Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Band-ensemble spectral proper orthogonal decomposition with frequency attribution

Jakob G. R. von Saldern*

Oliver T. Schmidt

Philipp Godbersen

J. Moritz Reumschüssel

Tim Colonius

  • *Contact author: j.vonsaldern@tu-berlin.de

Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 104905 – Published 23 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b9hq-xvpx

Abstract

This study presents band-ensemble spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (bSPOD). The approach is inspired by frequency smoothing, a method used to reduce estimator variance in power spectral density estimates, and is here extended to SPOD. The algorithm estimates SPOD modes from consecutive Fourier coefficients obtained from a single Fourier transform of the full-time record and thus avoids time segmentation. In this study, bSPOD is applied to artificial test data and to a particle image velocimetry data set of a broadband-tonal cavity flow. Compared to the more commonly used Welch-based SPOD formulation, bSPOD reduces spectral leakage, permits increased frequency resolution, and retains frequency information of tonal components at comparable computational cost. These features enable reduced estimator variance while maintaining low bias for tonal components, making bSPOD particularly effective for broadband-tonal flows.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. J. L. Lumley, The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows, in Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation (Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 1967), pp. 166–178.
  2. L. Sirovich, Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures, Q. Appl. Math. 45, 561 (1987).
  3. C. W. Rowley, I. Mezić, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Henningson, Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 641, 115 (2009).
  4. P. J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, J. Fluid Mech. 656, 5 (2010).
  5. K. Taira, S. L. Brunton, S. T. M. Dawson, C. W. Rowley, T. Colonius, B. J. McKeon, O. T. Schmidt, S. Gordeyev, V. Theofilis, and L. S. Ukeiley, Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview, AIAA J. 55, 4013 (2017).
  6. A. Towne, O. T. Schmidt, and T. Colonius, Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis, J. Fluid Mech. 847, 821 (2018).
  7. P. Jordan and T. Colonius, Wave packets and turbulent jet noise, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 173 (2013).
  8. S. Demange, Z. Yuan, S. Jekosch, A. Hanifi, A. V. G. Cavalieri, E. Sarradj, T. L. Kaiser, and K. Oberleithner, Resolvent model for aeroacoustics of trailing edge noise, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 38, 163 (2024).
  9. K. Sarras, C. Tayeh, V. Mons, and O. Marquet, Linear stability analysis of turbulent mean flows based on a data-consistent Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes model: Prediction of three-dimensional stall cells around an airfoil, J. Fluid Mech. 1001, A41 (2024).
  10. T. J. Poinsot, A. C. Trouve, D. P. Veynante, S. M. Candel, and E. J. Esposito, Vortex-driven acoustically coupled combustion instabilities, J. Fluid Mech. 177, 265 (1987).
  11. J. G. R. von Saldern, J. P. Beuth, J. M. Reumschüssel, A. Jaeschke, C. O. Paschereit, and K. Oberleithner, Low-frequency streaky structures in turbulent hydrogen jet flames, Combust. Flame 278, 114231 (2025).
  12. C. H. Williamson and R. N. Govardhan, Vortex-induced vibrations, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 413 (2004).
  13. N. Wiener, Generalized harmonic analysis, Acta Math. 55, 117 (1930).
  14. A. Khintchine, Korrelationstheorie der stationären stochastischen Prozesse, Math. Ann. 109, 604 (1934).
  15. M. S. Bartlett, Periodogram analysis and continuous spectra, Biometrika 37, 1 (1950).
  16. P. Welch, The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms, IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 15, 70 (1967).
  17. D. Thomson, Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis, Proc. IEEE 70, 1055 (1982).
  18. B. Babadi and E. N. Brown, A review of multitaper spectral analysis, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61, 1555 (2014).
  19. T. Bronez, On the performance advantage of multitaper spectral analysis, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40, 2941 (1992).
  20. P. J. Daniell, Discussion on symposium on autocorrelation in time series, Supplement to the J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Supp. 8, 85 (1946).
  21. M. S. Bartlett, Smoothing periodograms from time-series with continuous spectra, Nature (London) 161, 686 (1948).
  22. R. B. Blackman and J. W. Tukey, The measurement of power spectra from the point of view of communications engineering—Part I, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 37, 185 (1958).
  23. K. Pearson, LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space, Lond. Edinb. Dubl. Phil. 2, 559 (1901).
  24. H. Hotelling, Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components, J. Educ. Psychol. 24, 417 (1933).
  25. G. Berkooz, P. Holmes, and J. L. Lumley, The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 539 (1993).
  26. J. Weiss, A tutorial on the proper orthogonal decomposition, in Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2019).
  27. J. Borée, Extended proper orthogonal decomposition: A tool to analyse correlated events in turbulent flows, Exp. Fluids 35, 188 (2003).
  28. M. Sieber, C. O. Paschereit, and K. Oberleithner, Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition, J. Fluid Mech. 792, 798 (2016).
  29. M. A. Mendez, M. Balabane, and J.-M. Buchlin, Multi-scale proper orthogonal decomposition of complex fluid flows, J. Fluid Mech. 870, 988 (2019).
  30. S. V. Gordeyev and F. O. Thomas, A temporal proper decomposition (TPOD) for closed-loop flow control, Exp. Fluids 54, 1477 (2013).
  31. P. Frame and A. Towne, Space-time POD and the Hankel matrix, PLoS ONE 18, e0289637 (2023).
  32. O. T. Schmidt and P. J. Schmid, A conditional space-time pod formalism for intermittent and rare events: Example of acoustic bursts in turbulent jets, J. Fluid Mech. 867, R2 (2019).
  33. O. T. Schmidt, Data-driven forecasting of high-dimensional transient and stationary processes via space-time projection, Proc. R. Soc. A 482, 20250454 (2026).
  34. J. L. Lumley, Stochastic Tools in Turbulence (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1970).
  35. C. Picard and J. Delville, Pressure velocity coupling in a subsonic round jet, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 21, 359 (2000).
  36. O. T. Schmidt and T. Colonius, Guide to spectral proper orthogonal decomposition, AIAA J. 58, 1023 (2020).
  37. J. H. Cintriniti and W. K. George, Reconstruction of the global velocity field in the axisymmetric mixing layer utilizing the proper orthogonal decomposition, J. Fluid Mech. 418, 137 (2000).
  38. C. Chen, S. Wang, and S. Ghaemi, Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition of time-resolved three-dimensional flow measurements in the turbulent wake of the Ahmed body, J. Fluid Mech. 985, A19 (2024).
  39. J. G. R. von Saldern, O. T. Schmidt, P. Jordan, and K. Oberleithner, On the role of eddy viscosity in resolvent analysis of turbulent jets, J. Fluid Mech. 1000, A51 (2024).
  40. B. Steinfurth, M. Li, F. Scarano, and J. Weiss, Three-dimensional low-frequency dynamics of a turbulent separation bubble, J. Fluid Mech. 1019, R4 (2025).
  41. A. Colanera, O. T. Schmidt, and M. Chiatto, Robust spectral proper orthogonal decomposition, Comput. Phys. Commun. 307, 109432 (2025).
  42. D. C. Blanco, E. Martini, K. Sasaki, and A. V. Cavalieri, Improved convergence of the spectral proper orthogonal decomposition through time shifting, J. Fluid Mech. 950, A9 (2022).
  43. L. Heidt and T. Colonius, Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition of harmonically forced turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 985, A42 (2024).
  44. B. C. Y. Yeung and O. T. Schmidt, Adaptive spectral proper orthogonal decomposition of broadband-tonal flows, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 38, 355 (2024).
  45. O. T. Schmidt, Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition using multitaper estimates, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 36, 741 (2022).
  46. K. Riedel and A. Sidorenko, Minimum bias multiple taper spectral estimation, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 43, 188 (1995).
  47. A. J. Barbour and R. L. Parker, psd: Adaptive, sine multitaper power spectral density estimation for R, Comput. Geosci. 63, 1 (2014).
  48. F. Harris, On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform, Proc. IEEE 66, 51 (1978).
  49. bSPOD–Band-ensemble spectral proper orthogonal decomposition, https://github.com/jakobvonsaldern/bspod.
  50. L. Heidt and T. Colonius, Optimal frequency resolution for spectral proper orthogonal decomposition, arXiv:2402.15775.
  51. Y. Zhang, L. N. Cattafesta, and L. Ukeiley, Spectral analysis modal methods (SAMMs) using non-time-resolved PIV, Exp. Fluids 61, 226 (2020).
  52. A. V. G. Cavalieri, D. Rodríguez, P. Jordan, T. Colonius, and Y. Gervais, Wavepackets in the velocity field of turbulent jets, J. Fluid Mech. 730, 559 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation