Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

RETRACTED: Multiparticle quantum heat engine: Exploring the impact of criticality on efficiency

Anass Hminat1, Abdallah Slaoui1,2,*, Brahim Amghar2,3, and Rachid Ahl Laamara1,2

  • *Contact author: abdallah.slaoui@fsr.um5.ac.ma

Phys. Rev. E 112, 044104 – Published 2 October, 2025Retraction Phys. Rev. E 113, 049906 (2026)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qyby-5yvg

Abstract

This article has been retracted: see Phys. Rev. E 113, 049906 (2026)

Quantum many-body systems present substantial technical challenges from both analytical and numerical perspectives. Despite these difficulties, some progress has been made, including studies of interacting atomic gases and interacting quantum spins. Furthermore, the potential for criticality to enhance engine performance has been demonstrated, suggesting a promising direction for future investigation. Here, we explore the performance of a quantum Otto cycle using a long-range Ising chain as the working substance. We consider an idealized cycle consisting of two adiabatic transformations and two perfect thermalizations, eliminating dissipation. Analyzing both engine and refrigerator modes, we investigate the influence of particle number, varied from 10 to 100, on efficiencies and behavior near the critical point of the phase transition, which we characterize using a scaling factor. We also examine how internal factors—specifically, the power-law exponent, the number of particles, and the hot and cold reservoir temperatures—affect the system's operation in different modes. Our results reveal that these factors have a different impact compared with their classical counterparts.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Erratum

Retraction: Multiparticle quantum heat engine: Exploring the impact of criticality on efficiency [Phys. Rev. E 112, 044104 (2025)]

Anass Hminat, Abdallah Slaoui, Brahim Amghar, and Rachid Ahl Laamara
Phys. Rev. E 113, 049906 (2026)

Article Text

References (70)

  1. D. E. Winterbone and A. Turan, Advanced Thermodynamics for Engineers (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015).
  2. S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Thermodynamics of Quantum Systems, Quantum Thermodynamics (Morgan Claypool Publishers, 2019).
  3. P. Strasberg, Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications (Oxford University Press, 2022).
  4. J. P. Pérez, Thermodynamique: Fondements et Applications: Avec 250 Exercices et Problèmes Résolus (Dinod, 2001).
  5. H. E. Scovil and E. O. Schulz-DuBois, Three-level masers as heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 262 (1959).
  6. E. Latifah and A. Purwanto, Quantum heat engines; Multiple-State 1D box system, J. Mod. Phys. 04, 1091 (2013).
  7. C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and B. K. Meister, Entropy and temperature of a quantum Carnot engine, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 458, 1519 (2002).
  8. C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and B. K. Meister, Quantum mechanical Carnot engine, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, 4427 (2000).
  9. A. Solfanelli, M. Falsetti, and M. Campisi, Nonadiabatic single-qubit quantum Otto engine, Phys. Rev. B 101, 054513 (2020).
  10. G. Piccitto, M. Campisi, and D. Rossini, The Ising critical quantum Otto engine, New J. Phys. 24, 103023 (2022).
  11. Y. Yin, L. Chen, and F. Wu, Optimal power and efficiency of quantum stirling heat engines, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 45 (2017).
  12. Y. Yin, L. Chen, and F. Wu, Performance of quantum stirling heat engine with numerous copies of extreme relativistic particles confined in 1D potential well, Physica A 503, 58 (2018).
  13. D. P. Setyo, E. Latifah, H. Wisodo, and A. Hidayat, Quantum relativistic diesel engine with single massless fermion in 1 dimensional box system, J. Penelit. Fis. Apl. (JPFA) 8, 25 (2018).
  14. D. P. Setyo and E. Latifah, Quantum Otto engine based on multiple-state single fermion in 1D box system, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1093, 012030 (2018).
  15. A. Purwanto, H. Sukamto, B. A. Subagyo, and M. Taufiqi, Two scenarios on the relativistic quantum heat engine, J. Appl. Math. Phys. 4, 1344, 1353 (2016).
  16. P. A. Camati, J. F. G. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Coherence effects in the performance of the quantum Otto heat engine, Phys. Rev. A 99, 062103 (2019).
  17. Q. Bouton, J. Nettersheim, S. Burgardt, D. Adam, E. Lutz, and A. Widera, A quantum heat engine driven by atomic collisions, Nat. Commun. 12, 2063 (2021).
  18. V. R. Arezzo, D. Rossini, and G. Piccitto, Many-body quantum heat engines based on free fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224309 (2024).
  19. A. El Makouri, A. Slaoui, and R. A. Laamara, Quantum unital Otto heat engines: Using Kirkwood–Dirac quasi-probability for the engine's coherence to stay alive, Ann. Phys. 473, 169889 (2025).
  20. A. El Makouri, A. Slaoui, and R. Ahl Laamara, Monitored nonadiabatic and coherent-controlled quantum unital Otto heat engines: First four cumulants, Phys. Rev. E 108, 044114 (2023).
  21. N. Ranabhat and M. Collura, Thermalization of long range Ising model in different dynamical regimes: A full counting statistics approach, SciPost Phys. Core 7, 017 (2024).
  22. B. Amghar, A. Slaoui, J. Elfakir, and M. Daoud, Geometrical, topological, and dynamical description of N interacting spin-s particles in a long-range Ising model and their interplay with quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032402 (2023).
  23. A. Lerose, B. Žunkovič, A. Silva, and A. Gambassi, Quasilocalized excitations induced by long-range interactions in translationally invariant quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 99, 121112(R) (2019).
  24. G. Piccitto, B. Žunković, and A. Silva, Dynamical phase diagram of a quantum Ising chain with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B 100, 180402(R) (2019).
  25. G. Piccitto and A. Silva, Crossover from fast to slow dynamics in a long-range interacting Ising chain, J. Stat. Mech. (2019) 094017.
  26. V. Mukherjee and U. Divakaran, Many-body quantum thermal machines, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 454001 (2021).
  27. L. M. Cangemi, C. Bhadra, and A. Levy, Quantum engines and refrigerators, Phys. Rep. 1087, 1 (2024).
  28. J. Jaramillo, M. Beau, and A. del Campo, Quantum supremacy of many-particle thermal machines, New J. Phys. 18, 075019 (2016).
  29. R. S. Watson and K. V. Kheruntsyan, An interaction-driven quantum many-body engine enabled by atom-atom correlations, SciPost Phys. 18, 190 (2025).
  30. N. Yunger Halpern, C. D. White, S. Gopalakrishnan, and G. Refael, Quantum engine based on many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B 99, 024203 (2019).
  31. F. Carollo, F. M. Gambetta, K. Brandner, J. P. Garrahan, and I. Lesanovsky, Nonequilibrium quantum many-body Rydberg atom engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 170602 (2020).
  32. T. Zhang, W.-T. Liu, P.-X. Chen, and C.-Z. Li, Four-level entangled quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. A 75, 062102 (2007).
  33. E. Muñoz and F. J. Peña, Magnetically driven quantum heat engine, Phys. Rev. E 89, 052107 (2014).
  34. S. Xu, Long-range coupling affects entanglement dynamics, Physics 15, 2 (2022).
  35. A. Russomanno, F. Iemini, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio, Floquet time crystal in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model, Phys. Rev. B 95, 214307 (2017).
  36. F. M. Surace, A. Russomanno, M. Dalmonte, A. Silva, R. Fazio, and F. Iemini, Floquet time crystals in clock models, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104303 (2019).
  37. A. Pizzi, J. Knolle, and A. Nunnenkamp, Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in clean long-range interacting systems, Nat. Commun. 12, 2341 (2021).
  38. N. Defenu, G. Morigi, L. Dell'Anna, and T. Enss, Universal dynamical scaling of long-range topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 100, 184306 (2019).
  39. J. C. Halimeh, M. Van Damme, V. Zauner-Stauber, and L. Vanderstraeten, Quasiparticle origin of dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033111 (2020).
  40. O. L. Acevedo, L. Quiroga, F. J. Rodríguez, and N. F. Johnson, New dynamical scaling universality for quantum networks across adiabatic quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 030403 (2014).
  41. M.-J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase transition and universal dynamics in the Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015).
  42. N. Defenu, T. Enss, M. Kastner, and G. Morigi, Dynamical critical scaling of long-range interacting quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 240403 (2018).
  43. P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions, Nature (London) 511, 198 (2014).
  44. P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many-body system, Nature (London) 511, 202 (2014).
  45. T. Koffel, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagliacozzo, Entanglement entropy for the long-range Ising chain in a transverse field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 267203 (2012).
  46. A. S. Buyskikh, M. Fagotti, J. Schachenmayer, F. Essler, and A. J. Daley, Entanglement growth and correlation spreading with variable-range interactions in spin and fermionic tunneling models, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053620 (2016).
  47. H. Tarif, A. Slaoui, and R. Ahl Laamara, Unlocking thermodynamic multitasking: Exploring the functioning of two-qubit engines through coherence and entanglement, Physica A 668, 130469 (2025).
  48. M. Campisi and R. Fazio, The power of a critical heat engine, Nat. Commun. 7, 11895 (2016).
  49. G. B. Mbeng, A. Russomanno, and G. E. Santoro, The quantum Ising chain for beginners, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 82 (2024).
  50. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys. 16, 407 (1961).
  51. F. Liu, R. Lundgren, P. Titum, G. Pagano, J. Zhang, C. Monroe, and A. V. Gorshkov, Confined quasiparticle dynamics in long-range interacting quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 150601 (2019).
  52. S. Scopa, P. Calabrese, and A. Bastianello, Entanglement dynamics in confining spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 105, 125413 (2022).
  53. E. Gonzalez Lazo, M. Heyl, M. Dalmonte, and A. Angelone, Finite-temperature critical behavior of long-range quantum Ising models, SciPost Phys. 11, 076 (2021).
  54. J. Jin, A. Biella, O. Viyuela, L. Mazza, J. Keeling, R. Fazio, and D. Rossini, Cluster mean-field approach to the steady-state phase diagram of dissipative spin systems, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031011 (2016).
  55. A. El Makouri, A. Slaoui, and M. Daoud, Enhancing the performance of coupled quantum Otto thermal machines without entanglement and quantum correlations, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 56, 085501 (2023).
  56. D. Yamamoto, Correlated cluster mean-field theory for spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 79, 144427 (2009).
  57. E. Muñoz and F. J. Peña, Quantum heat engine in the relativistic limit: The case of a Dirac particle, Phys. Rev. E 86, 061108 (2012).
  58. P. Chattopadhyay and G. Paul, Relativistic quantum heat engine from uncertainty relation standpoint, Sci. Rep., 9, 16967 (2019).
  59. A. D' Abbruzzo and D. Rossini, Self-consistent microscopic derivation of Markovian master equations for open quadratic quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 103, 052209 (2021).
  60. M. E. Fisher, S.-K. Ma, and B. G. Nickel, Critical exponents for long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 917 (1972).
  61. D. Vodola, L. Lepori, E. Ercolessi, and G. Pupillo, Long-range Ising and Kitaev models: Phases, correlations and edge modes, New J. Phys. 18, 015001 (2016)
  62. L. Fusco, M. Paternostro, and G. De Chiara, Work extraction and energy storage in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E 94, 052122 (2016).
  63. J. G. Martínez-Herrera, Critical temperature of one-dimensional Ising model with long-range interaction revisited, Physica A 596, 127136 (2022).
  64. R. Dorner, J. Goold, C. Cormick, M. Paternostro, and V. Vedral, Emergent thermodynamics in a quenched quantum many-body system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160601 (2012).
  65. L. Fusco, S. Pigeon, T. J. G. Apollaro, A. Xuereb, L. Mazzola, M. Campisi, A. Ferraro, M. Paternostro, and G. De Chiara, Assessing the nonequilibrium thermodynamics in a quenched quantum many-body system via single projective measurements, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031029 (2014).
  66. N. Defenu, T. Donner, T. Macrì, G. Pagano, S. Ruffo, and A. Trombettoni, Long-range interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035002 (2023).
  67. M. O. Scully, M. S. Zubairy, G. S. Agarwal, and H. Walther, Extracting work from a single heat bath via quantum coherence, Science 299, 862 (2003).
  68. R. Uzdin, A. Levy, and R. Kosloff, Equivalence of quantum heat machines, and quantum-thermodynamic signatures, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031044 (2015).
  69. H. T. Quan, Y. X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E 76, 031105 (2007).
  70. J. Gemmer, M. Michel, and G. Mahler, Quantum Thermodynamics: Emergence of Thermodynamic Behavior Within Composite Quantum Systems, 2nd ed. (Springer, 2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation