Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Invited
  • Open Access

Chaos, coherence, and turbulence

Javier Jiménez*

  • *Contact author: javier.jimenezs@upm.es

Phys. Rev. Fluids 10, 100504 – Published 27 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lkvl-dlcn

Abstract

This paper is a personal overview of the efforts over the past half century to understand fluid turbulence in terms of simpler coherent units. The consequences of chaos and the concept of coherence are first reviewed, using examples from free-shear and wall-bounded shear flows, and including how the simplifications due to coherent structures have been useful in the conceptualization and control of turbulence. It is remarked that, even if this approach has revolutionized our understanding of the flow, most of turbulence cannot yet be described by structures. This includes cascades, both direct and inverse, and possibly junk turbulence, whose role, if any, is currently unknown. This part of the paper is mostly a catalog of questions, some of them answered and others still open. A second part of the paper examines which new techniques can be expected to help in attacking the open questions and which, in the opinion of the author, are the strengths and limitations of current approaches, such as data-driven science and causal inference.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (128)

  1. G. K. Batchelor, The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1953).
  2. H. Tennekes and J. L. Lumley, A First Course in Turbulence (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1972).
  3. J. O. Hinze, Turbulence, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1975).
  4. M. Lesieur, Turbulence in Fluids, 4th ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
  5. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
  6. G. H. L. Hagen, Über den Bewegung des Wassers in engen cylindrischen Röhren, Poggendorfs Ann. Physik Chemie 122, 423 (1839).
  7. H. Darcy, Recherches expérimentales relatives au mouvement de l'eau dans les tuyaux, Mém. Savants Etrang. Acad. Sci. Paris 17, 1 (1854).
  8. J. M. L. Poiseuille, Recherches expérimentales sur le mouvement des liquides dans les tubes de très petits diamètres, Mém. Savants Etrang. Acad. Sci. Paris 9, 435 (1846).
  9. C.-L. Navier, Mémoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides, Mém. Acad. Sciences Inst. de France 1827, 389 (1823).
  10. G. G. Stokes, On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion and of the equilibrium and motion of elastic solids, Trans. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 8, 287 (1845).
  11. L. Euler, Principes généraux du mouvement des fluides, Mém. Acad. Sci. Berlin 11, 274 (1757).
  12. G. Hagen, Über den Einfluss der Temperatur auf die Bewegung des Wassers in Röhren, Math. Abh. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 17 (1854).
  13. J. Boussinesq, Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes, Mém. Acad. Sci. Paris 23, 1 (1877).
  14. O. Reynolds, On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion, Proc. R. Soc. London 56, 40 (1894).
  15. J. Boussinesq, Théorie de l'écoulement tourbillonnant et tumultueux des liquides dans les lits rectilignes à grande section (Gautier-Villars, Paris, 1897).
  16. B. E. Launder, G. J. Reece, and W. Rodi, Progress in development of Reynolds-stress turbulence closure, J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537 (1975).
  17. L. Richardson, Weather Prediction by Numerical Process (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1922), p. 66.
  18. A. N. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluids at very large Reynolds numbers, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 30, 301 (1941), reprinted in Proc. R. Soc. London A 434, 9 (1991).
  19. L. Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics, Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 6, 279 (1949).
  20. S. A. Orszag and G. S. Patterson, Numerical simulation of three-dimensional homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 76 (1972).
  21. E. D. Siggia, Numerical study of small scale intermittency in three-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 107, 375 (1981).
  22. R. S. Rogallo, Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence, NASA-TM- 81315 (Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, 1981).
  23. J. Kim, P. Moin, and R. D. Moser, Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133 (1987).
  24. P. Constantin, C. Foias, and R. Temam, Attractors representing turbulent flows, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 53, 1 (1985).
  25. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press, London, 1959).
  26. F. Voltaire, Dictionnaire Philosophique: Atomes (Oxford University Press, 1994).
  27. J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields (Springer, New York, 1997).
  28. J. Jiménez, Coherent structures and dynamical systems, in Proceedings of the CTR Summer School (, Stanford, CA, 1987), pp. 323–324.
  29. P. Cvitanović, Invariant measurement of strange sets in terms of cycles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2729 (1988).
  30. J. Jiménez, G. Kawahara, M. P. Simens, M. Nagata, and M. Shiba, Characterization of near-wall turbulence in terms of equilibrium and “bursting” solutions, Phys. Fluids 17, 015105 (2005).
  31. B. Eckhardt, T. M. Schneider, B. Hof, and J. Westerweel, Turbulence transition in pipe flow, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 447 (2007).
  32. H. T. Kim, S. J. Kline, and W. C. Reynolds, The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 50, 133 (1971).
  33. J. M. Wallace, H. Eckelman, and R. S. Brodkey, The wall region in turbulent shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 54, 39 (1972).
  34. S. S. Lu and W. W. Willmarth, Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 60, 481 (1973).
  35. G. L. Brown and A. Roshko, On the density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers, J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775 (1974).
  36. A. Pandey, J. D. Scheel, and J. Schumacher, Turbulent superstructures in Rayleigh–Bénard convection., Nat. Commun. 9, 2118 (2018).
  37. P. Freymuth, On transition in a separated laminar boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 25, 683 (1966).
  38. H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. (Dover, New York, 1932).
  39. P. G. Drazin and W. H. Reid, Hydrodynamic Stability (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1981).
  40. J. Delville, J. H. Bellin, and J. P. Bonnet, Analysis of structures in a turbulent mixing layer using a pseudo-flow visualization method based on hot-wire anemometry, in Advances in Turbulence II., edited by H. H. Fernholz and H. Fiedler (Springer, Heidelberg, 1988), pp. 251–256.
  41. F. K. Browand and C.-M. Ho, Forced unbounded shear flows, Nucl. Phys. B 2, 139 (1987).
  42. C. H. Ho and P. Huerre, Perturbed free shear layers, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 365 (1984).
  43. W. C. Reynolds, D. E. Parekh, P. J. D. Juvet, and M. J. D. Lee, Bifurcating and blooming jets, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 295 (2003).
  44. G. L. Brown and A. Roshko, Turbulent shear layers and wakes, J. Turbul. 13, N51 (2012).
  45. S. J. Kline, W. C. Reynolds, F. A. Schraub, and P. W. Runstadler, The structure of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741 (1967).
  46. J. Jiménez, Coherent structures in wall-bounded turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 842, P1 (2018).
  47. W. V. R. Malkus, Outline of a theory of turbulent shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 1, 521 (1956).
  48. W. C. Reynolds and W. G. Tiederman, Stability of turbulent channel flow, with application to Malkus' theory, J. Fluid Mech. 27, 253 (1967).
  49. J. D. Swearingen and R. F. Blackwelder, The growth and breakdown of streamwise vortices in the presence of a wall, J. Fluid Mech. 182, 255 (1987).
  50. L. N. Trefethen, A. E. Trefethen, S. C. Reddy, and T. A. Driscoll, Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues, Science 261, 578 (1993).
  51. P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson, Stability and Transition in Shear Flows (Springer, New York, 2001).
  52. P. J. Schmid, Nonmodal stability theory, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 129 (2007).
  53. K. M. Butler and B. F. Farrell, Optimal perturbations and streak spacing in wall-bounded shear flow, Phys. Fluids A 5, 774 (1993).
  54. J. C. del Álamo and J. Jiménez, Linear energy amplification in turbulent channels, J. Fluid Mech. 559, 205 (2006).
  55. W. M. Orr, The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid, and of a viscous liquid. Part I: A perfect liquid, Proc. Royal Irish Acad. A 27, 9 (1907).
  56. B. F. Farrell and P. J. Ioannou, Optimal excitation of three-dimensional perturbations in viscous constant shear flow, Phys. Fluids A 5, 1390 (1993).
  57. J. Jiménez, How linear is wall-bounded turbulence? Phys. Fluids 25, 110814 (2013).
  58. A. Lozano-Durán, N. C. Constantinou, M.-A. Nikolaidis, and M. Karp, Cause-and-effect of linear mechanisms sustaining wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 914, A8 (2021).
  59. W. Schoppa and F. Hussain, Coherent structure generation in near-wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 453, 57 (2002).
  60. J. Jiménez and A. Pinelli, The autonomous cycle of near-wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 389, 335 (1999).
  61. J. Jiménez and P. Moin, The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213 (1991).
  62. J. M. Hamilton, J. Kim, and F. Waleffe, Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures, J. Fluid Mech. 287, 317 (1995).
  63. O. Flores and J. Jiménez, Hierarchy of minimal flow units in the logarithmic layer, Phys. Fluids 22, 071704 (2010).
  64. S. Hoyas and J. Jiménez, Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to Reτ=2003, Phys. Fluids 18, 011702 (2006).
  65. J. A. Sillero, J. Jiménez, and R. D. Moser, Two-point statistics for turbulent boundary layers and channels at Reynolds numbers up to δ+≈ 2000, Phys. Fluids 26, 105109 (2014).
  66. F. Waleffe, On a self-sustaining process in shear flows, Phys. Fluids 9, 883 (1997).
  67. M. Nagata, Three-dimensional finite-amplitude solutions in plane Couette flow: Bifurcation from infinity, J. Fluid Mech. 217, 519 (1990).
  68. F. Waleffe, Exact coherent structures in channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 435, 93 (2001).
  69. J. F. Gibson, J. Halcrow, and P. Cvitanović, Visualizing the geometry of state space in plane Couette flow, J. Fluid Mech. 611, 107 (2008).
  70. G. Kawahara, M. Uhlmann, and L. van Veen, The significance of simple invariant solutions in turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 203 (2012).
  71. A. Sekimoto and J. Jiménez, Vertically localised equilibrium solutions in large-eddy simulations of homogeneous shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 827, 225 (2017).
  72. B. F. Farrell and P. J. Ioannou, Dynamics of streamwise rolls and streaks in turbulent wall-bounded shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 708, 149 (2012).
  73. V. L. Thomas, B. F. Farrell, P. J. Ioannou, and D. F. Gayme, A minimal model of self-sustaining turbulence, Phys. Fluids 27, 105104 (2015).
  74. J. Jiménez, The streaks of wall-bounded turbulence need not be long, J. Fluid Mech. 945, R3 (2022).
  75. M. Lee and R. D. Moser, Extreme-scale motions in turbulent plane Couette flows, J. Fluid Mech. 842, 128 (2018).
  76. H. Choi, P. Moin, and J. Kim, Active turbulence control and drag reduction in wall-bounded flows, J. Fluid Mech. 262, 75 (1994).
  77. M. J. Walsh and A. M. Lindemann, Optimization and application of riblets for turbulent drag reduction, in Proceedings of the 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1984), AIAA Paper No. 1984-347.
  78. P. Luchini, F. Manzo, and A. Pozzi, Resistance of a grooved surface to parallel flow and cross-flow, J. Fluid Mech. 228, 87 (1991).
  79. J. Jiménez, M. Uhlmann, A. Pinelli, and G. Kawahara, Turbulent shear flow over active and passive porous surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 442, 89 (2001).
  80. R. García-Mayoral and J. Jiménez, Hydrodynamic stability and breakdown of the viscous regime over riblets, J. Fluid Mech. 678, 317 (2011).
  81. A. Guseva and J. Jiménez, Linear instability and resonance effects in large-scale opposition flow control, J. Fluid Mech. 935, A35 (2022).
  82. A. M. Obukhov, On the distribution of energy in the spectrum of turbulent flow, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 32, 22 (1941).
  83. J. I. Cardesa, A. Vela-Martín, and J. Jiménez, The turbulent cascade in five dimensions, Science 357, 782 (2017).
  84. C. D. Winant and F. K. Browand, Vortex pairing: The mechanism of turbulent mixing-layer growth at moderate Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 63, 237 (1974).
  85. D. W. Moore and P. G. Saffman, The density of organized vortices in a turbulent mixing layer, J. Fluid Mech. 69, 465 (1975).
  86. M. A. Hernán and J. Jiménez, Computer analysis of a high-speed film of the plane turbulent mixing layer, J. Fluid Mech. 119, 323 (1982).
  87. A. A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1976).
  88. A. E. Perry and C. J. Abell, Scaling laws for pipe-flow turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 67, 257 (1975).
  89. A. E. Perry, S. Henbest, and M. S. Chong, A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 165, 163 (1986).
  90. R. J. Adrian, Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence, Phys. Fluids. 19, 041301 (2007).
  91. L. P. Bernal and A. Roshko, Streamwise vortex structure in plane mixing layers, J. Fluid Mech. 170, 499 (1986).
  92. A. Lozano-Durán and J. Jiménez, Time-resolved evolution of coherent structures in turbulent channels: Characterization of eddies and cascade, J. Fluid Mech. 759, 432 (2014).
  93. S. A. Orszag, Statistical theory of turbulence, in Fluid Dynamics 1973, edited by R. Bailan and J. L. Peube, Les Houches Summer School in Physics (Gordon and Breach, London, 1977), pp. 237–374.
  94. A. Vela-Martín and J. Jiménez, Entropy, irreversibility and cascades in the inertial range of isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 915, A36 (2021).
  95. G. Boffetta and R. E. Ecke, Two-dimensional turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 427 (2012).
  96. R. Benzi, M. Colella, M. Briscolini, and P. Santangelo, A simple point vortex model for two-dimensional decaying turbulence, Phys. Fluids A 4, 1036 (1992).
  97. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/lkvl-dlcn for a supplementary video.
  98. J. Jiménez, Collective organization and screening in two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 084601 (2021).
  99. A. Lozano-Durán, O. Flores, and J. Jiménez, The three-dimensional structure of momentum transfer in turbulent channels, J. Fluid Mech. 694, 100 (2012).
  100. V. Poggiali, M. Mastrogiuseppe, A. G. Hayes, R. Seu, S. P. D. Birch, R. Lorenz, C. Grima, and J. D. Hofgartner, Liquid-filled canyons on Titan, Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 7887 (2016).
  101. A. F. Palazzo and T. R. Gregory, The case for junk DNA, PLoS Genet. 10, e1004351 (2014).
  102. J. Abramson, J. Adler, J. Dunger et al., Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3, Nature (London) 630, 493 (2024).
  103. J. Jiménez, Optimal fluxes and Reynolds stresses, J. Fluid Mech. 809, 585 (2016).
  104. K. Osawa and J. Jiménez, Intense structures of different momentum fluxes in turbulent channels, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 084603 (2018).
  105. K. Osawa and J. Jiménez, Causal features in turbulent channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 1000, A4 (2024).
  106. U. Frisch, After dinner talk (botany), First European Fluid Dynamics Conference (Euromech, Aachen, Cambridge, UK, 1991).
  107. E. N. Lorenz, Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 917 (1963).
  108. D. Marinazzo, With behaviors like these in complex systems, who needs mechanisms? Physics 18, 71 (2025).
  109. J. Pearl, Causal inference in statistics: An overview, Statist. Surv. 3, 95 (2009).
  110. J. D. Angrist, G. W. Imbens, and D. B. Rubin, Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables, J. Am. Stat. Ass. 91, 444 (1996).
  111. B. Russell, On the notion of cause, Proc. Aristotelian Soc. 13, 1 (1913).
  112. W. B. Hayes and K. R. Jackson, A fast shadowing algorithm for high-dimensional ODE systems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29, 1738 (2007).
  113. D. F. Griffiths and J. M. Sanz-Serna, On the scope of the method of modified equations, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Computing 7, 994 (1986).
  114. J. Teixeira, C. R. Reynolds, and K. Judd, Time step sensitivity of nonlinear atmospheric models: Numerical convergence, truncation error growth, and ensemble design, J. Atmos. Sci. 64, 175 (2007).
  115. R. M. Corless, Numerical methods for chaotic ODE, arXiv:2501.06123.
  116. A. Vela-Martín and M. Avila, Large-scale patterns set the predictability limit of extreme events in Kolmogorov flow, J. Fluid Mech. 986, A2 (2024).
  117. E. Hopf, Statistical hydromechanics and functional calculus, Indiana U. Math. J. 1, 87 (1952).
  118. J. Jiménez, A Perron–Frobenius analysis of wall-bounded turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 968, A10 (2023).
  119. J. Jiménez, Fake turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 990, R2 (2024).
  120. F. Tuerke and J. Jiménez, Simulations of turbulent channels with prescribed velocity profiles, J. Fluid Mech. 723, 587 (2013).
  121. C. W. J. Granger, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica 37, 424 (1969).
  122. A. Martínez-Sánchez, G. Arranz, and A. Lozano-Durán, Decomposing causality into its synergistic, unique, and redundant components, Nat. Commun. 15, 9296 (2024).
  123. R. Feynman, The Character of Physical Law (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965).
  124. E. Gibney, Google AI algorithm masters ancient game of Go, Nature (London) 529, 445 (2016).
  125. A. Solera-Rico, C. Sanmiguel-Vila, Y. Gómez-López, M. Wang, A. Almashjary, S. T. M. Dawson, and R. Vinuesa, β-variational autoencoders and transformers for reduced-order modelling of fluid flows, Nat. Commun. 15, 1361 (2024).
  126. M. Fraser, A. Granville, M. H. Harris, C. McLarty, E. Riehl, and A. Venkatesh, Will machines change mathematics? Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 61, 373 (2024).
  127. Plato, Phaedrus, translated by C. J. Rowe (Penguin, London, 2005), p. 275d.
  128. M. Mashaal, Bourbaki (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation