- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review E

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Finite-time performance of a cyclic two-dimensional quantum Ising heat engine

S. P. Katoorani1, C. Kohlfürst1, F. Queisser1, G. Schaller1,*, and R. Schützhold1,2

  • *Contact author: g.schaller@hzdr.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 112, 014122 – Published 21 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ky7b-5wyb

Abstract

We discuss the limit cycle regime of a finite-time quantum Otto cycle with a frictionless two-dimensional anisotropic Ising model as the working fluid. From Onsager's exact equilibrium solution, we first find optimal parameters for the operational modes of work extraction and cooling for infinitely slow cycles. The equilibrium points in these optimal cycles correspond to different phases of the model, such that the nonequilibrium dynamics during the cycle bypasses the phase transition. Finite-time cycles allow for finite power extraction or cooling currents, but for such cycles, we point out that—already within the regime of weak system-reservoir coupling—energetic changes of the system during dissipative strokes may contain a significant portion of coupling and decoupling control work and should thus not be directly identified with heat. For ultrafast cycles, the required control work spoils performance, such that to maximize work extraction or cooling heat per cycle time, there is an optimal cycle duration. We also find that net-zero-energy transitions may lead to undesired reservoir heating.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (73)

  1. F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso (eds.), Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime – Fundamental Aspects and New Directions, volume 195 of Fundamental Theories of Physics (Springer, Cham, 2019).
  2. L. M. Cangemi, C. Bhadra, and A. Levy, Quantum engines and refrigerators, Phys. Rep. 1087, 1 (2024).
  3. A. Ü. C. Hardal and Ö. E. Müstecaplıoğlu, Superradiant quantum heat engine, Sci. Rep. 5, 12953 (2015).
  4. R. Uzdin, Coherence-induced reversibility and collective operation of quantum heat machines via coherence recycling, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 024004 (2016).
  5. J. Jaramillo, M. Beau, and A. del Campo, Quantum supremacy of many-particle thermal machines, New J. Phys. 18, 075019 (2016).
  6. W. Niedenzu and G. Kurizki, Cooperative many-body enhancement of quantum thermal machine power, New J. Phys. 20, 113038 (2018).
  7. M. Kloc, P. Cejnar, and G. Schaller, Collective performance of a finite-time quantum Otto cycle, Phys. Rev. E 100, 042126 (2019).
  8. G. Watanabe, B. P. Venkatesh, P. Talkner, M.-J. Hwang, and A. del Campo, Quantum statistical enhancement of the collective performance of multiple bosonic engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 210603 (2020).
  9. M. A. Macovei, Performance of the collective three-level quantum thermal engine, Phys. Rev. A 105, 043708 (2022).
  10. L. da Silva Souza, G. Manzano, R. Fazio, and F. Iemini, Collective effects on the performance and stability of quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014143 (2022).
  11. D. Kolisnyk and G. Schaller, Performance boost of a collective qutrit refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 034023 (2023).
  12. M. Campisi, P. Hänggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 771 (2011).
  13. R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and refrigerators: Continuous devices, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 365 (2014).
  14. A. Levy and R. Kosloff, Quantum absorption refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070604 (2012).
  15. H. E. D. Scovil and E. O. Schulz-DuBois, Three-level masers as heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 262 (1959).
  16. K. Szczygielski, D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, and R. Alicki, Markovian master equation and thermodynamics of a two-level system in a strong laser field, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012120 (2013).
  17. S. Scopa, G. T. Landi, and D. Karevski, Lindblad-Floquet description of finite-time quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062121 (2018).
  18. A. A. S. Kalaee and A. Wacker, Positivity of entropy production for the three-level maser, Phys. Rev. A 103, 012202 (2021).
  19. A. A. S. Kalaee, A. Wacker, and P. P. Potts, Violating the thermodynamic uncertainty relation in the three-level maser, Phys. Rev. E 104, L012103 (2021).
  20. D. Kolisnyk, F. Queißer, G. Schaller, and R. Schützhold, Floquet analysis of a superradiant many-qutrit refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 044050 (2024).
  21. T. Feldmann and R. Kosloff, Performance of discrete heat engines and heat pumps in finite time, Phys. Rev. E 61, 4774 (2000).
  22. T. D. Kieu, The second law, Maxwell's demon, and work derivable from quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 140403 (2004).
  23. G. Marchegiani, P. Virtanen, F. Giazotto, and M. Campisi, Self-oscillating Josephson quantum heat engine, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 054014 (2016).
  24. S. Seah, S. Nimmrichter, and V. Scarani, Work production of quantum rotor engines, New J. Phys. 20, 043045 (2018).
  25. P. Strasberg, C. W. Wächtler, and G. Schaller, Autonomous implementation of thermodynamic cycles at the nanoscale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 180605 (2021).
  26. Wilson S. Martins, F. Carollo, W. Li, K. Brandner, and I. Lesanovsky, Rydberg-ion flywheel for quantum work storage, Phys. Rev. A 108, L050201 (2023).
  27. J. Wang, J. He, and Z. Wu, Efficiency at maximum power output of quantum heat engines under finite-time operation, Phys. Rev. E 85, 031145 (2012).
  28. A. Das and V. Mukherjee, Quantum-enhanced finite-time Otto cycle, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033083 (2020).
  29. M. Campisi and R. Fazio, The power of a critical heat engine, Nat. Commun. 7, 11895 (2016).
  30. A. Alecce, F. Galve, N. L. Gullo, L. Dell'Anna, F. Plastina, and R. Zambrini, Quantum Otto cycle with inner friction: finite-time and disorder effects, New J. Phys. 17, 075007 (2015).
  31. B. S. Revathy, V. Mukherjee, U. Divakaran, and A. del Campo, Universal finite-time thermodynamics of many-body quantum machines from Kibble-Zurek scaling, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043247 (2020).
  32. A. del Campo, J. Goold, and M. Paternostro, More bang for your buck: Super-adiabatic quantum engines, Sci. Rep. 4, 6208 (2014).
  33. M. Beau, J. Jaramillo, and A. Del Campo, Scaling-up quantum heat engines efficiently via shortcuts to adiabaticity, Entropy 18, 168 (2016).
  34. B. Çakmak and Ö. E. Müstecaplıoğlu, Spin quantum heat engines with shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. E 99, 032108 (2019).
  35. A. Hartmann, V. Mukherjee, W. Niedenzu, and W. Lechner, Many-body quantum heat engines with shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023145 (2020).
  36. R. Dann, R. Kosloff, and P. Salamon, Quantum finite-time thermodynamics: Insight from a single qubit engine, Entropy 22, 1255 (2020).
  37. V. Mukherjee, A. G. Kofman, and G. Kurizki, Anti-Zeno quantum advantage in fast-driven heat machines, Commun. Phys. 3, 8 (2020).
  38. Camille L. Latune, G. Pleasance, and F. Petruccione, Cyclic quantum engines enhanced by strong bath coupling, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 024038 (2023).
  39. M. Wiedmann, J. T. Stockburger, and J. Ankerhold, Non-Markovian dynamics of a quantum heat engine: out-of-equilibrium operation and thermal coupling control, New J. Phys. 22, 033007 (2020).
  40. K. Ptaszyński, Non-Markovian thermal operations boosting the performance of quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014114 (2022).
  41. M. Ishizaki, N. Hatano, and H. Tajima, Switching the function of the quantum Otto cycle in non-Markovian dynamics: Heat engine, heater, and heat pump, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023066 (2023).
  42. I. A. Picatoste, A. Colla, and Heinz-Peter Breuer, Dynamically emergent quantum thermodynamics: Non-Markovian Otto cycle, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013258 (2024).
  43. W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Quantum Zeno effect, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990).
  44. Y. Shirai, K. Hashimoto, R. Tezuka, C. Uchiyama, and N. Hatano, Non-Markovian effect on quantum Otto engine: Role of system-reservoir interaction, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023078 (2021).
  45. J. Roßnagel, S. T. Dawkins, K. N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz, Ferdinand Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, A single-atom heat engine, Science 352, 325 (2016).
  46. G. Maslennikov, S. Ding, R. Hablützel, J. Gan, A. Roulet, S. Nimmrichter, J. Dai, V. Scarani, and D. Matsukevich, Quantum absorption refrigerator with trapped ions, Nat. Commun. 10, 202 (2019).
  47. J. Klatzow, J. N. Becker, P. M. Ledingham, C. Weinzetl, K. T. Kaczmarek, D. J. Saunders, J. Nunn, I. A. Walmsley, R. Uzdin, and E. Poem, Experimental demonstration of quantum effects in the operation of microscopic heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110601 (2019).
  48. J. P. S. Peterson, T. B. Batalhão, M. Herrera, A. M. Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, and R. M. Serra, Experimental characterization of a spin quantum heat engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240601 (2019).
  49. V. F. Lisboa, P. R. Dieguez, J. R. Guimarães, J. F. G. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Experimental investigation of a quantum heat engine powered by generalized measurements, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022436 (2022).
  50. J.-W. Zhang, J.-Q. Zhang, G.-Y. Ding, J.-C. Li, J.-T. Bu, B. Wang, L.-L. Yan, S.-L. Su, L. Chen, F. Nori, Ş. K. Özdemir, F. Zhou, H. Jing, and M. Feng, Dynamical control of quantum heat engines using exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 13, 6225 (2022).
  51. J. Koch, K. Menon, E. Cuestas, S. Barbosa, E. Lutz, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, and A. Widera, A quantum engine in the BEC–BCS crossover, Nature (London) 621, 723 (2023).
  52. T. Uusnäkki, T. Mörstedt, W. Teixeira, M. Rasola, and M. Möttönen, Experimental realization of a quantum heat engine based on dissipation-engineered superconducting circuits, arXiv:2502.20143.
  53. K. Shende, M. Kandpal, Arvind, and K. Dorai, Experimental investigation of a quantum Otto heat engine with shortcuts to adiabaticity implemented using counter-adiabatic driving, arXiv:2412.20194.
  54. R. Kosloff and Y. Rezek, The quantum harmonic Otto cycle, Entropy 19, 136 (2017).
  55. G. Schaller and T. Brandes, Preservation of positivity by dynamical coarse-graining, Phys. Rev. A 78, 022106 (2008).
  56. S. A. Gurvitz, L. Fedichkin, D. Mozyrsky, and G. P. Berman, Relaxation and the Zeno effect in qubit measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 066801 (2003).
  57. N. Ahmadiniaz, M. Geller, J. König, P. Kratzer, A. Lorke, G. Schaller, and R. Schützhold, Quantum Zeno manipulation of quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L032045 (2022).
  58. A. G. Kofman and G. Kurizki, Acceleration of quantum decay processes by frequent observations, Nature (London) 405, 546 (2000).
  59. G. Schaller and J. Ablaßmayer, Thermodynamics of the coarse-graining master equation, Entropy 22, 525 (2020).
  60. L. Onsager, Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
  61. B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, The Two-Dimensional Ising Model, (Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1973).
  62. John B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979).
  63. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
  64. G. Piccitto, M. Campisi, and D. Rossini, The Ising critical quantum Otto engine, New J. Phys. 24, 103023 (2022).
  65. V. R. Arezzo, D. Rossini, and G. Piccitto, Many-body quantum heat engines based on free fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224309 (2024).
  66. C. Brand, A. Hucht, G. Jnawali, J. D. Fortmann, B. Sothmann, H. Mehdipour, P. Kratzer, R. Schützhold, and M. Horn-von Hoegen, Dimer coupling energies of the Si(001) surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126203 (2023).
  67. A. N. Jordan and E. V. Sukhorukov, Transport statistics of bistable systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 260604 (2004).
  68. D. Newman, F. Mintert, and A. Nazir, Performance of a quantum heat engine at strong reservoir coupling, Phys. Rev. E 95, 032139 (2017).
  69. D. Newman, F. Mintert, and A. Nazir, Quantum limit to nonequilibrium heat-engine performance imposed by strong system-reservoir coupling, Phys. Rev. E 101, 052129 (2020).
  70. A. Pozas-Kerstjens, E. G. Brown, and K. V. Hovhannisyan, A quantum Otto engine with finite heat baths: Energy, correlations, and degradation, New J. Phys. 20, 043034 (2018).
  71. S. P. Katoorani, C. Kohlfürst, F. Queißer, G. Schaller, and R. Schützhold, Figure data publication: Finite-time performance of a cyclic two-dimensional quantum Ising heat engine, Rodare (2025), http://doi.org/10.14278/rodare.3875.
  72. M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1665 (2009).
  73. P. Kratzer, Multiscale Simulation Methods in Molecular Sciences, volume 42 of NIC Series, chapter Monte Carlo and Kinetic Monte Carlo Methods – A Tutorial, pages 51–76, John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC), Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany, 2009.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 112, 014122– Published 21 July, 2025
  • Received 5 May 2025
  • Accepted 1 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation