Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

High-pressure synthesis of quantum magnet M−YbTaO4 with a stretched diamond lattice

Nicola D. Kelly1,2,*, Xuan Liang2, Siân E. Dutton1,†, Kazunari Yamaura2, and Yoshihiro Tsujimoto2,‡

  • *Contact author: ne281@cam.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: sed33@cam.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: tsujimoto.yoshihiro@nims.go.jp

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 024411 – Published 25 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3xqz-qzr7

Abstract

We report bulk magnetic properties of ytterbium tantalate in its monoclinic fergusonite modification, M−YbTaO4. The spin-12 Yb3+ ions in this phase are arranged on a geometrically frustrated “stretched diamond” lattice. M−YbTaO4 cannot be prepared at ambient pressure and was instead prepared in a belt-type apparatus at 6 GPa and 1800∘C. Susceptibility and specific heat data show no long-range ordering down to 1.8 K and are consistent with a Jeff=12 Kramers doublet which splits in an applied field. Furthermore, under high-pressure synthesis the entire solid solution YbNbxTa1−xO4 (0≤x≤1) can be stabilized in the M phase, in contrast to ambient-pressure synthesis which favors the competing M′ phase for Ta-rich compositions. Subsequent annealing of the Nb-Ta mixed samples resulted in color changes, suggesting oxygen deficiency in some of the as-prepared high pressure samples. There was little variation in the bulk magnetic properties upon varying either the Nb/Ta ratio or the annealing conditions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (59)

  1. H. Huppertz, Multianvil high-pressure synthesis and crystal structure of β−YbBO3, Z. Naturforsch. B: Chem. Sci. 56, 697 (2001).
  2. H. Huppertz, B. von der Eltz, R. D. Hoffmann, and H. Piotrowski, Multianvil high-pressure syntheses and crystal structures of the new rare-earth oxoborates χ−DyBO3 and χ−ErBO3, J. Solid State Chem. 166, 203 (2002).
  3. H. Emme and H. Huppertz, High-pressure synthesis of ν−DyBO3, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 60, i117 (2004).
  4. S.-J. Song, Y.-Q. Lin, B.-Z. Li, S.-Q. Wu, Q.-Q. Zhu, Z. Ren, and G.-H. Cao, Tetragonal polymorph of BaFe2S2O as an antiferromagnetic Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 055002 (2022).
  5. F. Takeiri, Y. Matsumoto, T. Yamamoto, N. Hayashi, Z. Li, T. Tohyama, C. Tassel, C. Ritter, Y. Narumi, M. Hagiwara, and H. Kageyama, High-pressure synthesis of the layered iron oxyselenide BaFe2Se2O with strong magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 94, 184426 (2016).
  6. Y. Tsujimoto, J. Sugiyama, M. Ochi, K. Kuroki, P. Manuel, D. D. Khalyavin, I. Umegaki, M. Månsson, D. Andreica, S. Hara, T. Sakurai, S. Okubo, H. Ohta, A. T. Boothroyd, and K. Yamaura, Impact of mixed anion ordered state on the magnetic ground states of S=1/2 square-lattice quantum spin antiferromagnets, Sr2NiO3Cl and Sr2NiO3F, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 114404 (2022).
  7. Y. Yuan, M. Yang, S. D. Kloß, and J. P. Attfield, A new family of high oxidation state antiperovskite nitrides: La3MN5 (M = Cr, Mn and Mo), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202405498 (2024).
  8. M. Markkula, A. M. Arévalo-López, A. Kusmartseva, J. A. Rodgers, C. Ritter, H. Wu, and J. P. Attfield, Incommensurate spin order in the metallic perovskite MnVO3, Phys. Rev. B 84, 094450 (2011).
  9. A. Almadhi, K. Ji, S. D. Injac, C. Ritter, and J. P. Attfield, (Ca0.5Mn0.5)2MnTeO6 – An anomalously stable high-pressure double perovskite, Chem. Asian J. 19, e202400280 (2024).
  10. E.-P. Liu, S. M. Kumawat, C.-C. Lee, T.-H. Liu, A. M. Arévalo-López, W.-T. Chen, and C.-L. Huang, Complex magnetic properties of the double perovskite Hg2MnTeO6 probed by thermodynamic measurements and neutron diffraction, Phys. Rev. B 112, 104436 (2025).
  11. E. Solana-Madruga, C. Ritter, C. Aguilar-Maldonado, O. Mentré, J. P. Attfield, and A. M. Arévalo-López, Mn3MnNb2O9: High-pressure triple perovskite with 1:2 B-site order and modulated spins, Chem. Commun. 57, 8441 (2021).
  12. X. Liang, K. Yamaura, and A. A. Belik, Cryogenic magnetocaloric properties of zinc-based perovskite Nd2ZnZn(Zn2Sb2)O12 with A-site columnar-type and B-site rock-salt-type orders, Acta Mater. 302, 121626 (2026).
  13. N. Tristan, J. Hemberger, A. Krimmel, H. A. K. von Nidda, V. Tsurkan, and A. Loidl, Geometric frustration in the cubic spinels MAl2O4 (M = Co, Fe, and Mn), Phys. Rev. B 72, 174404 (2005).
  14. L. Ge, J. Flynn, J. A. M. Paddison, M. B. Stone, S. Calder, M. A. Subramanian, A. P. Ramirez, and M. Mourigal, Spin order and dynamics in the diamond-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnets CuRh2O4 and CoRh2O4, Phys. Rev. B 96, 064413 (2017).
  15. V. Fritsch, J. Hemberger, N. Büttgen, E.-W. Scheidt, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, A. Loidl, and V. Tsurkan, Spin and orbital frustration in MnSc2S4 and FeSc2S4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 116401 (2004).
  16. H. Cho, R. Nirmala, J. Jeong, P. J. Baker, H. Takeda, N. Mera, S. J. Blundell, M. Takigawa, D. T. Adroja, and J.-G. Park, Dynamic spin fluctuations in the frustrated a-site spinel CuAl2O4, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014439 (2020).
  17. M. M. Bordelon, C. Liu, L. Posthuma, E. Kenney, M. J. Graf, N. P. Butch, A. Banerjee, S. Calder, L. Balents, and S. D. Wilson, Frustrated Heisenberg J1−J2 model within the stretched diamond lattice of LiYbO2, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014420 (2021).
  18. A. H. Abdeldaim, T. Li, L. Farrar, A. A. Tsirlin, W. Yao, A. S. Gibbs, P. Manuel, P. Lightfoot, G. J. Nilsen, and L. Clark, Realising square and diamond lattice S = 1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet models in the α and β phases of the coordination framework, KTi(C2O4)2·xH2O, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 104414 (2020).
  19. C. A. Marjerrison, C. Mauws, A. Z. Sharma, C. R. Wiebe, S. Derakhshan, C. Boyer, B. D. Gaulin, and J. E. Greedan, Structure and magnetic properties of KRuO4, Inorg. Chem. 55, 12897 (2016).
  20. J. R. Chamorro, L. Ge, J. Flynn, M. A. Subramanian, M. Mourigal, and T. M. McQueen, Frustrated spin one on a diamond lattice in NiRh2O4, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 034404 (2018).
  21. M. M. Bordelon, J. D. Bocarsly, L. Posthuma, A. Banerjee, Q. Zhang, and S. D. Wilson, Antiferromagnetism and crystalline-electric field excitations in tetragonal NaCeO2, Phys. Rev. B 103, 024430 (2021).
  22. P. Mukherjee, E. Suard, and S. E. Dutton, Magnetic properties of monoclinic lanthanide metaborates, Ln(BO2)3, Ln = Pr, Nd, Gd, Tb, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 405807 (2017).
  23. N. D. Kelly, L. Yuan, R. L. Pearson, E. Suard, I. P. Orench, and S. E. Dutton, Magnetism on the stretched diamond lattice in lanthanide orthotantalates, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 044410 (2022).
  24. X. Zhang, N. D. Kelly, D. Sheptyakov, C. Liu, S. Deng, S. S. Saxena, and S. E. Dutton, Magnetoelastic coupling in the stretched diamond lattice of TbTaO4, Mater. Adv. 6, 2570 (2025).
  25. J. Kumar, D. Ranaut, J. G. Nakamura, and K. Mukherjee, Presence of a correlated dynamical ground state in the stretched diamond lattice system YbNbO4, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014411 (2025).
  26. L. H. Brixner and H. Y. Chen, On the structural and luminescent properties of the M' LnTaO4 rare earth tantalates, J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 2435 (1983).
  27. V. Y. Markiv, N. M. Belyavina, M. V. Markiv, Y. Titov, A. M. Sych, A. N. Sokolov, A. A. Kapshuk, and M. S. Slobodyanyk, Peculiarities of polymorphic transformations in YbTaO4 and crystal structure of its modifications, J. Alloys Compd. 346, 263 (2002).
  28. J. Kumar, R. Roy, D. Ranaut, J. G. Nakamura, S. Kanungo, and K. Mukherjee, YbTaO4: A quasi-two-dimensional frustrated magnet possessing spin orbit entangled Kramers doublet ground state, Phys. Rev. B 110, 174420 (2024).
  29. A. Ramanathan, M. Mourigal, and H. S. La Pierre, Frustrated magnetism and spin anisotropy in a buckled square net YbTaO4, Inorg. Chem. 64, 158 (2025).
  30. H. T. Hall, Ultra‐high‐pressure, high‐temperature apparatus: The “belt”, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 31, 125 (1960).
  31. M. Miyakawa and T. Taniguchi, Homogeneous heating of a sample space by a modified heating assembly in a belt-type high-pressure apparatus, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 025101 (2015).
  32. H. M. Rietveld, A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 65 (1969).
  33. A. A. Coelho, TOPAS and TOPAS-Academic: An optimization program integrating computer algebra and crystallographic objects written in C++, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 210 (2018).
  34. E. S. R. Gopal, Specific Heats at Low Temperatures (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1966).
  35. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/3xqz-qzr7 for tables of synthesis attempts, photographs of annealed samples, and additional diffraction and magnetic data for the Nb-Ta solid solution.
  36. C. Keller, Über ternäre oxide des niobs und tantals vom typ ABO4, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 318, 89 (1962).
  37. A. D. Mighell, Conventional cells–The last step toward general acceptance of standard conventional cells for the reporting of crystallographic data, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 107, 373 (2002).
  38. B. A. Steele, E. Stavrou, J. C. Crowhurst, J. M. Zaug, V. B. Prakapenka, and I. I. Oleynik, High-pressure synthesis of a pentazolate salt, Chem. Mater. 29, 735 (2017).
  39. F. Xu, D. Yamazaki, N. Tsujino, and L. Guan, Lattice preferred orientation of stishovite deformed at high pressure and high temperature, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 306, 106546 (2020).
  40. S. L. Butler, J. F. Partridge, X. Huang, I. Suarez-Martinez, N. A. Marks, J. E. Bradby, and D. G. McCulloch, Origin of preferred orientation in an isotropic material: High pressure synthesis of bc8-Si, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 231903 (2023).
  41. M. Saura-Múzquiz, B. G. Mullens, H. E. Maynard-Casely, and B. J. Kennedy, Neutron diffraction study of the monoclinic-tetragonal phase transition in NdNbO4 and NdTaO4, Dalton Trans. 50, 11485 (2021).
  42. B. G. Mullens, M. Saura-Múzquiz, F. P. Marlton, M. Avdeev, H. E. A. Brand, S. Mondal, G. Vaitheeswaran, and B. J. Kennedy, Beyond the ionic radii: A multifaceted approach to understand differences between the structures of LnNbO4 and LnTaO4 fergusonites, J. Alloys Compd. 930, 167399 (2023).
  43. R. D. Shannon, Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides, Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751 (1976).
  44. E. Nakazawa, The lowest 4f-to-5d and charge-transfer transitions of rare earth ions in YPO4 hosts, J. Lumin. 100, 89 (2002).
  45. K. E. Arpino, B. A. Trump, A. O. Scheie, T. M. McQueen, and S. M. Koohpayeh, Impact of stoichiometry of Yb2Ti2O7 on its physical properties, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094407 (2017).
  46. V. V. Brazhkin, High-pressure synthesized materials: Treasures and hints, High Press. Res. 27, 333 (2007).
  47. F. Pan, S. Sun, A. I. Kolesnikov, M. B. Stone, J. Huang, D. Xu, C. Shang, B. Shi, X. Gui, Z. Sun, J. Wang, J. Liu, H. Zhang, Z. Liu, and P. Cheng, Structural and magnetic characterization of CeTa7O19 and YbTa7O19 triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 110, 174448 (2024).
  48. C. Y. Jiang, Y. X. Yang, Y. X. Gao, Z. T. Wan, Z. H. Zhu, T. Shiroka, C. S. Chen, Q. Wu, X. Li, J. C. Jiao, K. W. Chen, Y. Bao, Z. M. Tian, and L. Shu, Spin excitations in the quantum dipolar magnet Yb(BaBO3)3, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014409 (2022).
  49. S. Mugiraneza and A. M. Hallas, Tutorial: A beginner's guide to interpreting magnetic susceptibility data with the Curie-Weiss law, Commun. Phys. 5, 95 (2022).
  50. R. Kumar, A. G. Francis, R. Stewart, P. J. Baker, S. K. Pati, and A. Sundaresan, Quasiparamagnetic ground state in the hyperhoneycomb lattice compound Na0.5Yb0.5WO4, Phys. Rev. B 111, 094407 (2025).
  51. S. Guchhait, R. Kolay, A. Magar, and R. Nath, Magnetic and crystal electric field studies of the Yb3+-based triangular lattice antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 214437 (2025).
  52. U. Arjun, K. M. Ranjith, A. Jesche, F. Hirschberger, D. D. Sarma, and P. Gegenwart, Adiabatic demagnetization refrigeration to millikelvin temperatures with the distorted square lattice magnet NaYbGeO4, Phys. Rev. B 108, 224415 (2023).
  53. S. T. Bramwell, M. N. Field, M. J. Harris, and I. P. Parkin, Bulk magnetization of the heavy rare earth titanate pyrochlores - A series of model frustrated magnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, 483 (2000).
  54. V. K. Pecharsky and K. A. Gschneidner, Magnetocaloric effect and magnetic refrigeration, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 44 (1999).
  55. A. P. Ramirez, Strongly geometrically frustrated magnets, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 24, 453 (1994).
  56. M. J. P. Gingras, in Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, Springer Series in Solid State Science, Vol. 164 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).
  57. Y. Tokiwa, S. Bachus, K. Kavita, A. Jesche, A. A. Tsirlin, and P. Gegenwart, Frustrated magnet for adiabatic demagnetization cooling to milli-Kelvin temperatures, Commun. Mater. 2, 42 (2021).
  58. U. Arjun, K. M. Ranjith, A. Jesche, F. Hirschberger, D. D. Sarma, and P. Gegenwart, Efficient adiabatic demagnetization refrigeration to below 50 mK with ultrahigh-vacuum-compatible ytterbium diphosphates AYbP2O7 (A = Na, K), Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 014013 (2023).
  59. Research data supporting this work will be made available at: DOI:10.17863/CAM.123100.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation