Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Direct observation of nanoindentation-induced punching-out of prismatic dislocation loops in tungsten

Florian Tropper and Takahito Ohmura*

  • *Contact author: ohmura.takahito@nims.go.jp

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, L090601 – Published 14 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7c3d-tw8q

Abstract

While bulk bcc plasticity is traditionally governed by screw dislocation glide, prismatic dislocation loops are proposed as an essential pathway for strain accommodation under severe, local constraints. This experimental study on pure W, as a model bcc system, demonstrates that prismatic dislocation half-loops can develop and propagate in a triaxial stress field as imposed by nanoindentation. Using electron channeling contrast imaging, the Burgers vector of emitted dislocation half-loops is determined to be 1/2 〈111〉 and the punching-out process is studied during progressive stages of imposed strain. Long arrays of dislocation half-loops are emitted during the initial displacement burst (pop-in) and continue to propagate during subsequent loading. Although energetic considerations indicate that loop formation alone cannot account for the total plastic deformation energy—implying a concurrent contribution from glide mechanisms—these findings reveal that plastic flow under severe hydrostatic stress gradients can be accommodated via non-Schmid loop punching. Crucially, the unique slip system multiplicity of the bcc lattice yields highly mobile, circular loop geometries that stand in stark contrast to the faceted loops typical of fcc metals.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (29)

  1. F. Seitz, Prismatic dislocations and prismatic punching in crystals, Phys. Rev. 79, 723 (1950).
  2. Y. Miura, Punched-out dislocation rosettes in low-dislocation-density copper, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2917 (1972).
  3. Y. Miura, H. Nakamura, and H. Kaieda, Prismatic dislocation loops in copper revealed by X-ray topography, Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 17, 793 (1976).
  4. S. Graça, P. A. Carvalho, and R. Colaço, Dislocation structures in nanoindented ductile metals—a transmission electron microscopy direct observation, J. Phys. D 44, 335402 (2011).
  5. S. Lee, A. Vaid, J. Im, B. Kim, A. Prakash, J. Guénolé, D. Kiener, E. Bitzek, and S. H. Oh, In situ observation of the initiation of plasticity by nucleation of prismatic dislocation loops, Nat. Commun. 11, 2367 (2020).
  6. Y. Miura and J. Washburn, Mobility of prismatic dislocation half-loops in copper, Cryst. Lattice Defects 2, 197 (1971).
  7. T. Tsuru and Y. Shibutani, Atomistic simulations of elastic deformation and dislocation nucleation in Al under indentation-induced stress distribution, Model. Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng. 14, S55 (2006).
  8. T. Tsuru, Y. Shibutani, and Y. Kaji, Nanoscale contact plasticity of crystalline metal: Experiment and analytical investigation via atomistic and discrete dislocation models, Acta Mater. 58, 3096 (2010).
  9. M. A. Lodes, A. Hartmaier, M. Göken, and K. Durst, Influence of dislocation density on the pop-in behavior and indentation size effect in CaF2 single crystals: Experiments and molecular dynamics simulations, Acta Mater. 59, 4264 (2011).
  10. S. Roy, R. Gatti, B. Devincre, and D. Mordehai, A multiscale study of the size-effect in nanoindentation of Au nanoparticles, Comput. Mater. Sci. 162, 47 (2019).
  11. J. Gagel, D. Weygand, and P. Gumbsch, Formation of extended prismatic dislocation structures under indentation, Acta Mater. 111, 399 (2016).
  12. L. B. Munday, J. C. Crone, and J. Knap, Prismatic and helical dislocation loop generation from defects, Acta Mater. 103, 217 (2016).
  13. C. Erel, G. Po, T. Crosby, and N. Ghoniem, Generation and interaction mechanisms of prismatic dislocation loops in FCC metals, Comput. Mater. Sci. 140, 32 (2017).
  14. P. Anderson, J. Hirth, and J. Lothe, Theory of Dislocations, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017).
  15. J. H. A. Hagelaar, E. Bitzek, C. F. J. Flipse, and P. Gumbsch, Atomistic simulations of the formation and destruction of nanoindentation contacts in tungsten, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045425 (2006).
  16. I. H. Chen, C. I. Hsiao, R. K. Behera, and W. D. Hsu, Defect formation by pristine indenter at the initial stage of nanoindentation, J. Appl. Phys. 114, 214305 (2013).
  17. T. P. Remington, C. J. Ruestes, E. M. Bringa, B. A. Remington, C. H. Lu, B. Kad, and M. A. Meyers, Plastic deformation in nanoindentation of tantalum: A new mechanism for prismatic loop formation, Acta Mater. 78, 378 (2014).
  18. F. Zhu, J. Tao, J. Wu, F. Zhou, J. Chen, Y. Pei, L. Song, J. Wu, and D. Wang, Molecular dynamics simulation of the indentation behavior of tungsten with varying crystal orientations and Berkovich indenter orientations, Mater. Today Commun. 41, 110738 (2024).
  19. N. Zhou, K. I. Elkhodary, X. Huang, S. Tang, and Y. Li, Dislocation structure and dynamics govern pop-in modes of nanoindentation on single-crystal metals, Philos. Mag. 100, 1585 (2020).
  20. H. Yu, A. C. F. Cocks, and E. Tarleton, Formation of prismatic dislocation loops during unloading in nanoindentation, Scr. Mater. 189, 112 (2020).
  21. H. Yu, S. Das, H. Yu, P. Karamched, E. Tarleton, and F. Hofmann, Orientation dependence of the nano-indentation behaviour of pure tungsten, Scr. Mater. 189, 135 (2020).
  22. F. Tropper and T. Ohmura, Distinct orientation dependence of plasticity initiation and subsequent deformation in nanoindented tungsten, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 140, 107907 (2026).
  23. K. L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).
  24. S. Zaefferer and N. N. Elhami, Theory and application of electron channelling contrast imaging under controlled diffraction conditions, Acta Mater. 75, 20 (2014).
  25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/7c3d-tw8q for details on ECCI methodology and additional experimental results.
  26. A. Howie and M. J. Whelan, Diffraction contrast of electron microscope images of crystal lattice defects. III. Results and experimental confirmation of the dynamical theory of dislocation image contrast, Proc. R. Soc. A 267, 206 (1962).
  27. S. Vadalakonda, R. Banerjee, A. Puthcode, and R. Mirshams, Comparison of incipient plasticity in bcc and fcc metals studied using nanoindentation, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 426, 208 (2006).
  28. T. Tsuru and Y. Shibutani, Theoretical investigation of the displacement burst observed in nanoindentation by collective dislocation loops nucleation model, J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2, 559 (2008).
  29. J. Alcalá, R. Dalmau, O. Franke, M. Biener, J. Biener, and A. Hodge, Planar defect nucleation and annihilation mechanisms in nanocontact plasticity of metal surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 075502 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation