Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Theory of cell body lensing and phototaxis sign reversal in “eyeless” mutants of Chlamydomonas

Sumit Kumar Birwa*, Ming Yang†, Adriana I. Pesci‡, and Raymond E. Goldstein§

  • *Contact author: skb61@cam.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: my365@cam.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: A.I.Pesci@damtp.cam.ac.uk
  • §Contact author: R.E.Goldstein@damtp.cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. E 114, 014408 – Published 21 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fw4b-pg8q

Abstract

Phototaxis of many species of green algae relies upon directional sensitivity of their membrane-bound photoreceptors, which arises from the presence of a pigmented “eyespot” behind them that blocks light passing through the cell body from reaching the photoreceptor. A decade ago it was discovered that the spherical cell body of the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii acts as a lens to concentrate incoming light, and that in “eyeless” mutants of Chlamydomonas the consequence of that focused light reaching the photoreceptor from behind is a reversal in the sign of phototaxis relative to the wild type behavior. We present a quantitative theory of this sign reversal by completing a recent simplified analysis of lensing [Yang et al., Phys. Rev. E 113, 024401 (2026)] and incorporating it into an adaptive model for Chlamydomonas phototaxis. This model shows that phototactic dynamics in the presence of lensing is subtle because of the existence of internal light caustics when the cellular index of refraction exceeds that of water. During each period of cellular rotation about its body-fixed axis, the photoreceptor receives two competing signals: a relatively long, slowly varying signal from the direct illumination, and a stronger, shorter, rapidly varying lensed signal. The reversal of the sign of phototaxis is then a consequence of the dominance of the flagellar photoresponse to the signal with the higher time derivative. These features lead to a quantitative understanding of phototaxis sign reversal, including bistability in the direction choice, a prediction that can be tested in single-cell tracking studies of mutant phototaxis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. G. Jékely, Evolution of phototaxis, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 2795 (2009).
  2. H. C. Berg, Chemotaxis in bacteria, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 4, 119 (1976).
  3. K. Schaller, R. David, and R. Uhl, How Chlamydomonas keeps track of the light once it has reached the right phototactic orientation, Biophys. J. 73, 1562 (1997).
  4. M. Nakajima, K. Iizuka, N. Ueki, A. Isu, K. Yoshimura, T. Nakagake, T. Hisabori, K. Sato, and K. Wakabayashi, Basis for the phototaxis sign reversal in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii studied by high-speed observation, bioRxiv (2020).
  5. U. Rüffer and W. Nultsch, Flagellar photoresponses of Chlamydomonas cells held on micropipettes: II. Change in flagellar beat pattern, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 18, 269 (1991).
  6. U. Rüffer and W. Nultsch, Flagellar photoresponses of ptx1, a nonphototactic mutant of Chlamydomonas, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 37, 111 (1997).
  7. U. Rüffer and W. Nultsch, Flagellar photoresponses of Chlamydomonas cells held on micropipettes: I. Change in flagellar beat frequency, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 15, 162 (1990).
  8. R. R. Bennett and R. Golestanian, A steering mechanism for phototaxis in Chlamydomonas, J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141164 (2015).
  9. K. C. Leptos, M. Chioccioli, S. Furlan, A. I. Pesci, and R. E. Goldstein, Phototaxis of Chlamydomonas arises from a tuned adaptive photoresponse shared with ulticellular Volvocine green algae, Phys. Rev. E 107, 014404 (2023).
  10. H. de Maleprade, F. Moisy, T. Ishikawa, and R. E. Goldstein, Motility and phototaxis in Gonium, the simplest differentiated colonial alga, Phys. Rev. E 101, 022416 (2020).
  11. K. Drescher, R. E. Goldstein, and I. Tuval, Fidelity of adaptive phototaxis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11171 (2010).
  12. D. Cortese and K. Y. Wan, Control of helical navigation by three-dimensional flagellar beating, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 088003 (2021).
  13. K. Seth, G. Kumawat, P. Vyas, and Harish, The structure and functional mechanism of eyespot in Chlamydomonas, J. Basic Microbiol. 62, 1169 (2022).
  14. K. W. Foster and R. D. Smyth, Light antennas in phototactic algae, Microbiol. Rev. 44, 572 (1980).
  15. N. A. Locket, The choroidal tapetum lucidum of Latimeria chalumnae, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 186, 281 (1974).
  16. K. Schaller and R. Uhl, A microspectrophotometric study of the shielding properties of eyespot and cell body in Chlamydomonas, Biophys. J. 73, 1573 (1997).
  17. O. A. Sineshchekov, E. G. Govorunova, D. Dér, L. Keszthelyi, and W. Nultsch, Photoinduced electrical currents in caroteoid-deficient Chlamydomonas mutants reconstituted with retinal and its analogs, Biophys. J. 66, 2073 (1994).
  18. J. O. Kessler, A. M. Nedelcu, C. A. Solari, and D. E. Shelton, Cells acting as lenses: A possible role for light in the evolution of morphological asymmetry in multicellular Volvocine algae, in Evolutionary Transitions to Multicellular Life, Advances in Marine Genomics, Vol 2 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2015), pp. 225–243.
  19. N. Ueki, T. Ide, S. Mochiji, Y. Kobayashi, R. Tokutsu, N. Ohnishi, K. Yamaguchi, S. Shigenobu, K. Tanaka, J. Minagawa, T. Hisabori, M. Hirono, and K. Wakabayashi, Eyespot-dependent determination of the phototactic sign in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5299 (2016).
  20. M. Yang, S. K. Birwa, and R. E. Goldstein, Algal optics, Phys. Rev. E 113, 024401 (2026).
  21. S. Raikwar, A. Al-Kassem, N. S. Gov, A. I. Pesci, R. Jeanneret, and R. E. Goldstein, Phototactic decision-making by micro-algae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 228401 (2025).
  22. G. Kreimer, The green algal eyespot apparatus: A primordial visual system and more? Curr. Genet. 55, 19 (2009).
  23. Y.-T. Tu and The Ray Optics Simulation contributors, Ray optics simulation (Version v5.3.2) [Computer software], Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20090812.
  24. M. Polin, I. Tuval, K. Drescher, J. P. Gollub, and R. E. Goldstein, Chlamydomonas swims with two “gears” in a eukaryotic version of run-and-tumble locomotion, Science 325, 487 (2009).
  25. K. Drescher, K. C. Leptos, and R. E. Goldstein, How to track protists in three dimensions, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 014301 (2009).
  26. Z. Wang, S. A. Bentley, J. Li, K. Y. Wan, and A. C. H. Tsang, Light-dependent switching of circling handedness in microswimmer navigation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 078301 (2026).
  27. J. Arrieta, A. Barreira, M. Chioccioli, M. Polin, and I. Tuval, Phototaxis beyond turning: Persistent accumulation and response acclimation of the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Sci. Rep. 7, 3447 (2017).
  28. T. Laroussi, M. Jarrahi, and G. Amselem, Short-term memory effects in the phototactic behavior of microalgae, Soft Matter 20, 3996 (2024).
  29. S. K. Choudhary, Y. Ma, A. Baskaran, and P. Sharma, Transient state dynamics of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells during phototaxis, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033282 (2025).
  30. Z. Wang and A. C. H. Tsang, Intermediate light adaptation induces oscillatory phototaxis switching and pattern formation in Chlamydomonas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2425369122 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation