Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Beyond Lagrangians: Noether's theorem in gradient flow PDEs

Nicholas C. White*,†

  • *Contact author: ncw@alumni.princeton.edu
  • †Unaffiliated.

Phys. Rev. E 112, 064214 – Published 22 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5jbb-df5h

Abstract

Noether’s theorem is traditionally applied to Lagrangian systems to identify conserved quantities. In this work, we apply Noether’s theorem instead to a broad class of non-Lagrangian gradient flow partial differential equations (PDEs) arising in physics, showing how continuous symmetries constrain the evolution of such systems and, in certain special cases, still give rise to conserved quantities. We demonstrate symmetry-induced evolutionary constraints numerically on the thin-film equation with capillary and van der Waals forces, and also theoretically derive a conserved quantity for a singular fast-diffusion equation. These results not only provide a tool to analyze gradient flow PDEs; they also demonstrate the utility of Noether’s theorem beyond Lagrangians.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. J. E. Marsden and A. J. Tromba, Vector Calculus, 5th ed. (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 2003).
  2. M. I. Jordan, On gradient-based optimization: Accelerated, distributed, asynchronous and stochastic, in Computational Challenges in Machine Learning (Simons Institute, Berkeley, California, USA, 2017).
  3. F. Otto, The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: The porous medium equation, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 26, 101 (2001).
  4. M. M. Weislogel, Capillary flow in interior corners: The infinite column, Phys. Fluids 13, 3101 (2001).
  5. G. Verbist, D. Weaire, and A. M. Kraynik, The foam drainage equation, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 3715 (1996).
  6. L. Giacomelli and F. Otto, Variational formulation for the lubrication approximation of the Hele-Shaw flow, Calc. Var. PDE 13, 377 (2001).
  7. M. Rumpf and O. Vantzos, Numerical gradient flow discretization of viscous thin films on curved geometries, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23, 917 (2013).
  8. G. Głuch and R. Urbanke, Noether: The more things change, the more they stay the same, arXiv:2104.05508.
  9. D. Kunin, J. Sagastuy-Brena, S. Ganguli, D. L. K. Yamins, and H. Tanaka, Neural mechanics: Symmetry and broken conservation laws in deep learning dynamics, in International Conference on Learning Representations (Vienna, Austria, 2021).
  10. E. Noether, Invariante variation problems, Göttingen Nachr. 1918, 235 (1918).
  11. P. J. Olver, On the Hamiltonian structure of evolution equations, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 88, 71 (1980).
  12. W. Strampp, On the correspondence between symmetries and conservation laws of evolution equations, Lett. Math. Phys. 6, 113 (1982).
  13. A.S. Fokas, Generalized symmetries and constants of motion of evolution equations, Lett. Math. Phys. 3, 467 (1979).
  14. S. S. Du, W. Hu, and J. D. Lee, Algorithmic regularization in learning deep homogeneous models: Layers are automatically balanced, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc., 2018), Vol. 31.
  15. S. Marcotte, R. Gribonval, and G. Peyré, Abide by the law and follow the flow: Conservation laws for gradient flows, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, and S. Levine, Vol. 36 (Curran Associates, Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2023), pp. 63210–63221.
  16. S. Marcotte, R. Gribonval, and G. Peyré, Keep the momentum: Conservation laws beyond Euclidean gradient flows, in 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (Vienna, Austria, 2024).
  17. P. J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986).
  18. P. E. Hydon, Symmetry Methods for Differential Equations: A Beginner's Guide, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
  19. A. Oron, S. H. Davis, and S. G. Bankoff, Long-scale evolution of thin liquid films, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 931 (1997).
  20. F. Hecht, New development in freefem++, J. Numer. Math. 20, 251 (2012).
  21. N. C. White, Replication data for beyond Lagrangians: Noether's theorem in gradient flow PDEs, Harvard Dataverse (2025), https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IXTWDB.
  22. J. L. Vázquez, The Porous Medium Equation: Mathematical Theory, Oxford Science Publications (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 2007).
  23. J. C. Simo, N. Tarnow, and K. K. Wong, Exact energy-momentum conserving algorithms and symplectic schemes for nonlinear dynamics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 100, 63 (1992).
  24. N. C. White, Nonlinear dynamics and stability of viscous free-surface microcapillary flows in V-shaped channels and on curved surfaces, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 2022.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation