Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

It takes two to tribo: Stochastic charge evolution in repeated binary collisions of acoustically levitated particles

Tom F. O'Hara1,*, Adrian C. Barnes2, James W. E. Drewitt2, Nathan Croll Dawes3, and Karen L. Aplin1

  • *Contact author: tom.ohara@bristol.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. E 114, 045409 – Published 23 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p9zp-hf26

Abstract

The mechanisms governing triboelectric charging between insulating particles of the same material remain an open question in nonequilibrium physics, with several competing models proposed to explain observed charging behavior. Here, we investigate charge evolution in a minimal system consisting of two acoustically levitated particles undergoing repeated binary collisions. To quantify particle charge transfer, purpose-built Faraday cage picoammeters were developed and calibrated. The MultiLev acoustic levitation system was used alongside Ultraino simulations to generate transducer control signals, enabling controlled collision and separation of polystyrene (PS) particles. Although individual collision events exhibit stochastic charge transfer, described by skew-normal distributions, we demonstrate that the cumulative charge evolution of an individual acoustically levitated particle pair follows the saturation behavior predicted by the condenser model of triboelectric charging, with fits achieving R2>0.99. Under identical conditions, conductive graphite-coated PS particles also undergo charge transfer, but accumulate substantially less charge, consistent with the distinct charging behavior expected for conductive materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Focus

Tiny Particles Charge Like Capacitors

Published 23 October, 2026

Lab experiments provide new details about the charge-transfer process that occurs in ash clouds and other collections of particles.

See more in Physics

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (55)

  1. D. J. Lacks and T. Shinbrot, Long-standing and unresolved issues in triboelectric charging, Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 465 (2019).
  2. H. Grosshans, W. Xu, S. Jantač, G. Ozler, and C. Wilms, Unmasking hidden ignition sources: A new approach to finding extreme charge peaks in powder processing, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 92, 105434 (2024).
  3. T. F. O'Hara, E. Player, G. Ackroyd, P. J. Caine, and K. L. Aplin, The scaling of triboelectric charging powder drops for industrial applications, J. Electrost. 138, 104166 (2025).
  4. J. Méndez Harper, D. Harvey, T. Huang, J. McGrath, D. Meer, and J. C. Burton, The lifetime of charged dust in the atmosphere, PNAS Nexus 1, pgac220 (2022).
  5. Isobel M. P. Houghton, K. L. Aplin, and K. A. Nicoll, Triboelectric charging of volcanic ash from the 2011 Grímsvötn eruption, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 118501 (2013).
  6. D. P. Reid and K. L. Aplin, Lab-based Martian analogue experiments investigating electric and magnetic fields of dust devils, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2702, 012020 (2024).
  7. B. Hotte and P. Mehrani, Electrostatic charging–based dry separation of graphite, nickel oxide, and lithium oxide, Miner. Eng. 244, 110272 (2026).
  8. S. Labiod, T. Zeghloul, M. S. Bendilmi, A. Parenty, F. Tomasella, and L. Dascalescu, Triboelectric charging properties of ABS and PS granules with different concentration of brominated flame retardants, J. Electrost. 138, 104158 (2025).
  9. S. D. Cezan, A. A. Nalbant, M. Buyuktemiz, Y. Dede, H. T. Baytekin, and B. Baytekin, Control of triboelectric charges on common polymers by photoexcitation of organic dyes, Nat. Commun. 10, 276 (2019).
  10. K. W. Biegaj, M. G. Rowland, T. M. Lukas, and J. Y. Y. Heng, Surface chemistry and humidity in powder electrostatics: A comparative study between tribocharging and corona discharge, ACS Omega 2, 1576 (2017).
  11. T. F. O'Hara, E. Player, G. Ackroyd, P. J. Caine, and K. L. Aplin, Surface material dependence in powder triboelectric charging, in 2025 Joint Conference on Electrostatics (ESA) (IEEE, 2025), pp. 1–5.
  12. A. N. Alagha, E. Galindo, M. Conlon, J. Muñiz, K. Azari, E. Butler-Jones, and M. Brochu, Surface chemistry analysis of aluminum powders through triboelectric charging: Effect of composition, particle size distribution and moisture adsorption, Powder Technol. 468, 121636 (2026).
  13. M. I. Nimvari, A. Sowinski, and P. Mehrani, Investigation of the role of temperature on contact electrification of polyethylene particles, Powder Technol. 433, 119236 (2024).
  14. T. Gemine, S. Dehareng, T. Andrianne, and G. Lumay, Influence of turbulence on the triboelectric charging of granular materials carried by an airflow, Phys. Rev. E 113, 045415 (2026).
  15. G. Grosjean, M. Ostermann, M. Sauer, M. Hahn, C. M. Pichler, F. Fahrnberger, F. Pertl, D. M. Balazs, M. M. Link, S. H. Kim, D. L. Schrader, A. Blanco, F. Gracia, N. Mujica, and S. R. Waitukaitis, Adventitious carbon breaks symmetry in oxide contact electrification, Nature (London) 651, 626 (2026).
  16. G. Grosjean and S. Waitukaitis, Asymmetries in triboelectric charging: Generalizing mosaic models to different-material samples and sliding contacts, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 065601 (2023).
  17. S. Matsusaka, M. Ghadiri, and H. Masuda, Electrification of an elastic sphere by repeated impacts on a metal plate, J. Phys. D 33, 2311 (2000).
  18. S. Matsusaka and H. Masuda, Electrostatics of particles, Adv. Powder Technol. 14, 143 (2003).
  19. H. Grosshans, G. Ozler, V. Veeravalli, and S. Jantač, Unifying same- and different-material particle charging through stochastic scaling, Phys. Rev. X 16, 011023 (2026).
  20. H. T. Baytekin, A. Z. Patashinski, M. Branicki, B. Baytekin, S. Soh, and B. A. Grzybowski, The mosaic of surface charge in contact electrification, Science 333, 308 (2011).
  21. S. Matsusaka, H. Maruyama, T. Matsuyama, and M. Ghadiri, Triboelectric charging of powders: A review, Chem. Eng. Sci. 65, 5781 (2010).
  22. T. F. O'Hara, D. P. Reid, G. L. Marsden, and K. L. Aplin, Faraday cup measurements of triboelectrically charged granular material: A modular interpretation methodology, Soft Matter 21, 855 (2025).
  23. W. Xu, S. Jantač, T. Matsuyama, and H. Grosshans, Spatially resolved measurement of the electrostatic charge of turbulent powder flows, Exp. Fluids 65, 54 (2024).
  24. M. Lara, M. Flores, G. Castillo, S. Tassara, S. R. Waitukaitis, and N. Mujica, Particle size scaling of non-Gaussian granular charge distributions, Phys. Rev. Mater. 10, 045604 (2026).
  25. G. Grosjean and S. Waitukaitis, Single-collision statistics reveal a global mechanism driven by sample history for contact electrification in granular media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 098202 (2023).
  26. F. Chowdhury, M. Ray, A. Passalacqua, P. Mehrani, and A. Sowinski, Electrostatic charging due to individual particle-particle collisions, Powder Technol. 381, 352 (2021).
  27. O. Obukohwo, A. Sowinski, P. Mehrani, and H. Grosshans, CFD study of particle backflow in pneumatic conveying systems due to triboelectrification, Powder Technol. 418, 118285 (2023).
  28. A. G. Kline, M. X. Lim, and H. M. Jaeger, Precision measurement of tribocharging in acoustically levitated sub-millimeter grains, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 023908 (2020).
  29. R. G. Harrison and D. Robert, A Faraday cup for charge measurements in biophysical and environmental fieldwork, J. Electrost. 135, 104062 (2025).
  30. A. Marzo, A. Barnes, and B. W. Drinkwater, TinyLev: A multi-emitter single-axis acoustic levitator, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 085105 (2017).
  31. A. C. Barnes, T. F. O'Hara, and J. W. E. Drewitt, A simple low cost multi channel signal generator for ultrasonic applications (unpublished).
  32. J. F. Davies, A. E. Haddrell, and J. P. Reid, Time-resolved measurements of the evaporation of volatile components from single aerosol droplets, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46, 666 (2012).
  33. A. Marzo, T. Corkett, and B. W. Drinkwater, Ultraino: An open phased-array system for narrowband airborne ultrasound transmission, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 65, 102 (2018).
  34. G. T. Silva and H. Bruus, Acoustic interaction forces between small particles in an ideal fluid, Phys. Rev. E 90, 063007 (2014).
  35. L. Jaouen and F.-X. Bécot, Acoustical characterization of perforated facings, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 1400 (2011).
  36. A. Bendali, M. Fares, E. Piot, and S. Tordeux, Mathematical justification of the Rayleigh conductivity model for perforated plates in acoustics, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 73, 438 (2013).
  37. Harrison, R Giles, Meteorological Measurements and Instrumentation (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015).
  38. https://manualmachine.com/thurlbythandarinstruments/tg230/4644809-user-manual/.
  39. https://www.ni.com/docs/en-US/bundle/usb-6211-specs/page/specs.html.
  40. R. G. Harrison and K. L. Aplin, Multimode electrometer for atmospheric ion measurements, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 4683 (2000).
  41. https://www.ni.com/docs/en-US/bundle/usb-6211-specs/page/specs.html.
  42. https://www.ni.com/en/support/downloads/software-products/download.labview.html.
  43. https://www.python.org/.
  44. https://datasheet.octopart.com/386-Adafruit-Industries-datasheet-81453130.pdf.
  45. https://docs.arduino.cc/resources/datasheets/A000067-datasheet.pdf..
  46. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/p9zp-hf26 for videos showing particles operating in the MultiLev acoustic levitator and high-frame-rate position tracking in the TinyLev.
  47. T. Matsuyama and H. Yamamoto, Charge relaxation process dominates contact charging of a particle in atmospheric conditions, J. Phys. D 28, 2418 (1995).
  48. A. Azzalini, A class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scand. J. Stat. 12, 171 (1985).
  49. A. McElligott, A. Guerra, M. J. Wood, A. D. Rey, A.-M. Kietzig, and P. Servio, TinyLev acoustically levitated water: Direct observation of collective, inter-droplet effects through morphological and thermal analysis of multiple droplets, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 619, 84 (2022).
  50. V. Lee, N. M. James, S. R. Waitukaitis, and H. M. Jaeger, Collisional charging of individual submillimeter particles: Using ultrasonic levitation to initiate and track charge transfer, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 035602 (2018).
  51. S. Jantač, J. Pelcová, J. Sklenářová, M. Drápela, H. Grosshans, and J. Kosek, Triboelectric charging model for particles with rough surfaces, Adv. Powder Technol. 36, 104787 (2025).
  52. O. Obukohwo, S. Jantač, A. Sowinski, P. Mehrani, and H. Grosshans, A novel apparatus for particle-particle single contact triboelectrification experiments, Powder Technol. 474, 122259 (2026).
  53. T. F. O'Hara, A. C. Barnes, N. Croll Dawes, and K. L. Aplin, It takes two to tribo materials data facility (2026), https://materialsdatafacility.org/detail/b3740e10-bcc5-454c-a00b-89d74a147230-1.0.
  54. T. O'Hara, It takes two to tribo Zenodo code repository, Zenodo, 2026, https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.21264875.
  55. M. Morrell and D. G. Grier, Acoustodynamic mass determination: Accounting for inertial effects in acoustic levitation of granular materials, Phys. Rev. E 108, 064903 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation