- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Multiobjective tweezers in scattering media

Tristan Nerson1,*, Jakob Hüpfl2, Clément Ferise1, David Globosits2, Marlene Hudler2, Matthieu Malléjac3,4, Stefan Rotter2, and Romain Fleury1,†

  • *Contact author: tristan.nerson@epfl.ch
  • †Contact author: romain.fleury@epfl.ch
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023254 – Published 5 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/769x-8s3k

Abstract

Radiation forces and torques enable the manipulation of objects with acoustic and electromagnetic waves. Yet, harnessing them in complex scattering media remains a formidable challenge, especially when multiple objects must be controlled under competing objectives. Here, we demonstrate that sound or light can be shaped to tailor momentum transfer to multiple objects simultaneously in a complex scattering medium. For a single object, our theory yields the maximal achievable force or torque; for multiple objects, it produces Pareto-optimal actuation and exact bounds on the simultaneous realization of incompatible objectives. This opens applications for wave tweezers, enabling selective and precise manipulation of objects within complex media, ranging from the handling of cells, organoids, or microrobots to targeted drug delivery in biological media.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (74)

  1. M. Fink, D. Cassereau, A. Derode, C. Prada, P. Roux, M. Tanter, J.-L. Thomas, and F. Wu, Time-reversed acoustics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1933 (2000).
  2. M. Horodynski, D. Bouchet, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Invariance property of the Fisher information in scattering media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 233201 (2021).
  3. I. M. Vellekoop and A. P. Mosk, Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media, Opt. Lett. 32, 2309 (2007).
  4. A. P. Mosk, A. Lagendijk, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media, Nat. Photon. 6, 283 (2012).
  5. S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati, M. Fink, A. C. Boccara, and S. Gigan, Measuring the transmission matrix in optics: An approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100601 (2010).
  6. F. T. Smith, Lifetime matrix in collision theory, Phys. Rev. 118, 349 (1960).
  7. M. Froissart, M. L. Goldberger, and K. M. Watson, Spatial separation of events in S-matrix theory, Phys. Rev. 131, 2820 (1963).
  8. P. W. Brouwer, K. M. Frahm, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Quantum mechanical time-delay matrix in chaotic scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4737 (1997).
  9. P. Ambichl, A. Brandstötter, J. Böhm, M. Kühmayer, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Focusing inside disordered media with the generalized Wigner-Smith operator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 033903 (2017).
  10. M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, A. Brandstötter, K. Pichler, Y. V. Fyodorov, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Optimal wave fields for micromanipulation in complex scattering environments, Nat. Photon. 14, 149 (2020).
  11. D. Bouchet, S. Rotter, and A. P. Mosk, Maximum information states for coherent scattering measurements, Nat. Phys. 17, 564 (2021).
  12. M. W. Matthès, Y. Bromberg, J. de Rosny, and S. M. Popoff, Learning and avoiding disorder in multimode fibers, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021060 (2021).
  13. P. del Hougne, K. B. Yeo, P. Besnier, and M. Davy, Coherent wave control in complex media with arbitrary wavefronts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 193903 (2021).
  14. M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, C. Ferise, S. Rotter, and M. Davy, Anti-reflection structure for perfect transmission through complex media, Nature (London) 607, 281 (2022).
  15. J. Hüpfl, N. Bachelard, M. Kaczvinszki, M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Optimal cooling of multiple levitated particles through far-field wavefront shaping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 083203 (2023).
  16. J. Sol, L. Le Magoarou, and P. del Hougne, Optimal blind focusing on perturbation-inducing targets in sub-unitary complex media, Laser Photon. Rev. 19, 2400619 (2025).
  17. U. G. Būtaitė, C. Sharp, M. Horodynski, G. M. Gibson, M. J. Padgett, S. Rotter, J. M. Taylor, and D. B. Phillips, Photon-efficient optical tweezers via wavefront shaping, Sci. Adv. 10, eadi7792 (2024).
  18. D. Globosits, J. Hüpfl, and S. Rotter, Pseudounitary Floquet scattering matrix for wave-front shaping in time-periodic photonic media, Phys. Rev. A 110, 053515 (2024).
  19. A. Goïcoechea, J. Hüpfl, S. Rotter, F. Sarrazin, and M. Davy, Detecting and focusing on a nonlinear target in a complex medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183802 (2025).
  20. N. Byrnes and M. R. Foreman, Perturbing scattering resonances in non-Hermitian systems: A generalized Wigner-Smith operator formulation, Newton 1, 100194 (2025).
  21. K. Y. Bliokh, Z. Kuang, and S. Rotter, Dynamic and geometric shifts in wave scattering, Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 107901 (2025).
  22. K. Dholakia and T. Čižmár, Shaping the future of manipulation, Nat. Photon. 5, 335 (2011).
  23. M. A. Ghanem, A. D. Maxwell, Y.-N. Wang, B. W. Cunitz, V. A. Khokhlova, O. A. Sapozhnikov, and M. R. Bailey, Noninvasive acoustic manipulation of objects in a living body, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 16848 (2020).
  24. W.-C. Lo, C.-H. Fan, Y.-J. Ho, C.-W. Lin, and C.-K. Yeh, Tornado-inspired acoustic vortex tweezer for trapping and manipulating microbubbles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023188118 (2021).
  25. Y. Yang, Y. Yang, D. Liu, Y. Wang, M. Lu, Q. Zhang, J. Huang, Y. Li, T. Ma, F. Yan, and H. Zheng, In-vivo programmable acoustic manipulation of genetically engineered bacteria, Nat. Commun. 14, 3297 (2023).
  26. M. Baudoin, J.-C. Gerbedoen, A. Riaud, O. B. Matar, N. Smagin, and J.-L. Thomas, Folding a focalized acoustical vortex on a flat holographic transducer: Miniaturized selective acoustical tweezers, Sci. Adv. 5, eaav1967 (2019).
  27. M. Baudoin, J.-L. Thomas, R. A. Sahely, J.-C. Gerbedoen, Z. Gong, A. Sivery, O. B. Matar, N. Smagin, P. Favreau, and A. Vlandas, Spatially selective manipulation of cells with single-beam acoustical tweezers, Nat. Commun. 11, 4244 (2020).
  28. R. Hirayama, G. Christopoulos, D. Martinez Plasencia, and S. Subramanian, High-speed acoustic holography with arbitrary scattering objects, Sci. Adv. 8, eabn7614 (2022).
  29. L. Shen, Z. Tian, K. Yang, J. Rich, J. Zhang, J. Xia, W. Collyer, B. Lu, N. Hao, Z. Pei, et al., Acousto-dielectric tweezers enable independent manipulation of multiple particles, Sci. Adv. 10, eado8992 (2024).
  30. J. E. Curtis, B. A. Koss, and D. G. Grier, Dynamic holographic optical tweezers, Opt. Commun. 207, 169 (2002).
  31. J. Leach, G. Sinclair, P. Jordan, J. Courtial, M. J. Padgett, J. Cooper, and Z. J. Laczik, 3D manipulation of particles into crystal structures using holographic optical tweezers, Opt. Express 12, 220 (2004).
  32. A. Holman, Y. Xu, X. Sun, J. Wu, M. Wang, Z. Zhu, B. Seo, N. Yu, and S. Will, Trapping of single atoms in metasurface optical tweezer arrays, Nature (London) 649, 859 (2026).
  33. T. Čižmár, M. Mazilu, and K. Dholakia, In situ wavefront correction and its application to micromanipulation, Nat. Photon. 4, 388 (2010).
  34. T. Peng, R. Li, S. An, X. Yu, M. Zhou, C. Bai, Y. Liang, M. Lei, C. Zhang, B. Yao, and Z. Peng, Real-time optical manipulation of particles through turbid media, Opt. Express 27, 4858 (2019).
  35. M. Horodynski, T. Reiter, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Tractor beams with optimal pulling force using structured waves, Phys. Rev. A 108, 023504 (2023).
  36. B. Orazbayev, M. Malléjac, N. Bachelard, S. Rotter, and R. Fleury, Wave-momentum shaping for moving objects in heterogeneous and dynamic media, Nat. Phys. 20, 1441 (2024).
  37. J. T. Karlsen, P. Augustsson, and H. Bruus, Acoustic force density acting on inhomogeneous fluids in acoustic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 114504 (2016).
  38. B. Anghinoni, G. Flizikowski, L. Malacarne, M. Partanen, S. Bialkowski, and N. Astrath, On the formulations of the electromagnetic stress–energy tensor, Ann. Phys. 443, 169004 (2022).
  39. A. Zemanian, An N-port realizability theory based on the theory of distributions, IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory 10, 265 (1963).
  40. R. H. Dicke, General microwave circuit theorems, in Principles of Microwave Circuits, IET Electromagnetic Waves Series No. 25, edited by C. G. Montgomery, R. H. Dicke, and E. M. Purcell (IET, Stevenage, 1987), pp. 130–161.
  41. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/769x-8s3k for details on modal expansions, commutation of GWS matrices, expectation-value statistics, additional simulations, and constrained optimization, which includes Ref. [74].
  42. An exception occurs if the two matrices happen to share the same eigenvector associated with their maximal eigenvalues. This nongeneric case is understood in Eq. ( (15) by observing that what matters is not ultimately the commutation of the two matrices but the vanishing of the expectation value of the commutator. Further details on the commutation of Q-matrices, as well as an example of optimization under mirror symmetry, are given in the Supplemental Material [41].
  43. K. Miettinen, Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, edited by F. S. Hillier (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1999), Vol. 12.
  44. F. Hausdorff, Der Wertvorrat einer Bilinearform, Math. Z. 3, 314 (1919).
  45. M. K. Fan and A. L Tits, On the generalized numerical range, Linear Multilinear Algebra 21, 313 (1987).
  46. T. Gallay and D. Serre, Numerical measure of a complex matrix, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 65, 287 (2012).
  47. C. F. Dunkl, P. Gawron, J. A. Holbrook, Z. Puchała, and K. Życzkowski, Numerical shadows: Measures and densities on the numerical range, Linear Algebra Appl. 434, 2042 (2011).
  48. L. C. Venuti and P. Zanardi, Probability density of quantum expectation values, Phys. Lett. A 377, 1854 (2013).
  49. Y. Wang and C. Guo, Probability distribution for coherent transport of random waves, Newton 2, 100478 (2026).
  50. E. Schrödinger, About Heisenberg uncertainty relation, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 19, 296 (1930) [Bulg. J. Phys. 26, 193 (1999)].
  51. R. Bhatia and C. Davis, A better bound on the variance, Am. Math. Mon. 107, 353 (2000).
  52. Y. Huang and D. P. Palomar, Rank-constrained separable semidefinite programming with applications to optimal beamforming, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 58, 664 (2010).
  53. Z.-Q. Luo, W.-K. Ma, A. M.-C. So, Y. Ye, and S. Zhang, Semidefinite relaxation of quadratic optimization problems, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 27, 20 (2010).
  54. Gurobi Optimization, LLC, Gurobi Optimizer reference manual, 2024, https://www.gurobi.com.
  55. I. A. Favre-Bulle, A. B. Stilgoe, E. K. Scott, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Optical trapping in vivo: Theory, practice, and applications, Nanophotonics 8, 1023 (2018).
  56. A. Del Campo Fonseca and D. Ahmed, Ultrasound robotics for precision therapy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 205, 115164 (2024).
  57. A. Del Campo Fonseca, C. Glück, J. Droux, Y. Ferry, C. Frei, S. Wegener, B. Weber, M. El Amki, and D. Ahmed, Ultrasound trapping and navigation of microrobots in the mouse brain vasculature, Nat. Commun. 14, 5889 (2023).
  58. M. Medany, L. Piglia, L. Achenbach, S. K. Mukkavilli, and D. Ahmed, Model-based reinforcement learning for ultrasound-driven autonomous microrobots, Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 1076 (2025).
  59. R. Burstow and A. N. Pouliopoulos, Evaluating the accuracy of acoustic holograms for precise spatial targeting within the brain, npj Acoust. 1, 24 (2025).
  60. S. Li, D. Kim, S. Fan, and C. Guo, Joint control of coherent transmission, reflection, and absorption, Phys. Rev. B 112, 245421 (2025).
  61. T. Nerson, Multi-objective tweezers in scattering media, Zenodo, 2026, https://zenodo.org/records/19185387.
  62. J. Hüpfl, N. Bachelard, M. Kaczvinszki, M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Optimal cooling of multiple levitated particles: Theory of far-field wavefront shaping, Phys. Rev. A 107, 023112 (2023).
  63. H. Ren, H. Luo, M. A. Selim, G. G. Pyrialakos, F. O. Wu, M. Khajavikhan, and D. Christodoulides, Rigorous analysis of optical forces in dielectric structures based on the Minkowski-Helmholtz formula, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033517 (2022).
  64. A. A. Barybin, Modal expansions and orthogonal complements in the theory of complex media waveguide excitation by external sources for isotropic, anisotropic, and bianisotropic media, Prog. Electromagn. Res. 19, 241 (1998).
  65. P. Blanchard and E. Brüning, Inner product spaces and Hilbert spaces, in Mathematical Methods in Physics, Progress in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 69 (Birkhäuser, Cham, 2015), pp. 213–225.
  66. I. Toftul, S. Golat, F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. Nori, Y. Kivshar, and K. Y. Bliokh, Radiation forces and torques in optics and acoustics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 98, 025002 (2026).
  67. P. L. Marston and J. H. Crichton, Radiation torque on a sphere caused by a circularly-polarized electromagnetic wave, Phys. Rev. A 30, 2508 (1984).
  68. L. Zhang and P. L. Marston, Angular momentum flux of nonparaxial acoustic vortex beams and torques on axisymmetric objects, Phys. Rev. E 84, 065601 (2011).
  69. G. T. Silva, T. P. Lobo, and F. G. Mitri, Radiation torque produced by an arbitrary acoustic wave, Europhys. Lett. 97, 54003 (2012).
  70. M. Smagin, I. Toftul, K. Y. Bliokh, and M. Petrov, Acoustic lateral recoil force and stable lift of anisotropic particles, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 064041 (2024).
  71. P. C. Chaumet and A. Rahmani, Electromagnetic force and torque on magnetic and negative-index scatterers, Opt. Express 17, 2224 (2009).
  72. Y. E. Lee, K. H. Fung, D. Jin, and N. X. Fang, Optical torque from enhanced scattering by multipolar plasmonic resonance, Nanophotonics 3, 343 (2014).
  73. M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Optical torque on small bi-isotropic particles, Opt. Lett. 40, 3021 (2015).
  74. W. C. Chew, Lectures on theory of microwave and optical waveguides, arXiv:2107.09672.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023254– Published 5 June, 2026
  • Received 1 December 2025
  • Revised 23 March 2026
  • Accepted 9 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation