Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Strong-field magnetohydrodynamics for neutron stars

Shreya Vardhan1,*, Sašo Grozdanov2,3,†, Samuel Leutheusser4,‡, and Hong Liu5,§

  • 1Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • 2Higgs Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Scotland
  • 3Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Jadranska ulica 19, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 4Princeton Gravity Initiative, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 5Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • *Contact author: vardhan@stanford.edu
  • †Contact author: saso.grozdanov@ed.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: sl9535@princeton.edu
  • §Contact author: hong_liu@mit.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L042050 – Published 26 November, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042050

Abstract

We present a formulation of magnetohydrodynamics which can be used to describe the evolution of strong magnetic fields in neutron star interiors. Our approach is based on viewing magnetohydrodynamics as a theory with a one-form global symmetry and developing an effective field theory for the hydrodynamic modes associated with this symmetry. In the regime where the local velocity and temperature variations can be neglected, we derive the most general constitutive relation consistent with symmetry constraints for the electric field in the presence of a strong magnetic field. This constitutive relation not only reproduces the phenomena of Ohmic decay, ambipolar diffusion, and Hall drift derived in a phenomenological model by Goldreich and Reisenegger, but also reveals terms in the evolution of the magnetic field which cannot easily be seen from such microscopic models. This formulation gives predictions for diffusion behaviors of small perturbations around a constant background magnetic field, and for the two-point correlation functions among various components of the electric and magnetic fields.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (50)

  1. J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, The physics of neutron stars, Science 304, 536 (2004).
  2. V. M. Kaspi and A. Beloborodov, Magnetars, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 261 (2017).
  3. A. K. Harding and D. Lai, Physics of strongly magnetized neutron stars, Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 2631 (2006).
  4. We use μ,ν,⋯ to denote space-time indices and i,j,⋯ to denote spatial indices.
  5. This amounts to assuming that the neutron background is static. This assumption has been relaxed in recent works (see, e.g., Refs. [49, 50]), leading to faster evolution of the magnetic field, but it can still be used as a first approximation to illustrate the main physical effects.
  6. P. Goldreich and A. Reisenegger, Magnetic field decay in isolated neutron stars, Astrophys. J. 395, 250 (1992).
  7. K. N. Gourgouliatos and A. Cumming, Hall effect in neutron star crusts: Evolution, endpoint and dependence on initial conditions, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 438, 1618 (2014).
  8. F. Castillo, A. Reisenegger, and J. A. Valdivia, Magnetic field evolution and equilibrium configurations in neutron star cores: The effect of ambipolar diffusion, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 507 (2017).
  9. A. Bransgrove, Y. Levin, and A. Beloborodov, Magnetic field evolution of neutron stars - I. Basic formalism, numerical techniques and first results, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 2771 (2018).
  10. C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, Neutron star dynamos and the origins of pulsar magnetism, Astrophys. J. 408, 194 (1993).
  11. C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars - I. Radiative mechanism for outbursts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 275, 255 (1995).
  12. V. Urpin and D. Shalybkov, Magnetohydrodynamic processes in strongly magnetized young neutron stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 304, 451 (1999).
  13. A. Cumming, P. Arras, and E. G. Zweibel, Magnetic field evolution in neutron star crusts due to the Hall effect and Ohmic decay, Astrophys. J. 609, 999 (2004).
  14. J. Cho and A. Lazarian, The anisotropy of electron magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Astrophys. J. 615, L41 (2004).
  15. A. Reisenegger, J. Prieto, R. Benguria, D. Lai, and P. Araya, Magnetic fields in neutron stars: A theoretical perspective, AIP Conf. Proc. 784, 263 (2005).
  16. S. Mereghetti, J. Pons, and A. Melatos, Magnetars: Properties, origin and evolution, Space Sci. Rev. 191, 315 (2015).
  17. A. Passamonti, T. Akgün, J. A. Pons, and J. A. Miralles, The relevance of ambipolar diffusion for neutron star evolution, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 3416 (2017).
  18. J. A. Pons and D. Viganò, Magnetic, thermal and rotational evolution of isolated neutron stars, Living Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 5, 3 (2019).
  19. A. Brandenburg and E. G. Zweibel, The formation of sharp structures by ambipolar diffusion, Astrophys. J. 427, L91 (1994).
  20. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory, Phys. Rep. 417, 1 (2005).
  21. S. A. Balbus, Magnetohydrodynamics of protostellar disks, arXiv:0906.0854.
  22. K. Glampedakis, N. Andersson, and L. Samuelsson, Magnetohydrodynamics of superfluid and superconducting neutron star cores, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 805 (2011).
  23. V. A. Dommes and M. E. Gusakov, Dissipative superfluid relativistic magnetohydrodynamics of a multicomponent fluid: The combined effect of particle diffusion and vortices, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123008 (2021).
  24. S. Vardhan, S. Grozdanov, S. Leutheusser, and H. Liu, Effective field theories of dissipative fluids with one-form symmetries, arXiv:2408.12868.
  25. M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 095.
  26. P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, and H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): Classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 096.
  27. P. Glorioso and H. Liu, Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, arXiv:1805.09331.
  28. S. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi, Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 91, 105031 (2015).
  29. F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, Topological sigma models & dissipative hydrodynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 039.
  30. K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, and A. Yarom, Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 127.
  31. S. Grozdanov, D. M. Hofman, and N. Iqbal, Generalized global symmetries and dissipative magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 95, 096003 (2017).
  32. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 172.
  33. J. Hernandez and P. Kovtun, Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 001.
  34. S. Grozdanov and N. Poovuttikul, Generalised global symmetries in holography: Magnetohydrodynamic waves in a strongly interacting plasma, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 141.
  35. P. Glorioso and D. T. Son, Effective field theory of magnetohydrodynamics from generalized global symmetries, arXiv:1811.04879.
  36. J. Armas and A. Jain, One-form superfluids & magnetohydrodynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 041.
  37. S. E. Gralla and N. Iqbal, Effective field theory of force-free electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 99, 105004 (2019).
  38. B. Benenowski and N. Poovuttikul, Classification of magnetohydrodynamic transport at strong magnetic field, arXiv:1911.05554.
  39. M. J. Landry, Higher-form and (non-)Stückelberg symmetries in non-equilibrium systems, arXiv:2101.02210.
  40. J. Armas and F. Camilloni, A stable and causal model of magnetohydrodynamics, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 039.
  41. Note that ∂0Gij=H0ij+∂iG0j−∂jG0i.
  42. M. J. Landry and H. Liu, A systematic formulation of chiral anomalous magnetohydrodynamics, arXiv:2212.09757.
  43. M. J. Landry and H. Liu (unpublished).
  44. In this equation, H refers to the external magnetic field, which does not appear explicitly in our formalism, and in particular should not be confused with the higher form field Hijk.
  45. D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal, Generalized global symmetries and holography, SciPost Phys. 4, 005 (2018).
  46. D. Viganò, D. Martínez-Gómez, J. A. Pons, C. Palenzuela, F. Carrasco, B. Miñano, A. Arbona, C. Bona, and J. Massó, A Simflowny-based high-performance 3D code for the generalized induction equation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 237, 168 (2019).
  47. Note that we need an initial configuration which involves both kz and k⊥ to probe this difference.
  48. C. A. Burge, S. Van Loo, S. A. E. G. Falle, and T. W. Hartquist, Ambipolar diffusion regulated collapse of filaments threaded by perpendicular magnetic fields, Astron. Astrophys. 596, A28 (2016).
  49. D. D. Ofengeim and M. E. Gusakov, Fast magnetic field evolution in neutron stars: The key role of magnetically induced fluid motions in the core, Phys. Rev. D 98, 043007 (2018).
  50. F. Castillo, A. Reisenegger, and J. A. Valdivia, Two-fluid simulations of the magnetic field evolution in neutron star cores in the weak-coupling regime, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 498, 3000 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation