec. SIV) a general proof of the superballistic entanglement dynamics, (Sec. SV) calculations of entropy, (Sec. SVI) entanglement dynamics of dissipative Luttinger liquids, and (Sec. SVII) a summary of results.
  36. If loss and gain coexist, the t-leading term in SA(t) would be different.
  37. As shown in Eq. (52) of the Supplemental Material [35], the specific expression of SA in the long-time regime is SA(t)=f(t)exp(−Λt), where f(t)=a0+a1t+O(t2). Because of a0≫a1, SA(t)∼e−Λt usually dominates in the timescale where SA(t) has observable finite values, although it asymptotically approaches zero obeying ∼a1te−Λt and the higher-order terms.
  38. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020).
  39. Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Higashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018).
  40. K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019).
  41. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  42. I. Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 36, L205 (2003).
  43. I. Peschel and V. Eisler, Reduced density matrices and entanglement entropy in free lattice models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 504003 (2009).
  44. Note that Eq. (6) is not exact because the vacuum state has to be considered for the complete expansion of ρ(t). However, Eq. (6) generates the accurate entanglement entropy S(t) because the vacuum state does not contribute to S(t).
  45. F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian topological invariants in real space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 246801 (2019).
  46. Y. Ashida and M. Ueda, Full-counting many-particle dynamics: Nonlocal and chiral propagation of correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 185301 (2018).
  47. B. Dóra and C. P. Moca, Quantum quench in PT-symmetric Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 136802 (2020).
  48. N. Matsumoto, K. Kawabata, Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Continuous phase transition without gap closing in non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260601 (2020).
  49. A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017).
  50. S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and F. Verstraete, Lieb-Robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050401 (2006).
  51. J. Eisert and T. J. Osborne, General entanglement scaling laws from time evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 150404 (2006).
  52. L. Bonnes, F. H. L. Essler, and A. M. Läuchli, “Light-cone” dynamics after quantum quenches in spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 187203 (2014).
  53. A. Hamma, F. Markopoulou, I. Prémont-Schwarz, and S. Severini, Lieb-Robinson bounds and the speed of light from topological order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017204 (2009).
  54. O. Hart, S. Gopalakrishnan, and C. Castelnovo, Logarithmic entanglement growth from disorder-free localization in the two-leg compass ladder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 227202 (2021).
  55. B.-Q. Jin and V. E. Korepin, Quantum spin chain, Toeplitz determinants and the Fisher–Hartwig conjecture, J. Stat. Phys. 116, 79 (2004).
  56. M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, M. B. Hastings, and J. I. Cirac, Area laws in quantum systems: Mutual information and correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 070502 (2008).
  57. G. De Chiara and A. Sanpera, Genuine quantum correlations in quantum many-body systems: A review of recent progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 074002 (2018).
  58. B. Dóra, R. Lundgren, M. Selover, and F. Pollmann, Momentum-space entanglement and Loschmidt echo in Luttinger liquids after a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 010603 (2016).
  59. Á. Bácsi, C. P. Moca, G. Zaránd, and B. Dóra, Vaporization dynamics of a dissipative quantum liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 266803 (2020).
  60. D. Poulin, Lieb-Robinson bound and locality for general Markovian quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 190401 (2010).
  61. A. Kamenev and A. Andreev, Electron-electron interactions in disordered metals: Keldysh formalism, Phys. Rev. B 60, 2218 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation