Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Enhancing the performance of quantum switch refrigeration with an information pool of qubits

Jian Wei Cheong, Andri Pradana, and Lock Yue Chew*

  • Division of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637371, Singapore

  • *Contact author: lockyue@ntu.edu.sg

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013272 – Published 10 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3vft-yzlr

Abstract

Indefinite causal order has been shown to enable nonclassical refrigeration, with recent experimental verification using an ensemble of nuclear spins in the nuclear magnetic resonance system that boosted prior coefficient of performance (COP) through the approach of density matrix exponentiation (DME). In this paper, we demonstrate an approach to improve the COP of this setup by incorporating an information pool of qubits to absorb the entropic cost of refrigeration. If these qubits are reused until their resources are expended, an increase of the COP beyond the DME approach can be achieved in certain temperature ranges. This improvement is found to hold even for the case when the working body is hotter than the cold bath, and in the prethermalization regimes where further enhancements can be observed. Our work thus introduces a technique to enhance quantum refrigeration with indefinite causal order.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Valiron, Quantum computations without definite causal structure, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022318 (2013).
  2. N. Loizeau and A. Grinbaum, Channel capacity enhancement with indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. A 101, 012340 (2020).
  3. A. Feix, M. Araújo, and Č. Brukner, Quantum superposition of the order of parties as a communication resource, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052326 (2015).
  4. P. A. Guérin, A. Feix, M. Araújo, and Č. Brukner, Exponential communication complexity advantage from quantum superposition of the direction of communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100502 (2016).
  5. D. Ebler, S. Salek, and G. Chiribella, Enhanced communication with the assistance of indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 120502 (2018).
  6. G. Chiribella, M. Banik, S. S. Bhattacharya, T. Guha, M. Alimuddin, A. Roy, S. Saha, S. Agrawal, and G. Kar, Indefinite causal order enables perfect quantum communication with zero capacity channels, New J. Phys. 23, 033039 (2021).
  7. M. Araújo, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, Computational advantage from quantum-controlled ordering of gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 250402 (2014).
  8. M. J. Renner and Č. Brukner, Computational advantage from a quantum superposition of qubit gate orders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 230503 (2022).
  9. F. Chapeau-Blondeau, Indefinite causal order for quantum metrology with quantum thermal noise, Phys. Lett. A 447, 128300 (2022).
  10. K. Simonov, G. Francica, G. Guarnieri, and M. Paternostro, Work extraction from coherently activated maps via quantum switch, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032217 (2022).
  11. G. Francica, Causal games of work extraction with indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042214 (2022).
  12. D. Felce and V. Vedral, Quantum refrigeration with indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070603 (2020).
  13. J. W. Cheong, A. Pradana, and L. Y. Chew, Non-Markovian refrigeration and heat flow in the quantum switch, Phys. Rev. A 110, 022220 (2024).
  14. X. Nie, X. Zhu, K. Huang, K. Tang, X. Long, Z. Lin, Y. Tian, C. Qiu, C. Xi, X. Yang, J. Li, Y. Dong, T. Xin, and D. Lu, Experimental realization of a quantum refrigerator driven by indefinite causal orders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 100603 (2022).
  15. D. Mandal, H. T. Quan, and C. Jarzynski, Maxwell’s refrigerator: An exactly solvable model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 030602 (2013).
  16. A. B. Boyd, D. Mandal, and J. P. Crutchfield, Identifying functional thermodynamics in autonomous Maxwellian ratchets, New J. Phys. 18, 023049 (2016).
  17. S. Deffner, Information-driven current in a quantum Maxwell demon, Phys. Rev. E 88, 062128 (2013).
  18. A. Chapman and A. Miyake, How an autonomous quantum Maxwell demon can harness correlated information, Phys. Rev. E 92, 062125 (2015).
  19. L. He, A. Pradana, J. W. Cheong, and L. Y. Chew, Information processing second law for an information ratchet with finite tape, Phys. Rev. E 105, 054131 (2022).
  20. L. He, J. W. Cheong, A. Pradana, and L. Y. Chew, Effects of correlation in an information ratchet with finite tape, Phys. Rev. E 107, 024130 (2023).
  21. J. W. Cheong, A. Pradana, and L. Y. Chew, Communication advantage of quantum compositions of channels from non-Markovianity, Phys. Rev. A 106, 052410 (2022).
  22. J. W. Cheong, A. Pradana, and L. Y. Chew, Effects of non-Markovianity on daemonic ergotropy in the quantum switch, Phys. Rev. A 108, 012201 (2023).
  23. M. Rosati, A. Mari, and V. Giovannetti, Narrow bounds for the quantum capacity of thermal attenuators, Nat. Commun. 9, 4339 (2018).
  24. S. Khatri, K. Sharma, and M. M. Wilde, Information-theoretic aspects of the generalized amplitude-damping channel, Phys. Rev. A 102, 012401 (2020).
  25. R. Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183 (1961).
  26. A. Barato and U. Seifert, Unifying three perspectives on information processing in stochastic thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 090601 (2014).
  27. T. Van Vu and K. Saito, Finite-time quantum Landauer principle and quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010602 (2022).
  28. A. Rolandi and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Finite-time Landauer principle beyond weak coupling, Quantum 7, 1161 (2023).
  29. D. Lu, H. Li, D.-A. Trottier, J. Li, A. Brodutch, A. P. Krismanich, A. Ghavami, G. I. Dmitrienko, G. Long, J. Baugh, and R. Laflamme, Experimental estimation of average fidelity of a Clifford gate on a 7-qubit quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 140505 (2015).
  30. L. M. K. Vandersypen, M. Steffen, G. Breyta, C. S. Yannoni, M. H. Sherwood, and I. L. Chuang, Experimental realization of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance, Nature (London) 414, 883 (2001).
  31. H. Nie, T. Feng, S. Longden, and V. Vedral, Quantum cooling activated by coherently-controlled thermalisation, arXiv:2201.06954.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation