- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review E

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Eastward transients in the dayside ionosphere. II. A parallel-plate capacitorlike effect

Magnus F. Ivarsen*, Jean-Pierre St-Maurice†, Glenn C. Hussey, and Kathryn McWilliams‡

Yaqi Jin

Devin R. Huyghebaert§

Yukinaga Miyashita∥

David Sibeck

  • *Also at The European Space Agency Centre for Earth Observation, Frascati, Italy.
  • †Also at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • ‡Deceased.
  • §Also at Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • ∥Also at Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Korea University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 112, 045203 – Published 8 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3bzj-bsf8

Abstract

During the 23 April 2023 geospace storm, we observed chorus-wave-driven, energetic particle precipitation on closed magnetic field lines in the dayside magnetosphere. Simultaneously and in the ionosphere's bottom side, we observed signatures of impact ionization and strong enhancements in the ionospheric electric field, via radar detection of meter-scale turbulence, and with temporal characteristics matching those of the magnetospheric observations. We detail this in another work [M. F. Ivarsen et al., Phys. Rev. E 112, 045204 (2025)]. In the present article we place those observations into context with the dayside ionosphere and describe a remarkably similar event that took place during the May 2024 geospace superstorm. In both cases, fast, eastward-moving electric field structures were excited equatorward of the ionospheric cusp, on closed magnetic field lines, observations that challenge existing modes of explanation for electrodynamics in the cusp region, where most such observations are interpreted in the context of poleward-moving auroral forms. Instead, primarily eastward-moving electric field structures were associated with turbulent Hall currents that are perhaps characteristically excited during geospace storms by wave-particle interactions near the magnetospheric equator or by proton precipitation characteristics in the cusp, forming a parallel-plate capacitorlike effect. We propose that transient eastward electrodynamic bursts in the dayside ionosphere might be a common, albeit previously unresolved, feature of geomagnetic storms.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Eastward transients in the dayside ionosphere. I. Electrodynamics on closed field lines

Magnus F. Ivarsen, Jean-Pierre St-Maurice, Glenn C. Hussey, Daniel Billet, Devin R. Huyghebaert, Yaqi Jin, Yukinaga Miyashita, Satoshi Kasahara, Kaili Song, P. T. Jayachandran, Shoichiro Yokota, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Atsuki Shinbori, Yoshiya Kasahara, Iku Shinohara, and Ayako Matsuoka
Phys. Rev. E 112, 045204 (2025)

Article Text

References (75)

  1. J. W. Dungey, Interplanetary magnetic field and the auroral zones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47 (1961).
  2. S. W. H. Cowley, in Magnetospheric Current Systems, edited by S.-I. Ohtani, R. Fujii, M. Hesse, and R. L. Lysak, Geophysics Monograph Series Vol. 118 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 2000), p. 91.
  3. M. Saunders, The polar cusp ionosphere: A window on solar wind–magnetosphere coupling, Antarctic Sci. 1, 193 (1989).
  4. G. G. Shepherd, Dayside cleft aurora and its ionospheric effects, Rev. Geophys. 17, 2017 (1979).
  5. Y. Ogawa, R. Fujii, S. C. Buchert, S. Nozawa, and S. Ohtani, Simultaneous EISCAT Svalbard radar and DMSP observations of ion upflow in the dayside polar ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 1101 (2003).
  6. H. U. Frey, D. Han, R. Kataoka, M. R. Lessard, S. E. Milan, Y. Nishimura, R. J. Strangeway, and Y. Zou, Dayside aurora, Space Sci. Rev. 215, 51 (2019).
  7. D. J. Southwood, C. J. Farrugia, and M. A. Saunders, What are flux transfer events? Planet. Space Sci. 36, 503 (1988).
  8. K. Oksavik, J. Moen, and H. C. Carlson, High-resolution observations of the small-scale flow pattern associated with a poleward moving auroral form in the cusp, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L11807 (2004).
  9. G. J. Fasel, Dayside poleward moving auroral forms: A statistical study, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 11891 (1995).
  10. M. Lester, in Polar Cap Boundary Phenomena, edited by J. Moen, A. Egeland, and M. Lockwood (Springer, Dordrecht, 1998), pp. 219–232.
  11. P. E. Sandholt and C. J. Farrugia, Poleward moving auroral forms (PMAFs) revisited: Responses of aurorae, plasma convection and Birkeland currents in the pre- and postnoon sectors under positive and negative IMF By conditions, Ann. Geophys. 25, 1629 (2007).
  12. K. Oksavik, C. van der Meeren, D. A. Lorentzen, L. J. Baddeley, and J. Moen, Scintillation and loss of signal lock from poleward moving auroral forms in the cusp ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 120, 9161 (2015).
  13. S. E. Milan, M. Lester, S. W. H. Cowley, and M. Brittnacher, Convection and auroral response to a southward turning of the IMF: Polar UVI, CUTLASS, and IMAGE signatures of transient magnetic flux transfer at the magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 15741 (2000).
  14. K. A. McWilliams, T. K. Yeoman, and S. W. H. Cowley, Two-dimensional electric field measurements in the ionospheric footprint of a flux transfer event, Ann. Geophys. 18, 1584 (2000).
  15. P. E. Sandholt, Auroral electrodynamics at the cusp/cleft poleward boundary during northward interplanetary magnetic field, Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 805 (1991).
  16. A. Kozlovsky and J. Kangas, Motion and origin of noon high-latitude poleward moving auroral arcs on closed magnetic field lines, J. Geophys. Res. 107, SMP 1 (2002).
  17. Y.-J. J. Wu, S. B. Mende, and H. U. Frey, Simultaneous observations of poleward-moving auroral forms at the equatorward and poleward boundaries of the auroral oval in antarctica, J. Geophys. Res. 125, e2019JA027646 (2020).
  18. W. Lyatsky and D. Sibeck, Central plasma sheet disruption and the formation of dayside poleward moving auroral events, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 17625 (1997).
  19. W. Lyatsky, C. Pollock, M. L. Goldstein, S. Lyatskaya, and L. Avanov, Penetration of magnetosheath plasma into dayside magnetosphere: 1. Density, velocity, and rotation, J. Geophys. Res. 121, 7699 (2016).
  20. M. Spasojevic and U. S. Inan, Drivers of chorus in the outer dayside magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 115, A4 (2010).
  21. Y. Nishimura, J. Bortnik, W. Li, R. M. Thorne, B. Ni, L. R. Lyons, V. Angelopoulos, Y. Ebihara, J. W. Bonnell, O. Le Contel, and U. Auster, Structures of dayside whistler-mode waves deduced from conjugate diffuse aurora, J. Geophys. Res. 118, 664 (2013).
  22. B. Ni, J. Bortnik, Y. Nishimura, R. M. Thorne, W. Li, V. Angelopoulos, Y. Ebihara, and A. T. Weatherwax, Chorus wave scattering responsible for the earth's dayside diffuse auroral precipitation: A detailed case study, J. Geophys. Res. 119, 897 (2014).
  23. B. Ni, R. M. Thorne, Y. Y. Shprits, and J. Bortnik, Resonant scattering of plasma sheet electrons by whistler-mode chorus: Contribution to diffuse auroral precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 2008GL034032 (2008).
  24. B. Ni, R. M. Thorne, N. P. Meredith, R. B. Horne, and Y. Y. Shprits, Resonant scattering of plasma sheet electrons leading to diffuse auroral precipitation: 2. Evaluation for whistler mode chorus waves, J. Geophys. Res. 116, A4 (2011).
  25. X. Fang, C. E. Randall, D. Lummerzheim, W. Wang, G. Lu, S. C. Solomon, and R. A. Frahm, Parameterization of monoenergetic electron impact ionization, Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, 2010GL045406 (2010).
  26. G. W. Prölss, in Physics of the Earth's Space Environment: An Introduction, edited by G. W. Prölss (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 77–157.
  27. A. D. Richmond and J. P. Thayer, in Magnetospheric Current Systems (Ref. [2]), pp. 131–146.
  28. M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St.-Maurice, G. C. Hussey, D. Billet, D. R. Huyghebaert, Y. Jin, Y. Miyashita, S. Kasahara, K. Song and P. T. Jayachandran et al., following paper, Eastward transients in the dayside ionosphere. I. Electrodynamics on closed field lines, Phys. Rev. E 112, 045204 (2025).
  29. D. L. Hysell, in Auroral Dynamics and Space Weather, edited by Y. Zhang and L. J. Paxton (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 2015), Chap. 14, pp. 191–209.
  30. D. Huyghebaert, G. Hussey, J. Vierinen, K. McWilliams, and J.-P. St-Maurice, ICEBEAR: An all-digital bistatic coded continuous-wave radar for studies of the E region of the ionosphere, Radio Sci. 54, 349 (2019).
  31. D. T. Farley, A plasma instability resulting in field-aligned irregularities in the ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 6083 (1963).
  32. O. Buneman, Excitation of field aligned sound waves by electron streams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 285 (1963).
  33. P. Prikryl, D. André, G. J. Sofko, and J. A. Koehler, Doppler radar observations of harmonics of electrostatic ion cyclotron waves in the auroral ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 7409 (1988).
  34. P. Prikryl, D. Andre, J. A. Koehler, G. J. Sofko, and M. J. McKibben, Evidence of highly localized auroral scatterers from 50-MHz CW radar interferometry, Planet. Space Sci. 38, 933 (1990).
  35. M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, G. C. Hussey, D. R. Huyghebaert, and M. D. Gillies, Point-cloud clustering and tracking algorithm for radar interferometry, Phys. Rev. E 110, 045207 (2024).
  36. M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, D. R. Huyghebaert, M. D. Gillies, F. Lind, B. Pitzel, and G. C. Hussey, Deriving the ionospheric electric field from the bulk motion of radar aurora in the E-region, J. Geophys. Res. 129, e2024JA033060 (2024).
  37. N. E. Papitashvili and J. H. King, OMNI Hourly Data, [Data Set], NASA Space Physics Data Facility (2020), doi: 10.48322/1shr-ht18.
  38. G. K. Davis, History of the NOAA satellite program, J. Appl. Remote Sens. 1, 012504 (2007).
  39. D. S. Evans, Polar orbiting environmental satellite space environment monitor-2: Instrument description and archive data, NOAA OAR SEC Report No. 93 (NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR SEC-93), available at noaa_19636_DS1.pdf.
  40. K. B. Baker and S. Wing, A new magnetic coordinate system for conjugate studies at high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 9139 (1989).
  41. J.-H. Li, X.-Z. Zhou, S. Wang, Z.-Y. Liu, Q.-G. Zong, S.-T. Yao, A. V. Artemyev, Y. Omura, L. Li, C. Yue, and Q.-Q. Shi, Bow shock ripples and their modulation of whistler wave packets: MMS observations, Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL111590 (2024).
  42. E. Krämer, F. Koller, J. Suni, A. T. LaMoury, A. Pöppelwerth, G. Glebe, T. Mohammed-Amin, S. Raptis, L. Vuorinen, S. Weiss, N. Xirogiannopoulou, M. Archer, X. Blanco-Cano, H. Gunell, H. Hietala, T. Karlsson, F. Plaschke, L. Preisser, O. Roberts, C. Simon Wedlund et al., Jets downstream of collisionless shocks: Recent discoveries and challenges, Space Sci. Rev. 221, 4 (2025).
  43. P. T. Newell and C.-I. Meng, The cusp and the cleft/boundary layer: Low-altitude identification and statistical local time variation, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 14549 (1988).
  44. M. F. Ivarsen, Y. Jin, A. Spicher, J.-P. St-Maurice, J. Park, and D. Billett, GNSS scintillations in the cusp, and the role of precipitating particle energy fluxes, J. Geophys. Res. 128, e2023JA031849 (2023).
  45. K. T. Asai, K. Maezawa, T. Mukai, and H. Hayakawa, Latitudinal and longitudinal displacement of cusp ion precipitation controlled by IMF By and Bz, Earth, Planets Space 57, 627 (2005).
  46. Y. Jin, J. I. Moen, K. Oksavik, A. Spicher, L. B. N. Clausen, and W. J. Miloch, GPS scintillations associated with cusp dynamics and polar cap patches, J. Space Weather Space Clim. 7, A23 (2017).
  47. E. Nielsen and K. Schlegel, A first comparison of STARE and EISCAT electron drift velocity measurements, J. Geophys. Res. 88, 5745 (1983).
  48. J. C. Foster and P. J. Erickson, Simultaneous observations of E-region coherent backscatter and electric field amplitude at F-region heights with the Millstone Hill UHF radar, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3177 (2000).
  49. M. O. Archer, H. Hietala, M. D. Hartinger, F. Plaschke, and V. Angelopoulos, Direct observations of a surface eigenmode of the dayside magnetopause, Nat. Commun. 10, 615 (2019).
  50. H.-X. Qiu, D.-S. Han, R. Shi, and J. Liu, Magnetosheath high-speed jet drives multiple auroral arcs near local noon, AGU Adv. 5, e2024AV001197 (2024).
  51. Q. Q. Shi, X.-C. Shen, A. M. Tian, A. W. Degeling, Q. Zong, S. Y. Fu, Z. Y. Pu, H. Y. Zhao, H. Zhang, and S. T. Yao, in Dayside Magnetosphere Interactions, edited by Q. Zong, P. Escoubet, D. Sibeck, G. Le, and H. Zhang (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 2020), Chap. 5, pp. 77–97.
  52. B. S. Lanchester, K. Kaila, and I. W. McCrea, Relationship between large horizontal electric fields and auroral arc elements, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 5075 (1996).
  53. H. J. Opgenoorth, I. Hägström, P. J. S. Williams, and G. O. L. Jones, Regions of strongly enhanced perpendicular electric fields adjacent to auroral arcs, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 52, 449 (1990).
  54. S. Tuttle, B. Lanchester, B. Gustavsson, D. Whiter, N. Ivchenko, R. Fear, and M. Lester, Horizontal electric fields from flow of auroral O+(P2) ions at sub-second temporal resolution, Ann. Geophys. 38, 845 (2020).
  55. P. Krcelic, R. C. Fear, D. Whiter, B. Lanchester, and N. Brindley, Variability in the electrodynamics of the small scale auroral arc, J. Geophys. Res. 129, e2024JA032623 (2024).
  56. D. D. Billett, K. A. McWilliams, I. P. Pakhotin, J. K. Burchill, D. J. Knudsen, and C. J. Martin, High-Resolution poynting flux statistics from the swarm mission: How much is being underestimated at larger scales? J. Geophys. Res. 127, e2022JA030573 (2022).
  57. K. Liou, P. T. Newell, and C.-I. Meng, Seasonal effects on auroral particle acceleration and precipitation, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 5531 (2001).
  58. C. Senior, R. M. Robinson, and T. A. Potemra, Relationship between field-aligned currents, diffuse auroral precipitation and the westward electrojet in the early morning sector, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 10469 (1982).
  59. K. Hosokawa, Y. Ogawa, A. Kadokura, H. Miyaoka, and N. Sato, Modulation of ionospheric conductance and electric field associated with pulsating aurora, J. Geophys. Res. 115, (2010).
  60. K. Hosokawa, S. E. Milan, M. Lester, A. Kadokura, N. Sato, and G. Bjornsson, Large flow shears around auroral beads at substorm onset, Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4987 (2013).
  61. M. F. Ivarsen, Y. Miyashita, J.-P. St-Maurice, G. C. Hussey, B. Pitzel, D. Galeschuk, S. Marei, R. B. Horne, Y. Kasahara, S. Matsuda, S. Kasahara, K. Keika, Y. Miyoshi, K. Yamamoto, A. Shinbori, D. R. Huyghebaert, A. Matsuoka, S. Yokota, and F. Tsuchiya, Characteristic E-region plasma signature of magnetospheric wave-particle interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 145201 (2025).
  62. H. Feng, D. Wang, D. Guo, Y. Y. Shprits, D. Han, S. Teng, B. Ni, R. Shi, and Y. Zhang, Lower band chorus wave scattering causing the extensive morningside diffuse auroral precipitation during active geomagnetic conditions: A detailed case study, J. Geophys. Res. 129, e2023JA032240 (2024).
  63. M. Palmroth, M. Grandin, T. Sarris, E. Doornbos, S. Tourgaidis, A. Aikio, S. Buchert, M. A. Clilverd, I. Dandouras, R. Heelis, A. Hoffmann, N. Ivchenko, G. Kervalishvili, D. J. Knudsen, A. Kotova, H.-L. Liu, D. M. Malaspina, G. March, A. Marchaudon, O. Marghitu et al., Lower-thermosphere–ionosphere (LTI) quantities: Current status of measuring techniques and models, Ann. Geophys. 39, 189 (2021).
  64. Q. Wu, W. Wang, D. Lin, C. Huang, and Y. Zhang, Penetrating electric field simulated by the MAGE and comparison with ICON observation, J. Geophys. Res. 127, e2022JA030467 (2022).
  65. M. Wiltberger, V. Merkin, B. Zhang, F. Toffoletto, M. Oppenheim, W. Wang, J. G. Lyon, J. Liu, Y. Dimant, M. I. Sitnov, and G. K. Stephens, Effects of electrojet turbulence on a magnetosphere-ionosphere simulation of a geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res. 122, 5008 (2017).
  66. J.-P. St-Maurice and L. Goodwin, Revisiting the behavior of the E-region electron temperature during strong electric field events at high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res. 126, 2020JA028288 (2021).
  67. G. Hussey, icebear 3D echoes for 23 April 2023, https://zenodo.org/records/14616122 (Zenodo, Geneva, 2023).
  68. ICEBEAR data policy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, http://icebear.usask.ca/icebeardata.php?page=1.
  69. https://supermag.jhuapl.edu/mag/ (US National Science Foundation, Alexandria, 2001).
  70. https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/ (NASA, Washington, DC).
  71. NOAA, Washington, DC, https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/satellite/poes/.
  72. SuperDARN Canada, Saskatoon, Canada, https://superdarn.ca/ascii-download.
  73. R. J. Redmon, W. F. Denig, L. M. Kilcommons, and D. J. Knipp, New DMSP database of precipitating auroral electrons and ions, J. Geophys. Res. 122, 9056 (2017).
  74. P. T. Newell, T. Sotirelis, and S. Wing, Seasonal variations in diffuse, monoenergetic, and broadband aurora, J. Geophys. Res. 115, A03216 (2010).
  75. M. F. Ivarsen, J.-P. St-Maurice, Y. Jin, J. Park, L. M. Buschman, and L. B. Clausen, To what degree does the high-energy aurora destroy F-region irregularities? Front. Astron. Space Sci. 11, 1309136 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 112, 045203– Published 8 October, 2025
  • Received 8 January 2025
  • Accepted 19 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation