Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Graph entropy, degree assortativity, and hierarchical structures in networks

Fatihcan M. Atay1,* and Türker Bıyıkoğlu2,†

  • *Contact author: f.atay@bilkent.edu.tr
  • †Contact author: tbiyikoglu@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. E 112, 064315 – Published 24 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6kxf-qn44

Abstract

We connect several notions relating the structural and dynamical properties of a graph. Among them are the topological entropy coming from the vertex shift, which is related to the spectral radius of the graph's adjacency matrix, the Randić index, and the degree assortativity. We show that, among all connected graphs with the same degree sequence, the graph having maximum entropy is characterized by a hierarchical structure; namely, it satisfies a breadth-first search ordering with decreasing degrees (BFD ordering for short). Consequently, the maximum-entropy graph necessarily has high degree assortativity; furthermore, for such a graph the degree centrality and eigenvector centrality coincide. Moreover, the notion of assortativity is related to the general Randić index. We prove that the graph that maximizes the Randić index satisfies a BFD ordering. For trees, the converse holds as well. We also define a normalized Randić function and show that its maximum value equals the difference of Shannon entropies of two probability distributions defined on the edges and vertices of the graph based on degree correlations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006).
  2. M. E. J. Newman, The structure and function of complex networks, SIAM Rev. 45, 167 (2003).
  3. F. M. Atay, T. Bıyıkoğlu, and J. Jost, Network synchronization: Spectral versus statistical properties, Physica D 224, 35 (2006).
  4. D. Lind and B. Marcus, An Introduction to Symbolic Dynamics and Coding (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1995).
  5. D. M. Cvetković, M. Doob, and H. Sachs, Spectra of Graphs, 3rd ed. (Johann Ambrosius Barth, Heidelberg, 1995).
  6. M. Fujii, M. Nakamura, Y. Seo, and Y. Watatani, Graphs and Kolmogorov's complexity, Math. Jap. 44, 113 (1996).
  7. M. Randić, On characterization of molecular branching, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 6609 (1975).
  8. B. Bollobás and P. Erdős, Graphs of extremal weights, Ars Combin. 50, 225 (1998).
  9. X. Li and Y. Shi, A survey on the Randić index, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 59, 127 (2008).
  10. M. E. J. Newman, Assortative mixing in networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208701 (2002).
  11. D. E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1997).
  12. S. Sternberg, Dynamical Systems (Dover, New York, 2010).
  13. “Log” denotes logarithm in base 2; however, the choice of the base is not important for the discussion.
  14. C. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Techn. J. 27, 379 (1948).
  15. L. Demetrius and T. Manke, Robustness and network evolution–an entropic principle, Physica A 346, 682 (2005).
  16. L. Arnold, V. M. Gundlach, and L. Demetrius, Evolutionary formalism for products of positive random matrices, Ann. Appl. Probab. 4, 859 (1994).
  17. A. Pomerance, E. Ott, M. Girvan, and W. Losert, The effect of network topology on the stability of discrete state models of genetic control, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8209 (2009).
  18. P. H. Leslie, On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics, Biometrika 33, 183 (1945).
  19. L. Demetrius, V. M. Gundlach, and G. Ochs, Complexity and demographic stability in population models, Theor. Popul Biol. 65, 211 (2004).
  20. G. Simonyi, Perfect graphs and graph entrophy: An updated survey, in Perfect Graphs, edited by J. L. Ramírez Alfonsín and B. A. Reed (Wiley, Chichester, 2001).
  21. S. L. Braunstein, S. Ghosh, and S. Severini, The Laplacian of a graph as a density matrix: A basic combinatorial approach to separability of mixed states, Ann. Comb. 10, 291 (2006).
  22. R. V. Solé and S. Valverde, Information theory of complex networks: On evolution and architectural constraints, in Complex Networks, edited by E. Ben-Naim, H. Frauenfelder, and Z. Toroczkai (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004), pp. 189–207.
  23. G. Bianconi, Entropy of network ensembles, Phys. Rev. E 79, 036114 (2009).
  24. S. Johnson, J. J. Torres, J. Marro, and M. A. Muñoz, Entropic origin of disassortativity in complex networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 108702 (2010).
  25. K. Anand, G. Bianconi, and S. Severini, Shannon and von Neumann entropy of random networks with heterogeneous expected degree, Phys. Rev. E 83, 036109 (2011).
  26. M. De Domenico and J. Biamonte, Spectral entropies as information-theoretic tools for complex network comparison, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041062 (2016).
  27. B. Bollobás, C. Borgs, J. Chayes, and O. Riordan, Percolation on dense graph sequences, Ann. Probab. 38, 150 (2010).
  28. D. Cvetković and P. Rowlinson, The largest eigenvalue of a graph: A survey, Linear Multilinear A. 28, 3 (1990).
  29. V. Havel, Eine bemerkung zur existenz endlicher graphen, Časopis Pěst Math 80, 477 (1955).
  30. S. L. Hakimi, On the realizability of a set of integers as degrees of the vertices of a graph, J. Ind. Appl. Math. 10, 496 (1962).
  31. T. Bıyıkoğlu and J. Leydold, Graphs with given degree sequence and maximal spectral radius, Electron. J. Combin. 15, R119 (2008).
  32. P. Bonacich, Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification, J. Math. Sociol. 2, 113 (1972).
  33. A. Rényi, On measures of entropy and information, in Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics (University of California, Berkeley, 1961), Vol. 1, pp. 547–561.
  34. C. Tsallis, Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics, J. Stat. Phys. 52, 479 (1988).
  35. M. E. J. Newman, Mixing patterns in networks, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026126 (2003).
  36. J. C. Doyle, D. L. Alderson, L. Li, S. Low, M. Roughan, S. Shalunov, R. Tanaka, and W. Willinger, The “robust yet fragile” nature of the internet, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14497 (2005).
  37. L. Li, D. Alderson, J. C. Doyle, and W. Willinger, Towards a theory of scale-free graphs: Definition, properties, and implications, Internet Math. 2, 431 (2005).
  38. S. A. Choudum, On forcibly connected graphic sequences, Discrete Math. 96, 175 (1991).
  39. F. M. Atay, T. Bıyıkoğlu, and J. Jost, Synchronization of networks with prescribed degree distributions, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 53, 92 (2006).
  40. The kind of “star-like” graph mentioned here is obtained from a path of n−k+1 vertices by adding k−1 leaves to the first vertex.
  41. C. Delorme, O. Favaron, and D. Rautenbach, Closed formulas for the numbers of small independent sets and matchings and an extremal problem for trees, Discrete Appl. Math. 130, 503 (2003).
  42. https://networkrepository.com/.
  43. R. A. Rossi and N. K. Ahmed, An Interactive Data Repository with Visual Analytics, SIGKDD Explor. 17, 37 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation