Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Fracture and failure of shear-jammed dense suspensions under impact

Malcolm Slutzky1,2, Alice Pelosse1, Michael van der Naald1,2, and Heinrich M. Jaeger1,2

Phys. Rev. E 113, 025410 – Published 9 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dtp1-hrzp

Abstract

Impacted with sufficiently large stress, a dense, initially liquidlike suspension can be forced into a solidlike state through a process known as shear jamming. While the onset of shear jamming has been investigated extensively, much less is known about the resulting solidlike state in the high-stress limit and, in particular, about its failure mode. We report on experiments that produce such high-stress failure by impacting dense suspensions with a cylindrical rod moving at controlled speed. Using suspensions of cornstarch particles we vary the impact speed over several orders of magnitude and change the fluid viscosity as well as the surface tension in order to identify the conditions for failure. The results are compared with similarly dense suspensions of potato starch or polydisperse silica particles. In all cases where the shear-jammed suspension fails by fracturing, similar to brittle solids, we observe two types of cracks: a primary circular crack around the impacting rod followed by secondary radial cracks. Mapping out the onset of radial fracturing for different particle volume fractions ϕ and impact speeds, we identify the requirements for failure via crack formation to occur with at least 50% likelihood and record the corresponding normal stress σN on the impactor. We find that this likelihood is not particularly sensitive to changes in particle diameter, but increases when the solvent's viscosity or its surface tension are reduced. In the state diagram for dense suspensions we use these data to delineate the upper limit of shear-jammed rigidity and the crossover into a fracture regime at large ϕ and large σN, several orders of magnitude above the stress required for the onset of shear jamming. We find that the onset of fracturing in many cases is correlated with signatures of internal ductile deformation of the shear-jammed material underneath the impactor, observable in σN as a function of axial strain. However, for smaller suspension volumes and larger impact speeds, we find strain hardening up to the point of fracturing. This more brittle behavior results in a modulus that, just before crack formation, is roughly an order of magnitude larger than what we observe in shear-jammed suspensions undergoing internal ductile deformation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. H. A. Barnes, Shear thickening (“dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids, J. Rheol. 33, 329 (1989).
  2. J. Mewis and N. J. Wagner, Colloidal Suspension Rheology, Cambridge Series in Chemical Engineering (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
  3. B. J. Maranzano and N. J. Wagner, The effects of particle size on reversible shear thickening of concentrated colloidal dispersions, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10514 (2001).
  4. A. Fall, N. Huang, F. Bertrand, G. Ovarlez, and D. Bonn, Shear thickening of cornstarch suspensions as a reentrant jamming transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 018301 (2008).
  5. E. Brown and H. M. Jaeger, The role of dilation and confining stresses in shear thickening of dense suspensions, J. Rheol. 56, 875 (2012).
  6. M. Wyart and M. E. Cates, Discontinuous shear thickening without inertia in dense non-Brownian suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 098302 (2014).
  7. E. Brown and H. M. Jaeger, Shear thickening in concentrated suspensions: Phenomenology, mechanisms and relations to jamming, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 046602 (2014).
  8. L. C. Hsiao, S. Jamali, E. Glynos, P. F. Green, R. G. Larson, and M. J. Solomon, Rheological state diagrams for rough colloids in shear flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 158001 (2017).
  9. A. Singh, R. Mari, M. M. Denn, and J. F. Morris, A constitutive model for simple shear of dense frictional suspensions, J. Rheol. 62, 457 (2018).
  10. J. F. Morris, Lubricated-to-frictional shear thickening scenario in dense suspensions, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 110508 (2018).
  11. C. Ness, R. Seto, and R. Mari, The physics of dense suspensions, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 97 (2022).
  12. D. Bi, J. Zhang, B. Chakraborty, and R. P. Behringer, Jamming by shear, Nature (London) 480, 355 (2011).
  13. I. R. Peters, S. Majumdar, and H. M. Jaeger, Direct observation of dynamic shear jamming in dense suspensions, Nature (London) 532, 214 (2016).
  14. E. Han, I. R. Peters, and H. M. Jaeger, High-speed ultrasound imaging in dense suspensions reveals impact-activated solidification due to dynamic shear jamming, Nat. Commun. 7, 12243 (2016).
  15. E. Han, M. Wyart, I. R. Peters, and H. M. Jaeger, Shear fronts in shear-thickening suspensions, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 073301 (2018).
  16. S. Dhar, S. Chattopadhyay, and S. Majumdar, Signature of jamming under steady shear in dense particulate suspensions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 124002 (2020).
  17. N. M. James, E. Han, R. A. L. de la Cruz, J. Jureller, and H. M. Jaeger, Interparticle hydrogen bonding can elicit shear jamming in dense suspensions, Nat. Mater. 17, 965 (2018).
  18. E. Han, N. M. James, and H. M. Jaeger, Stress controlled rheology of dense suspensions using transient flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 248002 (2019).
  19. E. E. Bischoff White, M. Chellamuthu, and J. P. Rothstein, Extensional rheology of a shear-thickening cornstarch and water suspension, Rheol. Acta 49, 119 (2010).
  20. R. J. E. Andrade, A. R. Jacob, F. J. Galindo-Rosales, L. Campo-Deaño, Q. Huang, O. Hassager, and G. Petekidis, Dilatancy in dense suspensions of model hard-sphere-like colloids under shear and extensional flow, J. Rheol. 64, 1179 (2020).
  21. M. I. Smith, R. Besseling, M. E. Cates, and V. Bertola, Dilatancy in the flow and fracture of stretched colloidal suspensions, Nat. Commun. 1, 114 (2010).
  22. C. Chen, M. van der Naald, A. Singh, N. D. Dolinski, G. L. Jackson, H. M. Jaeger, S. J. Rowan, and J. J. de Pablo, Leveraging the polymer glass transition to access thermally switchable shear jamming suspensions, ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 639 (2023).
  23. M. I. Smith, Fracture of jammed colloidal suspensions, Sci. Rep. 5, 14175 (2015).
  24. D. Ozturk, M. L. Morgan, and B. Sandnes, Flow-to-fracture transition and pattern formation in a discontinuous shear thickening fluid, Commun. Phys. 3, 119 (2020).
  25. P. Lilin, J. E. Elkhoury, I. R. Peters, and I. Bischofberger, Fracture and relaxation in dense cornstarch suspensions, PNAS Nexus 3, 1 (2024).
  26. M. Roché, E. Myftiu, M. C. Johnston, P. Kim, and H. A. Stone, Dynamic fracture of nonglassy suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 148304 (2013).
  27. R. Maharjan, S. Mukhopadhyay, B. Allen, T. Storz, and E. Brown, Constitutive relation for the system-spanning dynamically jammed region in response to impact of cornstarch and water suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 97, 052602 (2018).
  28. B. Allen, B. Sokol, S. Mukhopadhyay, R. Maharjan, and E. Brown, System-spanning dynamically jammed region in response to impact of cornstarch and water suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 97, 052603 (2018).
  29. O. E. Petel and S. Ouellet, Dynamic strength, particle deformation, and fracture within fluids with impact-activated microstructures, J. Appl. Phys. 122, 025108 (2017).
  30. E. R. Dufresne, E. I. Corwin, N. A. Greenblatt, J. Ashmore, D. Y. Wang, A. D. Dinsmore, J. X. Cheng, X. S. Xie, J. W. Hutchinson, and D. A. Weitz, Flow and fracture in drying nanoparticle suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 224501 (2003).
  31. E. R. Dufresne, D. J. Stark, N. A. Greenblatt, J. X. Cheng, J. W. Hutchinson, L. Mahadevan, and D. A. Weitz, Dynamics of fracture in drying suspensions, Langmuir 22, 7144 (2006).
  32. M. J. Dalbe, P. Jodlowski, and N. Vandenberghe, Crack pattern of indented cohesive granular media, Phys. Rev. E 112, 025423 (2025).
  33. R. Maharjan and E. Brown, Giant deviation of a relaxation time from generalized Newtonian theory in discontinuous shear thickening suspensions, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 123301 (2017).
  34. S. Gürgen, M. C. Kushan, and W. Li, Shear thickening fluids in protective applications: A review, Prog. Polym. Sci. 75, 48 (2017).
  35. M. R. Sheikhi, S. Gurgen, and M. C. Kushan, Shear thickening fluid in spall-liner applications, in Advances in Healthcare and Protective Textiles, edited by S. ul Islam, A. Majumdar, and B. Butola, Textile Institute Book Series (Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 2023), pp. 487–508.
  36. L. Wang, Q. Zhao, X. Hu, Q. Liu, and K. Yu, Thickening effect of shear thickening fluid under normal loading to improve stab resistance of shear thickening fluid-fabric composite, Text. Res. J. 94, 2736 (2024).
  37. Y. S. Lee, E. D. Wetzel, and N. J. Wagner, The ballistic impact characteristics of Kevlar® woven fabrics impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid, J. Mater. Sci. 38, 2825 (2003).
  38. J. J. S. Jerome, N. Vandenberghe, and Y. Forterre, Unifying impacts in granular matter from quicksand to cornstarch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 098003 (2016).
  39. S. R. Waitukaitis and H. M. Jaeger, Impact-activated solidification of dense suspensions via dynamic jamming fronts, Nature (London) 487, 205 (2012).
  40. E. Han, N. V. Ha, and H. M. Jaeger, Measuring the porosity and compressibility of liquid-suspended porous particles using ultrasound, Soft Matter 13, 3506 (2017).
  41. S. Fakhouri, S. B. Hutchens, and A. J. Crosby, Puncture mechanics of soft solids, Soft Matter 11, 4723 (2015).
  42. S. Rattan and A. J. Crosby, Effect of far-field compliance on local failure dynamics of soft solids, Extreme Mech. Lett. 24, 14 (2018).
  43. P. Singh and S. Mondal, Viscous fingering to fracturing transition in Hele–Shaw flow of shear-thickening fluid, Phys. Fluids 35, 064116 (2023).
  44. M. Slutzky, A. Pelosse, M. van der Naald, and H. M. Jaeger, Dataset for “Fracture and failure of shear-jammed dense suspensions under impact” (2025), https://doi.org/10.18126/81a7-b030.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation