Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Interplay of noise and reservoir-induced decoherence in persistent currents

Samudra Sur* and Thierry Giamarchi

  • Department of Quantum Matter Physics, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 24, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

  • *Contact author: samudra.sur@unige.ch

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 043141 – Published 9 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/486b-4qgc

Abstract

Persistent current is a hallmark of quantum phase coherence. We study the fate of the persistent current in a nonequilibrium setting, where a tight-binding ring is subjected to stochastic disorder as well as a fermionic reservoir attached to each site. We evaluate the current using the Keldysh technique and find that it exhibits nonmonotonic behavior, suggesting two distinct mechanisms of decoherence. While coupling to the reservoirs introduces a coherence length scale given by the inverse of the coupling strength, the other mechanism is more subtle and driven by the ratio of noise strength to reservoir coupling. The interplay of noise and reservoir constitutes a purely nonequilibrium steady state with a flatter distribution function that we effectively describe using classical rate equations. We also discuss possibilities of realizing our findings in ultracold-atom experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (101)

  1. R. Feynman and F. Vernon, The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Ann. Phys. (NY) 281, 547 (2000).
  2. A. Caldeira and A. Leggett, Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 121, 587 (1983).
  3. C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004).
  4. A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010).
  5. M. V. Medvedyeva, F. H. L. Essler, and T. Prosen, Exact Bethe ansatz spectrum of a tight-binding chain with dephasing noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 137202 (2016).
  6. A. Bastianello, J. De Nardis, and A. De Luca, Generalized hydrodynamics with dephasing noise, Phys. Rev. B 102, 161110(R) (2020).
  7. B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019).
  8. O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Entanglement transition in a monitored free-fermion chain: From extended criticality to area law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170602 (2021).
  9. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009).
  10. S. A. Gurvitz, Measurements with a noninvasive detector and dephasing mechanism, Phys. Rev. B 56, 15215 (1997).
  11. S. A. Gurvitz, L. Fedichkin, D. Mozyrsky, and G. P. Berman, Relaxation and the Zeno effect in qubit measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 066801 (2003).
  12. C. Carisch, A. Romito, and O. Zilberberg, Quantifying measurement-induced quantum-to-classical crossover using an open-system entanglement measure, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L042031 (2023).
  13. M. Buchhold, Y. Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, Effective theory for the measurement-induced phase transition of Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041004 (2021).
  14. X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. De Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Phys. 7, 024 (2019).
  15. P. Zhang, C. Liu, S.-K. Jian, and X. Chen, Universal entanglement transitions of free fermions with long-range non-unitary dynamics, Quantum 6, 723 (2022).
  16. B. Altshuler, M. Gershenson, and I. Aleiner, Phase relaxation of electrons in disordered conductors, Phys. E: Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 3, 58 (1998).
  17. I. V. Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, and D. G. Polyakov, Interacting electrons in disordered wires: Anderson localization and low-T transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 206603 (2005).
  18. D. M. Basko, I. L. Aleiner, and B. L. Altshuler, Metal–insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states, Ann. Phys. (NY) 321, 1126 (2006).
  19. F. Hund, Rechnungen über das magnetische verhalten von kleinen metallstücken bei tiefen temperaturen, Ann. Phys. (NY) 424, 102 (1938).
  20. M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, and R. Landauer, Josephson behavior in small normal one-dimensional rings, Phys. Lett. A 96, 365 (1983).
  21. H.-F. Cheung, Y. Gefen, and E. K. Riedel, Isolated rings of mesoscopic dimensions. Quantum coherence and persistent currents, IBM J. Res. Dev. 32, 359 (1988).
  22. H.-F. Cheung, Y. Gefen, E. K. Riedel, and W.-H. Shih, Persistent currents in small one-dimensional metal rings, Phys. Rev. B 37, 6050 (1988).
  23. H.-F. Cheung, E. K. Riedel, and Y. Gefen, Persistent currents in mesoscopic rings and cylinders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 587 (1989).
  24. B. L. Altshuler, Y. Gefen, and Y. Imry, Persistent differences between canonical and grand canonical averages in mesoscopic ensembles: Large paramagnetic orbital susceptibilities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 88 (1991).
  25. A. Schmid, Persistent currents in mesoscopic rings by suppression of charge fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 80 (1991).
  26. F. von Oppen and E. K. Riedel, Average persistent current in a mesoscopic ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 84 (1991).
  27. V. Ambegaokar and U. Eckern, Coherence and persistent currents in mesoscopic rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 381 (1990).
  28. U. Eckern and A. Schmid, Persistent currents of single mesoscopic rings, Europhys. Lett. 18, 457 (1992).
  29. N. Yu and M. Fowler, Persistent current of a Hubbard ring threaded with a magnetic flux, Phys. Rev. B 45, 11795 (1992).
  30. S. Fujimoto and N. Kawakami, Persistent currents in mesoscopic Hubbard rings with spin-orbit interaction, Phys. Rev. B 48, 17406 (1993).
  31. R. A. Smith and V. Ambegaokar, Systematic calculation of moment of flux-dependent currents in single mesoscopic rings, Europhys. Lett. 20, 161 (1992).
  32. U. Eckern and P. Schwab, Normal persistent currents, Adv. Phys. 44, 387 (1995).
  33. P. Kopietz, Universal persistent currents in mesoscopic metal rings due to long-range Coulomb interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3123 (1993).
  34. T. Giamarchi and B. S. Shastry, Persistent currents in a one-dimensional ring for a disordered Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10915 (1995).
  35. M. Büttiker, Small normal-metal loop coupled to an electron reservoir, Phys. Rev. B 32, 1846 (1985).
  36. N. Trivedi and D. A. Browne, Mesoscopic ring in a magnetic field: Reactive and dissipative response, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9581 (1988).
  37. B. Wunsch and A. Chudnovskiy, Persistent current in a ring coupled to an external fermionic reservoir, Phys. E: Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 22, 353 (2004).
  38. A. G. Semenov and A. D. Zaikin, Persistent currents in nanorings and quantum decoherence by Coulomb interaction, Phys. Rev. B 80, 155312 (2009).
  39. O. I. Pâţu and D. V. Averin, Temperature-dependent periodicity of the persistent current in strongly interacting systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 096801 (2022).
  40. H. Bouchiat and G. Montambaux, Persistent currents in mesoscopic rings: Ensemble averages and half-flux-quantum periodicity, J. Phys. 50, 2695 (1989).
  41. G. Montambaux, H. Bouchiat, D. Sigeti, and R. Friesner, Persistent currents in mesoscopic metallic rings: Ensemble average, Phys. Rev. B 42, 7647 (1990).
  42. H. Bouchiat, G. Montambaux, and D. Sigeti, Persistent currents in mesoscopic rings, conductance, and boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. B 44, 1682 (1991).
  43. G. Bouzerar and D. Poilblanc, Persistent currents in multichannel interacting systems, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10772 (1995).
  44. P. Schmitteckert, R. A. Jalabert, D. Weinmann, and J.-L. Pichard, From the Fermi glass towards the Mott insulator in one dimension: Delocalization and strongly enhanced persistent currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2308 (1998).
  45. L. P. Lévy, G. Dolan, J. Dunsmuir, and H. Bouchiat, Magnetization of mesoscopic copper rings: Evidence for persistent currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2074 (1990).
  46. V. Chandrasekhar, R. A. Webb, M. J. Brady, M. B. Ketchen, W. J. Gallagher, and A. W. Kleinsasser, Magnetic response of a single, isolated gold loop, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3578 (1991).
  47. E. M. Q. Jariwala, P. Mohanty, M. B. Ketchen, and R. A. Webb, Diamagnetic persistent current in diffusive normal-metal rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1594 (2001).
  48. R. Deblock, R. Bel, B. Reulet, H. Bouchiat, and D. Mailly, Diamagnetic orbital response of mesoscopic silver rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 206803 (2002).
  49. H. Bluhm, N. C. Koshnick, J. A. Bert, M. E. Huber, and K. A. Moler, Persistent currents in normal metal rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136802 (2009).
  50. A. C. Bleszynski-Jayich, W. E. Shanks, B. Peaudecerf, E. Ginossar, F. von Oppen, L. I. Glazman, and J. G. E. Harris, Persistent currents in normal metal rings, Science 326, 272 (2009).
  51. L. Amico, D. Anderson, M. Boshier, J.-P. Brantut, L.-C. Kwek, A. Minguzzi, and W. von Klitzing, Colloquium: Atomtronic circuits: From many-body physics to quantum technologies, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 041001 (2022).
  52. J. Polo, W. Chetcuti, T. Haug, A. Minguzzi, K. Wright, and L. Amico, Persistent currents in ultracold gases, Phys. Rep. 1137, 1 (2025).
  53. G. Barontini, R. Labouvie, F. Stubenrauch, A. Vogler, V. Guarrera, and H. Ott, Controlling the dynamics of an open many-body quantum system with localized dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 035302 (2013).
  54. H. P. Lüschen, P. Bordia, S. S. Hodgman, M. Schreiber, S. Sarkar, A. J. Daley, M. H. Fischer, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Signatures of many-body localization in a controlled open quantum system, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011034 (2017).
  55. T. Tomita, S. Nakajima, I. Danshita, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of the Mott insulator to superfluid crossover of a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard system, Sci. Adv. 3, e1701513 (2017).
  56. M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase transition in a one-dimensional circuit QED lattice, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011016 (2017).
  57. R. Ma, B. Saxberg, C. Owens, N. Leung, Y. Lu, J. Simon, and D. I. Schuster, A dissipatively stabilized Mott insulator of photons, Nature (London) 566, 51 (2019).
  58. K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, N. Tsuji, M. Ueda, and N. Kawakami, Collective excitations and nonequilibrium phase transition in dissipative fermionic superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 055301 (2021).
  59. N. Dogra, M. Landini, K. Kroeger, L. Hruby, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Dissipation-induced structural instability and chiral dynamics in a quantum gas, Science 366, 1496 (2019).
  60. F. Ferri, R. Rosa-Medina, F. Finger, N. Dogra, M. Soriente, O. Zilberberg, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Emerging dissipative phases in a superradiant quantum gas with tunable decay, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041046 (2021).
  61. N. Syassen, D. M. Bauer, M. Lettner, T. Volz, D. Dietze, J. J. Garciá-Ripoll, J. I. Cirac, G. Rempe, and S. Dürr, Strong dissipation inhibits losses and induces correlations in cold molecular gases, Science 320, 1329 (2008).
  62. K. Sponselee, L. Freystatzky, B. Abeln, M. Diem, B. Hundt, A. Kochanke, T. Ponath, B. Santra, L. Mathey, K. Sengstock, and C. Becker, Dynamics of ultracold quantum gases in the dissipative Fermi-Hubbard model, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 014002 (2019).
  63. M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, Dephasing assisted transport: Quantum networks and biomolecules, New J. Phys. 10, 113019 (2008).
  64. P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, I. Kassal, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum transport, New J. Phys. 11, 033003 (2009).
  65. S. Viciani, M. Lima, M. Bellini, and F. Caruso, Observation of noise-assisted transport in an all-optical cavity-based network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 083601 (2015).
  66. C. Maier, T. Brydges, P. Jurcevic, N. Trautmann, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Environment-assisted quantum transport in a 10-qubit network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 050501 (2019).
  67. L. Corman, P. Fabritius, S. Häusler, J. Mohan, L. H. Dogra, D. Husmann, M. Lebrat, and T. Esslinger, Quantized conductance through a dissipative atomic point contact, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053605 (2019).
  68. P. Bredol, H. Boschker, D. Braak, and J. Mannhart, Decoherence effects break reciprocity in matter transport, Phys. Rev. B 104, 115413 (2021).
  69. M.-Z. Huang, J. Mohan, A.-M. Visuri, P. Fabritius, M. Talebi, S. Wili, S. Uchino, T. Giamarchi, and T. Esslinger, Superfluid signatures in a dissipative quantum point contact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 200404 (2023).
  70. A.-M. Visuri, T. Giamarchi, and C. Kollath, Symmetry-protected transport through a lattice with a local particle loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 056802 (2022).
  71. O. Entin-Wohlman, Y. Imry, and A. Aharony, Effects of external radiation on biased Aharonov-Bohm rings, Phys. Rev. B 70, 075301 (2004).
  72. K. Yamamoto, Y. Ashida, and N. Kawakami, Rectification in nonequilibrium steady states of open many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043343 (2020).
  73. T. Jin, M. Filippone, and T. Giamarchi, Generic transport formula for a system driven by Markovian reservoirs, Phys. Rev. B 102, 205131 (2020).
  74. T. Jin, J. S. Ferreira, M. Filippone, and T. Giamarchi, Exact description of quantum stochastic models as quantum resistors, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013109 (2022).
  75. J. Ferreira, T. Jin, J. Mannhart, T. Giamarchi, and M. Filippone, Transport and nonreciprocity in monitored quantum devices: An exact study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 136301 (2024).
  76. A. M. Lacerda, J. Goold, and G. T. Landi, Dephasing enhanced transport in boundary-driven quasiperiodic chains, Phys. Rev. B 104, 174203 (2021).
  77. F. Tonielli, R. Fazio, S. Diehl, and J. Marino, Orthogonality catastrophe in dissipative quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040604 (2019).
  78. M. T. Mitchison, T. Fogarty, G. Guarnieri, S. Campbell, T. Busch, and J. Goold, In situ thermometry of a cold Fermi gas via dephasing impurities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 080402 (2020).
  79. P. E. Dolgirev, J. Marino, D. Sels, and E. Demler, Non-Gaussian correlations imprinted by local dephasing in fermionic wires, Phys. Rev. B 102, 100301(R) (2020).
  80. V. Alba, Unbounded entanglement production via a dissipative impurity, SciPost Phys. 12, 011 (2022).
  81. S. Wolff, J.-S. Bernier, D. Poletti, A. Sheikhan, and C. Kollath, Evolution of two-time correlations in dissipative quantum spin systems: Aging and hierarchical dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 100, 165144 (2019).
  82. Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018).
  83. S. Choi, Y. Bao, X.-L. Qi, and E. Altman, Quantum error correction in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induced phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030505 (2020).
  84. M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical purification phase transition induced by quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041020 (2020).
  85. T. Müller, S. Diehl, and M. Buchhold, Measurement-induced dark state phase transitions in long-ranged fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010605 (2022).
  86. J. C. Hoke, M. Ippoliti, E. Rosenberg, D. Abanin, R. Acharya, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, et al., Measurement-induced entanglement and teleportation on a noisy quantum processor, Nature (London) 622, 481 (2023).
  87. I. Poboiko, P. Pöpperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Theory of free fermions under random projective measurements, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041046 (2023).
  88. C. M. Caves and G. J. Milburn, Quantum-mechanical model for continuous position measurements, Phys. Rev. A 36, 5543 (1987).
  89. D. Bernard, T. Jin, and O. Shpielberg, Transport in quantum chains under strong monitoring, Europhys. Lett. 121, 60006 (2018).
  90. P. Das and S. Banerjee, Inverse superconductor-insulator transition in weakly monitored Josephson junction arrays, Phys. Rev. B 112, L180503 (2025).
  91. J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992).
  92. H. J. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. m18 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
  93. V. P. Belavkin, in Modeling and Control of Systems, edited by A. Blaquiére (Springer, Berlin, 1989), pp. 245–265.
  94. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
  95. A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
  96. A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonlinear conductivity of superconductors in the mixed state, Sov. Phys. JETP 41, 960 (1975).
  97. G. Del Pace, K. Xhani, A. Muzi Falconi, M. Fedrizzi, N. Grani, D. Hernandez Rajkov, M. Inguscio, F. Scazza, W. J. Kwon, and G. Roati, Imprinting persistent currents in tunable fermionic rings, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041037 (2022).
  98. J.-P. Brantut, J. Meineke, D. Stadler, S. Krinner, and T. Esslinger, Conduction of ultracold fermions through a mesoscopic channel, Science 337, 1069 (2012).
  99. S. Krinner, T. Esslinger, and J.-P. Brantut, Two-terminal transport measurements with cold atoms, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 343003 (2017).
  100. B. Nagler, M. Will, S. Hiebel, S. Barbosa, J. Koch, M. Fleischhauer, and A. Widera, Ultracold Bose gases in dynamic disorder with tunable correlation time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 233601 (2022).
  101. S. Hiebel, B. Nagler, S. Barbosa, J. Koch, and A. Widera, Characterizing quantum gases in time-controlled disorder realizations using cross-correlations of density distributions, New J. Phys. 26, 013042 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation