Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Hyperbolic embedding of multilayer networks

Martin Guillemaud*

Vera Dinkelacker

Mario Chavez

  • CNRS, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France

  • *Contact author: martin.guillemaud@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. E 112, 064301 – Published 1 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7wd9-dwlr

Abstract

Multilayer networks offer a powerful framework for modeling complex systems across diverse domains, effectively capturing multiple types of connections and interdependent subsystems commonly found in real-world scenarios. To analyze these networks, embedding techniques that project nodes into a lower-dimensional geometric space are essential. This paper introduces a novel hyperbolic embedding framework that advances the state of the art in multilayer network analysis. Our method, which supports heterogeneous node sets across networks and interlayer connections, generates layer-specific hyperbolic embeddings, enabling detailed intralayer analysis and interlayer comparisons, while simultaneously preserving the global multilayer structure within hyperbolic space—a capability that sets it apart from existing approaches, which typically rely on independent embedding of layers. Through experiments on synthetic multilayer stochastic block models, we demonstrate that our approach effectively preserves community structure, even when layers consist of different node sets. When applied to real brain networks, the method successfully clusters disease-related brain regions from different patients, outperforming layer-independent approaches and highlighting its relevance for comparative analysis. Overall, this work provides a robust tool for multilayer network analysis, enhancing interpretability and offering new insights into the structure and function of complex systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006).
  2. S. Boccaletti, G. Bianconi, R. Criado, C. I. del Genio, J. G.-G. nes, M. Romance, I. S. na Nadal, Z. Wang, and M. Zanin, Phys. Rep. 544, 1 (2014).
  3. M. Kivelä, A. Arenas, M. Barthelemy, J. P. Gleeson, Y. Moreno, and M. A. Porter, J. Complex Networks 2, 203 (2014).
  4. T. Xu, K. H. Nenning, E. Schwartz, S. J. Hong, J. T. Vogelstein, A. Goulas, D. A. Fair, C. E. Schroeder, D. S. Margulies, J. Smallwood, M. P. Milham, and G. Langs, NeuroImage 223, 117346 (2020).
  5. M. G. Puxeddu, M. Petti, and L. Astolfi, Front. Syst. Neurosci. 15, 624183 (2021).
  6. P. Goyal and E. Ferrara, Knowledge-Based Syst. 151, 78 (2018).
  7. P. Cui, X. Wang, J. Pei, and W. Zhu, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 31, 833 (2019).
  8. M. Xu, SIAM Rev. 63, 825 (2021).
  9. Z. Liu, C. Huang, Y. Yu, B. Fan, and J. Dong, in International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020), pp. 995–1004.
  10. L. Pio-Lopez, A. Valdeolivas, L. Tichit, É. Remy, and A. Baudot, Sci. Rep. 11, 8794 (2021).
  11. W. Liu, P. Y. Chen, S. Yeung, T. Suzumura, and L. Chen, in IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW, Vol. 2017-November (IEEE Computer Society, 2017), pp. 134–141.
  12. Q. Wang, H. Jiang, Y. Jiang, S. Yi, Q. Nie, and G. Zhang, Digital Commun. Networks 9, 1157 (2023).
  13. C. Park, J. Han, and H. Yu, Knowledge-Based Syst. 197, 105861 (2020).
  14. Y. Wang, D. Chang, Z. Fu, and Y. Zhao, IEEE Trans. Multimedia 25, 1008 (2023).
  15. Y. Liu, L. He, B. Cao, P. S. Yu, A. B. Ragin, and A. D. Leow, in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 32 (AAAI Press, 2018), pp. 117–124.
  16. J. Li, C. Chen, H. Tong, and H. Liu, in Proceedings of the 2018 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications, 2018), pp. 684–692.
  17. M. Boguñá, D. Krioukov, and K. C. Claffy, Nat. Phys. 5, 74 (2009).
  18. D. Krioukov, F. Papadopoulos, M. Kitsak, A. Vahdat, and M. Boguñá, Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 82, 036106 (2010).
  19. M. Boguñá, I. Bonamassa, M. D. Domenico, S. Havlin, D. Krioukov, and M. Á. Serrano, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 114 (2021).
  20. M. Nickel and D. Kiela, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Vol. 30, edited by I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc., Long Beach, CA, USA), pp. 6341–6350.
  21. F. Papadopoulos, M. Kitsak, M. Á. Serrano, M. Boguñá, and D. Krioukov, Nature (London) 489, 537 (2012).
  22. F. Papadopoulos, C. Psomas, and D. Krioukov, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 23, 198 (2015).
  23. G. García-Pérez, A. Allard, M. Á. Serrano, and M. Boguñá, New J. Phys. 21, 123033 (2019).
  24. R. Jankowski, A. Allard, M. Boguñá, and M. Á. Serrano, Nat. Commun. 14, 7585 (2023).
  25. A. Muscoloni, J. M. Thomas, S. Ciucci, G. Bianconi, and C. V. Cannistraci, Nat. Commun. 8, 1615 (2017).
  26. B. Kovács and G. Palla, Sci. Rep. 11, 8350 (2021).
  27. L. Wang, C. Huang, W. Ma, R. Liu, and S. Vosoughi, Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 35, 1906 (2021).
  28. M. Yang, M. Zhou, H. Xiong, and I. King, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 35, 11489 (2023).
  29. K. K. Kleineberg, M. Boguñá, M. Á. Serrano, and F. Papadopoulos, Nat. Phys. 12, 1076 (2016).
  30. U. von Luxburg, Stat. Comput. 17, 395 (2007).
  31. J. B. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva, and J. C. Langford, Science 290, 2319 (2000).
  32. F. Battiston, V. Nicosia, and V. Latora, Phys. Rev. E 89, 032804 (2014).
  33. V. Khrulkov, L. Mirvakhabova, E. Ustinova, I. Oseledets, and V. Lempitsky, in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR, 2020), pp. 6418–6428.
  34. A. A. Ungar, Comput. Math. Appl. 41, 135 (2001).
  35. J. van der Kolk, D. Krioukov, M. Boguñá, and M. Ángeles Serrano, Multiplexity amplifies geometry in networks, arXiv:2505.17688.
  36. P. Besson, V. Dinkelacker, R. Valabregue, L. Thivard, X. Leclerc, M. Baulac, D. Sammler, O. Colliot, S. Lehéricy, S. Samson, and S. Dupont, NeuroImage 100, 135 (2014).
  37. A. Longhena, M. Guillemaud, and M. Chavez, Chaos: An Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 34, 063117 (2024).
  38. Z. Abu-Aisheh, R. Raveaux, J. Ramel, and P. Martineau, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods - Volume 1: ICPRAM, INSTICC (SciTePress, 2015), pp. 271–278.
  39. https://github.com/MartinG-38/MLNHypEmb.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation