Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Intrinsic resonance depends on network size for coupled-delayed interacting oscillators

Felipe A. Torres1, Alejandro Weinstein2, Jesus M. Cortes3,4,5, and Wael El-Deredy6,*

  • *Contact author: wael.el-deredy@uv.cl

Phys. Rev. E 113, 024207 – Published 17 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rnqc-y1kd

Abstract

The collective frequency that emerges from synchronized neuronal populations—the network resonance—shows a systematic relationship with brain size: a whole-brain large network oscillates slowly, whereas finer parcellations of fixed volume exhibit faster rhythms. This resonance–size scaling has been reported in delayed neural mass models and human neuroimaging, yet the physical mechanism has remained unresolved. Here, we show that size-dependent resonance follows directly from propagation delays in delay-coupled phase oscillators. Starting from a Kuramoto model with heterogeneous delays, we linearize around the near-synchronous solution and obtain a closed-form approximation linking the resonance Ω to the mean delay and the effective coupling field. The analysis predicts a generic scaling law: Ω≈(∑jcijτ)−1, so resonance is delay limited and therefore depends systematically on geometric size or parcellation density. We evaluate four growth scenarios—expanding geometry, fixed-volume parcellation, constant geometry, and an unphysical reference case—and show that only geometry-consistent scaling satisfies the analytical prediction. Numerical simulations with heterogeneous delays validate the law and quantify its error as a function of delay dispersion. These results identify a minimal physical mechanism for size-dependent cortical resonance and provide an analytical framework that unifies numeric simulation outputs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (22)

  1. S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006).
  2. A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks, Phys. Rep. 469, 93 (2008).
  3. Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non-linear oscillators, in International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics: January 23–29, 1975, Kyoto University, Kyoto/Japan, edited by H. Araki (Springer, Berlin, 1975), pp. 420–422.
  4. S. H. Strogatz, From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators, Phys. D (Amsterdam, Neth.) 143, 1 (2000).
  5. E. Niebur, H. G. Schuster, and D. M. Kammen, Collective frequencies and metastability in networks of limit-cycle oscillators with time delay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2753 (1991).
  6. J. Cabral, H. Luckhoo, M. Woolrich, M. Joensson, H. Mohseni, A. Baker, M. L. Kringelbach, and G. Deco, Exploring mechanisms of spontaneous functional connectivity in MEG: How delayed network interactions lead to structured amplitude envelopes of band-pass filtered oscillations, Neuroimage 90, 423 (2014).
  7. M. Breakspear, S. Heitmann, and A. Daffertshofer, Generative models of cortical oscillations: Neurobiological implications of the Kuramoto model, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 190 (2010).
  8. F. A. Torres, M. Otero, C. A. Lea-Carnall, J. Cabral, A. Weinstein, and W. El-Deredy, Emergence of multiple spontaneous coherent subnetworks from a single configuration of human connectome coupled oscillators model, Sci. Rep. 14, 30726 (2024).
  9. C. A. Lea-Carnall, M. A. Montemurro, N. J. Trujillo-Barreto, L. M. Parkes, and W. El-Deredy, Cortical resonance frequencies emerge from network size and connectivity, PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004740 (2016).
  10. J. C. Pang, K. M. Aquino, M. Oldehinkel, P. A. Robinson, B. D. Fulcher, M. Breakspear, and A. Fornito, Geometric constraints on human brain function, Nature (London) 618, 566 (2023).
  11. R. O'Dea, J. J. Crofts, and M. Kaiser, Spreading dynamics on spatially constrained complex brain networks, J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130016 (2013).
  12. A. Salova and I. A. Kovács, Combined topological and spatial constraints are required to capture the structure of neural connectomes, Network Neurosci. 9, 181 (2025).
  13. W. S. Lee, E. Ott, and T. M. Antonsen, Large coupled oscillator systems with heterogeneous interaction delays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 044101 (2009).
  14. B. C. Van Wijk, C. J. Stam, and A. Daffertshofer, Comparing brain networks of different size and connectivity density using graph theory, PLoS ONE 5, e13701 (2010).
  15. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002).
  16. G. Iñiguez, S. Heydari, J. Kertész, and J. Saramäki, Universal patterns in egocentric communication networks, Nat. Commun. 14, 5217 (2023).
  17. L. Daqing, K. Kosmidis, A. Bunde, and S. Havlin, Dimension of spatially embedded networks, Nat. Phys. 7, 481 (2011).
  18. BrainDynamicsLaboratory, GitHub repository (2024), https://github.com/anillovibrain/kuramotonetworkspackage.
  19. S. Coombes, Large-scale neural dynamics: Simple and complex, NeuroImage 52, 731 (2010).
  20. J. de Oliveira and C. Abud, Nonmonotonic critical threshold in the Kuramoto model, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 91, 105428 (2020).
  21. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/rnqc-y1kd for details of the networks used in Case A and Case B.
  22. Brain Dynamics Laboratory, NetworksSizeResonance, GitHub repository (2025), https://github.com/anillovibrain/networkssizeresonance.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation