Directional solidification of water-based solutions has emerged as a versatile technique for templating hierarchical porous materials. However, the underlying mechanisms of pattern formation remain incompletely understood. In this work, we present a detailed derivation and analysis of a quantitative phase-field model for simulating this nonequilibrium process. The phase-field model extends the thin-interface formulation of dilute binary alloy solidification with antitrapping to incorporate the highly anisotropic energetic and kinetic properties of the partially faceted ice-water interface. This interface is faceted in the basal plane normal to the $\langle 0001\rangle$ directions and atomically rough in other directions within the basal plane. On the basal plane, the model reproduces a linear or nonlinear relationship between the interface growth rate and the kinetic undercooling that can be linked to experimental measurements. In both cases, spontaneous parity breaking of the solidification front is observed when the preferred growth direction is aligned with the temperature gradient. This phenomenon leads to the formation of partially faceted ice lamellae that drift laterally in one of the $\langle 0001\rangle$ directions. We demonstrate that the drifting velocity of the ice lamellae is controlled by the kinetics on the basal plane and converges as the thickness of the diffuse solid-liquid interface decreases. Furthermore, we examine the effect of the form of the kinetic anisotropy, which is chosen here such that the inverse of the kinetic coefficient varies linearly from a finite value in the $\langle 0001\rangle$ directions to zero in all other directions within the basal plane, consistent with the assumption that the interface grows in local thermodynamic equilibrium in this plane. Our results indicate that the drifting velocity of ice lamellae is not affected by the slope of this linear relation, and the radius and undercooling at the tip of an ice lamella converge at relatively small slope values. Consequently, the phase-field simulations remain quantitative with computationally tractable choices of both the interface thickness and the slope assumed in the form of the kinetic anisotropy.

Close

PrevNext

View figure in article

• Crystal growth
• Liquid-solid phase transition
• Microstructure
• Ice
• Phase-field modeling
• Solidification