- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review E

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Hydrodynamic theory of wetting by active particles

Noah Grodzinski1,*, Michael E. Cates1, and Robert L. Jack1,2

  • *Contact author: njbg2@cam.ac.uk, he/him
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 113, 065423 – Published 23 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rdc2-gsqc

Abstract

The accumulation of self-propelled particles on repulsive barriers is a widely observed feature in active matter. Despite being implicated in a broad range of biological processes, from biofilm formation to cytoskeletal movement, wetting of surfaces by active particles remains poorly understood. In this work, we study this active wetting by considering a model comprising an active lattice gas, interacting with a permeable barrier under periodic boundary conditions, for which an exact hydrodynamic description is possible. We consider a hydrodynamic scaling limit that eliminates dynamical noise while retaining microscopic interpretability, enabling a precise characterization of steady states and their transitions. We demonstrate that the accumulation of active particles has remarkable similarities to equilibrium wetting, and that active wetting transitions display all the salient characteristics of the equilibrium critical wetting transition—despite fundamental differences in underlying microscopic dynamics. However, our framework also enables the investigation of subtle but important nonequilibrium effects in active wetting, including a spontaneous ratchet effect which leads to a global steady-state current, departure of the bulk densities from their binodal values, and a modified dynamical transition pathway. Our results provide an intrinsically nonequilibrium framework in which to study active wetting, precisely demonstrating the connection to passive wetting while clarifying the nonequilibrium consequences of activity.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Spontaneous Ratchet Currents and Transition Dynamics in Active Wetting

Noah Grodzinski, Robert L. Jack, and Michael E. Cates
Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 257101 (2026)

Article Text

References (93)

  1. M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013).
  2. S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010).
  3. J. Elgeti, R. G. Winkler, and G. Gompper, Physics of microswimmers—single particle motion and collective behavior: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 056601 (2015).
  4. J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates, Statistical mechanics of interacting run-and-tumble bacteria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 218103 (2008).
  5. M. E. Cates, Diffusive transport without detailed balance in motile bacteria: Does microbiology need statistical physics? Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 042601 (2012).
  6. R. Alert and X. Trepat, Physical models of collective cell migration, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 77 (2020).
  7. T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995).
  8. J. Toner and Y. Tu, Flocks, herds, and schools: A quantitative theory of flocking, Phys. Rev. E 58, 4828 (1998).
  9. A. Doostmohammadi, J. Ignés-Mullol, J. M. Yeomans, and F. Sagués, Active nematics, Nat. Commun. 9, 3246 (2018).
  10. A. Walther and A. H. E. Müller, Janus particles: Synthesis, self-assembly, physical properties, and applications, Chem. Rev. 113, 5194 (2013).
  11. B. Saintyves, M. Spenko, and H. M. Jaeger, A self-organizing robotic aggregate using solid and liquid-like collective states, Sci. Rob. 9, eadh4130 (2024).
  12. M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 219 (2015).
  13. M. E. Cates and C. Nardini, Active phase separation: New phenomenology from non-equilibrium physics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 056601 (2025).
  14. M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, When are active Brownian particles and run-and-tumble particles equivalent? Consequences for motility-induced phase separation, Europhys. Lett. 101, 20010 (2013).
  15. Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no alignment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 235702 (2012).
  16. G. S. Redner, M. F. Hagan, and A. Baskaran, Structure and dynamics of a phase-separating active colloidal fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 055701 (2013).
  17. P. Digregorio, D. Levis, A. Suma, L. F. Cugliandolo, G. Gonnella, and I. Pagonabarraga, Full phase diagram of active Brownian disks: From melting to motility-induced phase separation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 098003 (2018).
  18. R. Wittkowski, A. Tiribocchi, J. Stenhammar, R. J. Allen, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Scalar ϕ4 field theory for active-particle phase separation, Nat. Commun. 5, 4351 (2014).
  19. E. Tjhung, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Cluster phases and bubbly phase separation in active fluids: Reversal of the Ostwald process, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031080 (2018).
  20. O. Granek, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, S. Ro, J. Tailleur, and A. Solon, Colloquium: Inclusions, boundaries, and disorder in scalar active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 031003 (2024).
  21. C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. Löwen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045006 (2016).
  22. J. Stenhammar, R. Wittkowski, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Light-induced self-assembly of active rectification devices, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501850 (2016).
  23. Y. Ben Dor, S. Ro, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, and J. Tailleur, Disordered boundaries destroy bulk phase separation in scalar active matter, Phys. Rev. E 105, 044603 (2022).
  24. P. Galajda, J. Keymer, P. Chaikin, and R. Austin, A wall of funnels concentrates swimming bacteria, J. Bacteriol. 189, 8704 (2007).
  25. C. O. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, Ratchet effects in active matter systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 51 (2017).
  26. M. Mangeat, S. Chakraborty, A. Wysocki, and H. Rieger, Stationary particle currents in sedimenting active matter wetting a wall, Phys. Rev. E 109, 014616 (2024).
  27. F. Turci and N. B. Wilding, Wetting transition of active Brownian particles on a thin membrane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 238002 (2021).
  28. F. Turci, R. L. Jack, and N. B. Wilding, Partial and complete wetting of droplets of active Brownian particles, Soft Matter 20, 2060 (2024).
  29. P. D. Neta, M. Tasinkevych, M. M. Telo da Gama, and C. S. Dias, Wetting of a solid surface by active matter, Soft Matter 17, 2468 (2021).
  30. J. Elgeti and G. Gompper, Wall accumulation of self-propelled spheres, Europhys. Lett. 101, 48003 (2013).
  31. Y. Zhao, R. Zakine, A. Daerr, Y. Kafri, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Wetting by active fluids, Nat. Phys. (2026), doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03208-4.
  32. L. Caprini, D. Breoni, A. Ldov, C. Scholz, and H. Löwen, Dynamical clustering and wetting phenomena in inertial active matter, Commun. Phys. 7, 343 (2024).
  33. N. Sepúlveda and R. Soto, Wetting transitions displayed by persistent active particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 078001 (2017).
  34. N. Sepúlveda and R. Soto, Universality of active wetting transitions, Phys. Rev. E 98, 052141 (2018).
  35. S. Das and R. Chelakkot, Morphological transitions of active Brownian particle aggregates on porous walls, Soft Matter 16, 7250 (2020).
  36. S. Das, G. Gompper, and R. G. Winkler, Confined active Brownian particles: Theoretical description of propulsion-induced accumulation, New J. Phys. 20, 015001 (2018).
  37. S. Das and R. Chelakkot, Active wetting transitions induced by rotational noise at solid interfaces, J. Chem. Phys. 163, 014704 (2025).
  38. P. Pérez-Bastías and R. Soto, Two-field theory for phase coexistence of active Brownian particles, Phys. Rev. E 112, 055403 (2025).
  39. A. Wysocki and H. Rieger, Capillary action in scalar active matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 048001 (2020).
  40. M. Rojas-Vega, P. de Castro, and R. Soto, Wetting dynamics by mixtures of fast and slow self-propelled particles, Phys. Rev. E 107, 014608 (2023).
  41. P. G. de Gennes, Wetting: Statics and dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827 (1985).
  42. D. Bonn, J. Eggers, J. Indekeu, J. Meunier, and E. Rolley, Wetting and spreading, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 739 (2009).
  43. R. Evans, M. C. Stewart, and N. B. Wilding, A unified description of hydrophilic and superhydrophobic surfaces in terms of the wetting and drying transitions of liquids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23901 (2019).
  44. U. Thiele, What is active wetting? arXiv:2602.10287.
  45. A. M. Tayar, F. Caballero, T. Anderberg, O. A. Saleh, M. Cristina Marchetti, and Z. Dogic, Controlling liquid–liquid phase behaviour with an active fluid, Nat. Mater. 22, 1401 (2023).
  46. S. Douezan, K. Guevorkian, R. Naouar, S. Dufour, D. Cuvelier, and F. Brochard-Wyart, Spreading dynamics and wetting transition of cellular aggregates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7315 (2011).
  47. R. Hartmann, P. K. Singh, P. Pearce, R. Mok, B. Song, F. Díaz-Pascual, J. Dunkel, and K. Drescher, Emergence of three-dimensional order and structure in growing biofilms, Nat. Phys. 15, 251 (2019).
  48. E. Lauga, W. R. DiLuzio, G. M. Whitesides, and H. A. Stone, Swimming in circles: Motion of bacteria near solid boundaries, Biophys. J. 90, 400 (2006).
  49. Y. I. Yaman, E. Demir, R. Vetter, and A. Kocabas, Emergence of active nematics in chaining bacterial biofilms, Nat. Commun. 10, 2285 (2019).
  50. L. Chai, V. Zaburdaev, and R. Kolter, How bacteria actively use passive physics to make biofilms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2403842121 (2024).
  51. R. M. Harshey, Bacterial motility on a surface: Many ways to a common goal, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57, 249 (2003).
  52. C. Pérez-González, R. Alert, C. Blanch-Mercader, M. Gómez-González, T. Kolodziej, E. Bazellieres, J. Casademunt, and X. Trepat, Active wetting of epithelial tissues, Nat. Phys. 15, 79 (2019).
  53. A. Brugués, E. Anon, V. Conte, J. H. Veldhuis, M. Gupta, J. Colombelli, J. J. Muñoz, G. W. Brodland, B. Ladoux, and X. Trepat, Forces driving epithelial wound healing, Nat. Phys. 10, 683 (2014).
  54. J. F. Joanny, K. Kruse, J. Prost, and S. Ramaswamy, The actin cortex as an active wetting layer, Eur. Phys. J. E 36, 52 (2013).
  55. K. Binder and D. P. Landau, Wetting and layering in the nearest-neighbor simple-cubic Ising lattice: A Monte Carlo investigation, Phys. Rev. B 37, 1745 (1988).
  56. D. E. Sullivan and M. M. Telo da Gama, Wetting transitions and multilayer adsorption at fluid interfaces, in Fluid Interfacial Phenomena, edited by C. A. Croxton (Wiley, New York, 1986).
  57. S. Dietrich, Wetting phenomena, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, London, 1988), Vol. 12.
  58. M. Schick, Introduction to wetting phenomena, in Liquids at Interfaces, Les Houches Session XLVIII, edited by J. Charvolin, J. F. Joanny, and J. Zinn-Justin (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990), pp. 415.
  59. R. Lipowsky, Critical surface phenomena at first-order bulk transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1575 (1982).
  60. R. Zakine, Y. Zhao, M. Knežević, A. Daerr, Y. Kafri, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Surface tensions between active fluids and solid interfaces: Bare vs dressed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 248003 (2020).
  61. J. Bialké, J. T. Siebert, H. Löwen, and T. Speck, Negative interfacial tension in phase-separated active Brownian particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 098301 (2015).
  62. R. Adkins, I. Kolvin, Z. You, S. Witthaus, M. C. Marchetti, and Z. Dogic, Dynamics of active liquid interfaces, Science 377, 768 (2022).
  63. M. Kourbane-Houssene, C. Erignoux, T. Bodineau, and J. Tailleur, Exact hydrodynamic description of active lattice gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 268003 (2018).
  64. J. Mason, C. Erignoux, R. L. Jack, and M. Bruna, Exact hydrodynamics and onset of phase separation for an active exclusion process, Proc. R. Soc. A 479, 20230524 (2023).
  65. C. Erignoux, On the hydrodynamics of active matter models on a lattice, Markov Process. Relat. Fields. 30, 57 (2024).
  66. D. Martin, D. Seara, Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Transition to collective motion in nonreciprocal active matter: Coarse graining agent-based models into fluctuating hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. X 15, 041015 (2025).
  67. J. Mason, R. L. Jack, and M. Bruna, Dynamical patterns and nonreciprocal effective interactions in an active-passive mixture through exact hydrodynamic analysis, Nat. Commun. 16, 6017 (2025).
  68. J. M. J. van Leeuwen, M. J. P. Nijmeijer, and C. Bruin, Molecular dynamics of wetting and drying at solid-fluid interfaces, Phys. Scr. T25, 256 (1989).
  69. K. Bucior, L. Yelash, and K. Binder, Molecular-dynamics simulation of evaporation processes of fluid bridges confined in slitlike pores, Phys. Rev. E 79, 031604 (2009).
  70. P. S. Swain and R. Lipowsky, Wetting between structured surfaces: Liquid bridges and induced forces, Europhys. Lett. 49, 203 (2000).
  71. A. Valencia, M. Brinkmann, and R. Lipowsky, Liquid bridges in chemically structured slit pores, Langmuir 17, 3390 (2001).
  72. A. Maciołek, R. Evans, and N. B. Wilding, Effects of weak surface fields on the density profiles and adsorption of a confined fluid near bulk criticality, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 8663 (2003).
  73. E. M. Grzelak and J. R. Errington, Computation of interfacial properties via grand canonical transition matrix Monte Carlo simulation, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 014710 (2008).
  74. M. J. P. Nijmeijer, C. Bruin, A. F. Bakker, and J. M. J. van Leeuwen, Wetting and drying of an inert wall by a fluid in a molecular-dynamics simulation, Phys. Rev. A 42, 6052 (1990).
  75. J. H. Sikkenk, J. O. Indekeu, J. M. J. van Leeuwen, and E. O. Vossnack, Molecular-dynamics simulation of wetting and drying at solid-fluid interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 98 (1987).
  76. N. Grodzinski, R. L. Jack, and M. E. Cates, companion paper, Spontaneous ratchet currents and transition dynamics in active wetting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 257101 (2026).
  77. J. W. Cahn, Critical point wetting, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 3667 (1977).
  78. P.-G. de Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, and D. Quéré, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves (Springer, New York, 2003).
  79. R. Evans and P. Tarazona, Wetting and thick-thin film transitions in a model of argon at a solid CO2 substrate, Phys. Rev. A 28, 1864 (1983).
  80. H. Nakanishi and M. E. Fisher, Multicriticality of wetting, prewetting, and surface transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1565 (1982).
  81. R. Evans and U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, Capillary condensation versus prewetting, Phys. Rev. A 32, 3817 (1985).
  82. A. Malijevský and A. O. Parry, Capillary condensation and depinning transitions in open slits, Phys. Rev. E 104, 044801 (2021).
  83. X.-T. Wu, D. B. Abraham, and J. O. Indekeu, Apparent first-order wetting and anomalous scaling in the two-dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 046101 (2016).
  84. K. Binder, D. Landau, and M. Müller, Monte Carlo studies of wetting, interface localization and capillary condensation, J. Stat. Phys. 110, 1411 (2003).
  85. L. Yao and R. L. Jack, Interfacial and density fluctuations in a lattice model of motility-induced phase separation, J. Chem. Phys. 162, 114902 (2025).
  86. X.-q. Shi, G. Fausti, H. Chaté, C. Nardini, and A. Solon, Self-organized critical coexistence phase in repulsive active particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 168001 (2020).
  87. J. Mason, R. L. Jack, and M. Bruna, Macroscopic behaviour in a two-species exclusion process via the method of matched asymptotics, J. Stat. Phys. 190, 47 (2023).
  88. J. Metzger, S. Ro, and J. Tailleur, Exceptions to the ratchet principle in active and passive stochastic dynamics, arXiv:2503.11902.
  89. T. Agranov, S. Ro, Y. Kafri, and V. Lecomte, Exact fluctuating hydrodynamics of active lattice gases—typical fluctuations, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2021) 083208.
  90. H. R. Vutukuri, M. Lisicki, E. Lauga, and J. Vermant, Light-switchable propulsion of active particles with reversible interactions, Nat. Commun. 11, 2628 (2020).
  91. M. Rey, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Light, matter, action: Shining light on active matter, ACS Photonics 10, 1188 (2023).
  92. N. Grodzinski, Research data supporting “Hydrodynamic theory of wetting by active particles” and “Spontaneous ratchet currents and transition dynamics in active wetting”, Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository (2026), https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.129364.
  93. R. Lipowsky, Surface-induced order and disorder: Critical phenomena at first-order phase transitions (invited), J. Appl. Phys. 55, 2485 (1984).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 113, 065423– Published 23 June, 2026
  • Received 25 June 2025
  • Accepted 6 April 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation