Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Effective longitudinal slip over grooves encapsulated by a nearly inviscid lubricant

Ory Schnitzer1 and Ehud Yariv2

Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 054202 – Published 26 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hvpr-9s1q

Abstract

We calculate the effective slip length for a rectangularly grooved periodic surface encapsulated (i.e., fully wetted) by a lubricant fluid and subjected to exterior shear flow parallel to the grooves. Our focus is the limit of a nearly inviscid lubricant, where the ratio μ of the lubricant viscosity to that of the exterior fluid is small. This limit is singular for an encapsulated surface, indicating a dominant lubricant-flow effect—a stark contrast to superhydrophobic surfaces where the role of the lubricant is typically negligible. In addition to μ, the ratio λ of the slip length to the grooving semiperiod depends on three geometric lengths, all normalized by the semiperiod: b, the thickness of the lubricant films wetting the groove ridges, and ϕ and h, the semiwidth and height of the ridges, respectively. We identify two key limits characterizing the regime μ≪1. In the first, with b held fixed, we find λ∼μ−1λ̃(b,ϕ,h), where the rescaled slip length λ̃ is determined by an interior lubricant-flow problem. In the second, with b/μ held fixed, we find λ∼Λ(b/μ,ϕ), where Λ is governed by an exterior flow problem in which the thin lubricant films wetting the ridges are effectively replaced by a Navier-slip condition, while the rest of the interface is shear free. As b/μ→0, the Navier-slip condition simplifies to no slip, whereby the exterior problem reduces to that for a superhydrophobic grooved surface—famously solved by Philip using complex variables [Philip, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23, 353 (1972)]. Asymptotic and numerical analysis of the exterior problem demonstrates (i) the transition from Philip's solution at b/μ≪1 to an algebraic behavior Λ∼b/(μϕ) at b/μ≫1, matching with the small-b limit of the interior problem, and (ii) for ϕ≪1, the transition from a logarithmic O(lnϕ) scaling for b≪μϕ—familiar from the superhydrophobic case, where ϕ constitutes the solid-to-air fraction—to the aforementioned algebraic regime when μϕ≪b≪ϕ. As b becomes comparable to ϕ, the exterior problem loses validity in favor of the interior problem. By analyzing the latter in the distinguished sublimit where b and ϕ are comparably small, we demonstrate how, as b/ϕ is increased, the algebraic growth of λ with b/μ is arrested at order μ−1/lnb.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. D. Quéré, Wetting and roughness, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 38, 71 (2008).
  2. J. P. Rothstein, Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 89 (2010).
  3. L. Bocquet and E. Lauga, A smooth future? Nat. Mater. 10, 334 (2011).
  4. A. Lafuma and D. Quéré, Slippery pre-suffused surfaces, Europhys. Lett. 96, 56001 (2011).
  5. T.-S. Wong, S. H. Kang, S. K. Y. Tang, E. J. Smythe, B. D. Hatton, A. Grinthal, and J. Aizenberg, Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity, Nature (London) 477, 443 (2011).
  6. J. H. Guan, É. Ruiz-Gutiérrez, B. B. Xu, D. Wood, G. McHale, R. Ledesma-Aguilar, and G. G. Wells, Drop transport and positioning on lubricant-impregnated surfaces, Soft Matter 13, 3404 (2017).
  7. A. Keiser, L. Keiser, C. Clanet, and D. Quéré, Drop friction on liquid-infused materials, Soft Matter 13, 6981 (2017).
  8. M. J. Kreder, D. Daniel, A. Tetreault, Z. Cao, B. Lemaire, J. V. I. Timonen, and J. Aizenberg, Film dynamics and lubricant depletion by droplets moving on lubricated surfaces, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031053 (2018).
  9. M. S. Sadullah, C. Semprebon, and H. Kusumaatmaja, Drop dynamics on liquid-infused surfaces: The role of the lubricant ridge, Langmuir 34, 8112 (2018).
  10. M. Villegas, Y. Zhang, N. Abu Jarad, L. Soleymani, and T. F. Didar, Liquid-infused surfaces: A review of theory, design, and applications, ACS Nano 13, 8517 (2019).
  11. A. Keiser, P. Baumli, D. Vollmer, and D. Quéré, Universality of friction laws on liquid-infused materials, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 014005 (2020).
  12. S. Nath and D. Quéré, Expediting viscous spreading with liquid-infused solids, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 054001 (2024).
  13. B. R. Solomon, K. S. Khalil, and K. K. Varanasi, Drag reduction using lubricant-impregnated surfaces in viscous laminar flow, Langmuir 30, 10970 (2014).
  14. S. Hardt and G. McHale, Flow and drop transport along liquid-infused surfaces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54, 83 (2022).
  15. A. M. J. Davis and E. Lauga, Geometric transition in friction for flow over a bubble mattress, Phys. Fluids 21, 011701 (2009).
  16. D. Crowdy, Slip length for longitudinal shear flow over a dilute periodic mattress of protruding bubbles, Phys. Fluids 22, 121703 (2010).
  17. C. Lee, C.-H. Choi, and C.-J. Kim, Superhydrophobic drag reduction in laminar flows: A critical review, Exp. Fluids 57, 176 (2016).
  18. J. R. Philip, Flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23, 353 (1972).
  19. J. R. Philip, Integral properties of flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23, 960 (1972).
  20. A. Sander Haase, J. A. Wood, R. G. H. Lammertink, and J. H. Snoeijer, Why bumpy is better: The role of the dissipation distribution in slip flow over a bubble mattress, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 054101 (2016).
  21. D. G. Crowdy, Analytical formulae for longitudinal slip lengths over unidirectional superhydrophobic surfaces with curved menisci, J. Fluid Mech. 791, R7 (2016).
  22. D. G. Crowdy, Slip length for transverse shear flow over a periodic array of weakly curved menisci, Phys. Fluids 29, 091702 (2017).
  23. O. Schnitzer, Slip length for longitudinal shear flow over an arbitrary-protrusion-angle bubble mattress: The small-solid-fraction singularity, J. Fluid Mech. 820, 580 (2017).
  24. E. Luca, J. Marshall, and G. Karamanis, Longitudinal shear flow over a bubble mattress with curved menisci: Arbitrary protrusion angle and solid fraction, IMA J. Appl. Math. 83, 942 (2018).
  25. C.-O. Ng and C. Wang, Stokes shear flow over a grating: Implications for superhydrophobic slip, Phys. Fluids 21, 013602 (2009).
  26. D. G. Crowdy, Frictional slip lengths and blockage coefficients, Phys. Fluids 23, 072001 (2011).
  27. D. G. Crowdy, Slip length formulas for longitudinal shear flow over a superhydrophobic grating with partially filled cavities, J. Fluid Mech. 925, R2 (2021).
  28. E. Yariv, Effective slip length for longitudinal shear flow over partially-invaded grooves: Small solid-fraction approximations, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, L012101 (2023).
  29. E. Yariv, Effective slip length for transverse shear flow over partially-invaded grooves, J. Fluid Mech. 957, R1 (2023).
  30. E. Yariv, Highly singular slip length for longitudinal shear flow over a dense bubble mattress, J. Fluid Mech. 967, R3 (2023).
  31. E. Yariv, Longitudinal shear flow over a superhydrophobic grating with partially invaded grooves and curved menisci, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 84, 1186 (2024).
  32. D. Crowdy, Effect of shear thinning on superhydrophobic slip: Perturbative corrections to the effective slip length, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 124201 (2017).
  33. O. Schnitzer and P. K. Ray, Giant superhydrophobic slip of shear-thinning liquids, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, L112201 (2024).
  34. F. J. Peaudecerf, J. R. Landel, R. E. Goldstein, and P. Luzzatto-Fegiz, Traces of surfactants can severely limit the drag reduction of superhydrophobic surfaces, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7254 (2017).
  35. D. Song, B. Song, H. Hu, X. Du, P. Du, C.-H. Choi, and J. P. Rothstein, Effect of a surface tension gradient on the slip flow along a superhydrophobic air-water interface, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 033303 (2018).
  36. T. Baier and S. Hardt, Influence of insoluble surfactants on shear flow over a surface in Cassie state at large Péclet numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 907, A3 (2021).
  37. J. R. Landel, F. J. Peaudecerf, F. Temprano-Coleto, F. Gibou, R. E. Goldstein, and P. Luzzatto-Fegiz, A theory for the slip and drag of superhydrophobic surfaces with surfactant, J. Fluid Mech. 883, A18 (2020).
  38. J. Sundin and S. Bagheri, Slip of submerged two-dimensional liquid-infused surfaces in the presence of surfactants, J. Fluid Mech. 950, A35 (2022).
  39. M. D. Mayer and D. G. Crowdy, Superhydrophobic surface immobilisation by insoluble surfactant, J. Fluid Mech. 949, A18 (2022).
  40. T. Baier and S. Hardt, Shear flow over a surface containing a groove covered by an incompressible surfactant phase, J. Fluid Mech. 949, A34 (2022).
  41. H. Rodriguez-Broadbent and D. G. Crowdy, Superhydrophobic surfaces with recirculating interfacial flow due to surfactants are “effectively” immobilized, J. Fluid Mech. 956, R3 (2023).
  42. A. M. J. Davis and E. Lauga, The friction of a mesh-like super-hydrophobic surface, Phys. Fluids 21, 113101 (2009).
  43. A. M. J. Davis and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamic friction of fakir-like superhydrophobic surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 661, 402 (2010).
  44. O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, Resistive-force theory for mesh-like superhydrophobic surfaces, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 032201(R) (2018).
  45. O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, Small-solid-fraction approximations for the slip-length tensor of micropillared superhydrophobic surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 843, 637 (2018).
  46. E. Lauga and H. A. Stone, Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech. 489, 55 (2003).
  47. J. Ou, B. Perot, and J. P. Rothstein, Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces, Phys. Fluids 16, 4635 (2004).
  48. J. Davies, D. Maynes, B. W. Webb, and B. Woolford, Laminar flow in a microchannel with superhydrophobic walls exhibiting transverse ribs, Phys. Fluids 18, 087110 (2006).
  49. M. Sbragaglia and A. Prosperetti, A note on the effective slip properties for microchannel flows with ultrahydrophobic surfaces, Phys. Fluids 19, 043603 (2007).
  50. C. J. Teo and B. C. Khoo, Analysis of Stokes flow in microchannels with superhydrophobic surfaces containing a periodic array of micro-grooves, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 7, 353 (2009).
  51. O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, Longitudinal pressure-driven flows between superhydrophobic grooved surfaces: Large effective slip in the narrow-channel limit, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 072101(R) (2017).
  52. E. Yariv, Velocity amplification in pressure-driven flows between superhydrophobic gratings of small solid fraction, Soft Matter 13, 6287 (2017).
  53. E. Yariv and O. Schnitzer, Pressure-driven plug flows between superhydrophobic surfaces of closely spaced circular bubbles, J. Eng. Math. 111, 15 (2018).
  54. C. Schönecker, T. Baier, and S. Hardt, Influence of the enclosed fluid on the flow over a microstructured surface in the Cassie state, J. Fluid Mech. 740, 168 (2014).
  55. T. V. Nizkaya, E. S. Asmolov, and O. I. Vinogradova, Gas cushion model and hydrodynamic boundary conditions for superhydrophobic textures, Phys. Rev. E 90, 043017 (2014).
  56. D. G. Crowdy, Perturbation analysis of subphase gas and meniscus curvature effects for longitudinal flows over superhydrophobic surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 822, 307 (2017).
  57. C. Ybert, C. Barentin, C. Cottin-Bizonne, P. Joseph, and L. Bocquet, Achieving large slip with superhydrophobic surfaces: Scaling laws for generic geometries, Phys. Fluids 19, 123601 (2007).
  58. O. Schnitzer, Singular effective slip length for longitudinal flow over a dense bubble mattress, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 052101(R) (2016).
  59. C.-H. Choi and C.-J. Kim, Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 066001 (2006).
  60. C. Lee, C.-H. Choi, and C.-J. Kim, Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 064501 (2008).
  61. G. G. Peng, E. Yariv, and O. Schnitzer, Slip over liquid-infused gratings in the singular limit of a nearly inviscid lubricant, Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 044201 (2026).
  62. J. D. Smith, R. Dhiman, S. Anand, E. Reza-Garduno, R. E. Cohen, G. H. McKinley, and K. K. Varanasi, Droplet mobility on lubricant-impregnated surfaces, Soft Matter 9, 1772 (2013).
  63. This is the same singularity approached in Philip's canonical inviscid problem as the solid fraction is made to vanish. Unlike with encapsulation, however, the small-solid-fraction limit of the inviscid problem is not universally ill posed. An example for this is the transverse problem for a grooved superhydrophobic surface with protruding menisci.
  64. J. W. Brown and R. V. Churchill, Complex Variables and Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003).
  65. This argument may appear naive, as the integral relation is now applied to an asymptotically small interval. Nonetheless, the uniform-flow approximation remains consistent; indeed, the Navier condition (5.20) suggests that an ord(β/ϕ) large uniform velocity in the ord(ϕ) vicinity of that interval generates only weaker ord(1) velocity variations.
  66. L. E. Fraenkel, On the methods of matched asymptotic expansions. Part I: A matching principle, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 65, 209 (1969).
  67. P. Moon and D. E. Spencer, Field Theory Handbook (Springer, New York, 1988).
  68. E. J. Hinch, Perturbation Methods (Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1991).
  69. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 3rd ed. (Dover, New York, 1965).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation