- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Investigation of preservice physics teacher’s conceptual changes using the quantum interactive learning tutorials in Korea

Soyeon Kim

Pyung Kang Jung

Jung Bog Kim*

  • Kumnam Elementary School, Sejong, 30062, Korea

  • Suncheon Jeil High School, Suncheon, 57924, Korea

  • *Contact author: jbkim@knue.ac.kr
PDF

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020130 – Published 9 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ddkz-n6f8

Abstract

As global interest in quantum mechanics grows, its inherent complexities continue to pose challenges for effective instruction. This study investigates the impact of Quantum Interactive Learning Tutorials (QuILTs) on enhancing conceptual understanding of quantum mechanics among preservice physics teachers in Korea. The QuILTs, consisting of pretests, tutorial worksheets, and post-tests, targeted the following five key concepts: possible wave functions, bound/scattering states, time evolution of wave functions, quantum measurement, and the uncertainty principle. To assess conceptual change, the Quantum Mechanics Survey (QMS) was administered to 20 preservice teachers before and after the completion of QuILTs instruction to assess conceptual change. Additionally, embedded quizzes and interviews provided deeper insights into persistent misconceptions. Results indicated a moderate to substantial overall improvement, with a Hake gain of 0.54. Significant gains were observed in understanding possible wave functions and time evolution, although challenges remained in areas such as normalization of free particle wave functions and interpretation of scattering states. Misconceptions related to quantum measurement and the uncertainty principle showed partial improvement. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of QuILTs in enhancing conceptual understanding among preservice teachers, suggesting that research-based, concept-focused instructional strategies can support future educators in mastering complex quantum mechanics concepts. These results offer valuable insights into the development of teacher preparation curricula and instructional strategies in Korea.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. Korea Institute for Curriculum, and Evaluation, Science education in the national curriculum, Retrieved from http://ncic.kice.re.kr (2021) [accessed December 20, 2023].
  2. R. Müller and H. Wiesner, Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level, Am. J. Phys. 70, 200 (2002).
  3. D. Hoekzema, E. van den Berg, G. Schooten, and L. van Dijk, The particle/wave-in-a-box model in Dutch secondary schools, Phys. Educ. 42, 391 (2007).
  4. P. Lautesse, A. Vila Valls, F. Ferlin, J. L. Héraud, and H. Chabot, Teaching quantum physics in upper secondary school in France, Sci. Educ. 24, 937 (2015).
  5. S. B. McKagan and C. E. Wieman, Exploring student understanding of energy through the quantum mechanics conceptual survey, AIP Conf. Proc. 818, 65 (2006).
  6. P. Fletcher and I. Johnston, Quantum mechanics: Exploring conceptual change, in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA (1999).
  7. G. Corsiglia, B. P. Schermerhorn, H. Sadaghiani, A. Villaseñor, S. Pollock, and G. Passante, Exploring student ideas on change of basis in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010144 (2022).
  8. E. Cataloglu and R. W. Robinett, Testing the development of student conceptual and visualization understanding in quantum mechanics through the undergraduate career, Am. J. Phys. 70, 238 (2002).
  9. S. B. McKagan, K. K. Perkins, and C. E. Wieman, Design and validation of the quantum mechanics conceptual survey, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 020121 (2010).
  10. K. Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, H. J. Pol, A. Brinkman, and W. R. Van Joolingen, Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 010109 (2017).
  11. G. Zhu and C. Singh, Surveying students’ understanding of quantum mechanics in one spatial dimension, Am. J. Phys. 80, 252 (2012).
  12. L. C. McDermott, P. S. Shaffer, and Physics Education Group, Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002).
  13. C. Singh, Student understanding of quantum mechanics at the beginning of graduate instruction, Am. J. Phys. 76, 277 (2008).
  14. C. Singh, Interactive learning tutorials on quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 76, 400 (2008).
  15. G. J. Posner, K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog, Toward a theory of conceptual change, Sci. Educ. 66, 211 (1982).
  16. C. Singh, Student understanding of quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 69, 885 (2001).
  17. G. Min and J. Yoo, High school students’ perceptions and difficulties in learning the uncertainty principle, New Phys. 69, 380 (2019).
  18. S. Im, Analysis of distribution, and characteristics of pre-service physics teachers’ conception on quantum phenomena, New Phys. 71, 289 (2021).
  19. R. R. Hake, Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, Am. J. Phys. 66, 64 (1998).
  20. J. M. Nissen, R. M. Talbot, A. N. Thompson, and B. Van Dusen, Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010115 (2018).
  21. V. P. Coletta and J. J. Steinert, Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 010108 (2020).
  22. E. Christman, P. Miller, and J. Stewart, Beyond normalized gain: Improved comparison of physics educational outcomes, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 010123 (2024).
  23. , Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qual. Res. Psychol., 3, 77 (2006).
  24. G. Zhu and C. Singh, Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics via the Stern–Gerlach experiment, Am. J. Phys. 79, 499 (2011).
  25. C. Singh, M. Belloni, and W. Christian, Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics, Phys. Today 59(8), 43 (2006).
  26. S. McKagan, K. Perkins, and C. Wieman, Deeper look at student learning of quantum mechanics: The case of tunneling, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 020103 (2008).
  27. M. Chhabra and R. Das, Undergraduate students’ visualization of quantum mechanical eigenstates and the role of boundary conditions, Eur. J. Phys. 44, 025702 (2023).
  28. D. Domert, C. Linder, and Å. Ingerman, Probability as a conceptual hurdle to understanding one-dimensional quantum scattering and tunnelling, Eur. J. Phys. 26, 47 (2005).
  29. H. R. Sadaghiani and S. J. Pollock, Quantum mechanics concept assessment: Development and validation study, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 010110 (2015).
  30. I. Testa, A. Colantonio, S. Galano, I. Marzoli, F. Trani, and U. Scotti di Uccio, Effects of instruction on students’ overconfidence in introductory quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 010143 (2020).
  31. C. Singh, Interactive learning tutorials on quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 76, 400 (2008).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020130– Published 9 October, 2025
  • Received 25 December 2024
  • Accepted 8 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation