Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Phase and amplitude responses for delay equations using harmonic balance

R. Nicks*, R. Allen†, and S. Coombes‡

  • *Contact author: Rachel.Nicks@nottingham.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: pcyrga@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: Stephen.Coombes@nottingham.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. E 110, L012202 – Published 11 July, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.L012202

Abstract

Robust delay induced oscillations, common in nature, are often modeled by delay-differential equations (DDEs). Motivated by the success of phase-amplitude reductions for ordinary differential equations with limit cycle oscillations, there is now a growing interest in the development of analogous approaches for DDEs to understand their response to external forcing. When combined with Floquet theory, the fundamental quantities for this reduction are phase and amplitude response functions. Here, we develop a framework for their construction that utilizes the method of harmonic balance.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. T. Erneux, Applied Delay Differential Equations, Surveys and Tutorials in the Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol. 3 (Springer, New York, NY, 2009).
  2. G. Stepan, Retarded Dynamical Systems: Stability and Characteristic Functions (Longman Higher Education, Harlow, UK, 1989).
  3. S. A. Campbell, in Handbook of Brain Connectivity, edited by V. K. Jirsa and A. R. McIntosh (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007), pp. 65–90.
  4. A. Guillamon and G. Huguet, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 8, 1005 (2009).
  5. A. Mauroy, I. Mezić, and J. Moehlis, Physica D 261, 19 (2013).
  6. D. Wilson and J. Moehlis, Phys. Rev. E 94, 052213 (2016).
  7. B. Ermentrout, Y. Park, and D. Wilson, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A 377, 20190092 (2019).
  8. R. Nicks, R. Allen, and S. Coombes, Chaos 34, 013141 (2024).
  9. V. Novičenko and K. Pyragas, Physica D 241, 1090 (2012).
  10. K. Kotani, I. Yamaguchi, Y. Ogawa, Y. Jimbo, H. Nakao, and G. B. Ermentrout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 044101 (2012).
  11. K. Kotani, Y. Ogawa, S. Shirasaka, A. Akao, Y. Jimbo, and H. Nakao, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033106 (2020).
  12. D. Wilson and B. Ermentrout, J. Math. Biol. 76, 37 (2018).
  13. Y. Park and D. D. Wilson, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 20, 1464 (2021).
  14. D. Wilson, Phys. Rev. E 101, 022220 (2020).
  15. We note that the linear equations (14), (16), and (18) derived for the DDE (8) agree with those in [11], however our normalization for the amplitude response (19) differs from that in [11] by the factor of e−μτ multiplying the integral.
  16. T. Detroux, L. Renson, L. Masset, and G. Kerschen, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 296, 18 (2015).
  17. N. MacDonald, J. Sound Vib. 186, 649 (1995).
  18. L. Liu and T. Kalmár-Nagy, J. Vib. Control 16, 1189 (2010).
  19. P. Sun, X. Zhao, X. Yu, Q. Huang, Z. Feng, and J. Zhou, Appl. Math. Model. 118, 818 (2023).
  20. C. Simmendinger, A. Wunderlin, and A. Pelster, Phys. Rev. E 59, 5344 (1999).
  21. J. W. Kim and P. A. Robinson, Phys. Rev. E 75, 031907 (2007).
  22. I. Yamaguchi, Y. Ogawa, Y. Jimbo, H. Nakao, and K. Kotani, PLoS One 6, e26497 (2011).
  23. D. Wilson, Phys. Rev. E 99, 022210 (2019).
  24. D. Wilson and B. Ermentrout, SIAM Rev. 61, 277 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation