Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tensor network approach to momentum-resolved spectroscopy in nonperiodic super-moiré systems

Anouar Moustaj*, Yitao Sun, Tiago V. C. Antão, and Jose L. Lado

  • *Contact author: anouar.moustaj@aalto.fi

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023282 – Published 11 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9btt-y8sh

Abstract

Computing spectral functions in large, nonperiodic super-moiré systems remains an open problem due to the exceptionally large system size that must be considered. Here, we establish a tensor network methodology that allows computing momentum-resolved spectral functions of noninteracting and interacting super-moiré systems at an atomistic level. Our methodology relies on encoding an exponentially large tight-binding problem as an auxiliary quantum many-body problem, solved with a many-body kernel polynomial tensor network algorithm combined with a quantum Fourier transform tensor network. We demonstrate the method for one- and two-dimensional super-moiré systems, including super-moiré with nonuniform strain, interactions treated at the mean-field level, and quasicrystalline super-moiré patterns. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our methodology allows us to compute momentum-resolved spectral functions restricted to selected regions of a super-moiré, enabling direct imaging of position-dependent electronic structure and minigaps in super-moiré systems with nonuniform strain. Our results establish a powerful methodology to compute momentum-resolved spectral functions in exceptionally large super-moiré systems, providing a tool to directly model quantum twisting microscope experiments in twisted van der Waals heterostructures.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (97)

  1. A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals heterostructures, Nature (London) 499, 419 (2013).
  2. E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moiré materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 201 (2021).
  3. S. J. Ahn, P. Moon, T.-H. Kim, H.-W. Kim, H.-C. Shin, E. H. Kim, H. W. Cha, S.-J. Kahng, P. Kim, M. Koshino, Y.-W. Son, C.-W. Yang, and J. R. Ahn, Dirac electrons in a dodecagonal graphene quasicrystal, Science 361, 782 (2018).
  4. Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, J. M. Park, N. F. Q. Yuan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. M. Fernandes, L. Fu, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nematicity and competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene, Science 372, 264 (2021).
  5. T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. Devakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Quantum anomalous Hall effect from intertwined moiré bands, Nature (London) 600, 641 (2021).
  6. A. Ramires and J. L. Lado, Emulating heavy fermions in twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 026401 (2021).
  7. W. Ruan, Y. Chen, S. Tang, J. Hwang, H.-Z. Tsai, R. L. Lee, M. Wu, H. Ryu, S. Kahn, F. Liou, C. Jia, A. Aikawa, C. Hwang, F. Wang, Y. Choi, S. G. Louie, P. A. Lee, Z.-X. Shen, S.-K. Mo, and M. F. Crommie, Evidence for quantum spin liquid behaviour in single-layer 1T−TaSe2 from scanning tunnelling microscopy, Nat. Phys. 17, 1154 (2021).
  8. S. Kezilebieke, V. Vaňo, M. N. Huda, M. Aapro, S. C. Ganguli, P. Liljeroth, and J. L. Lado, Moiré-enabled topological superconductivity, Nano Lett. 22, 328 (2022).
  9. A. Uri, S. C. de la Barrera, M. T. Randeria, D. Rodan-Legrain, T. Devakul, P. J. D. Crowley, N. Paul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Lifshitz, L. Fu, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Superconductivity and strong interactions in a tunable moiré quasicrystal, Nature (London) 620, 762 (2023).
  10. H. Park, J. Oh, R. Ghadimi, C. Mondal, Y. Jeong, W. B. Choi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B.-J. Yang, and J. Jang, Evidence for electron localisation in a moiré-of-moiré superlattice, arXiv:2511.22115.
  11. J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature (London) 590, 249 (2021).
  12. X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 574, 653 (2019).
  13. Y. Zhang, Z. Che, W. Liu, J. Wang, M. Zhao, F. Guan, X. Liu, L. Shi, and J. Zi, Unfolded band structures of photonic quasicrystals and moiré superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 105, 165304 (2022).
  14. M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059 (2019).
  15. D. R. Klein, L.-Q. Xia, D. MacNeill, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Electrical switching of a bistable moiré superconductor, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 331 (2023).
  16. Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Knüppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moiré MoTe2, Nature (London) 622, 69 (2023).
  17. J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2, Nature (London) 622, 63 (2023).
  18. M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020).
  19. Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature (London) 626, 759 (2024).
  20. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018).
  21. W. Zhao, B. Shen, Z. Tao, Z. Han, K. Kang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Gate-tunable heavy fermions in a moiré Kondo lattice, Nature (London) 616, 61 (2023).
  22. H. Kim, Y. Choi, e. Lantagne-Hurtubise, C. Lewandowski, A. Thomson, L. Kong, H. Zhou, E. Baum, Y. Zhang, L. Holleis, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. F. Young, J. Alicea, and S. Nadj-Perge, Imaging inter-valley coherent order in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature (London) 623, 942 (2023).
  23. V. Vaňo, M. Amini, S. C. Ganguli, G. Chen, J. L. Lado, S. Kezilebieke, and P. Liljeroth, Artificial heavy fermions in a van der Waals heterostructure, Nature (London) 599, 582 (2021).
  24. J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. Castro Neto, Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256802 (2007).
  25. P. San-Jose and E. Prada, Helical networks in twisted bilayer graphene under interlayer bias, Phys. Rev. B 88, 121408(R) (2013).
  26. F. Guinea and N. R. Walet, Continuum models for twisted bilayer graphene: Effect of lattice deformation and hopping parameters, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205134 (2019).
  27. R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12233 (2011).
  28. G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019).
  29. M. Koshino, N. F. Q. Yuan, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, K. Kuroki, and L. Fu, Maximally localized Wannier orbitals and the extended Hubbard model for twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031087 (2018).
  30. A. Ramires and J. L. Lado, Impurity-induced triple point fermions in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245118 (2019).
  31. A. Lopez-Bezanilla and J. L. Lado, Defect-induced magnetism and Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 084003 (2019).
  32. L. Baldo, T. Löthman, P. Holmvall, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Defect-induced band restructuring and length scales in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125141 (2023).
  33. M. S. Ramzan, Z. A. H. Goodwin, A. A. Mostofi, A. Kuc, and J. Lischner, Effect of Coulomb impurities on the electronic structure of magic angle twisted bilayer graphene, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 7, 49 (2023).
  34. A. L. R. Manesco and J. L. Lado, Correlation-induced valley topology in buckled graphene superlattices, 2D Mater. 8, 035057 (2021).
  35. V. T. Phong and E. J. Mele, Boundary modes from periodic magnetic and pseudomagnetic fields in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 176406 (2022).
  36. G. Chen, L. Jiang, S. Wu, B. Lyu, H. Li, B. L. Chittari, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, J. Jung, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Evidence of a gate-tunable Mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice, Nat. Phys. 15, 237 (2019).
  37. Z. Zhu, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Modeling mechanical relaxation in incommensurate trilayer van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 101, 224107 (2020).
  38. A. Inbar, J. Birkbeck, J. Xiao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, B. Yan, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, E. Berg, and S. Ilani, The quantum twisting microscope, Nature (London) 614, 682 (2023).
  39. J. Xiao, Y. Vituri, and E. Berg, Probing the order parameter symmetry of two-dimensional superconductors by twisted Josephson interferometry, Phys. Rev. B 108, 094520 (2023).
  40. V. Peri, S. Ilani, P. A. Lee, and G. Refael, Probing quantum spin liquids with a quantum twisting microscope, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035127 (2024).
  41. J. Xiao, E. Berg, L. I. Glazman, F. Guinea, S. Ilani, and F. von Oppen, Theory of phonon spectroscopy with the quantum twisting microscope, Phys. Rev. B 110, 205407 (2024).
  42. J. Birkbeck, J. Xiao, A. Inbar, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, L. Glazman, F. Guinea, F. von Oppen, and S. Ilani, Quantum twisting microscopy of phonons in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 641, 345 (2025).
  43. H. Zhang, T. Pincelli, C. Jozwiak, T. Kondo, R. Ernstorfer, T. Sato, and S. Zhou, Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 54 (2022).
  44. M. Cattelan and N. A. Fox, A perspective on the application of spatially resolved ARPES for 2D materials, Nanomaterials 8, 284 (2018).
  45. S. M. Joao, M. Andelkovic, L. Covaci, T. G. Rappoport, J. M. V. P. Lopes, and A. Ferreira, Kite: High-performance accurate modelling of electronic structure and response functions of large molecules, disordered crystals and heterostructures, R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 191809 (2020).
  46. A. O. Fumega, M. Niedermeier, and J. L. Lado, Correlated states in super-moiré materials with a kernel polynomial quantics tensor cross interpolation algorithm, 2D Mater. 12, 015018 (2025).
  47. Y. Sun, M. Niedermeier, T. V. C. Antao, A. O. Fumega, and J. L. Lado, Self-consistent tensor network method for correlated super-moiré matter beyond one billion sites, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043288 (2025).
  48. T. V. C. Antão, Y. Sun, A. O. Fumega, and J. L. Lado, Tensor network method for real-space topology in quasicrystal Chern mosaics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 156601 (2026).
  49. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  50. J. I. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).
  51. M. C. Bañuls, Tensor network algorithms: A route map, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 173 (2023).
  52. R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys. 349, 117 (2014).
  53. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011).
  54. E. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Studying two-dimensional systems with the density matrix renormalization group, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 111 (2012).
  55. M. Fishman, S. White, and E. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases 4 (2022).
  56. Y. Zhou, E. M. Stoudenmire, and X. Waintal, What limits the simulation of quantum computers? Phys. Rev. X 10, 041038 (2020).
  57. W. Huggins, P. Patil, B. Mitchell, K. B. Whaley, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Towards quantum machine learning with tensor networks, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 024001 (2019).
  58. R. Orús, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 538 (2019).
  59. G. K.-L. Chan, A. Keselman, N. Nakatani, Z. Li, and S. R. White, Matrix product operators, matrix product states, and ab initio density matrix renormalization group algorithms, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 014102 (2016).
  60. I. Oseledets and E. Tyrtyshnikov, Tt-cross approximation for multidimensional arrays, Linear Algebra Appl. 432, 70 (2010).
  61. I. V. Oseledets, Tensor-train decomposition, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33, 2295 (2011).
  62. M. K. Ritter, Y. Núñez Fernández, M. Wallerberger, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka, and X. Waintal, Quantics tensor cross interpolation for high-resolution parsimonious representations of multivariate functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056501 (2024).
  63. M. Jeannin, Y. Núñez Fernández, T. Kloss, O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal, Cross-extrapolation reconstruction of low-rank functions and application to quantum many-body observables in the strong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035124 (2024).
  64. Y. Núñez Fernández, M. K. Ritter, M. Jeannin, J.-W. Li, T. Kloss, T. Louvet, S. Terasaki, O. Parcollet, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka, and X. Waintal, Learning tensor networks with tensor cross interpolation: New algorithms and libraries, SciPost Phys. 18, 104 (2025).
  65. M. Ritter and contributors, Quanticstci.jl, Github, 2022, https://github.com/tensor4all/quanticstci.jl.
  66. M. Ritter and contributors, Tensorcrossinterpolation.jl, Github, 2022, https://github.com/tensor4all/TensorCrossInterpolation.jl/tree/main.
  67. X. Waintal, C.-H. Huang, and C. W. Groth, Who can compete with quantum computers? Lecture notes on quantum inspired tensor networks computational techniques, arXiv:2601.03035.
  68. H. Shinaoka, M. Wallerberger, Y. Murakami, K. Nogaki, R. Sakurai, P. Werner, and A. Kauch, Multiscale space-time ansatz for correlation functions of quantum systems based on quantics tensor trains, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021015 (2023).
  69. A. Erpenbeck, W.-T. Lin, T. Blommel, L. Zhang, S. Iskakov, L. Bernheimer, Y. Núñez Fernández, G. Cohen, O. Parcollet, X. Waintal, and E. Gull, Tensor train continuous time solver for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245135 (2023).
  70. Y. Núñez Fernández, M. Jeannin, P. T. Dumitrescu, T. Kloss, J. Kaye, O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal, Learning Feynman diagrams with tensor trains, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041018 (2022).
  71. H. Takahashi, R. Sakurai, and H. Shinaoka, Compactness of quantics tensor train representations of local imaginary-time propagators, SciPost Phys. 18, 007 (2025).
  72. M. Jeannin, Y. Núñez-Fernández, T. Kloss, O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal, Comprehensive study of out-of-equilibrium Kondo effect and Coulomb blockade, Phys. Rev. B 112, 155159 (2025).
  73. N. Jolly, Y. N. Fernández, and X. Waintal, Tensorized orbitals for computational chemistry, Phys. Rev. B 111, 245115 (2025).
  74. R. D. Peddinti, S. Pisoni, A. Marini, P. Lott, H. Argentieri, E. Tiunov, and L. Aolita, Quantum-inspired framework for computational fluid dynamics, Commun. Phys. 7, 135 (2024).
  75. N. Gourianov, P. Givi, D. Jaksch, and S. B. Pope, Tensor networks enable the calculation of turbulence probability distributions, Sci. Adv. 11, eads5990 (2025).
  76. M. Niedermeier, A. Moulinas, T. Louvet, J. L. Lado, and X. Waintal, Solving the Gross-Pitaevskii equation on multiple different scales using the quantics tensor train representation Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 023006 (2026).
  77. A. Bou-Comas, M. Płodzień, L. Tagliacozzo, and J. J. García-Ripoll, Quantics tensor train for solving Gross-Pitaevskii equation, arXiv:2507.03134.
  78. Q.-C. Chen, I.-K. Liu, J.-W. Li, and C.-M. Chung, Solving the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with quantic tensor trains: Ground states and nonlinear dynamics, arXiv:2507.04279.
  79. R. J. J. Connor, C. W. Duncan, and A. J. Daley, Tensor network methods for the Gross-Pitaevskii equation on fine grids, New J. Phys. 28, 023203 (2026).
  80. P. W. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM J. Comput. 26, 1484 (1997).
  81. A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem, arXiv:quant-ph/9511026.
  82. J. Chen, E. M. Stoudenmire, and S. R. White, Quantum Fourier transform has small entanglement, PRX Quantum 4, 040318 (2023).
  83. J. Chen and M. Lindsey, Direct interpolative construction of the discrete Fourier transform as a matrix product operator, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 81, 101817 (2026).
  84. V. A. Kazeev and B. N. Khoromskij, Low-rank explicit QTT representation of the Laplace operator and its inverse, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 33, 742 (2012).
  85. V. A. Kazeev, B. N. Khoromskij, and E. E. Tyrtyshnikov, Multilevel Toeplitz matrices generated by tensor-structured vectors and convolution with logarithmic complexity, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35, A1511 (2013).
  86. A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, The kernel polynomial method, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 275 (2006).
  87. D. Jackson, On approximation by trigonometric sums and polynomials, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 13, 491 (1912).
  88. K. J. Woolfe, C. D. Hill, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Scaling and efficient classical simulation of the quantum Fourier transform, Quantum Inf. Comput. 17, 1 (2017).
  89. J. A. Roberts, D. V. Savostyanov, and E. E. Tyrtyshnikov, Superfast solution of linear convolutional Volterra equations using QTT approximation, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 260, 434 (2014).
  90. D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard model, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 239 (2022).
  91. A. Raja, A. Chaves, J. Yu, G. Arefe, H. M. Hill, A. F. Rigosi, T. C. Berkelbach, P. Nagler, C. Schüller, T. Korn, C. Nuckolls, J. Hone, L. E. Brus, T. F. Heinz, D. R. Reichman, and A. Chernikov, Coulomb engineering of the bandgap and excitons in two-dimensional materials, Nat. Commun. 8, 15251 (2017).
  92. M. Kapfer, B. S. Jessen, M. E. Eisele, M. Fu, D. R. Danielsen, T. P. Darlington, S. L. Moore, N. R. Finney, A. Marchese, V. Hsieh, et al., Programming twist angle and strain profiles in 2D materials, Science 381, 677 (2023).
  93. K. Viebahn, M. Sbroscia, E. Carter, J.-C. Yu, and U. Schneider, Matter-wave diffraction from a quasicrystalline optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110404 (2019).
  94. J.-C. Yu, S. Bhave, L. Reeve, B. Song, and U. Schneider, Observing the two-dimensional Bose glass in an optical quasicrystal, Nature (London) 633, 338 (2024).
  95. M. Sbroscia, K. Viebahn, E. Carter, J.-C. Yu, A. Gaunt, and U. Schneider, Observing localization in a 2D quasicrystalline optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 200604 (2020).
  96. E. Gottlob and U. Schneider, Hubbard models for quasicrystalline potentials, Phys. Rev. B 107, 144202 (2023).
  97. GitHub, 2025, https://github.com/mousanouar/Momentum-Resolved-Spectral-Functions-using-Tensor-Networks.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation