Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Floquet prethermal order by disorder

Hui-Ke Jin1,2 and Johannes Knolle1,2,3

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L042033 – Published 4 November, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042033

Abstract

Frustrated magnets can have accidental ground state degeneracies which may be lifted by various forms of disorder, for example in the form of thermal or quantum fluctuations. This order by disorder (ObD) paradigm is well established in equilibrium and here is generalized to Floquet many-body systems. Investigating a periodically driven XXZ-compass model on the square lattice, we show that in a prethermal regime, dynamical fluctuations induced by high-frequency drives select a discrete set of states out of a degenerate ground state manifold of the lowest order Floquet Hamiltonian chosen as initial states. Remarkably, prior to the ObD selection, an unusual fluctuating regime emerges leading to a prethermalization timescale scaling linearly with the drive frequency. We argue that prethermal ObD with its unusual approach to the selected states is a generic phenomenon of driven frustrated systems and confirm it in the paradigmatic J1−J2 XX model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (50)

  1. J. Vannimenus and G. Toulouse, Theory of the frustration effect. ii. ising spins on a square lattice, J. Phys. C 10, L537 (1977).
  2. G. Toulouse, Theory of the frustration effect in spin glasses: I, Communications on Physics 2, 115 (1977).
  3. H. T. Diep, Frustrated Spin Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).
  4. C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, Vol. 164 (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011).
  5. S. T. Bramwell and M. J. P. Gingras, Spin ice state in frustrated magnetic pyrochlore materials, Science 294, 1495 (2001).
  6. C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature (London) 451, 42 (2008).
  7. P. A. Lee, An end to the drought of quantum spin liquids, Science 321, 1306 (2008).
  8. L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010).
  9. Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025003 (2017).
  10. C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science 367, eaay0668 (2020).
  11. J. Knolle and R. Moessner, A field guide to spin liquids, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 451 (2019).
  12. L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2017).
  13. J. Villain, R. Bidaux, J.-P. Carton, and R. Conte, Order as an effect of disorder, J. Phys. France 41, 1263 (1980).
  14. C. L. Henley, Ordering by disorder: Ground-state selection in fcc vector antiferromagnets, J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3962 (1987).
  15. E. Shender and P. Holdsworth, Fluctuations and Order: The New Synthesis, edited by Mark Millonas (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1996), pp. 259–279.
  16. J. T. Chalker, Topological Aspects of Condensed Matter Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School, edited by C. Chamon, M. O. Goerbig, R. Moessner, and L F. Cugliandolo (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017), Vol. 103, pp. 123–164.
  17. S. Prakash and C. L. Henley, Ordering due to disorder in dipolar magnets on two-dimensional lattices, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6574 (1990).
  18. C. L. Henley, Ordering due to disorder in a frustrated vector antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2056 (1989).
  19. J. T. Chalker, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and E. F. Shender, Hidden order in a frustrated system: Properties of the heisenberg kagomé antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 855 (1992).
  20. R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Low-temperature properties of classical geometrically frustrated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 58, 12049 (1998).
  21. A. Chubukov, Order from disorder in a kagomé antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 832 (1992).
  22. Y. Wan and R. Moessner, Control of the effective free-energy landscape in a frustrated magnet by a field pulse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 167203 (2017).
  23. Y. Wan and R. Moessner, Nonequilibrium selection of magnetic order in a driven triangular xy antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 98, 184432 (2018).
  24. R. Hanai, Nonreciprocal frustration: Time crystalline order-by-disorder phenomenon and a spin-glass-like state, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011029 (2024).
  25. M. Bukov, L. D'Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to floquet engineering, Adv. Phys. 64, 139 (2015).
  26. A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 011004 (2017).
  27. T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 387 (2019).
  28. M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in floquet topological insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 229 (2020).
  29. J. Berges, S. Borsányi, and C. Wetterich, Prethermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 142002 (2004).
  30. M. Bukov, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Knap, and E. Demler, Prethermal floquet steady states and instabilities in the periodically driven, weakly interacting bose-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 205301 (2015).
  31. D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, and F. Huveneers, Exponentially slow heating in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 256803 (2015).
  32. E. Canovi, M. Kollar, and M. Eckstein, Stroboscopic prethermalization in weakly interacting periodically driven systems, Phys. Rev. E 93, 012130 (2016).
  33. T. Mori, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, Rigorous bound on energy absorption and generic relaxation in periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120401 (2016).
  34. S. A. Weidinger and M. Knap, Floquet prethermalization and regimes of heating in a periodically driven, interacting quantum system, Sci. Rep. 7, 45382 (2017).
  35. D. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. Huveneers, A rigorous theory of many-body prethermalization for periodically driven and closed quantum systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 354, 809 (2017).
  36. T. Mori, Floquet prethermalization in periodically driven classical spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 98, 104303 (2018).
  37. H.-K. Jin, A. Pizzi, and J. Knolle, Prethermal nematic order and staircase heating in a driven frustrated ising magnet with dipolar interactions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144312 (2022).
  38. M. Yue and Z. Cai, Space-time symmetry breaking in nonequilibrium frustrated magnetism, Phys. Rev. B 107, 094313 (2023).
  39. A. Pizzi, A. Nunnenkamp, and J. Knolle, Classical prethermal phases of matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140602 (2021).
  40. B. Ye, F. Machado, and N. Y. Yao, Floquet phases of matter via classical prethermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140603 (2021).
  41. A. Pizzi, A. Nunnenkamp, and J. Knolle, Classical approaches to prethermal discrete time crystals in one, two, and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094308 (2021).
  42. M. Yue and Z. Cai, Prethermal time-crystalline spin ice and monopole confinement in a driven magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 056502 (2023).
  43. Z. Fu, R. Moessner, H. Zhao, and M. Bukov, Engineering hierarchical symmetries, arXiv:2402.13519 [quant-ph].
  44. S. Khatua, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. G. Rau, Pseudo-goldstone modes and dynamical gap generation from order by thermal disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 266702 (2023).
  45. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042033 for the stroboscopic equation of motion, the dynamics for decorrelator d(t), the perturbated Landau-LifshitzGilbert equations, prethermal energy for various Jz, and the simulations on the J1−J2 model.
  46. O. Howell, P. Weinberg, D. Sels, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Bukov, Asymptotic prethermalization in periodically driven classical spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 010602 (2019).
  47. T. Bilitewski, S. Bhattacharjee, and R. Moessner, Temperature dependence of the butterfly effect in a classical many-body system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250602 (2018).
  48. T. Bilitewski, S. Bhattacharjee, and R. Moessner, Classical many-body chaos with and without quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. B 103, 174302 (2021).
  49. D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. Huveneers, Effective hamiltonians, prethermalization, and slow energy absorption in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014112 (2017).
  50. K. Mallayya, M. Rigol, and W. De Roeck, Prethermalization and thermalization in isolated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021027 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation