- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review E

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Change in the order of a phase transition in the two-dimensional Potts model with equivalent neighbors

Petro Sarkanych*

  • *Contact author: petrosark@gmail.com
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 113, 014108 – Published 7 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t156-9vyr

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) Potts model is a classical example when the symmetry of the order parameter controls the order of a phase transition: on a square lattice with nearest-neighbors interaction, when the number of states q is less than or equal to 4, the second-order phase transition is observed, while for q>4 the first-order phase transition occurs. Recent research shows that even when the number of states is fixed, increasing the interaction range allows one to reach the point where the order of the phase transition changes. I focus on a q=3 2D Potts model and, from the analysis of the partition-function zeros, locate the number of interacting neighbors that change the order of the phase transition.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (28)

  1. J. J. Binney, N. J. Dowrick, A. J. Fisher, and M. E. J. Newman, The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization Group (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992).
  2. T. Ising, R. Folk, R. Kenna, B. Berche, and Y. Holovatch, The fate of Ernst Ising and the fate of his model, J. Phys. Stud. 21, 3002 (2017).
  3. H. E. Stanley, Dependence of critical properties on dimensionality of spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 589 (1968).
  4. E. Luijten, H. W. J. Blöte, and K. Binder, Medium-range interactions and crossover to classical critical behavior, Phys. Rev. E 54, 4626 (1996).
  5. S. A. Cannas, One-dimensional Ising model with long-range interactions: A renormalization-group treatment, Phys. Rev. B 52, 3034 (1995).
  6. P. Sarkanych, Y. Holovatch, and R. Kenna, On the phase diagram of the 2D Ising model with frustrating dipole interaction, Ukr. J. Phys. 60, 334 (2015).
  7. T. Gobron and I. Merola, First-order phase transition in Potts models with finite-range interactions, J. Stat. Phys. 126, 507 (2007).
  8. M. Biskup and L. Chayes, Rigorous analysis of discontinuous phase transitions via mean-field bounds, Commun. Math. Phys. 238, 53 (2003).
  9. X. Qian, Y. Deng, Y. Liu, W. Guo, and H. W. J. Blöte, Equivalent-neighbor Potts models in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 94, 052103 (2016).
  10. L. Moueddene, N. G. Fytas, Y. Holovatch, R. Kenna, and B. Berche, Critical and tricritical singularities from small-scale Monte Carlo simulations: The Blume-Capel model in two dimensions, J. Stat. Mech. (2024) 023206.
  11. L. Moueddene, N. G. Fytas, and B. Berche, Critical and tricritical behavior of the d=3 Blume-Capel model: Results from small-scale Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. E 110, 064144 (2024).
  12. P. Sarkanych, Y. Holovatch, R. Kenna, and T. Yavors'kii, Extracting partition function zeros from Fukui-Todo simulations, Europhys. Lett. 135, 37003 (2021).
  13. K. Fukui and S. Todo, Order-n cluster Monte Carlo method for spin systems with long-range interactions, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 2629 (2009).
  14. C. M. Fortuin and P. W. Kasteleyn, On the random-cluster model: I. Introduction and relation to other models, Physica 57, 536 (1972); P. W. Kasteleyn and C. M. Fortuin, Phase transitions in lattice systems with random local properties, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan Supplement 26, 11 (1969).
  15. R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86 (1987).
  16. E. Luijten and H. W. Blöte, Monte Carlo method for spin models with long-range interactions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 06, 359 (1995).
  17. A. J. Walker, An efficient method for generating discrete random variables with general distributions, ACM Trans. Math. Software (TOMS) 3, 253 (1977).
  18. This requires to have a precomputed weights of each bond, which can be done once for each set of model parameters and remains constant throughout the run.
  19. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
  20. Y. Honchar, B. Berche, Y. Holovatch, and R. Kenna, When correlations exceed system size: Finite-size scaling in free boundary conditions above the upper critical dimension, Condens. Matter Phys. 27, 13603 (2024).
  21. Y. Honchar, M. Krasnytska, B. Berche, Y. Holovatch, and R. Kenna, Partition function zeros for the Blume-Capel model on a complete graph, Low Temp. Phys. 51, 567 (2025).
  22. M. E. Fisher, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics, edited by W. E. Britten (University of Colorado Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1965), Vol. 7C, pp. 1–159.
  23. E. J. Flores-Sola, Finite-size scaling above the upper critical dimension, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lorraine; Coventry University, 2016.
  24. W. Janke and R. Kenna, Density of partition function zeros and phase transition strength, Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 443 (2002).
  25. C. Itzykson, R. B. Pearson, and J. B. Zuber, Distribution of zeros in Ising and gauge models, Nucl. Phys. B 220, 415 (1983).
  26. F. Y. Wu, The Potts model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982).
  27. B. Nienhuis, Coulomb gas formulation of two-dimensional phase transitions, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, London, UK, 1987), Vol. 11, pp. 1–53.
  28. We use the same notation as for the second-order regime, even though the transition is of a first order.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 113, 014108– Published 7 January, 2026
  • Received 18 July 2025
  • Accepted 17 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation