Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Neural-network parametrization of fundamental measure theory: From hard spheres to Lennard-Jones fluids

    Conrard Giresse Tetsassi Feugmo*

    • *Contact author: cgtetsas@uwaterloo.ca

    Phys. Rev. E 114, 025302 – Published 3 August, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/m7vz-r1qq

    Abstract

    We introduce a neural-network framework for parametrizing fundamental measure theory (FMT) applied to hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones fluids. Lutsko's extended scalar FMT expresses the excess free-energy density through two parameters, A and B, which control the relative weight of tensor invariants in the third-order contribution Φ3; different choices recover established functionals (Rosenfeld, White Bear, and the recent optimized values of Gül et al.). We treat A and B as learnable functions of the packing fraction η=(π/6)ρσ3, predicted by a small neural network and optimized end to end through a JAX-based density functional solver. Four training strategies are examined, namely matching the Carnahan-Starling equation of state, minimizing chemical-potential and compressibility deviations, optimizing wall contact densities, and a combined multiobjective loss. All four converge to parameters near the Percus-Yevick line defined by the constraint combination C=8A+2B−9≈0, with subpercent agreement with Carnahan-Starling thermodynamics. Extension to Lennard-Jones fluids via Weeks-Chandler-Andersen perturbation theory, using the temperature-dependent Barker-Henderson effective diameter to define an effective packing fraction, yields vapor-liquid coexistence with a critical temperature Tc*=kBTc/ε≈1.28, consistent with mean-field DFT benchmarks. The learned parameters remain close to the fixed Lutsko baseline (A=1, B=0) throughout, confirming that bulk phase equilibria alone cannot drive nontrivial density dependence. A three-phase training strategy—bulk equation-of-state fitting, test-particle sum-rule optimization, and wall-contact density fine tuning via numerical gradients—breaks this degeneracy, yielding contact densities within 1–2% of molecular dynamics data across all benchmark packing fractions and a 5.5-fold reduction in final wall-contact loss relative to direct wall fine tuning, at the cost of 5–8% bulk thermodynamic errors that quantify a genuine bulk-interface tradeoff. These results provide a starting point for adaptive density functionals trained on inhomogeneous simulation data.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation