Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Single atomic layer quantum holography

P. N. Thomas Lloyd1,* and Rivka Bekenstein2,†

  • *Contact author: ptlloyd@berkeley.edu
  • †Contact author: rivka.bekenstein@mail.huji.ac.il

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L022014 – Published 11 April, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L022014

Abstract

Quantum metasurfaces composed of subwavelength two-dimensional atomic arrays hold great promise as a practical and scalable atom-photon interface. However, these quantum metasurfaces are limited to amplitude control of photonic states thereby restricting the quantum information processing task they can implement. In this work, we present a method that enables precise control over the phase distribution of quantum photonic states. We achieve this by developing a quantum holography technique, which involves preparing a superposition of holograms and leveraging both electromagnetically induced transparency and long-range Rydberg interactions. Our method enables encoding of arbitrary recoverable images that are entangled with the atomic array degrees of freedom rapidly on the order of microseconds. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to include many-body atom-photon entangled states by establishing a quantitative mapping between the atomic and photonic states. Finally, we discuss the experimental realization of our approach, potential error mechanisms, and practical quantum optics applications.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (59)

  1. A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015).
  2. C. Schön, E. Solano, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, and M. M. Wolf, Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 110503 (2005).
  3. D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000).
  4. D. Porras and J. I. Cirac, Collective generation of quantum states of light by entangled atoms, Phys. Rev. A 78, 053816 (2008).
  5. H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de Léséleuc, T. Macrì, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum ising models, Nature (London) 534, 667 (2016).
  6. A. M. Shaltout, V. M. Shalaev, and M. L. Brongersma, Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces, Science 364, eaat3100 (2019).
  7. T. M. Graham, M. Kwon, B. Grinkemeyer, Z. Marra, X. Jiang, M. T. Lichtman, Y. Sun, M. Ebert, and M. Saffman, Rydberg-mediated entanglement in a two-dimensional neutral atom qubit array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 230501 (2019).
  8. N. Engheta, Metamaterials with high degrees of freedom: space, time, and more, Nanophotonics 10, 639 (2021).
  9. A. H. Dorrah and F. Capasso, Tunable structured light with flat optics, Science 376, eabi6860 (2022).
  10. R. Bekenstein, I. Pikovski, H. Pichler, E. Shahmoon, S. F. Yelin, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum metasurfaces with atom arrays, Nat. Phys. 16, 676 (2020).
  11. J. Vaneecloo, S. Garcia, and A. Ourjoumtsev, Intracavity Rydberg superatom for optical quantum engineering: Coherent control, single-shot detection, and optical π phase shift, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021034 (2022).
  12. I. V. Ryzhov, R. F. Malikov, and V. A. Malyshev, High reflectance and optical dynamics of a metasurface comprizing quantum Λ-emitters, arXiv:2009.11664.
  13. M. Moreno-Cardoner, D. Goncalves, and D. E. Chang, Quantum nonlinear optics based on two-dimensional Rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 263602 (2021).
  14. C. C. Rusconi, T. Shi, and J. I. Cirac, Exploiting the photonic nonlinearity of free-space subwavelength arrays of atoms, Phys. Rev. A 104, 033718 (2021).
  15. J. Rui, D. Wei, A. Rubio-Abadal, S. Hollerith, J. Zeiher, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, A subradiant optical mirror formed by a single structured atomic layer, Nature (London) 583, 369 (2020).
  16. D. Castells-Graells, D. Malz, C. C. Rusconi, and J. I. Cirac, Atomic waveguide qed with atomic dimers, Phys. Rev. A 104, 063707 (2021).
  17. K. Srakaew, P. Weckesser, S. Hollerith, D. Wei, D. Adler, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, A subwavelength atomic array switched by a single Rydberg atom, Nat. Phys. 19, 714 (2023).
  18. J. Argüello-Luengo, A. González-Tudela, and D. González-Cuadra, Tuning long-range fermion-mediated interactions in cold-atom quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 083401 (2022).
  19. R. Bekenstein and S. F. Yelin, A switchable atomic mirror, Nat. Phys. 19, 619 (2023).
  20. D. Gabor, A new microscopic principle, Nature (London) 161, 777 (1948).
  21. D. Gabor and W. L. Bragg, Microscopy by reconstructed wave-fronts, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 197, 454 (1949).
  22. D. Brady and D. Psaltis, Information capacity of 3-D holographic data storage, Opt. Quantum Electron. 25, S597 (1993).
  23. A. K. Yetisen, Y. Montelongo, and H. Butt, Rewritable three-dimensional holographic data storage via optical forces, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 061106 (2016).
  24. H. Dammann and E. Klotz, Coherent optical generation and inspection of two-dimensional periodic structures, Opt. Acta: Int. J. Opt. 24, 505 (1977).
  25. B. R. Brown and A. W. Lohmann, Complex spatial filtering with binary masks, Appl. Opt. 5, 967 (1966).
  26. H. Dammann and K. Görtler, High-efficiency in-line multiple imaging by means of multiple phase holograms, Opt. Commun. 3, 312 (1971).
  27. J. J. Burch, A computer algorithm for the synthesis of spatial frequency filters, Proc. IEEE 55, 599 (1967).
  28. V. Arrizón, S. Kinne, and S. Sinzinger, Efficient detour-phase encoding of one-dimensional multilevel phase diffractive elements, Appl. Opt. 37, 5454 (1998).
  29. U. Levy, E. Marom, and D. Mendlovic, Modifications of detour phase computer-generated holograms, Appl. Opt. 37, 3044 (1998).
  30. J. Bucklew and N. C. Gallagher, Comprehensive error models and a comparative study of some detour-phase holograms, Appl. Opt. 18, 2861 (1979).
  31. J. Turunen, J. Fagerholm, A. Vasara, and M. R. Taghizadeh, Detour-phase kinoform interconnects: the concept and fabrication considerations, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1202 (1990).
  32. A. H. Dorrah, P. Bordoloi, V. S. de Angelis, J. O. de Sarro, L. A. Ambrosio, M. Zamboni-Rached, and F. Capasso, Light sheets for continuous-depth holography and three-dimensional volumetric displays, Nat. Photon. 17, 427 (2023).
  33. N. Yu and F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer metasurfaces, Nat. Mater. 13, 139 (2014).
  34. I. Liberal, A. M. Mahmoud, Y. Li, B. Edwards, and N. Engheta, Photonic doping of epsilon-near-zero media, Science 355, 1058 (2017).
  35. E. Shahmoon, D. S. Wild, M. D. Lukin, and S. F. Yelin, Cooperative resonances in light scattering from two-dimensional atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 113601 (2017).
  36. R. J. Bettles, S. A. Gardiner, and C. S. Adams, Cooperative eigenmodes and scattering in one-dimensional atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043844 (2016).
  37. A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031024 (2017).
  38. B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2019).
  39. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L022014 for a walk through of detailed calculations referenced in the text as well as further analysis and explanations of topics covered.
  40. C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, J. F. Sherson, M. Cheneau, P. Schauß, T. Fukuhara, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator, Nature (London) 471, 319 (2011).
  41. A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, A. S. Zibrov, H. Pichler, S. Choi, J. Cui, M. Rossignolo, P. Rembold, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Generation and manipulation of Schrodinger cat states in Rydberg atom arrays, Science 365, 570 (2019).
  42. R. Chrapkiewicz, M. Jachura, K. Banaszek, and W. Wasilewski, Hologram of a single photon, Nat. Photon. 10, 576 (2016).
  43. S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature (London) 595, 227 (2021).
  44. D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays, Nature (London) 604, 451 (2022).
  45. W. Xu, A. V. Venkatramani, S. H. Cantú, T. Sumarac, V. Klüsener, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletic, Fast preparation and detection of a Rydberg qubit using atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 050501 (2021).
  46. C. J. Picken, R. Legaie, K. McDonnell, and J. D. Pritchard, Entanglement of neutral-atom qubits with long ground-Rydberg coherence times, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 015011 (2018).
  47. H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170503 (2019).
  48. D. Niemietz, P. Farrera, S. Langenfeld, and G. Rempe, Nondestructive detection of photonic qubits, Nature (London) 591, 570 (2021).
  49. A. Reiserer, S. Ritter, and G. Rempe, Nondestructive detection of an optical photon, Science 342, 1349 (2013).
  50. M. J. Gibbons, C. D. Hamley, C.-Y. Shih, and M. S. Chapman, Nondestructive fluorescent state detection of single neutral atom qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 133002 (2011).
  51. S. Topfer, M. G. Basset, J. Fuenzalida, F. Steinlechner, J. P. Torres, and M. Gräfe, Quantum holography with undetected light, Sci. Adv. 8, eabl4301 (2022).
  52. A. F. Abouraddy, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, Quantum holography, Opt. Express 9, 498 (2001).
  53. D. N. Naik, R. K. Singh, T. Ezawa, Y. Miyamoto, and M. Takeda, Photon correlation holography, Opt. Express 19, 1408 (2011).
  54. H. Sun, Y. Song, A. Byun, H. Jeong, and J. Ahn, Imaging three-dimensional single-atom arrays all at once, Opt. Express 29, 4082 (2021).
  55. Y. Rivenson, Y. Zhang, H. Günaydın, D. Teng, and A. Ozcan, Phase recovery and holographic image reconstruction using deep learning in neural networks, Light science & applications 7, 17141 (2018).
  56. Y. Chew, T. Tomita, T. P. Mahesh, S. Sugawa, S. de Léséleuc, and K. Ohmori, Ultrafast energy exchange between two single Rydberg atoms on a nanosecond timescale, Nat. Photon. 16, 724 (2022).
  57. T. I. Andersen, R. J. Gelly, G. Scuri, B. L. Dwyer, D. S. Wild, R. Bekenstein, A. Sushko, J. Sung, Y. Zhou, A. A. Zibrov, X. Liu, A. Y. Joe, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. F. Yelin, P. Kim, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Spatial light modulation at the nanosecond scale with an atomically thin reflector, Nat. Commun. 13, 3431 (2022).
  58. E. Rozenberg, A. Karnieli, O. Yesharim, J. Foley-Comer, S. Trajtenberg-Mills, D. Freedman, A. M. Bronstein, and A. Arie, Inverse design of spontaneous parametric downconversion for generation of high-dimensional qudits, Optica 9, 602 (2022).
  59. M. Ringbauer, M. Meth, L. Postler, R. Stricker, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions, Nat. Phys. 18, 1053 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation