Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Canonical orbits for rapidly deforming planar microswimmers in shear flow

Eamonn A. Gaffney1,*, Mohit P. Dalwadi1,2,†, Clément Moreau3,‡, Kenta Ishimoto3,§, and Benjamin J. Walker1,2,∥

  • 1Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Mathematics, University College London, London, WC1H 0AY, United Kingdom
  • 3Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan

  • *gaffney@maths.ox.ac.uk
  • †m.dalwadi@ucl.ac.uk
  • ‡cmoreau@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp
  • §ishimoto@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp
  • ∥Corresponding author: benjamin.walker@ucl.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, L022101 – Published 18 February, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.L022101

Abstract

Classically, the rotation of ellipsoids in shear Stokes flow is captured by Jeffery's orbits. Here we demonstrate that Jeffery's orbits also describe high-frequency shape-deforming swimmers moving in the plane of a shear flow, employing only basic properties of Stokes flow and a multiple-scales asymptotic analysis. In doing so, we support the use of these simple models for capturing shape-changing swimmer dynamics in studies of active matter and highlight the ubiquity of ellipsoid-like dynamics in complex systems. This result is robust to weakly confounding effects, such as distant boundaries, and also applies in the low-frequency limit.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (28)

  1. G. B. Jeffery, The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid, Proc. R. Soc. London A 102, 161 (1922).
  2. F. P. Bretherton, The motion of rigid particles in a shear flow at low Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 14, 284 (1962).
  3. H. Brenner, The Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle—III: Shear fields, Chem. Eng. Sci. 19, 631 (1964).
  4. K. Ishimoto, Helicoidal particles and swimmers in a flow at low Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 892, A11 (2020).
  5. K. Ishimoto, Jeffery orbits for an object with discrete rotational symmetry, Phys. Fluids 32, 081904 (2020).
  6. B. J. Walker, K. Ishimoto, R. J. Wheeler, and E. A. Gaffney, Response of monoflagellate pullers to a shearing flow: A simulation study of microswimmer guidance, Phys. Rev. E 98, 063111 (2018).
  7. B. J. Walker, K. Ishimoto, E. A. Gaffney, C. Moreau, and M. P. Dalwadi, Effects of rapid yawing on simple swimmer models and planar Jeffery's orbits, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 023101 (2022).
  8. F. P. Bretherton and N. M. V. Rothschild, Rheotaxis of spermatozoa, Proc. R. Soc. London B 153, 490 (1961).
  9. V. Kantsler, J. Dunkel, M. Blayney, and R. E. Goldstein, Rheotaxis facilitates upstream navigation of mammalian sperm cells, eLife 3, e03521 (2014).
  10. A. Zöttl and H. Stark, Nonlinear dynamics of a microswimmer in Poiseuille flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 218104 (2012).
  11. H. Matsui, T. Omori, and T. Ishikawa, Rheology of a dilute suspension of deformable microswimmers, Phys. Fluids 32, 071902 (2020).
  12. A. Hope, O. A. Croze, W. C. K. Poon, M. A. Bees, and M. D. Haw, Resonant alignment of microswimmer trajectories in oscillatory shear flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 051201(R) (2016).
  13. G. Rosser, R. E. Baker, J. P. Armitage, and A. G. Fletcher, Modelling and analysis of bacterial tracks suggest an active reorientation mechanism in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, J. R. Soc., Interface 11, 20140320 (2014).
  14. D. M. Richards and R. G. Endres, Target shape dependence in a simple model of receptor-mediated endocytosis and phagocytosis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6113 (2016).
  15. C. Moreau, K. Ishimoto, E. A. Gaffney, and B. J. Walker, Control and controllability of microswimmers by a shearing flow, R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 211141 (2021).
  16. C. Moreau and K. Ishimoto, Driving a microswimmer with wall-induced flow, Micromachines 12, 1025 (2021).
  17. J. Słomka, U. Alcolombri, E. Secchi, R. Stocker, and V. I. Fernandez, Encounter rates between bacteria and small sinking particles, New J. Phys. 22, 043016 (2020).
  18. D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Instabilities and Pattern Formation in Active Particle Suspensions: Kinetic Theory and Continuum Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 178103 (2008).
  19. M. -C. Kim and C. Klapperich, A new method for simulating the motion of individual ellipsoidal bacteria in microfluidic devices, Lab Chip 10, 2464 (2010).
  20. Note that we distinguish between the swimmer frame and the swimmer basis, with the latter simply being the orthonormal triad {ex,ey,ez}, which can form a basis of both the laboratory and the swimmer-fixed frames.
  21. C. Pozrikidis, Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
  22. In writing this, we are minimally abusing notation by interpreting x̃S as a two-dimensional vector field in order to write the scalar product between it and L̂Ur, which we will continue to do throughout, noting that this is unambiguous as x̃S·ez≡0.
  23. If A were not invertible, then there would exist a nontrivial force- and torque-free motion when γ=0 and ω=0, violating conservation of energy.
  24. C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I (Springer New York, 1999).
  25. J. Gray and G. J. Hancock, The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa, J. Exp. Biol. 32, 802 (1955).
  26. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.L022101 for a constructive example and an analysis of small angular drift.
  27. B. M. Friedrich, I. H. Riedel-Kruse, J. Howard, and F. Julicher, High-precision tracking of sperm swimming fine structure provides strong test of resistive force theory, J. Exp. Biol. 213, 1226 (2010).
  28. D. M. Woolley, Motility of spermatozoa at surfaces, Reproduction 126, 259 (2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation