Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Winding-control mechanism of non-Hermitian systems

Yongxu Fu1,* and Yi Zhang2,†

  • *Contact author: yongxufu@zjnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: frankzhangyi@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L022030 – Published 15 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6n5b-l8jv

Abstract

Non-Hermitian quantum systems exhibit various interesting and interconnected spectral, topological, and boundary-sensitive features. By introducing conditional boundary conditions (CBCs) for non-Hermitian quantum systems, we explore a winding-control mechanism that selectively collapses specific periodic boundary condition loop-type spectra onto their open boundary condition counterparts, guided by their specific winding numbers, together with a composite reconstruction of the Brillouin zone (BZ) and generalized Brillouin zone (GBZ). The corresponding eigenstates also manifest nontrivial skin effects or extended behaviors arising from the interplay between BZ and GBZ structures. Intuitively, the winding-control mechanism is tied to the residual imaginary velocity originating from the corresponding Fermi sea, establishing the CBCs as the transition boundaries between different non-Hermitian topology of spectral windings. Furthermore, we can generalize our control by incorporating similarity transformations and holomorphic mappings with the boundary controls. We demonstrate the winding control numerically within various models, which enriches our knowledge of non-Hermitian physics across the spectrum, topology, and bulk-boundary correspondence.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (95)

  1. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020).
  2. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  3. T. E. Lee, Anomalous edge state in a non-Hermitian lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016).
  4. D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Edge modes, degeneracies, and topological numbers in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040401 (2017).
  5. V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401(R) (2018).
  6. H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Topological band theory for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 146402 (2018).
  7. Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Higashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018).
  8. K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019).
  9. F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018).
  10. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  11. S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Chern bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136802 (2018).
  12. K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-Bloch band theory of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019).
  13. K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence between winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020).
  14. D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non-Hermitian boundary modes and topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 056802 (2020).
  15. Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Non-Hermitian bulk-boundary correspondence and auxiliary generalized Brillouin zone theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 226402 (2020).
  16. N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020).
  17. H.-Y. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Amoeba formulation of non-Bloch band theory in arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021011 (2024).
  18. C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Hybrid higher-order skin-topological modes in nonreciprocal systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016805 (2019).
  19. K. Kawabata, M. Sato, and K. Shiozaki, Higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. B 102, 205118 (2020).
  20. R. Okugawa, R. Takahashi, and K. Yokomizo, Second-order topological non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. B 102, 241202(R) (2020).
  21. Y. Fu, J. Hu, and S. Wan, Non-Hermitian second-order skin and topological modes, Phys. Rev. B 103, 045420 (2021).
  22. H. Hu and E. Zhao, Knots and non-Hermitian Bloch bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 010401 (2021).
  23. Y. Li, X. Ji, Y. Chen, X. Yan, and X. Yang, Topological energy braiding of non-Bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195425 (2022).
  24. Y. Fu and Y. Zhang, Braiding topology of non-Hermitian open-boundary bands, Phys. Rev. B 110, L121401 (2024).
  25. X. Ji, H. Geng, N. Akhtar, and X. Yang, Floquet engineering of point-gapped topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 111, 195419 (2025).
  26. Y.-M. Hu and Z. Wang, Green's functions of multiband non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043073 (2023).
  27. F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian skin effect and chiral damping in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170401 (2019).
  28. A. McDonald, R. Hanai, and A. A. Clerk, Nonequilibrium stationary states of quantum non-Hermitian lattice models, Phys. Rev. B 105, 064302 (2022).
  29. A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Symmetry classes of open fermionic quantum matter, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021037 (2021).
  30. A. Gómez-León, T. Ramos, A. González-Tudela, and D. Porras, Bridging the gap between topological non-Hermitian physics and open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 106, L011501 (2022).
  31. B. Li, H.-R. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Bloch dynamics and topology in a classical nonequilibrium process, Phys. Rev. B 109, L201121 (2024).
  32. A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of PT-symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009).
  33. W. Chen, Ş. Kaya Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature (London) 548, 192 (2017).
  34. L. Xiao, K. Wang, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Observation of critical phenomena in parity-time-symmetric quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 230401 (2019).
  35. L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics, Nat. Phys. 16, 761 (2020).
  36. L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Observation of non-Bloch parity-time symmetry and exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 230402 (2021).
  37. L. Xiao, W.-T. Xue, F. Song, Y.-M. Hu, W. Yi, Z. Wang, and P. Xue, Observation of non-Hermitian edge burst in quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 070801 (2024).
  38. M. Ezawa, Non-Hermitian boundary and interface states in nonreciprocal higher-order topological metals and electrical circuits, Phys. Rev. B 99, 121411(R) (2019).
  39. M. Ezawa, Electric circuits for non-Hermitian Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 100, 081401(R) (2019).
  40. T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, F. Schindler, N. Salgo, M. Brzezińska, M. Greiter, T. Kiessling, D. Wolf, A. Vollhardt, A. Kabaši, C. H. Lee, A. Bilušić, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Reciprocal skin effect and its realization in a topolectrical circuit, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023265 (2020).
  41. T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Phys. 16, 747 (2020).
  42. L. Li, C. H. Lee, and J. Gong, Impurity induced scale-free localization, Commun. Phys. 4, 42 (2021).
  43. M. Brandenbourger, X. Locsin, E. Lerner, and C. Coulais, Non-reciprocal robotic metamaterials, Nat. Commun. 10, 4608 (2019).
  44. A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Observation of non-hermitian topology and its bulk–edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29561 (2020).
  45. Y. Chen, X. Li, C. Scheibner, V. Vitelli, and G. Huang, Realization of active metamaterials with odd micropolar elasticity, Nat. Commun. 12, 5935 (2021).
  46. W. Wang, X. Wang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian morphing of topological modes, Nature (London) 608, 50 (2022).
  47. W. Wang, M. Hu, X. Wang, G. Ma, and K. Ding, Experimental realization of geometry-dependent skin effect in a reciprocal two-dimensional lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 207201 (2023).
  48. Z. Li, L.-W. Wang, X. Wang, Z.-K. Lin, G. Ma, and J.-H. Jiang, Observation of dynamic non-Hermitian skin effects, Nat. Commun. 15, 6544 (2024).
  49. R. Hamazaki, K. Kawabata, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 090603 (2019).
  50. L.-Z. Tang, L.-F. Zhang, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Topological Anderson insulators in two-dimensional non-Hermitian disordered systems, Phys. Rev. A 101, 063612 (2020).
  51. S. Schiffer, X.-J. Liu, H. Hu, and J. Wang, Anderson localization transition in a robust PT-symmetric phase of a generalized Aubry-André model, Phys. Rev. A 103, L011302 (2021).
  52. Y. Liu, Q. Zhou, and S. Chen, Localization transition, spectrum structure, and winding numbers for one-dimensional non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024201 (2021).
  53. K. Kawabata and S. Ryu, Nonunitary scaling theory of non-Hermitian localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 166801 (2021).
  54. S.-X. Hu, Y. Fu, and Y. Zhang, Non-Hermitian delocalization induced by residue imaginary velocity, Commun. Phys. 8, 269 (2025).
  55. E. Lee, H. Lee, and B.-J. Yang, Many-body approach to non-Hermitian physics in fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. B 101, 121109(R) (2020).
  56. S. Mu, C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Emergent Fermi surface in a many-body non-Hermitian fermionic chain, Phys. Rev. B 102, 081115(R) (2020).
  57. P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, Entanglement spectrum and entropy in topological non-Hermitian systems and nonunitary conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033069 (2020).
  58. R. Shen and C. H. Lee, Non-Hermitian skin clusters from strong interactions, Commun. Phys. 5, 238 (2022).
  59. S.-B. Zhang, M. M. Denner, T. c. v. Bzdušek, M. A. Sentef, and T. Neupert, Symmetry breaking and spectral structure of the interacting Hatano-Nelson model, Phys. Rev. B 106, L121102 (2022).
  60. N. Matsumoto, K. Kawabata, Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Continuous phase transition without gap closing in non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260601 (2020).
  61. F. Alsallom, L. Herviou, O. V. Yazyev, and M. Brzezińska, Fate of the non-Hermitian skin effect in many-body fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033122 (2022).
  62. K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Entanglement phase transition induced by the non-Hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021007 (2023).
  63. T. Haga, M. Nakagawa, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Liouvillian skin effect: Slowing down of relaxation processes without gap closing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 070402 (2021).
  64. F. Yang, Q.-D. Jiang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Liouvillian skin effect in an exactly solvable model, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023160 (2022).
  65. S. Guo, C. Dong, F. Zhang, J. Hu, and Z. Yang, Theoretical prediction of a non-Hermitian skin effect in ultracold-atom systems, Phys. Rev. A 106, L061302 (2022).
  66. H. Li and S. Wan, Dynamic skin effects in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, L241112 (2022).
  67. K. Shimomura and M. Sato, General criterion for non-Hermitian skin effects and application: Fock space skin effects in many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136502 (2024).
  68. R. Shen, F. Qin, J.-Y. Desaules, Z. Papić, and C. H. Lee, Enhanced many-body quantum scars from the non-Hermitian Fock skin effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216601 (2024).
  69. J. Gliozzi, G. De Tomasi, and T. L. Hughes, Many-body non-Hermitian skin effect for multipoles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136503 (2024).
  70. Y.-M. Hu, Z. Wang, B. Lian, and Z. Wang, Many-body non-Hermitian skin effect with exact steady states in the dissipative quantum link model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 260401 (2025).
  71. J. Gliozzi, F. Balducci, T. L. Hughes, and G. D. Tomasi, Non-Hermitian multipole skin effects challenge localization Phys. Rev. B 113, L100203 (2026).
  72. C.-X. Guo, C.-H. Liu, X.-M. Zhao, Y. Liu, and S. Chen, Exact solution of non-Hermitian systems with generalized boundary conditions: Size-dependent boundary effect and fragility of the skin effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 116801 (2021).
  73. P. Molignini, O. Arandes, and E. J. Bergholtz, Anomalous skin effects in disordered systems with a single non-Hermitian impurity, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033058 (2023).
  74. C.-X. Guo, X. Wang, H. Hu, and S. Chen, Accumulation of scale-free localized states induced by local non-Hermiticity, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134121 (2023).
  75. Y. Fu and Y. Zhang, Hybrid scale-free skin effect in non-Hermitian systems: A transfer matrix approach, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205423 (2023).
  76. B. Li, H.-R. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Scale-free localization and PT symmetry breaking from local non-Hermiticity, Phys. Rev. B 108, L161409 (2023).
  77. Throughout the Letter, we adopt a unified notation convention for the Hamiltonians. The symbol with a hat, Ĥ, explicitly denotes the Hamiltonian operator in the second-quantized formalism. In contrast, the symbol without a hat, H, refers to the Hamiltonian matrix under OBCs, with boundary hoppings excluded. Meanwhile, H(z) represents the so-called non-Bloch Hamiltonian, obtained by analytically continuing the momentum-space Hamiltonian H(k),k∈BZ (defined under PBCs) through the mapping eik→z∈C.
  78. This filling convention can be generalized to filled (empty) states with Re(eiθε)<μ [Re(eiθε)>μ] via a mapping Ĥ′=Ĥeiθ−μN̂, where N̂ is the fermion number operator, e.g., the Fermi sea Im(ε)>0 in terms of long-time steady-state dynamics [54]. Such rotations and (or) translations are unphysical, as they correspond to transformations of the Hamiltonian that leave the Fermi surface invariant and equivalent to modifications of the Fermi surface over the original Hamiltonian. In this Letter, we choose the Fermi surface such that the contribution from real velocities is eliminated while the imaginary velocity is retained. In this case, the quasiparticle worldlines reside in the space spanned by imaginary time and configuration coordinates, which is consistent with the physical interpretation in our previous QMC-SSE calculations [54, 80], as further elaborated below.
  79. Multiple bands, if they exist, need to be summed over, except in the Z2 skin scenario.
  80. S.-X. Hu, Y. Fu, and Y. Zhang, Nontrivial worldline winding in non-Hermitian quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245114 (2023).
  81. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/6n5b-l8jv for technical details, additional figures or discussions, and further clarification of the main text.
  82. K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Universal non-Hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimensions, Nat. Commun. 13, 2496 (2022).
  83. An energy on the OBC spectrum that corresponds to n distinct points on the GBZ is referred to as an n-bifurcation point [88].
  84. Without loss of clarity, we hereafter refer to such intersections on both the BZ/GBZ and the spectra as Bloch points.
  85. C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 201103(R) (2019).
  86. K.-I. Imura and Y. Takane, Generalized bulk-edge correspondence for non-Hermitian topological systems, Phys. Rev. B 100, 165430 (2019).
  87. An analogue of Eq. (1) holds for more generic cases with multiple Fermi points.
  88. D. Wu, J. Xie, Y. Zhou, and J. An, Connections between the open-boundary spectrum and the generalized Brillouin zone in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 105, 045422 (2022).
  89. Equivalently, one can obtain the PBC spectrum Hp,ρ(z) by evaluating it on standard BZ (unit circle), and the corresponding OBC spectrum by applying the transformed GBZ associated with Hp,ρ. Both schemes yield identical PBC and OBC spectra. In Fig. 4, we have adopted the former approach.
  90. Here and below, we denote F(z) and F[BZ] as the images of the element z and the set BZ under the mapping F, respectively.
  91. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996).
  92. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Vortex pinning and non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8651 (1997).
  93. The truncation mainly influences the far-left edge of the OBC spectrum, leaving multiple protruding branches, but does not change the winding-control mechanism. A larger truncation nmax allows a better approximation to the model and spectrum in Eq. (5).
  94. H. Wang, J. Zhong, and S. Fan, Topology of the generalized Brillouin zone of one-dimensional models, arXiv:2510.07214.
  95. L. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y. Ge, Y.-J. Guan, Q. Chen, Q. Yan, F. Chen, R. Xi, Y. Li, D. Jia, S.-Q. Yuan, H.-X. Sun, H. Chen, and B. Zhang, Acoustic non-Hermitian skin effect from twisted winding topology, Nat. Commun. 12, 6297 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation