- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Optimization of quantum-repeater networks using stochastic automatic differentiation

Guus Avis* and Stefan Krastanov

  • *Contact author: guusavis@hotmail.com
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033111 – Published 1 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2g9m-h3jm

Abstract

Quantum repeaters are envisioned to enable long-distance entanglement distribution. Analysis of quantum-repeater networks could hasten their realization by informing design decisions and research priorities. Determining derivatives of network properties is crucial toward that end, facilitating optimizations and revealing parameter sensitivity. Doing so, however, is difficult because the networks are discretely random. Here we use a recently developed technique, stochastic automatic differentiation, to automatically extract derivatives from discrete Monte Carlo simulations of repeater networks. With these derivatives, we optimize rate-fidelity tradeoffs in a repeater chain, determine the chain's sensitivity with respect to the coherence times of different nodes, and finally choose the locations of quantum repeaters in a two-dimensional plane to optimize the guaranteed quality of service between four end nodes. In particular, the technique enabled us to discover how the best achievable quality of service, the minimal number of repeaters required to improve a network, and the number of repeaters required to saturate the network scale with the physical size of the network.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (130)

  1. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and N. D. Mermin, Quantum cryptography without Bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 557 (1992).
  2. A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
  3. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theor. Comput. Sci. 560, 7 (2014).
  4. A. Broadbent, J. Fitzsimons, and E. Kashefi, Universal blind quantum computation, in Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2009), pp. 517–526.
  5. J. F. Fitzsimons and E. Kashefi, Unconditionally verifiable blind quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012303 (2017).
  6. D. Leichtle, L. Music, E. Kashefi, and H. Ollivier, Verifying BQP computations on noisy devices with minimal overhead, PRX Quantum 2, 040302 (2021).
  7. Z. Eldredge, M. Foss-Feig, J. A. Gross, S. L. Rolston, and A. V. Gorshkov, Optimal and secure measurement protocols for quantum sensor networks, Phys. Rev. A 97, 042337 (2018).
  8. T. J. Proctor, P. A. Knott, and J. A. Dunningham, Multiparameter estimation in networked quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 080501 (2018).
  9. P. Kómár, E. M. Kessler, M. Bishof, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum network of clocks, Nat. Phys. 10, 582 (2014).
  10. L. K. Grover, Quantum telecomputation, arXiv:quant-ph/9704012.
  11. N. H. Nickerson, J. F. Fitzsimons, and S. C. Benjamin, Freely scalable quantum technologies using cells of 5-to-50 qubits with very lossy and noisy photonic links, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041041 (2014).
  12. J. I. Cirac, A. K. Ekert, S. F. Huelga, and C. Macchiavello, Distributed quantum computation over noisy channels, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4249 (1999).
  13. S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018).
  14. K. Azuma, K. Tamaki, and H.-K. Lo, All-photonic quantum repeaters, Nat. Commun. 6, 6787 (2015).
  15. H.-J. Briegel, W. Dür, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932 (1998).
  16. L.-M. Duan, M. Lukin, I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics, Nature (London) 414, 413 (2001).
  17. W. Dür, H.-J. Briegel, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum repeaters based on entanglement purification, Phys. Rev. A 59, 169 (1999).
  18. L. Jiang, J. M. Taylor, K. Nemoto, W. J. Munro, R. Van Meter, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum repeater with encoding, Phys. Rev. A 79, 032325 (2009).
  19. M. Pompili, S. L. N. Hermans, S. Baier, H. K. C. Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, M. J. Tiggelman, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse, S. Wehner, and R. Hanson, Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits, Science 372, 259 (2021).
  20. C. M. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y.-C. Wei, D. R. Assumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, M. Sutula, G. Baranes, N. Sinclair, C. De-Eknamkul, D. S. Levonian, M. K. Bhaskar, H. Park, M. Lončar, and M. D. Lukin, Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network, Nature (London) 629, 573 (2024).
  21. A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, M.-C. Slater, I. te Raa-Derckx, P. Botma, J. van Rantwijk, J. J. B. Biemond, R. A. J. Hagen, R. W. Herfst, W. D. Koek, A. J. H. Meskers, R. Vollmer, E. J. van Zwet, M. Markham, A. M. Edmonds, J. F. Geus, F. Elsen, B. Jungbluth, C. Haefner, C. Tresp et al., Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits, Sci. Adv. 10, eadp6442 (2024).
  22. M. K. Bhaskar, R. Riedinger, B. Machielse, D. S. Levonian, C. T. Nguyen, E. N. Knall, H. Park, D. Englund, M. Lončar, D. D. Sukachev, and M. D. Lukin, Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication, Nature (London) 580, 60 (2020).
  23. S. Langenfeld, P. Thomas, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, Quantum repeater node demonstrating unconditionally secure key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 230506 (2021).
  24. K. Goodenough, D. Elkouss, and S. Wehner, Optimizing repeater schemes for the quantum internet, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032610 (2021).
  25. G. Vardoyan and S. Wehner, Quantum network utility maximization, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2023), Vol. 01, pp. 1238–1248.
  26. S. Krastanov, V. V. Albert, and L. Jiang, Optimized entanglement purification, Quantum 3, 123 (2019).
  27. F. Rozpędek, T. Schiet, L. P. Thinh, D. Elkouss, A. C. Doherty, and S. Wehner, Optimizing practical entanglement distillation, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062333 (2018).
  28. L. Jiang, J. M. Taylor, N. Khaneja, and M. D. Lukin, Optimal approach to quantum communication using dynamic programming, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17291 (2007).
  29. S. Haldar, P. J. Barge, X. Cheng, K.-C. Chang, B. T. Kirby, S. Khatri, C. W. Wong, and H. Lee, Reducing classical communication costs in multiplexed quantum repeaters using hardware-aware quasi-local policies, Commun. Phys. 8, 132 (2025).
  30. S. Haldar, P. J. Barge, S. Khatri, and H. Lee, Fast and reliable entanglement distribution with quantum repeaters: Principles for improving protocols using reinforcement learning, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 024041 (2024).
  31. B. Li, T. Coopmans, and D. Elkouss, Efficient optimization of cutoffs in quantum repeater chains, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 2, 1 (2021).
  32. S. Pouryousef, N. K. Panigrahy, M. D. Purkayastha, S. Mukhopadhyay, G. Grammel, D. Di Mola, and D. Towsley, Resource management in quantum virtual private networks, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2023), Vol. 02, pp. 393–394.
  33. P. Pathumsoot, N. Benchasattabuse, R. Satoh, M. Hajdušek, R. Van Meter, and S. Suwanna, Optimizing link-level entanglement generation in quantum networks with unequal link lengths, in Proceedings of the 25th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC) (IEEE, Chiang Rai, Thailand, 2021), pp. 179–184.
  34. G. Avis, F. F. da Silva, T. Coopmans, A. Dahlberg, H. Jirovská, D. Maier, J. Rabbie, A. Torres-Knoop, and S. Wehner, Requirements for a processing-node quantum repeater on a real-world fiber grid, npj Quantum Inf 9, 100 (2023).
  35. F. F. da Silva, G. Avis, J. A. Slater, and S. Wehner, Requirements for upgrading trusted nodes to a repeater chain over 900 km of optical fiber, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 045041 (2024).
  36. F. F. da Silva, A. Torres-Knoop, T. Coopmans, D. Maier, and S. Wehner, Optimizing entanglement generation and distribution using genetic algorithms, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 035007 (2021).
  37. J. van Dam, G. Avis, T. B. Propp, F. F. da Silva, J. A. Slater, T. E. Northup, and S. Wehner, Hardware requirements for trapped-ion-based verifiable blind quantum computing with a measurement-only client, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 045031 (2024).
  38. A. L. Mora, F. F. da Silva, and S. Wehner, Reducing hardware requirements for entanglement distribution via joint hardware-protocol optimization, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 045001 (2024).
  39. J. Rabbie, K. Chakraborty, G. Avis, and S. Wehner, Designing quantum networks using preexisting infrastructure, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 5 (2022).
  40. T. Islam and E. Arslan, A heuristic approach for scalable quantum repeater deployment modeling, in Proceedings of the IEEE 48th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2023), pp. 1–9.
  41. S. Pouryousef, H. Shapourian, A. Shabani, R. Kompella, and D. Towsley, Resource placement for rate and fidelity maximization in quantum networks, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 5, 1 (2024).
  42. R. Sripotchanart, W. Si, R. N. Calheiros, Q. Cao, and T. Qiu, A two-step linear programming approach for repeater placement in large-scale quantum networks, Computer Networks 254, 110795 (2024).
  43. G. Avis, R. Knegjens, A. S. Sørensen, and S. Wehner, Asymmetric node placement in fiber-based quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 109, 052627 (2024).
  44. M. Chehimi, S. Pouryousef, N. K. Panigrahy, D. Towsley, and W. Saad, Scaling limits of quantum repeater networks, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2023), Vol. 01, pp. 1205–1210.
  45. P. Dhara, A. Patil, H. Krovi, and S. Guha, Subexponential rate versus distance with time-multiplexed quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. A 104, 052612 (2021).
  46. D. Luong, L. Jiang, J. Kim, and N. Lütkenhaus, Overcoming lossy channel bounds using a single quantum repeater node, Appl. Phys. B 122, 96 (2016).
  47. F. Rozpędek, K. Goodenough, J. Ribeiro, N. Kalb, V. C. Vivoli, A. Reiserer, R. Hanson, S. Wehner, and D. Elkouss, Parameter regimes for a single sequential quantum repeater, Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 034002 (2018).
  48. F. Rozpędek, K. Noh, Q. Xu, S. Guha, and L. Jiang, Quantum repeaters based on concatenated bosonic and discrete-variable quantum codes, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 102 (2021).
  49. K. J. Wo, G. Avis, F. Rozpędek, M. F. Mor-Ruiz, G. Pieplow, T. Schröder, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, and J. Borregaard, Resource-efficient fault-tolerant one-way quantum repeater with code concatenation, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 123 (2023).
  50. J. Yao, K. Zou, D. Li, and Z. Jiang, Optimal deployment design of repeaters and memories in quantum networks, in Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Conference on High Performance Computing & Communications; 7th International Conference on Data Science & Systems; 19th International Conference on Smart City; 7th International Conference on Dependability in Sensor, Cloud & Big Data Systems & Application (HPCC/DSS/SmartCity/DependSys) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2021), pp. 361–368.
  51. W. Dai and D. Towsley, Entanglement swapping for repeater chains with finite memory sizes, arXiv:2111.10994.
  52. L. Kamin, E. Shchukin, F. Schmidt, and P. van Loock, Exact rate analysis for quantum repeaters with imperfect memories and entanglement swapping as soon as possible, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023086 (2023).
  53. K. Goodenough, T. Coopmans, and D. Towsley, On noise in swap ASAP repeater chains: Exact analytics, distributions and tight approximations, Quantum 9, 1744 (2025).
  54. T. Coopmans, S. Brand, and D. Elkouss, Improved analytical bounds on delivery times of long-distance entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 105, 012608 (2022).
  55. N. Sangouard, C. Simon, J. Minář, H. Zbinden, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Long-distance entanglement distribution with single-photon sources, Phys. Rev. A 76, 050301 (2007).
  56. S. Guha, H. Krovi, C. A. Fuchs, Z. Dutton, J. A. Slater, C. Simon, and W. Tittel, Rate-loss analysis of an efficient quantum repeater architecture, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022357 (2015).
  57. E. Shchukin, F. Schmidt, and P. van Loock, Waiting time in quantum repeaters with probabilistic entanglement swapping, Phys. Rev. A 100, 032322 (2019).
  58. M. G. de Andrade, E. A. Van Milligen, L. Bacciottini, A. Chandra, S. Pouryousef, N. K. Panigrahy, G. Vardoyan, and D. Towsley, On the analysis of quantum repeater chains with sequential swaps, arXiv:2405.18252.
  59. T. Coopmans, R. Knegjens, A. Dahlberg, D. Maier, L. Nijsten, J. de Oliveira Filho, M. Papendrecht, J. Rabbie, F. Rozpędek, M. Skrzypczyk, L. Wubben, W. de Jong, D. Podareanu, A. Torres-Knoop, D. Elkouss, and S. Wehner, NetSquid, a NETwork Simulator for QUantum Information using Discrete events, Commun. Phys. 4, 164 (2021).
  60. X. Wu, A. Kolar, J. Chung, D. Jin, T. Zhong, R. Kettimuthu, and M. Suchara, SeQUeNCe: A customizable discrete-event simulator of quantum networks, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 045027 (2021).
  61. J. Wallnöfer, F. Hahn, F. Wiesner, N. Walk, and J. Eisert, Faithfully simulating near-term quantum repeaters, PRX Quantum 5, 010351 (2024).
  62. L. Chen, K. Xue, J. Li, N. Yu, R. Li, Q. Sun, and J. Lu, SimQN: A network-layer simulator for the quantum network investigation, IEEE Network 37, 182 (2023).
  63. R. Satoh, M. Hajdušek, N. Benchasattabuse, S. Nagayama, K. Teramoto, T. Matsuo, S. A. Metwalli, P. Pathumsoot, T. Satoh, S. Suzuki, and R. V. Meter, QuISP: A quantum internet simulation package, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2022), pp. 353–364.
  64. R. J. LeVeque, Finite Difference Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2007).
  65. P. W. Glynn, Likelihood ratio gradient estimation for stochastic systems, Commun. ACM 33, 75 (1990).
  66. W. Grathwohl, D. Choi, Y. Wu, G. Roeder, and D. Duvenaud, Backpropagation through the Void: Optimizing control variates for black-box gradient estimation, arXiv:1711.00123.
  67. B. Heidergott and F. J. Vázquez-Abad, Measure-valued differentiation for Markov chains, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 136, 187 (2008).
  68. E. Jang, S. Gu, and B. Poole, Categorical reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, Toulon, France, 2017).
  69. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, Auto-encoding variational Bayes, arXiv:1312.6114.
  70. J. P. C. Kleijnen and R. Y. Rubinstein, Optimization and sensitivity analysis of computer simulation models by the score function method, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 88, 413 (1996).
  71. S. Mohamed, M. Rosca, M. Figurnov, and A. Mnih, Monte Carlo gradient estimation in machine learning, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21, 1 (2020).
  72. G. C. Pflug, Sampling derivatives of probabilities, Computing 42, 315 (1989).
  73. G. Tucker, A. Mnih, C. J. Maddison, D. Lawson, and J. Sohl-Dickstein, REBAR: Low-variance, unbiased gradient estimates for discrete latent variable models, in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, 2017), pp. 2624–2633.
  74. R. J. Williams, Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning, Mach. Learn. 8, 229 (1992).
  75. P. Glasserman, Gradient Estimation Via Perturbation Analysis (Springer Science & Business Media, Cham, 1991).
  76. G. Arya, M. Schauer, F. Schäfer, and C. Rackauckas, Automatic differentiation of programs with discrete randomness, Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. 35, 10435 (2022).
  77. R. Porotti, V. Peano, and F. Marquardt, Gradient-ascent pulse engineering with feedback, PRX Quantum 4, 030305 (2023).
  78. F. Belliardo, F. Zoratti, F. Marquardt, and V. Giovannetti, Model-aware reinforcement learning for high-performance Bayesian experimental design in quantum metrology, Quantum 8, 1555 (2024).
  79. F. Belliardo, F. Zoratti, and V. Giovannetti, Applications of model-aware reinforcement learning in Bayesian quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A 109, 062609 (2024).
  80. J. F. Nolan, Analytical differentiation on a digital computer, Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1953.
  81. R. E. Wengert, A simple automatic derivative evaluation program, Commun. ACM 7, 463 (1964).
  82. A. G. Baydin, B. A. Pearlmutter, A. A. Radul, and J. M. Siskind, Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18, 1 (2018).
  83. G. Arya, https://github.com/gaurav-arya/StochasticAD.jl (2024).
  84. R. F. Werner, Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
  85. Á. G. Iñesta, G. Vardoyan, L. Scavuzzo, and S. Wehner, Optimal entanglement distribution policies in homogeneous repeater chains with cutoffs, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 46 (2023).
  86. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
  87. S. Santra, L. Jiang, and V. S. Malinovsky, Quantum repeater architecture with hierarchically optimized memory buffer times, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 025010 (2019).
  88. P. W. Shor and J. Preskill, Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 441 (2000).
  89. G. Avis, https://github.com/GuusAvis/QuantumNetwork Recipes.jl (2025).
  90. C. Cabrillo, J. I. Cirac, P. García-Fernández, and P. Zoller, Creation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1025 (1999).
  91. S. Bose, P. L. Knight, M. B. Plenio, and V. Vedral, Proposal for teleportation of an atomic state via cavity decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5158 (1999).
  92. P. C. Humphreys, N. Kalb, J. P. J. Morits, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, D. J. Twitchen, M. Markham, and R. Hanson, Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network, Nature (London) 558, 268 (2018).
  93. J. Schupp, V. Krcmarsky, V. Krutyanskiy, M. Meraner, T. Northup, and B. Lanyon, Interface between trapped-ion qubits and traveling photons with close-to-optimal efficiency, PRX Quantum 2, 020331 (2021).
  94. V. Krutyanskiy, M. Galli, V. Krcmarsky, S. Baier, D. A. Fioretto, Y. Pu, A. Mazloom, P. Sekatski, M. Canteri, M. Teller, J. Schupp, J. Bate, M. Meraner, N. Sangouard, B. P. Lanyon, and T. E. Northup, Entanglement of trapped-ion qubits separated by 230 meters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 050803 (2023).
  95. B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, and R. Hanson, Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature (London) 526, 682 (2015).
  96. H. Krovi, S. Guha, Z. Dutton, J. A. Slater, C. Simon, and W. Tittel, Practical quantum repeaters with parametric down-conversion sources, Appl. Phys. B 122, 52 (2016).
  97. S. Kar and S. Wehner, Convexification of the quantum network utility maximization problem, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 6, 1 (2025).
  98. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv:1412.6980.
  99. E. Stephens, Influence of coherence time drift on the secret key rate, Master's thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2023.
  100. A. Danageozian, Recovery with incomplete knowledge: Fundamental bounds on real-time quantum memories, Quantum 7, 1195 (2023).
  101. P. V. Klimov, J. Kelly, Z. Chen, M. Neeley, A. Megrant, B. Burkett, R. Barends, K. Arya, B. Chiaro, Y. Chen, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Graff, T. Huang, E. Jeffrey, E. Lucero, J. Y. Mutus et al., Fluctuations of energy-relaxation times in superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090502 (2018).
  102. S. Matityahu, A. Shnirman, and M. Schechter, Stabilization of qubit relaxation rates by frequency modulation, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 044036 (2021).
  103. D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein, and S. Croke, Longer-baseline telescopes using quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 070503 (2012).
  104. E. T. Khabiboulline, J. Borregaard, K. De Greve, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum-assisted telescope arrays, Phys. Rev. A 100, 022316 (2019).
  105. A. J. Brady, C. Gao, R. Harnik, Z. Liu, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhuang, Entangled sensor-networks for dark-matter searches, PRX Quantum 3, 030333 (2022).
  106. X. Guo, C. R. Breum, J. Borregaard, S. Izumi, M. V. Larsen, T. Gehring, M. Christandl, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous-variable entangled network, Nat. Phys. 16, 281 (2020).
  107. P. Sekatski, S. Wölk, and W. Dür, Optimal distributed sensing in noisy environments, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023052 (2020).
  108. Y. Xia, Q. Zhuang, W. Clark, and Z. Zhang, Repeater-enhanced distributed quantum sensing based on continuous-variable multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 99, 012328 (2019).
  109. A. Zang, A. Kolar, A. Gonzales, J. Chung, S. K. Gray, R. Kettimuthu, T. Zhong, and Z. H. Saleem, Quantum advantage in distributed sensing with noisy quantum networks, arXiv:2409.17089.
  110. Z. Zhang and Q. Zhuang, Distributed quantum sensing, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 043001 (2021).
  111. A. Kumar, D. A. de Jesus Pacheco, K. Kaushik, and J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, Futuristic view of the internet of quantum drones: Review, challenges and research agenda, Veh. Commun. 36, 100487 (2022).
  112. H.-Y. Liu, X.-H. Tian, C. Gu, P. Fan, X. Ni, R. Yang, J.-N. Zhang, M. Hu, J. Guo, X. Cao, X. Hu, G. Zhao, Y.-Q. Lu, Y.-X. Gong, Z. Xie, and S.-N. Zhu, Drone-based entanglement distribution towards mobile quantum networks, Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 921 (2020).
  113. A. Conrad, S. Isaac, R. Cochran, D. Sanchez-Rosales, T. Rezaei, T. Javid, A. J. Schroeder, G. Golba, D. Gauthier, and P. Kwiat, Drone-based quantum communication links, in Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation III (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2023), Vol. 12446, pp. 99–106.
  114. I. Karakosta-Amarantidou, R. Yehia, and M. Schiavon, Free-space model for a balloon-based quantum network, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023199 (2025).
  115. A. D. Hill, B. Christensen, and P. G. Kwiat, Advanced techniques for free-space optical quantum cryptography over water, in Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXVIII (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2016), Vol. 9739, pp. 306–311.
  116. L. Qin, Y. Li, and S. Wang, A key distribution protocol based on quantum entanglement swapping for unmanned surface vehicle, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1976, 012034 (2021).
  117. J. Gariano and I. B. Djordjevic, Theoretical study of a submarine to submarine quantum key distribution systems, Opt. Express 27, 3055 (2019).
  118. J. Yin, Y.-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, M. Yang, Y. Cao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, S.-L. Li, R. Shu, Y.-M. Huang, L. Deng, L. Li, Q. Zhang, N.-L. Liu, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, X.-B. Wang, F. Xu et al., Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres, Nature (London) 582, 501 (2020).
  119. T. Vergoossen, S. Loarte, R. Bedington, H. Kuiper, and A. Ling, Modelling of satellite constellations for trusted node QKD networks, Acta Astronaut. 173, 164 (2020).
  120. J. S. Sidhu, S. K. Joshi, M. Gündoğan, T. Brougham, D. Lowndes, L. Mazzarella, M. Krutzik, S. Mohapatra, D. Dequal, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, A. Ling, T. Jennewein, M. Mohageg, J. G. Rarity, I. Fuentes, S. Pirandola, and D. K. L. Oi, Advances in space quantum communications, IET Quantum Commun. 2, 182 (2021).
  121. D. Delahaye, S. Chaimatanan, and M. Mongeau, Simulated annealing: From basics to applications, in Handbook of Metaheuristics, edited by M. Gendreau and J.-Y. Potvin (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), Vol. 272, pp. 1–35.
  122. G. Avis, https://github.com/GuusAvis/RepeaterPlacement.jl (2025).
  123. M. Epping, H. Kampermann, C. Macchiavello, and D. Bruß, Multipartite entanglement speeds up quantum key distribution in networks, New J. Phys. 19, 093012 (2017).
  124. G. Murta, F. Grasselli, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Quantum conference key agreement: A review, Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 2000025 (2020).
  125. B. Colson, P. Marcotte, and G. Savard, An overview of bilevel optimization, Ann. Oper. Res. 153, 235 (2007).
  126. G. Avis and S. Krastanov, Data for optimization of quantum-repeater networks using stochastic automatic differentiation (2025), https://zenodo.org/records/14721267.
  127. G. Avis (2025), https://github.com/GuusAvis/code_for_Optimization_of_Quantum-Repeater_Networks_using_Stochastic_Automatic_Differentiation.
  128. G. Avis, GuusAvis/code_for_Optimization_of_Quantum-Repeater_Networks_using_Stochastic_Automatic_Differen-tiation: V1, Zenodo (2025), https://zenodo.org/records/14595893.
  129. J. Sobrinho, An algebraic theory of dynamic network routing, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 13, 1160 (2005).
  130. M. Caleffi, Optimal routing for quantum networks, IEEE Access 5, 22299 (2017).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033111– Published 1 August, 2025
  • Received 4 February 2025
  • Accepted 2 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation