Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Stability of algebraic spin liquids coupled to quantum phonons

Francesco Ferrari1,*, Josef Willsher2,3,4,*,†, Urban F. P. Seifert5,6, Roser Valentí1, and Johannes Knolle2,3,7

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: willsher@pks.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L042053 – Published 5 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9wnn-w8bg

Abstract

Algebraic spin liquids are quantum disordered phases of insulating magnets that exhibit fractionalized gapless excitations and power-law correlations. Quantum spin liquids in this category include the experimentally established one-dimensional (1D) Luttinger liquid, as well as the U(1) Dirac spin liquid (DSL) that has been a focus of recent candidate materials searches. Most notably, several exchange-frustrated Heisenberg materials on the triangular lattice have shown evidence of the U(1) DSL. In this work, we measure the algebraic correlations of spin-singlet excitations in the J1−J2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, prompting a detailed investigation of this model’s stability under spin-lattice coupling with dynamical quantum phonons using variational Monte Carlo. As seen before in 1D spin chains, we observe a low-temperature transition from a U(1) DSL to valence bond order and predict the parameter regime where the model realizes a stable DSL ground state. To achieve this, we employ a series of finite-size scaling Ansätze inspired by the low-energy DSL’s conformal description in terms of quantum electrodynamics and show that emergent monopole operators drive the instability. We compare the physics of this transition to the 1D Luttinger liquid throughout our analysis. We derive the regime of stability against spin-Peierls ordering and argue that the DSL ground state might still be achievable in candidate materials, despite its tendency to valence bond solid ordering.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. J. Knolle and R. Moessner, A field guide to spin liquids, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 451 (2019).
  2. C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science 367, eaay0668 (2020).
  3. X.-G. Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 65, 165113 (2002).
  4. L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2017).
  5. M. Hermele, T. Senthil, M. P. A. Fisher, P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Stability of U(1) spin liquids in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 70, 214437 (2004).
  6. X.-Y. Song, C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, Unifying description of competing orders in two-dimensional quantum magnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4254 (2019).
  7. R. Kaneko, S. Morita, and M. Imada, Gapless spin-liquid phase in an extended spin 1/2 triangular heisenberg model, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 093707 (2014).
  8. Z. Zhu and S. R. White, Spin liquid phase of the S=12J1−J2 heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 92, 041105 (2015).
  9. W.-J. Hu, S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Competing spin-liquid states in the spin-12 heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 92, 140403 (2015).
  10. Y. Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the heisenberg J1−J2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144411 (2016).
  11. S. Hu, W. Zhu, S. Eggert, and Y.-C. He, Dirac spin liquid on the spin-1/2 triangular heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 207203 (2019).
  12. F. Ferrari and F. Becca, Dynamical structure factor of the J1−J2 heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: Magnons, spinons, and gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031026 (2019).
  13. N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, and J. E. Moore, Spectral function of the J1−J2 heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 107, 165146 (2023).
  14. M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in an s = 12 heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, L220401 (2023).
  15. A. Wietek, S. Capponi, and A. M. Läuchli, Quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions as the organizing principle of a triangular lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021010 (2024).
  16. S. Budaraju, A. Parola, Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Monopole excitations in the U(1) dirac spin liquid on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125150 (2025).
  17. W. Rantner and X.-G. Wen, Electron spectral function and algebraic spin liquid for the normal state of underdoped high Tc superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3871 (2001).
  18. M. Hermele, T. Senthil, and M. P. A. Fisher, Algebraic spin liquid as the mother of many competing orders, Phys. Rev. B 72, 104404 (2005).
  19. M. Hermele, Y. Ran, P. A. Lee, and X.-G. Wen, Properties of an algebraic spin liquid on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 77, 224413 (2008).
  20. J. McGreevy, Quantum electrodynamics in a piece of rock, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 583 (2019).
  21. A. Tanaka and X. Hu, Many-body spin berry phases emerging from the π-flux state: Competition between antiferromagnetism and the valence-bond-solid state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 036402 (2005).
  22. T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
  23. R. J. Bursill, R. H. McKenzie, and C. J. Hamer, Phase diagram of a heisenberg spin-peierls model with quantum phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 408 (1999).
  24. M. Mourigal, M. Enderle, A. Klöpperpieper, J.-S. Caux, A. Stunault, and H. M. Rønnow, Fractional spinon excitations in the quantum heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain, Nat. Phys. 9, 435 (2013).
  25. B. Lake, D. A. Tennant, J.-S. Caux, T. Barthel, U. Schollwöck, S. E. Nagler, and C. D. Frost, Multispinon continua at zero and finite temperature in a near-ideal heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 137205 (2013).
  26. S. Xu, R. Bag, N. E. Sherman, L. Yadav, A. I. Kolesnikov, A. A. Podlesnyak, J. E. Moore, and S. Haravifard, Evidence of Dirac Quantum Spin Liquid in YbZn2GaO5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 266703 (2024).
  27. T. Xie, A. A. Eberharter, J. Xing, S. Nishimoto, M. Brando, P. Khanenko, J. Sichelschmidt, A. A. Turrini, D. G. Mazzone, P. G. Naumov, L. D. Sanjeewa, N. Harrison, A. S. Sefat, B. Normand, A. M. Läuchli, A. Podlesnyak, and S. E. Nikitin, Complete field-induced spectral response of the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice antiferromagnet CsYbSe2, npj Quantum Mater. 8, 48 (2023).
  28. A. O. Scheie et al., Proximate spin liquid and fractionalization in the triangular antiferromagnet KYbSe2, Nat. Phys. 20, 74 (2024).
  29. A. O. Scheie, M. Lee, K. Wang, P. Laurell, E. S. Choi, D. Pajerowski, Q. Zhang, J. Ma, H. D. Zhou, S. Lee, S. M. Thomas, M. O. Ajeesh, P. F. S. Rosa, A. Chen, V. S. Zapf, M. Heyl, C. D. Batista, E. Dagotto, J. E. Moore, and D. A. Tennant, Spectrum and low-energy gap in triangular quantum spin liquid NaYbSe2, arXiv:2406.17773.
  30. Z.-X. Luo, U. F. P. Seifert, and L. Balents, Twisted bilayer U(1) dirac spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144437 (2022).
  31. U. F. P. Seifert, J. Willsher, M. Drescher, F. Pollmann, and J. Knolle, Spin-Peierls instability of the U(1) dirac spin liquid, Nat. Commun. 15, 7110 (2024).
  32. Y.-M. Lu, Symmetric Z2 spin liquids and their neighboring phases on triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 93, 165113 (2016).
  33. Y.-C. He, J. Rong, and N. Su, Conformal bootstrap bounds for the U(1) dirac spin liquid and N=7 stiefel liquid, SciPost Phys. 13, 014 (2022).
  34. S. Albayrak, R. S. Erramilli, Z. Li, D. Poland, and Y. Xin, Bootstrapping Nf=4 conformal QED3, Phys. Rev. D 105, 085008 (2022).
  35. N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, Numerical determination of monopole scaling dimension in parity-invariant three-dimensional noncompact QED, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054514 (2019).
  36. S. Huizinga, J. Kommandeur, G. A. Sawatzky, B. T. Thole, K. Kopinga, W. J. M. de Jonge, and J. Roos, Spin-peierls transition in n-methyl-n-ethyl-morpholinium-ditetracyanoquinodimethanide [mem-(TCNQ)2], Phys. Rev. B 19, 4723 (1979).
  37. J. W. Bray, H. R. Hart, L. V. Interrante, I. S. Jacobs, J. S. Kasper, G. D. Watkins, S. H. Wee, and J. C. Bonner, Observation of a spin-peierls transition in a heisenberg antiferromagnetic linear-chain system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 744 (1975).
  38. M. Hase, I. Terasaki, and K. Uchinokura, Observation of the spin-peierls transition in linear cu2+ (spin-1/2) chains in an inorganic compound cugeo3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3651 (1993).
  39. X.-Y. Song, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath, and C. Wang, From spinon band topology to the symmetry quantum numbers of monopoles in dirac spin liquids, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011033 (2020).
  40. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
  41. In this construction, the effective temperature T̃ is related to the true temperature T by a (geometry-dependent) O(1) constant factor in 2D. Note that in 1D the effective critical temperature is exactly the spin-Peierls temperature; see the Supplemental Material for details [47].
  42. J. Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
  43. This effect is described in previous works [54, 55]; see the Supplemental Material for a discussion [47].
  44. F. Ferrari, R. Valentí, and F. Becca, Variational wave functions for the spin-peierls transition in the su-schrieffer-heeger model with quantum phonons, Phys. Rev. B 102, 125149 (2020).
  45. F. Ferrari, R. Valentí, and F. Becca, Effects of spin-phonon coupling in frustrated heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035126 (2021).
  46. F. Ferrari, F. Becca, and R. Valentí, Spin-phonon interactions on the kagome lattice: Dirac spin liquid versus valence-bond solids, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165133 (2024).
  47. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/9wnn-w8bg for details of the VMC method and theoretical analysis, which includes Refs. [44, 45, 46, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63].
  48. T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined quantum critical points, Science 303, 1490 (2004).
  49. T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum criticality beyond the landau-ginzburg-wilson paradigm, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144407 (2004).
  50. A. W. Sandvik, Continuous quantum phase transition between an antiferromagnet and a valence-bond solid in two dimensions: Evidence for logarithmic corrections to scaling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 177201 (2010).
  51. D. Hofmeier, J. Willsher, U. F. P. Seifert, and J. Knolle, Spin-Peierls instability of deconfined quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125130 (2024).
  52. A. Götz, M. Hohenadler, and F. F. Assaad, Phases and exotic phase transitions of a two-dimensional su-schrieffer-heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195154 (2024).
  53. F. Ferrari, J. Willsher, U. F. P. Seifert, R. Valenti, and J. Knolle, Stability of algebraic spin liquids coupled to quantum phonons, Zenodo, 2024, http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14039384.
  54. T. Papenbrock, T. Barnes, D. J. Dean, M. V. Stoitsov, and M. R. Strayer, Density matrix renormalization group study of critical behavior of the spin-12 alternating heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. B 68, 024416 (2003).
  55. E. Orignac, Quantitative expression of the spin gap via bosonization for a dimerized spin-1/2 chain, Eur. Phys. J. B 39, 335 (2004).
  56. F. Becca and S. Sorella, Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017).
  57. F. Becca, L. Capriotti, A. Parola, and S. Sorella, Variational wave functions for frustrated magnetic models, in Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 379–406.
  58. F. Ferrari, A. Parola, S. Sorella, and F. Becca, Dynamical structure factor of the J1−J2 heisenberg model in one dimension: The variational monte carlo approach, Phys. Rev. B 97, 235103 (2018).
  59. S. Sorella, Wave function optimization in the variational monte carlo method, Phys. Rev. B 71, 241103 (2005).
  60. J. Willsher and J. Knolle, Dynamics and stability of U(1) spin liquids beyond mean-field theory: Triangular-lattice J1−J2 heisenberg model, arXiv:2503.13831 [cond-mat].
  61. M. C. Cross and D. S. Fisher, A new theory of the spin-peierls transition with special relevance to the experiments on ttfcubdt, Phys. Rev. B 19, 402 (1979).
  62. S. M. Chester and S. S. Pufu, Towards bootstrapping QED3, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 019.
  63. E. Orignac and R. Chitra, Mean-field theory of the spin-peierls transition, Phys. Rev. B 70, 214436 (2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation