Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Cortical tension links curvature to tissue growth in the cellular Potts model

Kai Lennard Fastabend1, Cécile M. Bidan2, John W. C. Dunlop3, and Philip Kollmannsberger1

Phys. Rev. E 113, 024403 – Published 12 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/z152-x4l1

Abstract

The growth of biological tissue is sensitive to the physical properties of the environment. For example, the growth rate of contractile tissue under geometric confinement is proportional to local curvature as a result of tissue surface tension. It is not known how local cell behavior is coordinated to give rise to such behavior. Here we use computer simulations based on the cellular Potts model to investigate the role of cell adhesion and cortical contractility for curvature-dependent tissue growth. Our results show that tension-dependent local proliferation leads to the observed macroscopic curvature-driven growth kinetics via tissue surface tension, independent of soluble growth factors.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (60)

  1. C. M. Nelson and M. J. Bissell, Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: Tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 287 (2006).
  2. J. Foolen, T. Yamashita, and P. Kollmannsberger, Shaping tissues by balancing active forces and geometric constraints, J. Phys. D 49, 053001 (2016).
  3. A. Szabó and R. M. H. Merks, Cellular Potts modeling of tumor growth, tumor invasion, and tumor evolution, Front. Oncol. 3, 87 (2013).
  4. A. Deutsch and S. Dormann, Mathematical modeling of biological pattern formation, in Cellular Automaton Modeling of Biological Pattern Formation: Characterization, Examples, and Analysis, edited by A. Deutsch and S. Dormann (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2017), pp. 49–61.
  5. M. Rumpler, A. Woesz, J. W. C. Dunlop, J. T. van Dongen, and P. Fratzl, The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth, J. R. Soc. Interface. 5, 1173 (2008).
  6. P. Joly, G. N. Duda, M. Schöne, P. B. Welzel, U. Freudenberg, C. Werner, and A. Petersen, Geometry-driven cell organization determines tissue growths in scaffold pores: Consequences for fibronectin organization, PLoS ONE 8, e73545 (2013).
  7. M. Herklotz, M. C. Prewitz, C. M. Bidan, J. W. C. Dunlop, P. Fratzl, and C. Werner, Availability of extracellular matrix biopolymers and differentiation state of human mesenchymal stem cells determine tissue-like growth in vitro, Biomaterials 60, 121 (2015).
  8. C. M. Bidan, P. Kollmannsberger, V. Gering, S. Ehrig, P. Joly, A. Petersen, V. Vogel, P. Fratzl, and J. W. C. Dunlop, Gradual conversion of cellular stress patterns into pre-stressed matrix architecture during in vitro tissue growth, J. R. Soc. Interface. 13, 20160136 (2016).
  9. M. Werner, S. B. G. Blanquer, S. P. Haimi, G. Korus, J. W. C. Dunlop, G. N. Duda, D. W. Grijpma, and A. Petersen, Surface curvature differentially regulates stem cell migration and differentiation via altered attachment morphology and nuclear deformation, Adv. Sci. 4, 1600347 (2017).
  10. P. Kollmannsberger, C. M. Bidan, J. W. C. Dunlop, P. Fratzl, and V. Vogel, Tensile forces drive a reversible fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition during tissue growth in engineered clefts, Sci. Adv. 4, eaao4881 (2018).
  11. S. Ehrig, B. Schamberger, C. M. Bidan, A. West, C. Jacobi, K. Lam, P. Kollmannsberger, A. Petersen, P. Tomancak, K. Kommareddy, F. D. Fischer, P. Fratzl, and J. W. C. Dunlop, Surface tension determines tissue shape and growth kinetics, Sci. Adv. 5, eaav9394 (2019).
  12. K. P. Kommareddy, C. Lange, M. Rumpler, J. W. C. Dunlop, I. Manjubala, J. Cui, K. Kratz, A. Lendlein, and P. Fratzl, Two stages in three-dimensional in vitro growth of tissue generated by osteoblastlike cells, Biointerphases 5, 45 (2010).
  13. C. M. Bidan, K. P. Kommareddy, M. Rumpler, P. Kollmannsberger, Y. J. M. Bréchet, P. Fratzl, and J. W. C. Dunlop, How linear tension converts to curvature: Geometric control of bone tissue growth, PLoS ONE 7, e36336 (2012).
  14. M. C. Benn, S. A. Pot, J. Moeller, T. Yamashita, C. M. Fonta, G. Orend, P. Kollmannsberger, and V. Vogel, How the mechanobiology orchestrates the iterative and reciprocal ECM-cell cross-talk that drives microtissue growth, Sci. Adv. 9, eadd9275 (2023).
  15. J. W. C. Dunlop, G. A. Zickler, R. Weinkamer, F. D. Fischer, and P. Fratzl, The emergence of complexity from a simple model for tissue growth, J. Stat. Phys. 180, 459 (2020).
  16. P. Fratzl, F. D. Fischer, G. A. Zickler, and J. W. C. Dunlop, On shape forming by contractile filaments in the surface of growing tissues, PNAS Nexus 2, pgac292 (2023).
  17. A. Roschger, B. Schamberger, S. Ehrig, T. Dechat, S. Spitzer, P. Fratzl, and J. Dunlop, Curvature-related in-vitro formation of twisted plywood-like tissue by pre-osteoblast cells, in Osteologie (Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 2023), Vol. 32, p. 37.
  18. B. Schamberger, S. Ehrig, T. Dechat, S. Spitzer, C. M. Bidan, P. Fratzl, J. W. C. Dunlop, and A. Roschger, Twisted-plywood-like tissue formation in vitro. Does curvature do the twist? PNAS Nexus 3, 121 (2024).
  19. B. Schamberger, R. Ziege, K. Anselme, M. Ben Amar, M. Bykowski, A. P. G. Castro, A. Cipitria, R. A. Coles, R. Dimova, M. Eder, S. Ehrig, L. M. Escudero, M. E. Evans, P. R. Fernandes, P. Fratzl, et al., Curvature in biological systems: Its quantification, emergence, and implications across the scales, Adv. Mater. 35, 2206110 (2023).
  20. J. Folkman and A. Moscona, Role of cell shape in growth control, Nature (London) 273, 345 (1978).
  21. C. S. Chen, M. Mrksich, S. Huang, G. M. Whitesides, and D. E. Ingber, Geometric control of cell life and death, Science 276, 1425 (1997).
  22. B. Hinz, Tissue stiffness, latent TGF-beta1 activation, and mechanical signal transduction: Implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of fibrosis, Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 11, 120 (2009).
  23. D. Cuvelier, M. Théry, Y.-S. Chu, S. Dufour, J.-P. Thiéry, M. Bornens, P. Nassoy, and L. Mahadevan, The universal dynamics of cell spreading, Curr. Biol. 17, 694 (2007).
  24. T. Lecuit and P.-F. Lenne, Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 633 (2007).
  25. I. B. Bischofs, F. Klein, D. Lehnert, M. Bastmeyer, and U. S. Schwarz, Filamentous network mechanics and active contractility determine cell and tissue shape, Biophys. J. 95, 3488 (2008).
  26. W. R. Legant, A. Pathak, M. T. Yang, V. S. Deshpande, R. M. McMeeking, and C. S. Chen, Microfabricated tissue gauges to measure and manipulate forces from 3D microtissues, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10097 (2009).
  27. A. Fletcher, M. Osterfield, R. Baker, and S. Shvartsman, Vertex models of epithelial morphogenesis, Biophys. J. 106, 2291 (2014).
  28. R. Farhadifar, J.-C. Röper, B. Aigouy, S. Eaton, and F. Jülicher, The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing, Curr. Biol. 17, 2095 (2007).
  29. P. Van Liedekerke, M. M. Palm, N. Jagiella, and D. Drasdo, Simulating tissue mechanics with agent-based models: Concepts, perspectives and some novel results, Comput. Part. Mech. 2, 401 (2015).
  30. T. Liebisch, A. Drusko, B. Mathew, E. H. K. Stelzer, S. C. Fischer, and F. Matthäus, Cell fate clusters in ICM organoids arise from cell fate heredity and division: A modeling approach, Sci. Rep. 10, 22405 (2020).
  31. F. Graner and J. A. Glazier, Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended potts model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2013 (1992).
  32. J. A. Glazier, A. Balter, and N. J. Popławski, Magnetization to morphogenesis: A brief history of the Glazier-Graner-Hogeweg model, in Single-Cell-Based Models in Biology and Medicine, edited by A. R. A. Anderson, M. A. J. Chaplain, and K. A. Rejniak (Birkhäuser Basel, Basel, 2007), pp. 79–106.
  33. J. Käfer, T. Hayashi, A. F. M. Marée, R. W. Carthew, and F. Graner, Cell adhesion and cortex contractility determine cell patterning in the Drosophila retina, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18549 (2007).
  34. P. J. Albert and U. S. Schwarz, Modeling cell shape and dynamics on micropatterns, Cell Adhes. Migr. 10, 516 (2016).
  35. M. H. Swat, G. L. Thomas, J. M. Belmonte, A. Shirinifard, D. Hmeljak, and J. A. Glazier, Multi-scale modeling of tissues using CompuCell3D, in Computational Methods in Cell Biology, Methods in Cell Biology Vol. 110, edited by A. R. Asthagiri and A. P. Arkin (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2012), pp. 325–366.
  36. M. A. Wozniak and C. S. Chen, Mechanotransduction in development: A growing role for contractility, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 34 (2009).
  37. D. W. J. Wejchert and J. P. Kermode, Monte Carlo simulation of the evolution of a two-dimensional soap froth, Philos. Mag. B 53, 15 (1986).
  38. A. Voss-Böhme, Multi-scale modeling in morphogenesis: A critical analysis of the cellular Potts model, PLoS ONE 7, e42852 (2012).
  39. E. G. Rens and L. Edelstein-Keshet, From energy to cellular forces in the cellular potts model: An algorithmic approach, PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007459 (2019).
  40. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/z152-x4l1 for additional figures and movies.
  41. R. Magno, V. A. Grieneisen, and A. F. Marée, The biophysical nature of cells: Potential cell behaviours revealed by analytical and computational studies of cell surface mechanics, BMC Biophys. 8, 8 (2015).
  42. M. K. Driscoll, C. McCann, R. Kopace, T. Homan, J. T. Fourkas, C. Parent, and W. Losert, Cell shape dynamics: From waves to migration, PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002392 (2012).
  43. M. A. Alias and P. R. Buenzli, Modeling the effect of curvature on the collective behavior of cells growing new tissue, Biophys. J. 112, 193 (2017).
  44. D. J. VandenHeuvel, B. L. Devlin, P. R. Buenzli, M. A. Woodruff, and M. J. Simpson, New computational tools and experiments reveal how geometry affects tissue growth in 3D printed scaffolds, Chem. Eng. J. 475, 145776 (2023).
  45. N. Kumar, J. Rangel Ambriz, K. Tsai, M. S. Mim, M. Flores-Flores, W. Chen, J. J. Zartman, and M. Alber, Balancing competing effects of tissue growth and cytoskeletal regulation during Drosophila wing disk development, Nat. Commun. 15, 2477 (2024).
  46. S. Okuda, Y. Inoue, M. Eiraku, Y. Sasai, and T. Adachi, Modeling cell proliferation for simulating three-dimensional tissue morphogenesis based on a reversible network reconnection framework, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 12, 987 (2013).
  47. F. Montel, M. Delarue, J. Elgeti, D. Vignjevic, G. Cappello, and J. Prost, Isotropic stress reduces cell proliferation in tumor spheroids, New J. Phys. 14, 055008 (2012).
  48. A. F. M. Marée, V. A. Grieneisen, and P. Hogeweg, The cellular Potts model and biophysical properties of cells, tissues and morphogenesis, in Single-Cell-Based Models in Biology and Medicine, edited by A. R. A. Anderson, M. A. J. Chaplain, and K. A. Rejniak (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2007), pp. 107–136.
  49. S. Tripodi, P. Ballet, and V. Rodin, Computational energetic model of morphogenesis based on multi-agent cellular Potts model, in Advances in Computational Biology, edited by H. R. Arabnia (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 685–692.
  50. S. E. M. Boas, Y. Jiang, R. M. H. Merks, S. A. Prokopiou, and E. G. Rens, Cellular Potts model: Applications to vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, in Probabilistic Cellular Automata: Theory, Applications and Future Perspectives, edited by P.-Y. Louis and F. R. Nardi (Springer International, Cham, 2018), pp. 279–310.
  51. L. C. Carpenter, F. Pérez-Verdugo, and S. Banerjee, Mechanical control of cell proliferation patterns in growing epithelial monolayers, Biophys. J. 123, 909 (2024).
  52. A. Szabó, R. Ünnep, E. Méhes, W. O. Twal, W. S. Argraves, Y. Cao, and A. Czirók, Collective cell motion in endothelial monolayers, Phys. Biol. 7, 046007 (2010).
  53. A. R. Noppe, A. P. Roberts, A. S. Yap, G. A. Gomez, and Z. Neufeld, Modelling wound closure in an epithelial cell sheet using the cellular Potts model, Integr. Biol. 7, 1253 (2015).
  54. M. Luciano, S. L. Xue, W. H. De Vos, P. Redondo, K. Demeulenaere, M. Le Merrer, D. Delacour, and N. Minc, Cell monolayers sense curvature by exploiting active mechanics and nuclear mechanoadaptation, Nat. Phys. 17, 1382 (2021).
  55. A. Brú, J. M. Pastor, I. Fernaud, I. Brú, S. Melle, and C. Berenguer, Super-rough dynamics on tumor growth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4008 (1998).
  56. H. Nemati and J. de Graaf, The cellular Potts model on disordered lattices, Soft Matter 20, 8337 (2024).
  57. S. Sultan, S. Devi, S. N. Mueller, and J. Textor, A parallelized cellular Potts model that enables simulations at tissue scale, arXiv:2312.09317.
  58. E. Tsingos, B. H. Bakker, K. A. Keijzer, H. J. Hupkes, and R. M. Merks, Hybrid cellular Potts and bead-spring modeling of cells in fibrous extracellular matrix, Biophys. J. 122, 2609 (2023).
  59. N. Chen, J. A. Glazier, J. A. Izaguirre, and M. S. Alber, A parallel implementation of the cellular Potts model for simulation of cell-based morphogenesis, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 670 (2007).
  60. L. Fastabend, Tension-driven-cpm, https://github.com/LennardFastabend/tension-driven-cpm (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation