- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Fluids

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Enhanced dispersion in shear-thinning fluid flow through porous media

Amna Al-Qenae

Javad Shokri

Takshak Shende

Muhammad Sahimi

Vahid Niasar*

  • *Contact author: vahid.niasar@manchester.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 10, 063802 – Published 25 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5m8s-g4zy

Abstract

Mixing and dispersion in random porous materials are complex processes governed by the interplay of local velocity fields and pore morphology randomness. For purely advective transport in Newtonian fluid flow within porous media at macro scale, a linear relationship is established between the dispersion coefficient and average interstitial velocity, characterized by a coefficient known as dispersivity. Previous studies highlight that dispersivity remains constant and is solely dependent on the properties of the porous medium. However, whether dispersivity is constant when considering non-Newtonian fluids, which exhibit spatially variable viscosity, is questionable. For example, for a shear-thinning fluid, viscosity decreases as the shear rate increases. In non-Newtonian shear-thinning fluids, viscosity varies across pore spaces, influenced by local shear rates, making pore size distribution and fluid pathway connectivity critical factors that impact solute transport dynamics. In this study, we present experimental insights into solute transport for both non-Newtonian and Newtonian fluid flows within porous media using glass micromodels and optical microscopy. Xanthan gum solution, representing a shear-thinning fluid, and water, as a Newtonian control, were used to evaluate the differences in transport behavior. Results indicate an enhanced dispersion effect for shear-thinning fluids in porous media. While dispersivity remains constant in Newtonian fluid flow, our experiments reveal a nonmonotonic relationship between dispersivity and injection rate for shear-thinning fluids. Unlike in Newtonian fluids, dispersivity in non-Newtonian fluids is influenced not only by the properties of the porous medium but also by the fluid's rheology. We propose a mathematical model to account for this variability, offering a framework that aligns with our experimental findings and provides insights into the mechanisms governing solute transport in non-Newtonian fluid flow within porous media.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager, Dynamics of polymeric liquids, in Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1987), Vol. 1.
  2. G. R. Sanderson, Applications of Xanthan gum, Brit. Poly. J. 13, 71 (1981).
  3. E. Blanco, H. Shen, and M. Ferrari, Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery, Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 941 (2015).
  4. F. Gentile, M. Ferrari, and P. Decuzzi, The transport of nanoparticles in blood vessels: The effect of vessel permeability and blood rheology, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36, 254 (2008).
  5. D. Bolster, M. Dentz, and T. Le Borgne, Solute dispersion in channels with periodically varying apertures, Phys. Fluids 21, 056601 (2009).
  6. D. Diaz, C. Somaruga, C. Norman, and J. Romero, Colloidal dispersion gels improve oil recovery in a heterogeneous Argentina waterflood, in SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference (SPE, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2008), p. SPE–113320.
  7. J. Savins, Non-Newtonian flow through porous media, Ind. Eng. Chem. 61, 18 (1969).
  8. L. M. Amoo and R. L. Fagbenle, Overview of non-Newtonian boundary layer flows and heat transfer, in Applications of Heat, Mass and Fluid Boundary Layers (Woodhead Publishing, 2020), pp. 413–435.
  9. M. Sahimi, Nonlinear transport processes in disordered media, AIChE J. 39, 369 (1993).
  10. B. Berkowitz, Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: A review, Adv. Water Resour. 25, 861 (2002).
  11. Y. Chen, H. Steeb, H. Erfani, N. K. Karadimitriou, M. S. Walczak, M. Ruf, D. Lee, S. An, S. Hasan, T. Connolley et al., Nonuniqueness of hydrodynamic dispersion revealed using fast 4D synchrotron x-ray imaging, Sci. Adv. 7, eabj0960 (2021).
  12. F. Zami-Pierre, R. De Loubens, M. Quintard, and Y. Davit, Polymer flow through porous media: Numerical prediction of the contribution of slip to the apparent viscosity, Transp. Porous Media 119, 521 (2017).
  13. V. Chaplain, P. Mills, G. Guiffant, and P. Cerasi, Model for the flow of a yield fluid through a porous medium, J. Phys. II France 2, 2145 (1992).
  14. A. D'Onofrio, V. Freytes, M. Rosen, C. Allain, and J. Hulin, Echo tracer dispersion in flows of polymer solutions through porous media: A tool for detecting weak permeability heterogeneities? Eur. Phys. J. E 7, 251 (2002).
  15. S. An, M. Sahimi, and V. Niasar, Upscaling hydrodynamic dispersion in non-Newtonian fluid flow through porous media, Water Resour. Res. 58, e2022WR032238 (2022).
  16. J. Pearson and P. Tardy, Models for flow of non-Newtonian and complex fluids through porous media, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 102, 447 (2002).
  17. T. Sochi, Flow of non-Newtonian fluids in porous media, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 48, 2437 (2010).
  18. S. An, M. Sahimi, T. Shende, M. Babaei, and V. Niasar, Enhanced thermal fingering in a shear-thinning fluid flow through porous media: Dynamic pore network modeling, Phys. Fluids 34, 023105 (2022).
  19. S. De, P. Krishnan, J. van der Schaaf, J. Kuipers, E. Peters, and J. Padding, Viscoelastic effects on residual oil distribution in flows through pillared microchannels, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 510, 262 (2018).
  20. C. A. Browne, A. Shih, and S. S. Datta, Pore-scale flow characterization of polymer solutions in microfluidic porous media, Small 16, 1903944 (2020).
  21. A. Paterson, A. d'Onofrio, C. Allain, J. Hulin, M. Rosen, and C. Gauthier, Tracer dispersion in a polymer solution flowing through a double porosity porous medium, J. Phys. II France 6, 1639 (1996).
  22. A. D'onofrio, A. Paterson, C. Allain, J. Hulin, and M. Rosen, Flow of shear thinning polymer solutions in heterogeneous porous media: Tracer dispersion measurements, Rev. Inst. Fr. Pét. 52, 219 (1997).
  23. B. D. Hughes and M. Sahimi, Diffusion in disordered systems with multiple families of transport paths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2581 (1993).
  24. B. D. Hughes and M. Sahimi, Stochastic transport in heterogeneous media with multiple families of transport paths, Phys. Rev. E 48, 2776 (1993).
  25. C. A. Browne, R. B. Huang, C. W. Zheng, and S. S. Datta, Homogenizing fluid transport in stratified porous media using an elastic flow instability, J. Fluid Mech. 963, A30 (2023).
  26. M. Dejam, Dispersion in non-Newtonian fluid flows in a conduit with porous walls, Chem. Eng. Sci. 189, 296 (2018).
  27. D. Reinoso, M. Martín-Alfonso, P. Luckham, and F. Martínez-Boza, Rheological characterisation of xanthan gum in brine solutions at high temperature, Carbohydr. Polym. 203, 103 (2019).
  28. N. Karadimitriou, M. Musterd, P. Kleingeld, M. Kreutzer, S. Hassanizadeh, and V. Joekar-Niasar, On the fabrication of PDMS micromodels by rapid prototyping, and their use in two-phase flow studies, Water Resour. Res. 49, 2056 (2013).
  29. J. Shokri, O. E. Godinez-Brizuela, H. Erfani, Y. Chen, M. Babaei, B. Berkowitz, and V. Niasar, Impact of displacement direction relative to heterogeneity on averaged capillary pressure-saturation curves, Water Resour. Res. 58, e2021WR030748 (2022).
  30. S. S. Datta, A. M. Ardekani, P. E. Arratia, A. N. Beris, I. Bischofberger, G. H. McKinley, J. G. Eggers, J. E. López-Aguilar, S. M. Fielding, A. Frishman et al., Perspectives on viscoelastic flow instabilities and elastic turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 080701 (2022).
  31. N. K. Karadimitriou, V. Joekar-Niasar, M. Babaei, and C. A. Shore, Critical role of the immobile zone in non-Fickian two-phase transport: A new paradigm, Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4384 (2016).
  32. A. Ogata and R. B. Banks, A Solution of the Differential Equation of Longitudinal Dispersion in Porous Media (US Government Printing Office, 1961).
  33. M. N. Goltz and P. V. Roberts, Using the method of moments to analyze three-dimensional diffusion-limited solute transport from temporal and spatial perspectives, Water Resour. Res. 23, 1575 (1987).
  34. B. J. Wagner and S. M. Gorelick, A statistical methodology for estimating transport parameters: Theory and applications to one-dimensional advectivec-dispersive systems, Water Resour. Res. 22, 1303 (1986).
  35. C. C. Frippiat and A. E. Holeyman, A comparative review of upscaling methods for solute transport in heterogeneous porous media, J. Hydrol. X 362, 150 (2008).
  36. Y. Gong and M. Piri, Pore-to-core upscaling of solute transport under steady-state two-phase flow conditions using dynamic pore network modeling approach, Transp. Porous Media 135, 181 (2020).
  37. F. J. Leij and N. Toride, Discrete time-and length-averaged solutions of the advection-dispersion equation, Water Resour. Res. 31, 1713 (1995).
  38. C. Yu, A. Warrick, and M. Conklin, A moment method for analyzing breakthrough curves of step inputs, Water Resour. Res. 35, 3567 (1999).
  39. M. M. Mrokowska and A. Krztoń-Maziopa, Viscoelastic and shear-thinning effects of aqueous exopolymer solution on disk and sphere settling, Sci. Rep. 9, 7897 (2019).
  40. R. Speers and M. Tung, Concentration and temperature dependence of flow behavior of xanthan gum dispersions, J. Food Sci. 51, 96 (1986).
  41. D. M. Meter and R. B. Bird, Tube flow of non-Newtonian polymer solutions: Part I. Laminar flow and rheological models, AIChE J. 10, 878 (1964).
  42. T. Shende, V. J. Niasar, and M. Babaei, Effective viscosity and Reynolds number of non-Newtonian fluids using meter model, Rheol. Acta 60, 11 (2021).
  43. A. Lodge and J. Meissner, On the use of instantaneous strains, superposed on shear and elongational flows of polymeric liquids, to test the Gaussian network hypothesis and to estimate the segment concentration and its variation during flow, Rheol. Acta 11, 351 (1972).
  44. M. Sahimi, Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock: From Classical Methods to Modern Approaches (John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim, Germany, 2011).
  45. J. Bear, On the tensor form of dispersion in porous media, J. Geophys. Res. 66, 1185 (1961).
  46. A. E. Scheidegger, General theory of dispersion in porous media, J. Geophys. Res. 66, 3273 (1961).
  47. N. G. Barton, On the method of moments for solute dispersion, J. Fluid Mech. 126, 205 (1983).
  48. W. J. Cannella, C. Huh, and R. S. Seright, Prediction of xanthan rheology in porous media, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (SPE, Houston, Texas, 1988), p. SPE-18089-MS.
  49. J. Fried and M. Combarnous, Dispersion in porous media, in Advances in Hydroscience, edited by V. T. Chow, Advances in Hydroscience Vol. 7 (Elsevier, New York, 1971), pp. 169–282.
  50. M. Sahimi, Mixing and dispersion in flow through porous media, in Applications of Percolation Theory (Springer, 2023), pp. 155–174.
  51. R. P. Chhabra, Non-Newtonian fluids: An introduction, in Rheology of Complex Fluids (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 3–34.
  52. T. Sochi, Non-Newtonian flow in porous media, Polymer 51, 5007 (2010).
  53. B. Bijeljic and M. Blunt, Pore-scale modeling and continuous random walk analysis of dispersion in porous media, Water Resour. Res. 42, W01202 (2006).
  54. K. Foroutan-pour, P. Dutilleul, and D. Smith, Advances in the implementation of the box-counting method of fractal dimension estimation, Appl. Math. Comput. 105, 195 (1999).
  55. J. Li, Q. Du, and C. Sun, An improved box-counting method for image fractal dimension estimation, Pattern Recognit. 42, 2460 (2009).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 10, 063802– Published 25 June, 2025
  • Received 1 November 2024
  • Accepted 19 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation