Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Estimation of spatial and time scales of collective behaviors of active matter through learning hydrodynamic equations from particle dynamics

Bappaditya Roy1,2,* and Natsuhiko Yoshinaga1,2,3,†

  • 1Department of Complex and Intelligent Systems, Future University Hakodate, Kamedanakano-cho 116-2, Hakodate 041-8655, Japan
  • 2Mathematics for Advanced Materials-OIL (MathAM-OIL), AIST, Katahira 2-1-1, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
  • 3WPI-Advanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI-AIMR), Tohoku University, Katahira 2-1-1, Sendai 980-8577, Japan

  • *Contact author: physicsbapai@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: yoshinaga@fun.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. E 113, 025406 – Published 4 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h7n7-4vsq

Abstract

We present a data-driven framework for learning hydrodynamic equations from particle-based simulations of active matter. Our method leverages coarse graining in both space and time to bridge microscopic particle dynamics with macroscopic continuum models. By employing spectral representations and sparse regression, we efficiently estimate partial differential equations that capture collective behaviors such as flocking and phase separation. This approach, validated using hydrodynamic descriptions of the Vicsek model and active Brownian particles, demonstrates the potential of data-driven strategies to uncover the universal features of collective dynamics in active matter systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977).
  2. M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013).
  3. A. Onuki, Phase Transition Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
  4. T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995).
  5. J. Toner and Y. Tu, Long-range order in a two-dimensional dynamical XY model: How birds fly together, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4326 (1995).
  6. J. Toner, Reanalysis of the hydrodynamic theory of fluid, polar-ordered flocks, Phys. Rev. E 86, 031918 (2012).
  7. Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no alignment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 235702 (2012).
  8. M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 219 (2015).
  9. Y. Fily, S. Henkes, and M. C. Marchetti, Freezing and phase separation of self-propelled disks, Soft Matter 10, 2132 (2014).
  10. E. Bertin, M. Droz, and G. Grëgoire, Hydrodynamic equations for self-propelled particles: Microscopic derivation and stability analysis, J. Phys. A 42, 445001 (2009).
  11. T. Ihle, Kinetic theory of flocking: Derivation of hydrodynamic equations, Phys. Rev. E 83, 030901(R) (2011).
  12. H. Chaté, Dry aligning dilute active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 189 (2020).
  13. T. Speck, J. Bialké, A. M. Menzel, and H. Löwen, Effective Cahn-Hilliard equation for the phase separation of active Brownian particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 218304 (2014).
  14. I. S. Aranson and L. S. Tsimring, Pattern formation of microtubules and motors: Inelastic interaction of polar rods, Phys. Rev. E 71, 050901(R) (2005).
  15. T. B. Liverpool and M. C. Marchetti, Instabilities of isotropic solutions of active polar filaments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 138102 (2003).
  16. K. Kruse and F. Jülicher, Dynamics and mechanics of motor-filament systems, Eur. Phys. J. E 20, 459 (2006).
  17. R. Suzuki, C. A. Weber, E. Frey, and A. R. Bausch, Polar pattern formation in driven filament systems requires non-binary particle collisions, Nat. Phys. 11, 839 (2015).
  18. S. Hijazi, M. Freitag, and N. Landwehr, POD-Galerkin reduced order models and physics-informed neural networks for solving inverse problems for the Navier–Stokes equations, Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci. 10, 5 (2023).
  19. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686 (2019).
  20. S. L. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, and J. N. Kutz, Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3932 (2016).
  21. S. H. Rudy, S. L. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, and J. N. Kutz, Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations, Sci. Adv. 3, e1602614 (2017).
  22. N. Yoshinaga and S. Tokuda, Bayesian modeling of pattern formation from one snapshot of pattern, Phys. Rev. E 106, 065301 (2022).
  23. Y. Gao and N. Yoshinaga, Inverse problems of inhomogeneous fracture toughness using phase-field models, Physica D 448, 133734 (2023).
  24. C. Joshi, S. Ray, L. M. Lemma, M. Varghese, G. Sharp, Z. Dogic, A. Baskaran, and M. F. Hagan, Data-driven discovery of active nematic hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 258001 (2022).
  25. R. Supekar, B. Song, A. Hastewell, G. P. T. Choi, A. Mietke, and J. Dunkel, Learning hydrodynamic equations for active matter from particle simulations and experiments, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2206994120 (2023).
  26. S. Maddu, Q. Vagne, and I. F. Sbalzarini, Learning deterministic hydrodynamic equations from stochastic active particle dynamics, arXiv:2201.08623.
  27. R. Kürsten and T. Ihle, Dry active matter exhibits a self-organized cross sea phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 188003 (2020).
  28. G. S. Redner, M. F. Hagan, and A. Baskaran, Structure and dynamics of a phase-separating active colloidal fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 055701 (2013).
  29. Y. Zhao, T. Ihle, Z. Han, C. Huepe, and P. Romanczuk, Phases and homogeneous ordered states in alignment-based self-propelled particle models, Phys. Rev. E 104, 044605 (2021).
  30. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, New York, 2017).
  31. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, New York, 2006).
  32. The term ∇ρ is often called a pressure term. However, we call it an advection term because it arises from the advective part of the Boltzmann equation.
  33. E. Tjhung, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Cluster phases and bubbly phase separation in active fluids: Reversal of the Ostwald process, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031080 (2018).
  34. P. Digregorio, D. Levis, A. Suma, L. F. Cugliandolo, G. Gonnella, and I. Pagonabarraga, Full phase diagram of active Brownian disks: From melting to motility-induced phase separation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 098003 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation