Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Multistage volume exclusion models for cell proliferation

John Carlo Dimaculangan, Cameron A. Smith, and Christian A. Yates

Phys. Rev. E 114, 044405 – Published 13 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sn9r-l6ns

Abstract

Cell proliferation and cell movement are fundamentally stochastic processes which lead to variability in the growth and spatial structure of cell populations in many biological settings, such as cell invasion, wound healing, and tumor growth. Understanding how variability in cell-cycle progression and local spatial constraints interact to impact population-level behavior requires modeling frameworks that explicitly represent individual-cell behavior and elucidate how these affect emergent tissue-level behavior. We develop stochastic, on-lattice agent-based models (ABMs) which incorporate volume exclusion, random movement, and multistage representations of the cell cycle. The multistage framework enables a more realistic representation of true cell-cycle time distributions. We also introduce a form of myopic behavior, in which cells sense their local environment when attempting to proliferate. For each ABM, we derive a corresponding continuum partial differential equation (PDE) description under the mean-field approximation. Using numerical simulations, we investigate how different proliferation mechanisms influence population-level dynamics in both the discrete and continuum models. In particular, we consider biologically relevant contexts of growth-to-confluence assays (using uniform initial conditions) and traveling wave behavior associated with cell invasion. We examine how the PDE solutions compare with the behavior of the corresponding ABMs averaged over many realizations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. B. Alberts, D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and J. Watson, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th ed. (Garland, New York, 2002).
  2. G. Gurtner, S. Werner, Y. Barrandon, and M. Longaker, Wound repair and regeneration, Nature (London) 453, 314 (2008).
  3. D. Hanahan and R. Weinberg, Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation, Cell 144, 646 (2011).
  4. K. Schafer, The cell cycle: A review, Vet. Pathol. 35, 461 (1998).
  5. J. Pietenpol and Z. Stewart, Cell cycle checkpoint signaling: Cell cycle arrest versus apoptosis, Toxicology 181-182, 475 (2002).
  6. D. Johnson and C. Walker, Cyclins and cell cycle checkpoints, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 39, 295 (1999).
  7. A. Meerson, M. Milyavsky, and V. Rotter, p53 mediates density-dependent growth arrest, FEBS Lett. 559, 152 (2004).
  8. O. Leontieva, Z. Demidenko, and M. Blagosklonny, Contact inhibition and high cell density deactivate the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, thus suppressing the senescence program, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8832 (2014).
  9. C. Glen, M. Kemp, and E. Voit, Agent-based modeling of morphogenetic systems: Advantages and challenges, PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006577 (2019).
  10. G. An, Q. Mi, J. Dutta-Moscato, and Y. Vodovotz, Agent-based models in translational systems biology, WIREs Mech. Dis. 1, 159 (2009).
  11. M. Baar, L. Coquille, H. Mayer, M. Hölzel, M. Rogava, T. Tüting, and A. Bovier, A stochastic model for immunotherapy of cancer, Sci. Rep. 6, 24169 (2016).
  12. R. Mort, R. Ross, K. Hainey, O. Harrison, M. Keighren, G. Landini, R. Baker, K. Painter, I. Jackson, and C. Yates, Reconciling diverse mammalian pigmentation patterns with a fundamental mathematical model, Nat. Commun. 7, 10288 (2016).
  13. C. Turner, A. Stinchcombe, M. Kohandel, S. Singh, and S. Sivaloganathan, Characterization of brain cancer stem cells: A mathematical approach, Cell Prolif. 42, 529 (2009).
  14. D. Gillespie, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions, J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340 (1977).
  15. A. Golubev, Applications and implications of the exponentially modified gamma distribution as a model for time variabilities related to cell proliferation and gene expression, J. Theor. Biol. 393, 203 (2016).
  16. C. Yates, M. Ford, and R. Mort, A multi-stage representation of cell proliferation as a Markov process, Bull. Math. Biol. 79, 2905 (2017).
  17. H. X. Chao, R. I. Fakhreddin, H. K. Shimerov, K. M. Kedziora, R. J. Kumar, J. Perez, J. C. Limas, G. D. Grant, J. G. Cook, G. P. Gupta, and J. E. Purvis, Evidence that the human cell cycle is a series of uncoupled, memoryless phases, Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, MSB188604 (2019).
  18. J. Wang and P. Levin, Metabolism, cell growth and the bacterial cell cycle, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 822 (2009).
  19. R. Baker and M. Simpson, Correcting mean-field approximations for birth-death-movement processes, Phys. Rev. E 82, 041905 (2010).
  20. M. Simpson, K. Landman, and B. Hughes, Multi-species simple exclusion processes, Physica A 388, 399 (2009).
  21. M. Simpson, K. Landman, and B. Hughes, Cell invasion with proliferation mechanisms motivated by time-lapse data, Physica A 389, 3779 (2010).
  22. M. Simpson, W. Jin, S. T. Vittadello, T. Tambyah, J. Ryan, G. Gunasingh, N. Haass, and S. McCue, Stochastic models of cell invasion with fluorescent cell cycle indicators, Physica A 510, 375 (2018).
  23. E. Gavagnin, M. Ford, R. Mort, T. Rogers, and C. Yates, The invasion speed of cell migration models with realistic cell cycle time distributions, J. Theor. Biol. 481, 91 (2019).
  24. K. Landman and A. Fernando, Myopic random walkers and exclusion processes: Single and multispecies, Physica A 390, 3742 (2011).
  25. S. Vittadello, S. McCue, G. Gunasingh, N. Haass, and M. Simpson, Mathematical models incorporating a multi-stage cell cycle replicate normally-hidden inherent synchronization in cell proliferation, J. R. Soc. Interface 16, 20190382 (2019).
  26. E. Gavagnin, S. T. Vittadello, G. Gunasingh, N. K. Haass, M. J. Simpson, T. Rogers, and C. A. Yates, Synchronized oscillations in growing cell populations are explained by demographic noise, Biophys. J. 120, 1314 (2021).
  27. S. Vittadello, S. McCue, G. Gunasingh, N. Haass, and M. Simpson, A novel mathematical model of heterogeneous cell proliferation, J. Math. Biol. 82, 34 (2021).
  28. J. Murray, Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Vol. 17 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007).
  29. S. Vittadello, S. McCue, G. Gunasingh, N. Haass, and M. Simpson, Mathematical models for cell migration with real-time cell cycle dynamics, Biophys. J. 114, 1241 (2018).
  30. C. Falcó, D. J. Cohen, J. A. Carrillo, and R. E. Baker, Quantifying cell cycle regulation by tissue crowding, Biophys. J. 124, 923 (2025).
  31. J. Wang, T. Broer, T. Chavez, C. Zhou, S. Tran, Y. Xiang, A. Khodabukus, Y. Diao, and N. Bursac, Myoblast deactivation within engineered human skeletal muscle creates a transcriptionally heterogeneous population of quiescent satellite-like cells, Biomaterials 284, 121508 (2022).
  32. G. Yao, Modelling mammalian cellular quiescence, Interface Focus 4, 20130074 (2014).
  33. M. Simpson, B. Hughes, and K. Landman, Diffusing populations: Ghosts or folks? Austral. J. Eng. Ed. 15, 59 (2009).
  34. D. Kendall, On the role of variable generation time in the development of a stochastic birth process, Biometrika 35, 316 (1948).
  35. S. Streichan, C. Hoerner, T. Schneidt, D. Holzer, and L. Hufnagel, Spatial constraints control cell proliferation in tissues, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5586 (2014).
  36. L. Donker, R. Houtekamer, M. Vliem, F. Sipieter, H. Canever, M. Gómez-González, M. Bosch-Padrós, W.-J. Pannekoek, X. Trepat, N. Borghi, and M. Gloerich, A mechanical G2 checkpoint controls epithelial cell division through E-cadherin-mediated regulation of Wee1-Cdk1, Cell Rep. 41, 111475 (2022).
  37. M. Uroz, S. Wistorf, X. Serra-Picamal, V. Conte, M. Sales-Pardo, P. Roca-Cusachs, R. Guimerà, and X. Trepat, Regulation of cell cycle progression by cell–cell and cell–matrix forces, Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 646 (2018).
  38. K. Höllring, L. Nuić, L. Rogić, S. Kaliman, S. Gehrer, C. Wollnik, F. Rehfeldt, M. Hubert, and A.-S. Smith, Capturing the mechanosensitivity of cell proliferation in models of epithelium, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2308126121 (2024).
  39. P. Kulesa, C. Bailey, J. Kasemeier-Kulesa, and R. McLennan, Cranial neural crest migration: New rules for an old road, Dev. Biol. 344, 543 (2010).
  40. P. Maini, D. McElwain, and D. Leavesley, Travelling waves in a wound healing assay, Appl. Math. Lett. 17, 575 (2004).
  41. G. C. Paul, Tauhida, and D. Kumar, Revisiting Fisher-KPP model to interpret the spatial spreading of invasive cell population in biology, Heliyon 8, e10773 (2022).
  42. D. Markham, M. Simpson, P. Maini, E. Gaffney, and R. Baker, Comparing methods for modelling spreading cell fronts, J. Theor. Biol. 353, 95 (2014).
  43. A. Cai, K. Landman, and B. Hughes, Multi-scale modeling of a wound-healing cell migration assay, J. Theor. Biol. 245, 576 (2007).
  44. A. Parker, M. Simpson, and R. Baker, The impact of experimental design choices on parameter inference for models of growing cell colonies, R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 180384 (2018).
  45. E. Gavagnin, J. Owen, and C. Yates, Pair correlation functions for identifying spatial correlation in discrete domains, Phys. Rev. E 97, 062104 (2018).
  46. A. Sakaue-Sawano, H. Kurokawa, T. Morimura, A. Hanyu, H. Hama, H. Osawa, S. Kashiwagi, K. Fukami, T. Miyata, H. Miyoshi, T. Imamura, M. Ogawa, H. Masai, and A. Miyawaki, Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression, Cell 132, 487 (2008).
  47. W. Van Saarloos, Front propagation into unstable states, Phys. Rep. 386, 29 (2003).
  48. J. Harrison and C. Yates, A hybrid algorithm for coupling partial differential equation and compartment-based dynamics, J. R. Soc. Interface. 13, 20160335 (2016).
  49. E. Brunet and B. Derrida, Shift in the velocity of a front due to a cutoff, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2597 (1997).
  50. D. Selmeczi, S. Mosler, P. Hagedorn, N. Larsen, and H. Flyvbjerg, Cell motility as persistent random motion: Theories from experiments, Biophys. J. 89, 912 (2005).
  51. P. Wu, A. Giri, S. Sun, and D. Wirtz, Three-dimensional cell migration does not follow a random walk, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3949 (2014).
  52. J. C. J. Heyn, J. O. Rädler, and M. Falcke, Mesenchymal cell migration on one-dimensional micropatterns, Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 1352279 (2024).
  53. Y. Artemenko, T. Lampert, and P. Devreotes, Moving towards a paradigm: Common mechanisms of chemotactic signaling in Dictyostelium and mammalian leukocytes, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 3711 (2014).
  54. J. Espina, C. Marchant, and E. Barriga, Durotaxis: The mechanical control of directed cell migration, FEBS J. 289, 2736 (2022).
  55. S. Noureen, R. Mort, and C. Yates, Modeling adhesion in stochastic and mean-field models of cell migration, Phys. Rev. E 111, 014419 (2025).
  56. J. C. Dimaculangan, jcd65/msm-volume-exclusion-cell-models: msm-volume-exclusion-cell-models_v1.0.0 (Version final) [Computer software], Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23099835.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation