Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quasinormal Mode Content of Binary Black Hole Ringdowns

Richard Dyer1,* and Christopher J. Moore1,2,3,†

  • *Contact author: richard.dyer@ast.cam.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: christopher.moore@ast.cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 191403 – Published 13 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ptmd-rz1t

Abstract

We present a fully Bayesian, data-driven framework for identifying quasinormal modes in high-accuracy Cauchy characteristic evolution gravitational waveforms. Applying this to a public catalog, we identify quasinormal mode overtones, retrograde modes, and nonlinear modes up to cubic order in the ringdown. Multiple high-order overtones are found near the merger, confirming their physical significance for modeling the ringdown. The ringdown mode content is tabulated across a wide range of start times for all available simulations, providing a systematic reference for theoretical and observational studies. We also search for late-time power-law tails, which are, as expected, absent from the Cauchy characteristic evolution waveforms.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Quasinormal modes from numerical relativity with Bayesian inference

Richard Dyer and Christopher J. Moore
Phys. Rev. D 113, 104031 (2026)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (64)

  1. G. Carullo, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 57, 76 (2025).
  2. E. Berti et al., arXiv:2505.23895.
  3. O. Dreyer, B. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Garrison, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 787 (2004).
  4. M. Isi, M. Giesler, W. M. Farr, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 111102 (2019).
  5. LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 041403 (2026).
  6. M. Isi, W. M. Farr, M. Giesler, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 011103 (2021).
  7. A. Correia and C. D. Capano, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044018 (2024).
  8. A. G. Abac et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111403 (2025).
  9. E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 163001 (2009).
  10. LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084080 (2025).
  11. I. Kamaretsos, M. Hannam, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 141102 (2012).
  12. C. Pacilio, S. Bhagwat, F. Nobili, and D. Gerosa, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103037 (2024).
  13. L. Magaña Zertuche et al., Phys. Rev. D 112, 024077 (2025).
  14. H. Zhu et al., Phys. Rev. D 111, 064052 (2025).
  15. J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D 102, 044052 (2020).
  16. J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, N. Deppe, N. Vu, F. Hébert, L. E. Kidder, and W. Throwe, Phys. Rev. D 107, 064013 (2023).
  17. S. Bhagwat, M. Okounkova, S. W. Ballmer, D. A. Brown, M. Giesler, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104065 (2018).
  18. M. Okounkova, arXiv:2004.00671.
  19. M. Giesler, M. Isi, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041060 (2019).
  20. L. London, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084052 (2020).
  21. A. Dhani, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104048 (2021).
  22. X. J. Forteza and P. Mourier, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124072 (2021).
  23. E. Finch and C. J. Moore, Phys. Rev. D 103, 084048 (2021).
  24. M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Baibhav, and R. Cotesta, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044069 (2024).
  25. M. Giesler et al., Phys. Rev. D 111, 084041 (2025).
  26. K. Mitman et al., Phys. Rev. D 112, 064016 (2025).
  27. S. Ma, K. Mitman, L. Sun, N. Deppe, F. Hébert, L. E. Kidder, J. Moxon, W. Throwe, N. L. Vu, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084036 (2022).
  28. T. A. Clarke et al., Phys. Rev. D 109, 124030 (2024).
  29. J. Redondo-Yuste, G. Carullo, J. L. Ripley, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 109, L101503 (2024).
  30. G. Carullo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2024) 061.
  31. R. Dyer and C. J. Moore, companion paper, Phys. Rev. D 113, 104031 (2026).
  32. L. C. Stein, J. Open Source Software 4, 1683 (2019).
  33. M. Lagos and L. Hui, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044040 (2023).
  34. S. Ma and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104070 (2024).
  35. R. Dyer and C. J. Moore, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024002 (2025).
  36. R. H. Price, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2419 (1972).
  37. sxs CCE catalog, https://data.black-holes.org/waveforms/extcce_catalog.html (accessed: August 2024).
  38. N. Deppe et al., spectre v2024.09.29, 10.5281/zenodo.13858965 (2024).
  39. L. M. Zertuche et al., Phys. Rev. D 105, 104015 (2022).
  40. K. Mitman et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 084029 (2022).
  41. K. Mitman et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 223001 (2024).
  42. M. Boyle, Phys. Rev. D 87, 104006 (2013).
  43. M. Boyle, L. E. Kidder, S. Ossokine, and H. P. Pfeiffer, arXiv:1409.4431.
  44. M. Boyle, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084031 (2016).
  45. M. Boyle, D. Iozzo, and L. C. Stein, moble/scri: v1.2, 10.5281/zenodo.4041972 (2020).
  46. M. Boyle, K. Mitman, M. Scheel, and L. Stein, The sxs package, 10.5281/zenodo.4034006 (2021).
  47. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/ptmd-rz1t for a description and example of the ringdown model building algorithm, a table of the spherical harmonics used for each simulation, and details of the power-law tail analysis.
  48. QNM content site, https://bgp-qnm-fits.github.io/bgp_qnm_content/ (accessed: September 2025).
  49. K. Mitman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081402 (2023).
  50. M. H.-Y. Cheung et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081401 (2023).
  51. https://bgp-qnm-fits.github.io/bgp_qnm_content/sim_0010.html#nonlinear-mode-mixing-alternatives.
  52. P. Mourier, X. Jiménez Forteza, D. Pook-Kolb, B. Krishnan, and E. Schnetter, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044054 (2021).
  53. V. Baibhav, M. Ho-Yeuk Cheung, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, R. Cotesta, W. Del Pozzo, and F. Duque, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104020 (2023).
  54. P. J. Nee, S. H. Völkel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044032 (2023).
  55. N. Oshita and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104043 (2025).
  56. N. Oshita, S. Ma, Y. Chen, and H. Yang, arXiv:2509.09165.
  57. https://bgp-qnm-fits.github.io/bgp_qnm_content/sim_0010.html#epsilon.
  58. D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306 (2013).
  59. S. Ma, M. A. Scheel, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024003 (2025).
  60. https://bgp-qnm-fits.github.io/bgp_qnm_content/sim_0010.html#power-law-tails.
  61. M. De Amicis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 171401 (2025).
  62. C. Peterson, S. Gautam, A. Vañó-Viñuales, and D. Hilditch, Phys. Rev. D 110, 124033 (2024).
  63. https://github.com/BGP-QNM-FITS/bgp_qnm_fits.
  64. https://github.com/BGP-QNM-FITS/bgp_qnm_content.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation