Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Toward resolving the discrepancy in helium-3 and helium-4 nuclear charge radii

Xiao-Qiu Qi1,2, Pei-Pei Zhang2, Zong-Chao Yan3,2, Li-Yan Tang2, Ai-Xi Chen1, Ting-Yun Shi2,*, and Zhen-Xiang Zhong4,2,†

  • *Contact author: tyshi@wipm.ac.cn
  • †Contact author: zxzhong@hainanu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L022020 – Published 21 April, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L022020

Abstract

The discrepancy in the squared nuclear charge radius difference, ΔR2, between He3 and He4, as determined from electronic and muonic atom energy levels, presents an unresolved puzzle. This paper shows that accounting for off-diagonal hyperfine mixing effects can substantially reduce this discrepancy. We find that hyperfine mixing with the n3S and n1S states (n>2) in He3 introduces a correction of −1.37 kHz to the isotope shift of the 21S−23S transition, a factor of seven times larger than the current uncertainty. This correction modifies ΔR2 by −0.0064fm2, shifting it from 1.0757(15)fm2 to 1.0693(15)fm2, as initially reported by Werf et al. [arXiv:2306.02333]. This brings ΔR2 closer to the value of 1.0636(31)fm2 obtained from muonic helium μHe+ by Schuhmann et al. [arXiv:2305.11679], narrowing the existing discrepancy from 3.6σ to 1.7σ. The adjusted value ΔR2 also agrees well with the result of 1.069(3) fm2 derived from the helium 23S−23P transitions, as analyzed by Patkóš et al. [Phys. Rev. A 94, 052508 (2016)]. Our results provide key insights for resolving the discrepancy in ΔR2.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (49)

  1. H. Gao and M. Vanderhaeghen, The proton charge radius, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015002 (2022).
  2. S. Scheidegger and F. Merkt, Precision-spectroscopic determination of the binding energy of a two-body quantum system: The hydrogen atom and the proton-size puzzle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 113001 (2024).
  3. A. D. Brandt, S. F. Cooper, C. Rasor, Z. Burkley, A. Matveev, and D. C. Yost, Measurement of the 2S1/2−8D5/2 transition in hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 023001 (2022).
  4. R. Pohl, F. Nez, L. M. P. Fernandes, F. D. Amaro, F. Biraben, J. M. R. Cardoso, D. S. Covita, A. Dax, S. Dhawan, M. Diepold, A. Giesen, A. L. Gouvea, T. Graf, T. W. Hänsch, P. Indelicato, L. Julien, P. Knowles, F. Kottmann, E.-O. L. Bigot, Y.-W. Liu et al., Laser spectroscopy of muonic deuterium, Science 353, 669 (2016).
  5. Y. van der Werf, K. Steinebach, R. Jannin, H. Bethlem, and K. Eikema, The alpha and helion particle charge radius difference from spectroscopy of quantum-degenerate helium, arXiv:2306.02333.
  6. R. J. Rengelink, Y. van der Werf, R. P. M. J. W. Notermans, R. Jannin, K. S. E. Eikema, M. D. Hoogerl, and W. Vassen, Precision spectroscopy of helium in a magic wavelength optical dipole trap, Nat. Phys. 14, 1132 (2018).
  7. K. Schuhmann, L. M. P. Fernandes, F. Nez, M. A. Ahmed, F. D. Amaro, P. Amaro, F. Biraben, T.-L. Chen, D. S. Covita, A. J. Dax, M. Diepold, B. Franke, S. Galtier, A. L. Gouvea, J. Götzfried, T. Graf, T. W. HÄnsch, M. Hildebrandt, P. Indelicato, L. Julien et al., The helion charge radius from laser spectroscopy of muonic helium-3 ions, arXiv:2305.11679.
  8. J. J. Krauth, K. Schuhmann, M. A. Ahmed, F. D. Amaro, P. Amaro, F. Biraben, T.-L. Chen, D. S. Covita, A. J. Dax, M. Diepold, L. M. P. Fernandes, B. Franke, S. Galtier, A. L. Gouvea, J. Götzfried, T. Graf, T. W. Hänsch, J. Hartmann, M. Hildebrandt, P. Indelicato et al., Measuring the α-particle charge radius with muonic helium-4 ions, Nature (London) 589, 527 (2021).
  9. S. S. Li Muli, T. R. Richardson, and S. Bacca, Revisiting the helium isotope-shift puzzle with improved uncertainties from nuclear structure corrections, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 032502 (2025).
  10. P. C. Pastor, G. Giusfredi, P. D. Natale, G. Hagel, C. de Mauro, and M. Inguscio, Absolute frequency measurements of the 23S1→23P0,1,2 atomic helium transitions around 1083 nm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 023001 (2004).
  11. P. C. Pastor, L. Consolino, G. Giusfredi, P. De Natale, M. Inguscio, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Frequency metrology of helium around 1083 nm and determination of the nuclear charge radius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 143001 (2012).
  12. X.-Q. Qi, P.-P. Zhang, Z.-C. Yan, G. W. F. Drake, Z.-X. Zhong, T.-Y. Shi, S.-L. Chen, Y. Huang, H. Guan, and K.-L. Gao, Precision calculation of hyperfine structure and the Zemach radii of Li6,7+ ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 183002 (2020).
  13. H. Guan, S. Chen, X.-Q. Qi, S. Liang, W. Sun, P. Zhou, Y. Huang, P.-P. Zhang, Z.-X. Zhong, Z.-C. Yan, G. W. F. Drake, T.-Y. Shi, and K. Gao, Probing atomic and nuclear properties with precision spectroscopy of fine and hyperfine structures in the 7Li+ ion, Phys. Rev. A 102, 030801(R) (2020).
  14. X.-Q. Qi, P.-P. Zhang, Z.-C. Yan, T.-Y. Shi, G. W. F. Drake, A.-X. Chen, and Z.-X. Zhong, Theoretical hyperfine splittings of 7,9Be2+ ions for future studies of nuclear properties, Phys. Rev. A 107, L010802 (2023).
  15. W. Sun, P.-P. Zhang, P.-P. Zhou, S.-L. Chen, Z.-Q. Zhou, Y. Huang, X.-Q. Qi, Z.-C. Yan, T.-Y. Shi, G. W. F. Drake, Z.-X. Zhong, H. Guan, and K.-L. Gao, Measurement of hyperfine structure and the Zemach radius in Li6+ using optical Ramsey technique, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 103002 (2023).
  16. Z.-T. Lu, P. Mueller, G. W. F. Drake, W. Nörtershäuser, S. C. Pieper, and Z.-C. Yan, Colloquium: Laser probing of neutron-rich nuclei in light atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1383 (2013).
  17. R. van Rooij, J. S. Borbely, J. Simonet, M. D. Hoogerland, K. S. E. Eikema, R. A. Rozendaal, and W. Vassen, Frequency metrology in quantum degenerate helium: Direct measurement of the 23S1→21S0 transition, Science 333, 196 (2011).
  18. G. Clausen, P. Jansen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Ionization energy of the metastable 21S0 state of He4 from Rydberg-series extrapolation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 093001 (2021).
  19. G. Clausen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Imaging-assisted single-photon doppler-free laser spectroscopy and the ionization energy of metastable triplet helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 103001 (2023).
  20. Z.-C. Yan and G. W. F. Drake, High precision calculation of fine structure splittings in helium and He-like ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4791 (1995).
  21. K. Pachucki, α4R corrections to singlet states of helium, Phys. Rev. A 74, 022512 (2006).
  22. K. Pachucki, Helium energy levels including mα6 corrections, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062510 (2006).
  23. V. A. Yerokhin and K. Pachucki, Theoretical energies of low-lying states of light helium-like ions, Phys. Rev. A 81, 022507 (2010).
  24. V. Patkóš, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Complete quantum electrodynamic α6m correction to energy levels of light atoms, Phys. Rev. A 100, 042510 (2019).
  25. V. Patkóš, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Complete α7m Lamb shift of helium triplet states, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042809 (2021).
  26. V. Patkóš, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Radiative α7m QED contribution to the helium Lamb shift, Phys. Rev. A 103, 012803 (2021).
  27. V. Patkóš, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Higher-order QED corrections to the hyperfine splitting in He3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 183001 (2023).
  28. A. T. Bondy, G. W. F. Drake, C. McLeod, E. M. R. Petrimoulx, X.-Q. Qi, and Z.-X. Zhong, Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: Comparison with experiment for the 1s24p1p1 state (n=24), Phys. Rev. A 111, L010803 (2025).
  29. K. Pachucki and V. A. Yerokhin, Theory of the helium isotope shift, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 44, 031206 (2015).
  30. V. Patkóš, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Higher-order recoil corrections for triplet states of the helium atom, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052508 (2016).
  31. V. Patkóš, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Higher-order recoil corrections for singlet states of the helium atom, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012508 (2017).
  32. D. Shiner, R. Dixson, and V. Vedantham, Three-nucleon charge radius: A precise laser determination using He3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3553 (1995).
  33. X. Zheng, Y. R. Sun, J.-J. Chen, W. Jiang, K. Pachucki, and S.-M. Hu, Measurement of the frequency of the 2S3−2P3 transition of He4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 263002 (2017).
  34. Y.-J. Huang, Y.-C. Guan, J.-L. Peng, J.-T. Shy, and L.-B. Wang, Precision laser spectroscopy of the 21S0−31D2 two-photon transition in He3, Phys. Rev. A 101, 062507 (2020).
  35. C. R. Ottermann, G. Köbschall, K. Maurer, K. Röhrich, C. Schmitt, and V. Walther, Elastic electron scattering from He3 and He4, Nucl. Phys. A 436, 688 (1985).
  36. I. Sick, Precise root-mean-square radius of He4, Phys. Rev. C 77, 041302(R) (2008).
  37. I. Sick, Zemach moments of He3 and He4, Phys. Rev. C 90, 064002 (2014).
  38. X.-Q. Qi, P.-P. Zhang, Z.-C. Yan, L.-Y. Tang, A.-X. Chen, T.-Y. Shi, and Z.-X. Zhong, Revised 3 He nuclear charge radius due to electronic hyperfine mixing, arXiv:2409.09279.
  39. K. Pachucki, V. Patkóš, and V. A. Yerokhin, Second-order hyperfine correction to H, D, and He3 energy levels, Phys. Rev. A 110, 062806 (2024).
  40. G. Clausen, K. Gamlin, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology in a two-electron atom: The ionization energy of metastable triplet helium 23S1, Phys. Rev. A 111, 012817 (2025).
  41. R. M. Potvliege, Spectroscopy of light atoms and bounds on physics beyond the standard model, arXiv:2412.16315.
  42. K. Pachucki, V. Patkóš, and V. A. Yerokhin, Recoil nuclear size corrections in hydrogenic systems, arXiv:2502.09455.
  43. A. Wienczek, K. Pachucki, M. Puchalski, V. Patkóš, and V. A. Yerokhin, Quantum-electrodynamic corrections to the 1s3d states of the helium atom, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052505 (2019).
  44. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L022020 for details of formulas and numerical results.
  45. K. Pachucki, V. A. Yerokhin, and P. Cancio Pastor, Quantum electrodynamic calculation of the hyperfine structure of He3, Phys. Rev. A 85, 042517 (2012).
  46. D. C. Morton, Q. X. Wu, and G. W. F. Drake, Energy levels for the stable isotopes of atomic helium (He4 I and He3 I), Can. J. Phys. 84, 83 (2006).
  47. E. Tiesinga, P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor, Codata recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021).
  48. J.-L. Wen, J.-D. Tang, Y.-N. Lv, Y. R. Sun, C.-L. Zou, J.-F. Dong, and S.-M. Hu, Postselection shifts the transition frequency of helium in an atomic beam, Sci. Adv. 11, eadu9796 (2025).
  49. K. Pachucki, V. Lensky, F. Hagelstein, S. S. Li Muli, S. Bacca, and R. Pohl, Comprehensive theory of the Lamb shift in light muonic atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 015001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation