Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Assessing foundational atomistic models for iron alloys under Earth's core conditions

    Tianqi Wan1,*, Liangrui Wei1,2,*, Zepeng Wu1, Renata M. Wentzcovitch3,4,5, and Yang Sun1,†

    • 1Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
    • 2China-Malaysia International Institute for Advanced Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
    • 3Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
    • 4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
    • 5Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA

    • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
    • †Contact author: yangsun@xmu.edu.cn

    Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 093608 – Published 24 September, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vsf5-3pvf

    Abstract

    We assess the capability of recently developed foundational atomistic models (FAMs) to simulate iron alloys under the extreme pressures and temperatures of Earth's core. Static equations of state for hexagonal close-packed (hcp) and body-centered cubic (bcc) iron, computed using 17 FAMs, are benchmarked against ab initio calculations. Two representative models, MatterSim and MACE, are further evaluated for their ability to reproduce phonon spectra, liquid structure, and melting relations of iron at core conditions. While both models capture several key properties, MACE substantially overestimates the stability of bcc iron and fails to correctly describe the stability of hcp iron. Their performance is also examined for binary liquids, superionic phases, and a seven-component Fe–Ni–Si–S–O–H–C liquid. Although these FAMs were not explicitly trained on data from core conditions, they can reproduce several structural and dynamical properties across a wide range of compositions. However, none of the tested models consistently reproduces all first-principles benchmarks. By analyzing the origins of these discrepancies, we identify several limitations of current FAMs, particularly the lack of an explicit treatment of thermal electronic excitations, which significantly affect phase stability and thermodynamic properties under core conditions. We further discuss directions for improving FAMs to enable predictive simulations of core-forming materials under extreme conditions.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation