- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Materials

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Faceting transition in aluminum as a grain boundary phase transition

Yoonji Choi (최윤지) and Tobias Brink*

  • *Contact author: t.brink@mpi-susmat.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 083607 – Published 25 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2dnf-zdz8

Abstract

Grain boundaries facet because of anisotropic grain boundary energies: While the faceted boundary has a larger area than the corresponding straight boundary, a significantly lower energy of the facets compared to a straight segment can drive the faceting. This picture is complicated by faceting/defaceting transitions where the free energy difference between the two states depends on the temperature. Such transitions have been observed and modeled before, but their exact nature was not fully understood. Here, we use atomistic computer simulations to show that a well-known faceting transition in Σ3[111¯] tilt grain boundaries in Al is in fact a grain boundary phase transition (also called complexion transition). This means that the faceted and defaceted boundaries are associated with different atomic structures, which have different thermodynamic stability ranges. At low temperatures, the grain boundary phase associated with faceting is stable, while at high temperatures the flat grain boundary phase is stable. We also report on our thorough tests of Al interatomic potentials for this purpose, which include comparisons to density-functional theory calculations. Our chosen potential performs well for our grain boundaries. As a consequence, we were able to obtain results that align with previous experimental results.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (104)

  1. G. Gottstein, Physical Foundations of Materials Science, 1st ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  2. P. Lejček, Grain Boundary Segregation in Metals (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
  3. L. Priester, Grain Boundaries: From Theory to Engineering (Springer, Berlin, 2013).
  4. W. R. Wagner, T. Y. Tan, and R. W. Balluffi, Faceting of high-angle grain boundaries in the coincidence lattice, Philos. Mag. 29, 895 (1974).
  5. A. Brokman, P. D. Bristowe, and R. W. Balluffi, Atomistic faceting of asymetric tilt boundaries, Scr. Metall. 15, 201 (1981).
  6. T. E. Hsieh and R. W. Balluffi, Observations of roughening/de-faceting phase transitions in grain boundaries, Acta Metall. 37, 2133 (1989).
  7. B. B. Straumal, S. A. Polyakov, E. Bischoff, W. Gust, and E. J. Mittemeijer, Faceting of Σ3 and Σ9 grain boundaries in copper, Interface Sci. 9, 287 (2001).
  8. J. C. Hamilton, D. J. Siegel, I. Daruka, and F. Léonard, Why do grain boundaries exhibit finite facet lengths? Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 246102 (2003).
  9. Z. X. Wu, Y. W. Zhang, and D. J. Srolovitz, Grain boundary finite length faceting, Acta Mater. 57, 4278 (2009).
  10. A. D. Banadaki and S. Patala, A simple faceting model for the interfacial and cleavage energies of Σ3 grain boundaries in the complete boundary plane orientation space, Comput. Mater. Sci. 112, 147 (2016).
  11. G. P. Dimitrakopulos, T. H. Karakostas, and R. C. Pond, The defect character of interface junction lines, Interface Sci. 4, 129 (1997).
  12. R. C. Pond and V. Vítek, Periodic grain boundary structures in aluminium I. A combined experimental and theoretical investigation of coincidence grain boundary structure in aluminium, Proc. R. Soc. London A 357, 453 (1997).
  13. D. L. Medlin, K. Hattar, J. A. Zimmerman, F. Abdeljawad, and S. M. Foiles, Defect character at grain boundary facet junctions: Analysis of an asymmetric Σ=5 grain boundary in Fe, Acta Mater. 124, 383 (2017).
  14. R. Hadian, B. Grabowski, M. W. Finnis, and J. Neugebauer, Migration mechanisms of a faceted grain boundary, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 043601 (2018).
  15. T. Brink, L. Langenohl, S. Pemma, C. H. Liebscher, and G. Dehm, Stable nanofacets in [111] tilt grain boundaries of face-centered cubic metals, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 063606 (2024).
  16. B. B. Straumal, O. A. Kogtenkova, A. S. Gornakova, V. G. Sursaeva, and B. Baretzky, Review: Grain boundary faceting-roughening phenomena, J. Mater. Sci. 51, 382 (2016).
  17. T. Frolov and Y. Mishin, Phases, phase equilibria, and phase rules in low-dimensional systems, J. Chem. Phys. 143, 044706 (2015).
  18. M. Tang, W. C. Carter, and R. M. Cannon, Diffuse interface model for structural transitions of grain boundaries, Phys. Rev. B 73, 024102 (2006).
  19. S. J. Dillon, M. Tang, W. C. Carter, and M. P. Harmer, Complexion: A new concept for kinetic engineering in materials science, Acta Mater. 55, 6208 (2007).
  20. P. R. Cantwell, M. Tang, S. J. Dillon, J. Luo, G. S. Rohrer, and M. P. Harmer, Grain boundary complexions, Acta Mater. 62, 1 (2014).
  21. P. R. Cantwell, T. Frolov, T. J. Rupert, A. R. Krause, C. J. Marvel, G. S. Rohrer, J. M. Rickman, and M. P. Harmer, Grain boundary complexion transitions, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 50, 465 (2020).
  22. W. D. Kaplan, D. Chatain, P. Wynblatt, and W. C. Carter, A review of wetting versus adsorption, complexions, and related phenomena: the Rosetta Stone of wetting, J. Mater. Sci. 48, 5681 (2013).
  23. J. W. Gibbs, The Collected Works of J. Willard Gibbs, Volume 1: Thermodynamics (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1948).
  24. E. W. Hart, Two-dimensional phase transformation in grain boundaries, Scr. Metall. 2, 179 (1968).
  25. E. W. Hart, Grain boundary phase transformations, in The Nature and Behavior of Grain Boundaries, edited by H. Hu (Plenum Press, New York, 1972), pp. 155–170.
  26. W. Cahn, Transitions and phase equilibria among grain boundary structures, J. Phys. Colloques 43, C6 (1982).
  27. C. Rottman, Theory of phase transitions at internal interfaces, J. Phys. Colloques 49, C5 (1988).
  28. T. Frolov and Y. Mishin, Thermodynamics of coherent interfaces under mechanical stresses. I. Theory, Phys. Rev. B 85, 224106 (2012).
  29. T. Frolov and Y. Mishin, Thermodynamics of coherent interfaces under mechanical stresses. II. Application to atomistic simulation of grain boundaries, Phys. Rev. B 85, 224107 (2012).
  30. T. Meiners, T. Frolov, R. E. Rudd, G. Dehm, and C. H. Liebscher, Observations of grain-boundary phase transformations in an elemental metal, Nature (London) 579, 375 (2020).
  31. T. Meiners, J. M. Duarte, G. Richter, G. Dehm, and C. H. Liebscher, Tantalum and zirconium induced structural transitions at complex [111] tilt grain boundaries in copper, Acta Mater. 190, 93 (2020).
  32. L. Langenohl, T. Brink, R. Freitas, T. Frolov, G. Dehm, and C. H. Liebscher, Dual phase patterning during a congruent grain boundary phase transition in elemental copper, Nat. Commun. 13, 3331 (2022).
  33. L. Langenohl, T. Brink, G. Richter, G. Dehm, and C. H. Liebscher, Atomic-resolution observations of silver segregation in a [111] tilt grain boundary in copper, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134112 (2023).
  34. T. Brink, L. Langenohl, H. Bishara, and G. Dehm, Universality of grain boundary phases in fcc metals: Case study on high-angle [111] symmetric tilt grain boundaries, Phys. Rev. B 107, 054103 (2023).
  35. S. Saood, T. Brink, C. H. Liebscher, and G. Dehm, Influence of variation in grain boundary parameters on the evolution of atomic structure and properties of [111] tilt boundaries in aluminum, Acta Mater. 268, 119732 (2024).
  36. S. Saood, T. Brink, C. H. Liebscher, and G. Dehm, Microstates and defects of incoherent Σ3 [111] twin boundaries in aluminum, Acta Mater. 243, 118499 (2023).
  37. A. Morawiec, On ‘interface-plane scheme’ and symmetric grain boundaries, Z. Kristallogr. 227, 199 (2012).
  38. J. W. Cahn, Thermodynamics of solid and fluid surfaces, in Interfacial Segregation, edited by W. C. Johnson and J. M. Blakely (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1979), pp. 379–399.
  39. T. Frolov, D. L. Olmsted, M. Asta, and Y. Mishin, Structural phase transformations in metallic grain boundaries, Nat. Commun. 4, 1899 (2013).
  40. J. Hickman and Y. Mishin, Extra variable in grain boundary description, Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 010601 (2017).
  41. V. V. Zhakhovskii, N. A. Inogamov, Y. V. Petrov, S. I. Ashitkov, and K. Nishihara, Molecular dynamics simulation of femtosecond ablation and spallation with different interatomic potentials, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 9592 (2009).
  42. NIST Interatomic Potentials Repository, National Institute of Standards and Technology, https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials, https://doi.org/10.18434/m37.
  43. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in 't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen et al., LAMMPS—A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  44. S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
  45. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).
  46. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994).
  47. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
  48. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  49. J. Janssen, S. Surendralal, Y. Lysogorskiy, M. Todorova, T. Hickel, R. Drautz, and J. Neugebauer, pyiron: An integrated development environment for computational materials science, Comput. Mater. Sci. 163, 24 (2019).
  50. E. Chen, T. W. Heo, B. C. Wood, M. Asta, and T. Frolov, Grand canonically optimized grain boundary phases in hexagonal close-packed titanium, Nat. Commun. 15, 7049 (2024).
  51. S. M. Foiles, Evaluation of harmonic methods for calculating the free energy of defects in solids, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14930 (1994).
  52. R. Freitas, R. E. Rudd, M. Asta, and T. Frolov, Free energy of grain boundary phases: Atomistic calculations for Σ5(310)[001] grain boundary in Cu, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 093603 (2018).
  53. P. M. Larsen, S. Schmidt, and J. Schiøtz, Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 24, 055007 (2016).
  54. A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO—The Open Visualization Tool, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).
  55. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/2dnf-zdz8 for additional structure search data and analyses, more detailed free energy and thermal expansion data, as well as supplementary information on DFT and potential verification simulations.
  56. S. Saood, T. Brink, C. H. Liebscher, and G. Dehm, Datasets for the paper “Microstates and defects of incoherent Σ3 [111] twin boundaries in aluminum”, Zenodo (2022), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6414955.
  57. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  58. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  59. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  60. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
  61. K. Pearson, LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space, Philos. Mag. 2, 559 (1901).
  62. H. Hotelling, Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components, J. Educ. Psychol. 24, 417 (1933).
  63. H. Hotelling, Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components, J. Educ. Psychol. 24, 498 (1933).
  64. Note that GBs are never thermodynamically stable. A system in thermodynamic equilibrium would only contain point defects. However, if we take the presence of a GB as a given, we can still formulate the relative stability of different GB phases using standard thermodynamics.
  65. G. Dehm, B. J. Inkson, and T. Wagner, Growth and microstructural stability of epitaxial Al films on (0001) α−Al2O3 substrates, Acta Mater. 50, 5021 (2002).
  66. F. Abdeljawad, S. M. Foiles, A. Moore, A. R. Hinkle, C. Barr, N. M. Heckman, K. Hattar, and B. L. Boyce, The role of the interface stiffness tensor on grain boundary dynamics, Acta Mater. 158, 440 (2018).
  67. I. Daruka and J. C. Hamilton, Atomistic and lattice model of a grain boundary defaceting phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246105 (2004).
  68. C. Qiu, M. Salvalaglio, D. J. Srolovitz, and J. Han, Interface faceting-defaceting mediated by disconnections, Acta Mater. 251, 118880 (2023).
  69. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005).
  70. J. Rumble, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 103rd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2022).
  71. H. Ullmaier, ed., Atomic Defects in Metals, Landolt-Börnstein – Group III Condensed Matter, Vol. 25 (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
  72. L. Vitos, A. V. Ruban, H. L. Skriver, and J. Kollár, The surface energy of metals, Surf. Sci. 411, 186 (1998).
  73. N. Bernstein and E. B. Tadmor, Tight-binding calculations of stacking energies and twinnability in fcc metals, Phys. Rev. B 69, 094116 (2004).
  74. S. Ogata, J. Li, and S. Yip, Ideal pure shear strength of aluminum and copper, Science 298, 807 (2002).
  75. Y. Choi and T. Brink, Datasets for “Faceting transition in aluminum as a grain boundary phase transition”, Zenodo (2025), doi:10.5281/zenodo.15674815.
  76. A. F. Voter and S. P. Chen, Accurate interatomic potentials for Ni, Al and Ni3 Al, MRS Online Proceedings Library 82, 175 (1986).
  77. K. W. Jacobsen, P. Stoltze, and J. K. Nørskov, A semi-empirical effective medium theory for metals and alloys, Surf. Sci. 366, 394 (1996).
  78. Y. Mishin, D. Farkas, M. J. Mehl, and D. A. Papaconstantopoulos, Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations, Phys. Rev. B 59, 3393 (1999).
  79. J. B. Sturgeon and B. B. Laird, Adjusting the melting point of a model system via Gibbs-Duhem integration: Application to a model of aluminum, Phys. Rev. B 62, 14720 (2000).
  80. R. R. Zope and Y. Mishin, Interatomic potentials for atomistic simulations of the Ti-Al system, Phys. Rev. B 68, 024102 (2003).
  81. X.-Y. Liu, F. Ercolessi, and J. B. Adams, Aluminium interatomic potential from density functional theory calculations with improved stacking fault energy, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 12, 665 (2004).
  82. X. W. Zhou, R. A. Johnson, and H. N. G. Wadley, Misfit-energy-increasing dislocations in vapor-deposited CoFe/NiFe multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 69, 144113 (2004).
  83. M. I. Mendelev, M. J. Kramer, C. A. Becker, and M. Asta, Analysis of semi-empirical interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of crystalline and liquid Al and Cu, Philos. Mag. 88, 1723 (2008).
  84. J. M. Winey, A. Kubota, and Y. M. Gupta, A thermodynamic approach to determine accurate potentials for molecular dynamics simulations: Thermoelastic response of aluminum, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17, 055004 (2009).
  85. M. I. Pascuet and J. R. Fernández, Atomic interaction of the MEAM type for the study of intermetallics in the Al–U alloy, J. Nucl. Mater. 467, 229 (2015).
  86. T. Brink, L. Langenohl, H. Bishara, and G. Dehm, Dataset for “Universality of grain boundary phases in fcc metals: Case study on high-angle [111] symmetric tilt grain boundaries”, Zenodo (2022), doi:10.5281/zenodo.7358052.
  87. J. K. Nørskov, K. W. Jacobsen, and P. Stoltze, EMT potential for Al developed by Jacobsen, Stoltze, and Norskov (1996) v001, OpenKIM (2019).
  88. E. B. Tadmor, R. S. Elliott, J. P. Sethna, R. E. Miller, and C. A. Becker, The potential of atomistic simulations and the knowledgebase of interatomic models, JOM 63, 17 (2011).
  89. R. S. Elliott and E. B. Tadmor, Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) application programming interface (API), OpenKIM (2011).
  90. L.-F. Zhu, J. Janssen, S. Ishibashi, F. Körmann, B. Grabowski, and J. Neugebauer, A fully automated approach to calculate the melting temperature of elemental crystals, Comput. Mater. Sci. 187, 110065 (2021).
  91. V. Vítek, Thermally activated motion of screw dislocations in B.C.C. metals, Phys. Status Solidi B 18, 687 (1966).
  92. V. Vítek, Intrinsic stacking faults in body-centred cubic crystals, Philos. Mag. 18, 773 (1968).
  93. J. A. Zimmerman, H. Gao, and F. F. Abraham, Generalized stacking fault energies for embedded atom FCC metals, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 8, 103 (2000).
  94. J. Cai, C. Lu, P. H. Yap, and Y. Y. Wang, How to affect stacking fault energy and structure by atom relaxation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3543 (2002).
  95. P. Hidnert, Thermal expansion of aluminum and various important aluminum alloys, Scientific Papers of the Bureau of Standards 19, 697 (1924).
  96. F. R. Kroeger and C. A. Swenson, Absolute linear thermal-expansion measurements on copper and aluminum from 5 to 320 K, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 853 (1977).
  97. F. C. Nix and D. MacNair, The thermal expansion of pure metals: Copper, gold, aluminum, nickel, and iron, Phys. Rev. 60, 597 (1941).
  98. H. Dammak, Y. Chalopin, M. Laroche, M. Hayoun, and J.-J. Greffet, Quantum thermal bath for molecular dynamics simulation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 190601 (2009).
  99. J.-L. Barrat and D. Rodney, Portable implementation of a quantum thermal bath for molecular dynamics simulations, J. Stat. Phys. 144, 679 (2011).
  100. E. Grüneisen, Zustand des festen Körpers, in Thermische Eigenschaften der Stoffe, Handbuch der Physik, Vol. 10, edited by C. Drucker, E. Grüneisen, P. Kohnstamm, F. Körber, K. Scheel, E. Schrödinger, F. Simon, J. D. Waals, and F. Henning (Springer, Berlin, 1926), pp. 1–59.
  101. A. H. Barrozo and M. de Koning, Comment on “Quantum thermal bath for molecular dynamics simulation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 198901 (2011).
  102. H. Dammak, M. Hayoun, Y. Chalopin, and J.-J. Greffet, Dammak et al. Reply, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 198902 (2011).
  103. A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2023).
  104. A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35, 353001 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 083607– Published 25 August, 2025
  • Received 16 June 2025
  • Revised 4 August 2025
  • Accepted 12 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Open access publication funded by Max Planck Society.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation