- Open Access
Efficient laminar flow control
Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 033901 – Published 5 March, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sq42-dlzp
Abstract
Research studies conducted over the years have demonstrated that wall suction is a highly effective laminar flow control (LFC) technique to delay laminar to turbulent transition. In this work, we investigated efficient LFC configurations. These are evaluated both in terms of the drag and power exerted by the flow and demanded by the LFC system. To derive the LFC power, the literature analyses on drag reduction for turbulent flows were adapted for the LFC applications hereby considered, leading to the identification of the relevant power-contributing terms. Two methods, originally developed to predict the transition location for uncontrolled flows, were employed to explore LFC configurations. These are specifically the so-called method, derived from the linear stability theory, and the model. Only the approach gave more robust results for LFC applications. As such, it was embedded in an iterative framework exploiting Bayesian optimization to find the most beneficial configurations, for uniform suction LFC, to control the archetypal, bidimensional, and incompressible flat plate flow. Overall, 700 configurations were explored. Efficient LFC configurations were found with the optimal configuration delivering 34% of total power saving. This study, establishing a robust and computationally affordable methodology, while developing the power budget breakdown, paves the way for efficient LFC for aeronautical flows, possibly considering nonuniform suction, pressure gradients, surface curvature, the third spatial direction as well as flows at different Reynolds and Mach numbers.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (64)
- N. Beck, T. Landa, A. Seitz, L. Boermans, Y. Liu, and R. Radespiel, Drag reduction by laminar flow control, Energies 11, 252 (2018).
- R. D. Joslin, Aircraft laminar flow control, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 1 (1998).
- K. S. G. Krishnan, O. Bertram, and O. Seibel, Review of hybrid laminar flow control systems, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 93, 24 (2017).
- J. Svorcan, J. M. Wang, and K. P. Griffin, Current state and future trends in boundary layer control on lifting surfaces, Adv. Mech. Eng. 14, 16878132221112161 (2022).
- J.-P. Marec, Drag reduction: A major task for research, in Proceedings of the CEAS/DragNet European Drag Reduction Conference on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Technologies (Springer, Berlin, 2001), pp. 17–27.
- A. L. Braslow, History of suction-type laminar-flow control with emphasis on flight resrearch: Monographs in aerospace history number 13, Technical Report, NASA, Washington, D.C. (1999).
- G. A. Reynolds and W. S. Saric, Experiments on the stability of the flat-plate boundary layer with suction, AIAA J. 24, 202 (1986).
- J. H. M. Fransson and P. H. Alfredsson, On the disturbance growth in an asymptotic suction boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 482, 51 (2003).
- M. Corelli Grappadelli, S. Sattler, P. Scholz, R. Radespiel, and C. Badrya, Experimental investigations of boundary layer transition on a flat plate with suction, in Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2021), p. 1452.
- H. L. Meitz and H. F. Fasel, Navier-Stokes simulations of the effects of suction holes on a flat plate boundary layer, Application of Direct and Large Eddy Simulation to Transition and Turbulence, Technical Report ,NASA, Washington, D.C. (1994).
- J. A. Masad, A. H. Nayfeh, and A. A. Al-Maaitah, Effect of heat transfer on the stability of compressible boundary layers, Comput. Fluids 21, 43 (1992).
- P. L. O'Sullivan and S. Biringen, Numerical experiments on feedback EMHD control of large scale coherent structures in channel turbulence, Acta Mech. 152, 9 (2001).
- J. Pang and K. S. Choi, Turbulent drag reduction by Lorentz force oscillation, Phys. Fluids 16, L35 (2004).
- S. Grundmann and C. Tropea, Delay of boundary-layer transition using plasma actuators, in Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2008), p. 1369.
- S. L. Chernyshev, A. P. Kiselev, and A. P. Kuryachii, Laminar flow control research at TsAGI: Past and present, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 47, 169 (2011).
- J. Serpieri, S. Y. Venkata, and M. Kotsonis, Conditioning of cross-flow instability modes using dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators, J. Fluid Mech. 833, 164 (2017).
- J. Serpieri and M. Kotsonis, Conditioning of unsteady cross-flow instability modes using dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators, Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 93, 305 (2018).
- A. Altıntaş and L. Davidson, Direct numerical simulation analysis of spanwise oscillating Lorentz force in turbulent channel flow at low Reynolds number, Acta Mech. 228, 1269 (2017).
- R. Zhao, C. Y. Wen, X. D. Tian, T. H. Long, and W. Yuan, Numerical simulation of local wall heating and cooling effect on the stability of a hypersonic boundary layer, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 121, 986 (2018).
- S. Yadala, M. T. Hehner, J. Serpieri, N. Benard, P. C. Dörr, M. J. Kloker, and M. Kotsonis, Experimental control of swept-wing transition through base-flow modification by plasma actuators, J. Fluid Mech. 844, R2 (2018).
- H. Schlichting and J. Kestin, Boundary Layer Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1961), Vol. 121.
- P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson, Stability and Transition in Shear Flows (Springer, New York, NY, 2001), Vol. 142.
- H. L. Meitz, Numerical Investigation of Suction in a Transitional Flat-Plate Boundary Layer, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Arizona, 1996.
- J. L. Van Ingen, A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region, University of Techn., Dept. of Aerospace Eng., Report UTH-74 (1956).
- A. Smith and N. Gamberoni, Transition, pressure gradient, and stability theory. Technical Report No. ES. 26388, Douglas Aircraft, El Segundo, CA (1956).
- W. W. D. A. Gregory, B. A., Wind-tunnel tests on the 30 per cent symmetrical Griffith aerofoil with distributed suction over the nose, A.R.C. Technical Report 2647 (1953).
- W. S. Saric, R. B. Carrillo, and M. S. Reibert, Nonlinear stability and transition in 3-D boundary layers, Meccanica 33, 469 (1998).
- D. Arnal and G. Casalis, Laminar-turbulent transition prediction in three-dimensional flows, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 36, 173 (2000).
- H. L. Reed and A. H. Nayfeh, Numerical-perturbation technique for stability of flat-plate boundary layers with suction, AIAA J. 24, 208 (1986).
- K. H. Horstmann, G. Redeker, A. Quast, U. Dreßler, and H. Bieler, Flight tests with a natural laminar flow glove on a transport aircraft, Flight Simulation Technologies Conference Exhibit 385 (1990).
- G. Schrauf, Large-scale laminar flow tests evaluated with linear stability theory, J. Aircraft 41, 224 (2012).
- R. D. Wagner, D. V. Maddalon, D. W. Bartlett, J. C. F. S., and A. L. Braslow, Laminar-flow Flight Experiments, Transonic Symposium: Theory, Application and Experiment, Volume 2 (Springer, Berlin, 1989).
- D. G. MacManus and J. A. Eaton, Predictions and observations of the flow field induced by laminar flow control microperforations, Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 13, 395 (1996).
- D. G. MacManus and J. A. Eaton, Flow physics of discrete boundary layer suction–measurements and predictions, J. Fluid Mech. 417, 47 (2000).
- B. Crowley and C. Atkin, Effect of discrete widely spaced suction on a transitioning flow at high suction rates, in Proceedings of the 9th IUTAM Symposium on Laminar-Turbulent Transition (Springer, Berlin, 2022), pp. 359–368.
- M. Atzori, R. Vinuesa, G. Fahland, A. Stroh, D. Gatti, B. Frohnapfel, and P. Schlatter, Aerodynamic effects of uniform blowing and suction on a NACA4412 airfoil, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 105, 735 (2020).
- M. Atzori, R. Vinuesa, A. Stroh, D. Gatti, B. Frohnapfel, and P. Schlatter, Uniform blowing and suction applied to nonuniform adverse-pressure-gradient wing boundary layers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 113904 (2021).
- G. Fahland, A. Stroh, B. Frohnapfel, M. Atzori, R. Vinuesa, P. Schlatter, and D. Gatti, Investigation of blowing and suction for turbulent flow control on airfoils, AIAA J. 59, 4422 (2021).
- G. Fahland, M. Atzori, A. Frede, A. Stroh, B. Frohnapfel, and D. Gatti, Drag assessment for boundary layer control schemes with mass injection, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 113, 119 (2024).
- G. Fahland, Airfoil Drag with Uniform Blowing in Turbulent Boundary Layers, Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), 2024.
- F. Mallor, G. Semprini-Cesari, T. Mukha, S. Rezaeiravesh, and P. Schlatter, Bayesian optimization of wall-normal blowing and suction-based flow control of a NACA 4412 wing profile, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 113, 93 (2024).
- J.-L. Rioual, P. A. Nelson, P. Hackenberg, and O. R. Tutty, Optimum drag balance for boundary-layer suction, J. Aircr. 33, 435 (1996).
- F. R. Menter, R. Langtry, and S. Völker, Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 77, 277 (2006).
- R. B. Langtry and F. R. Menter, Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes, AIAA J. 47, 2894 (2009).
- H. B. Keller, Numerical Solution of Two Point Boundary Value Problems (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1976).
- T. J. Bridges and P. J. Morris, Differential eigenvalue problems in which the parameter appears nonlinearly, J. Comput. Phys. 55, 437 (1984).
- H. Haj-Hariri, Transformations reducing the order of the parameter in differential eigenvalue problems, J. Comput. Phys. 77, 472 (1988).
- S. Motsa and Z. Makukula, On spectral relaxation method approach for steady von Kármán flow of a Reiner-Rivlin fluid with Joule heating, viscous dissipation and suction/injection, Open Physics 11, 363 (2013).
- W. Huang and D. M. Sloan, The pseudospectral method for solving differential eigenvalue problems, J. Comput. Phys. 111, 399 (1994).
- M. V. Morkovin, On the many faces of transition, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Viscous Drag Reduction (Springer, Berlin, 1969), pp. 1–31.
- T. A. Zaki and P. A. Durbin, Continuous mode transition and the effects of pressure gradient, J. Fluid Mech. 563, 357 (2006).
- NASA, The Langtry-Menter 4-equation transitional SST model, Technical Report ,NASA, Washington, D.C. (2017).
- T. Hino, M. Hirota, N. Hirata, and K. Ohashi, Comparison of unstructured grid and overset grid approaches for flow computations around a ship with an energy-saving duct, in Proceedings of the MARINE VI International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (CIMNE, 2015), pp. 558–567.
- W. R. Thompson, On the likelihood that one unknown probability exceeds another in view of the evidence of two samples, Biometrika 25, 285 (1933).
- B. Shahriari, K. Swersky, Z. Wang, R. P. Adams, and N. De Freitas, Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization, Proc. IEEE 104, 148 (2015).
- A. B. Blanchard, G. Y. C. Maceda, D. Fan, Y. Li, Y. Zhou, B. R. Noack, and T. P. Sapsis, Bayesian optimization for active flow control, Acta Mech. Sin. 37, 1786 (2021).
- Y. Morita, S. Rezaeiravesh, N. Tabatabaei, R. Vinuesa, K. Fukagata, and P. Schlatter, Applying Bayesian optimization with Gaussian process regression to computational fluid dynamics problems, J. Comput. Phys. 449, 110788 (2022).
- The-MathWorks-Inc., Statistics and machine learning toolbox documentation (2022), https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/index.html.
- H. Wedin and S. Cherubini, Permeability models affecting nonlinear stability in the asymptotic suction boundary layer: The Forchheimer versus the Darcy model, Fluid Dyn. Res. 48, 061411 (2016).
- M. Scheffler and P. Colombo, Cellular Ceramics: Structure, Manufacturing, Properties and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).
- J. Methel, M. Forte, O. Vermeersch, and G. Casalis, An experimental study on the effects of two-dimensional positive surface defects on the laminar–turbulent transition of a sucked boundary layer, Exp. Fluids 60, 94 (2019).
- B. Egreteau, A. Mure d'Alexis, F. Mery, and C. Davoine, Influence of innovative porous panels for laminar flow control by suction, in Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum ASCEND 2024 (AIAA, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2024), p. 3760.
- R. Jordinson, The flat plate boundary layer. Part 1. Numerical integration of the Orr—Sommerfeld equation, J. Fluid Mech. 43, 801 (1970).
- G. Danabasoglu and S. Biringen, A chebyshev matrix method for the spatial modes of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 11, 1033 (1990).